Skip to content

Should Browns be thinking of trading Gordon?

The Browns Board
47 21 1.5k
  • @tour2ma said:

    I believe he is ours for two years... period.

    Original 4-year contract 2012 through 2015, but both his 2014 and 2015 years failed to accrue.

    • Obviously 2015 due the full-year suspension.
    • 2014 due to his one-game, week-17 suspension for being late. Left him with only 5 game appearances in 2014... one shy of the 6 needed for contract accrual.
    That said, should he produce for us in 2016, then I negotiate a big $$$ extension... with all suitable safeguards of course.

    Im pretty sure he'll be an RFA in 2017.....which happens at the 3 year mark, not 4......

    So, technically he would have been an RFA last year and UFA this year, but that was pushed back to RFA...then with the added suspension, that got pushed back again....to 2017....

    I understand he's appealing this, but no way they'll rule in his favor....

    Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by
    #38

    @mudfly said:

    Im pretty sure he'll be an RFA in 2017.....which happens at the 3 year mark, not 4......

    So, technically he would have been an RFA last year and UFA this year, but that was pushed back to RFA...then with the added suspension, that got pushed back again....to 2017....

    I understand he's appealing this, but no way they'll rule in his favor....

    Agree on the appeal... but OverTheCap has his original contract at 4-years...

    Year - Base - Prorated - Cap Number

    .2012 $390,000 $581,209 $971,209

    .2013 $632,802 $581,209 $1,139,564

    .2014 $825,604 $564,115 $954,070

    2015$1,068,406 $564,115 $564,115

    http://overthecap.com/player/josh-gordon/290

  • @mudfly said:

    Im pretty sure he'll be an RFA in 2017.....which happens at the 3 year mark, not 4......

    So, technically he would have been an RFA last year and UFA this year, but that was pushed back to RFA...then with the added suspension, that got pushed back again....to 2017....

    I understand he's appealing this, but no way they'll rule in his favor....

    Agree on the appeal... but OverTheCap has his original contract at 4-years...

    Year - Base - Prorated - Cap Number

    .2012 $390,000 $581,209 $971,209

    .2013 $632,802 $581,209 $1,139,564

    .2014 $825,604 $564,115 $954,070

    2015$1,068,406 $564,115 $564,115

    http://overthecap.com/player/josh-gordon/290

    gftChrisG gftChris wrote on last edited by
    #39

    @tour2ma said:

    Agree on the appeal... but OverTheCap has his original contract at 4-years...

    Year - Base - Prorated - Cap Number

    .2012 $390,000 $581,209 $971,209

    .2013 $632,802 $581,209 $1,139,564

    .2014 $825,604 $564,115 $954,070

    2015$1,068,406 $564,115 $564,115

    http://overthecap.com/player/josh-gordon/290

    Of which, 2014 was basically void, because of the final game suspension, which puts him at 2016, and 2015 was a write off putting him at 2017, no?

  • @mudfly said:

    Im pretty sure he'll be an RFA in 2017.....which happens at the 3 year mark, not 4......

    So, technically he would have been an RFA last year and UFA this year, but that was pushed back to RFA...then with the added suspension, that got pushed back again....to 2017....

    I understand he's appealing this, but no way they'll rule in his favor....

    Agree on the appeal... but OverTheCap has his original contract at 4-years...

    Year - Base - Prorated - Cap Number

    .2012 $390,000 $581,209 $971,209

    .2013 $632,802 $581,209 $1,139,564

    .2014 $825,604 $564,115 $954,070

    2015$1,068,406 $564,115 $564,115

    http://overthecap.com/player/josh-gordon/290

    MudflyM Mudfly wrote on last edited by Mudfly
    #40

    @tour2ma said:

    Agree on the appeal... but OverTheCap has his original contract at 4-years...

    Right, but even OTC shows him signed thru 2016 only...everybody gets a 4 year contract as required by the CBA, but can out at 3 and become a RFA(except first rounders)...I was pretty sure before, but looked around a lot more today and am certain he is RFA 2017, UFA 2018....

    So, we have him for 1 year, can match in 2 years and can trans tag him in 3(if we so choose).....

    Here's a link that spells it out....

    http://www.dawgsbynature.com/2016/1/20/10797170/josh-gordon-applies-for-reinstatement-browns-could-control-contract

    http://www.spotrac.com/nfl/cleveland-browns/josh-gordon/

    @gftchris said:

    Of which, 2014 was basically void, because of the final game suspension, which puts him at 2016, and 2015 was a write off putting him at 2017, no?

    Correct....

  • @browns52 said:

    people just don't get it....you hit the nail on the head....

    ....so don't trade him?

    @browns52 said:

    nobody even knows what this kid is doing or where he is...i haven't heard anything...don't see anything on espn...nothing on the radio....its a crapshoot...you gameplan for someone like him and then pow, another incident and he's booted out of the nfl...then what do you do, we don't have any recievers worth a shit. remember, this is cleveland where all bad luck and bad shit happens....

