Skip to content

If we draft Goff

The Browns Board
76 19 2.5k
  • There is a good qb in the cfl

  • I would take Prescott over Goff but it's close. Goff is a bit thin and needs to gain weight. It figures we'd get a 2 pick in a lousy year for QBs.

  • And to throw a wrench in the mix Goff will get $25 million guaranteed at #2. Kirk Cousins could probably be had for $50 million and you have a better idea on what you have.

    @baconhound said:

    And to throw a wrench in the mix Goff will get $25 million guaranteed at #2. Kirk Cousins could probably be had for $50 million and you have a better idea on what you have.

    Washington is not letting Cousins get away.

  • @baconhound said:

    And to throw a wrench in the mix Goff will get $25 million guaranteed at #2. Kirk Cousins could probably be had for $50 million and you have a better idea on what you have.

    Washington is not letting Cousins get away.

    @mark-o said:

    Washington is not letting Cousins get away.

    Money dictates a lot. The Browns will have to overpay but they have money to spend.

  • How many times are Browns fans going to be enamored with cousins?

    He had a great year - and if Washington got rid of him then what? I don't think you just let the QB who took you to the playoffs walk when there's no alternative.

    Cousins is kinda iffy to me still, but Washington is not going to let him walk.

  • @bbedward said:

    Ignoring the stats, all you have to do is watch him play. You see the best in class footwork, rapid going through progressions, best in class pocket awareness and accuracy.

    Well done! That said, it was tough to ignore a TD to INT ratio of 43 to 13 at a comp % of 64.5.

    @flugel said:

    Well done! That said, it was tough to ignore a TD to INT ratio of 43 to 13 at a comp % of 64.5.

    How about these stats? 300 out of 429 for a 69.9% comp. for 4,114 yds 37 tds and 13 ints

    I'd take that one over Goff any day. 😁

  • @mark-o said:

    Washington is not letting Cousins get away.

    Money dictates a lot. The Browns will have to overpay but they have money to spend.

    @baconhound said:

    Money dictates a lot. The Browns will have to overpay but they have money to spend.

    In some cases it doesn't dictate anything. If they can't get an extension, they can just franchise tag him and he stays in Washington.

  • @baconhound said:

    Money dictates a lot. The Browns will have to overpay but they have money to spend.

    In some cases it doesn't dictate anything. If they can't get an extension, they can just franchise tag him and he stays in Washington.

    @mark-o said:

    In some cases it doesn't dictate anything. If they can't get an extension, they can just franchise tag him and he stays in Washington.

    True but isn't that around $25 million guaranteed next year for a franchised QB?

  • @mark-o said:

    In some cases it doesn't dictate anything. If they can't get an extension, they can just franchise tag him and he stays in Washington.

    True but isn't that around $25 million guaranteed next year for a franchised QB?

    @baconhound said:

    True but isn't that around $25 million guaranteed next year for a franchised QB?

    No clue...but without any other options on the team at QB and the season that he just had, I bet they hang on to him. May prove to be a mistake....he could be great or he could be Scott Mitchell.

  • @baconhound said:

    True but isn't that around $25 million guaranteed next year for a franchised QB?

    No clue...but without any other options on the team at QB and the season that he just had, I bet they hang on to him. May prove to be a mistake....he could be great or he could be Scott Mitchell.

    @mark-o said:

    No clue...but without any other options on the team at QB and the season that he just had, I bet they hang on to him. May prove to be a mistake....he could be great or he could be Scott Mitchell.

    True QBs are a rare commodity. Phins gave Tannehil $45 guaranteed last year and that was probably a mistake.

  • @flugel said:

    Well done! That said, it was tough to ignore a TD to INT ratio of 43 to 13 at a comp % of 64.5.

    How about these stats? 300 out of 429 for a 69.9% comp. for 4,114 yds 37 tds and 13 ints

    I'd take that one over Goff any day. 😁

    @texasag1969 said:

    How about these stats? 300 out of 429 for a 69.9% comp. for 4,114 yds 37 tds and 13 ints

    I'd take that one over Goff any day. 😁

    This is why we look at more than stats πŸ˜‰

  • They HAVE TO get a qb nobody on the roster is the answer !!!

  • I would take Prescott over Goff but it's close. Goff is a bit thin and needs to gain weight. It figures we'd get a 2 pick in a lousy year for QBs.

    @opal312 said:

    I would take Prescott over Goff but it's close. Goff is a bit thin and needs to gain weight. It figures we'd get a 2 pick in a lousy year for QBs.

    Prescott? The next Taj Boyd, CFL?

    No thanks. I'll stick with Goff, NFL.

    Mike

  • VesnaKociper said:

    The Browns need to take Goff AND Paxton Lynch.

    Or as they are known in the parallel universe, Paul McDonald and Dan McGuire.

    WSS

  • @texasag1969 said:

    How about these stats? 300 out of 429 for a 69.9% comp. for 4,114 yds 37 tds and 13 ints

    I'd take that one over Goff any day. 😁

    This is why we look at more than stats πŸ˜‰

    @bbedward said:

    This is why we look at more than stats πŸ˜‰

    But we just prompted one stat guy and hired another.

    I wonder if they know they would have to find the guy that pulled off those stats his last year in college in Las Vegas riding a swan? πŸ˜†

  • @bbedward said:

    This is why we look at more than stats πŸ˜‰

    But we just prompted one stat guy and hired another.

    I wonder if they know they would have to find the guy that pulled off those stats his last year in college in Las Vegas riding a swan? πŸ˜†

    @texasag1969 said:

    But we just prompted one stat guy and hired another.

    I wonder if they know they would have to find the guy that pulled off those stats his last year in college in Las Vegas riding a swan? πŸ˜†

    That guy was more style than substance. Time to develope a more focused and talented young player. You sticking around ?
  • @bbedward said:

    This is why we look at more than stats πŸ˜‰

    But we just prompted one stat guy and hired another.

    I wonder if they know they would have to find the guy that pulled off those stats his last year in college in Las Vegas riding a swan? πŸ˜†

    @texasag1969 said:

    But we just prompted one stat guy and hired another.

    I wonder if they know they would have to find the guy that pulled off those stats his last year in college in Las Vegas riding a swan? πŸ˜†

    I still don't doubt that Manziel can be an effective NFL player. He just can't get his head into the game...and that's what's killing him. His performances range from garbage to above average - and that's while partying and drinking and doing drugs and worrying about hiding his off-the-field antics from the coaches.

    Imagine if he were to grow the hell up, study the game and cut all of this bullshit out. He'd be unstoppable - like Russell Wilson unstoppable. But that's never going to happen.

    His flaws aren't due to a lack of talent, they are due to poor choices and awful work ethic.

  • @texasag1969 said:

    But we just prompted one stat guy and hired another.

    I wonder if they know they would have to find the guy that pulled off those stats his last year in college in Las Vegas riding a swan? πŸ˜†

    I still don't doubt that Manziel can be an effective NFL player. He just can't get his head into the game...and that's what's killing him. His performances range from garbage to above average - and that's while partying and drinking and doing drugs and worrying about hiding his off-the-field antics from the coaches.

    Imagine if he were to grow the hell up, study the game and cut all of this bullshit out. He'd be unstoppable - like Russell Wilson unstoppable. But that's never going to happen.

    His flaws aren't due to a lack of talent, they are due to poor choices and awful work ethic.

    @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    I still don't doubt that Manziel can be an effective NFL player. He just can't get his head into the game...and that's what's killing him. His performances range from garbage to above average - and that's while partying and drinking and doing drugs and worrying about hiding his off-the-field antics from the coaches.

    Imagine if he were to grow the hell up, study the game and cut all of this bullshit out. He'd be unstoppable - like Russell Wilson unstoppable. But that's never going to happen.

    His flaws aren't due to a lack of talent, they are due to poor choices and awful work ethic.

    And I mostly agree with that yet allow me to propose one scenario between his last two starts. One of our members regularly watches the game With some of us and agreed that in his penultimate start he was actually sharp and was killed by a multitude of drops. If in fact he actually had a concussion in his final start that might have explained the inaccurate passing.

    WSS

  • @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    I still don't doubt that Manziel can be an effective NFL player. He just can't get his head into the game...and that's what's killing him. His performances range from garbage to above average - and that's while partying and drinking and doing drugs and worrying about hiding his off-the-field antics from the coaches.

    Imagine if he were to grow the hell up, study the game and cut all of this bullshit out. He'd be unstoppable - like Russell Wilson unstoppable. But that's never going to happen.

    His flaws aren't due to a lack of talent, they are due to poor choices and awful work ethic.

    And I mostly agree with that yet allow me to propose one scenario between his last two starts. One of our members regularly watches the game With some of us and agreed that in his penultimate start he was actually sharp and was killed by a multitude of drops. If in fact he actually had a concussion in his final start that might have explained the inaccurate passing.

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    And I mostly agree with that yet allow me to propose one scenario between his last two starts. One of our members regularly watches the game With some of us and agreed that in his penultimate start he was actually sharp and was killed by a multitude of drops. If in fact he actually had a concussion in his final start that might have explained the inaccurate passing.

    WSS

    He's continuing to get better, his bad games this year were nothing like last year. Once again, imagine how good he could be if he had zero distractions.

    The problem is that there's always new talent, and just because he CAN be great doesn't mean that others can't be. He's shown in two years now that he's not going to change his behavior any time soon and, if the reports are true, he doesn't even want to be here.

    Personally, I'd rather move on with someone else who also has the potential to be great, rather than sit around and hope Manziel finds stability in his life.

  • @texasag1969 said:

    But we just prompted one stat guy and hired another.

    I wonder if they know they would have to find the guy that pulled off those stats his last year in college in Las Vegas riding a swan? πŸ˜†

    I still don't doubt that Manziel can be an effective NFL player. He just can't get his head into the game...and that's what's killing him. His performances range from garbage to above average - and that's while partying and drinking and doing drugs and worrying about hiding his off-the-field antics from the coaches.

    Imagine if he were to grow the hell up, study the game and cut all of this bullshit out. He'd be unstoppable - like Russell Wilson unstoppable. But that's never going to happen.

    His flaws aren't due to a lack of talent, they are due to poor choices and awful work ethic.

    @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    Imagine if he were to grow the hell up, study the game and cut all of this bullshit out. He'd be unstoppable...

    I have a great imagination.... and, no...