    I'd call it 'keeping a low profile'....tho not sure what you're saying here, is it trade him now??....

    Even though you don't know what he's doing and ESPN doesn't know what he's doing, the NFL and his assigned Medical Advisor do.....and they've been working with him, monitoring his treatment plan and testing him through out his suspension.....

    So, since he's applied for reinstatement, you have to assume he's met all the requirements to do so.....or why bother?

    @jiggins7919 said:

    the resounding feeling I get is that he screws up again and he's done...basically forever. So what would a team possibly give up for a guy that's a beer away from never seeing the field again? I get that his talent is extremely desirable, but he has to walk such a straight line that it's not even funny.

    Additionally, his salary is very low (as I understand it), and from what I remember, we have him for this season and possibly NEXT year (I don't remember the specifics of what I heard. Possible the source was talking about a franchise tag, but I don't think that was it).

    Right....the one dim glimmer of hope is that "after 2 years" of staying clean, he can be discharged from the program by his medical advisor....all based upon how well he's adhered to his treatment program, etc.....it's a long shot, but possible....

    Salary wise, we have him this year....and next season he will be a restricted FA, meaning we can match any offers.....If he returns to form this season, Id expect a nice contract offer, with lots of conditions(and zero guaranteed money).....IE ....he'll get the big bucks, but only if he's here and playing....

    @gftchris said:

    As with any player, there's a price.

    Exactly....the one trade opportunity that may go over well is to package him for a move up in the draft.....say Gordon and a mid round pick or 2 to move back into the first?......

    B browns52 wrote on last edited by
    #41

    @mudfly said:

    ....so don't trade him?

    I'd call it 'keeping a low profile'....tho not sure what you're saying here, is it trade him now??....

    Even though you don't know what he's doing and ESPN doesn't know what he's doing, the NFL and his assigned Medical Advisor do.....and they've been working with him, monitoring his treatment plan and testing him through out his suspension.....

    So, since he's applied for reinstatement, you have to assume he's met all the requirements to do so.....or why bother?

    Right....the one dim glimmer of hope is that "after 2 years" of staying clean, he can be discharged from the program by his medical advisor....all based upon how well he's adhered to his treatment program, etc.....it's a long shot, but possible....

    Salary wise, we have him this year....and next season he will be a restricted FA, meaning we can match any offers.....If he returns to form this season, Id expect a nice contract offer, with lots of conditions(and zero guaranteed money).....IE ....he'll get the big bucks, but only if he's here and playing....

    Exactly....the one trade opportunity that may go over well is to package him for a move up in the draft.....say Gordon and a mid round pick or 2 to move back into the first?......

    trade him.....we already don't have a qb because of the manziel bs...we don't need anymore headcases...

  • @tour2ma said:

    Agree on the appeal... but OverTheCap has his original contract at 4-years...

    Right, but even OTC shows him signed thru 2016 only...everybody gets a 4 year contract as required by the CBA, but can out at 3 and become a RFA(except first rounders)...I was pretty sure before, but looked around a lot more today and am certain he is RFA 2017, UFA 2018....

    So, we have him for 1 year, can match in 2 years and can trans tag him in 3(if we so choose).....

    Here's a link that spells it out....

    http://www.dawgsbynature.com/2016/1/20/10797170/josh-gordon-applies-for-reinstatement-browns-could-control-contract

    http://www.spotrac.com/nfl/cleveland-browns/josh-gordon/

    @gftchris said:

    Of which, 2014 was basically void, because of the final game suspension, which puts him at 2016, and 2015 was a write off putting him at 2017, no?

    Correct....

    gumby73G gumby73 wrote on last edited by
    #42

    @mudfly said:

    Right, but even OTC shows him signed thru 2016 only...everybody gets a 4 year contract as required by the CBA, but can out at 3 and become a RFA(except first rounders)...I was pretty sure before, but looked around a lot more today and am certain he is RFA 2017, UFA 2018....

    So, we have him for 1 year, can match in 2 years and can trans tag him in 3(if we so choose).....

    Here's a link that spells it out....

    http://www.dawgsbynature.com/2016/1/20/10797170/josh-gordon-applies-for-reinstatement-browns-could-control-contract

    http://www.spotrac.com/nfl/cleveland-browns/josh-gordon/

    Correct....

    The $$$ remaining on Josh's contract & this^^^ is the reason analytically we will NOT trade Gordo. Now Gordo may do it to himself but we still hold the keys to the car (his poss. value) he may have stolen from his car dealing days. Trade deadline 2016? Let's just get to that point 😎

  • @tour2ma said:

    Agree on the appeal... but OverTheCap has his original contract at 4-years...

    Right, but even OTC shows him signed thru 2016 only...everybody gets a 4 year contract as required by the CBA, but can out at 3 and become a RFA(except first rounders)...I was pretty sure before, but looked around a lot more today and am certain he is RFA 2017, UFA 2018....

    So, we have him for 1 year, can match in 2 years and can trans tag him in 3(if we so choose).....

    Here's a link that spells it out....

    http://www.dawgsbynature.com/2016/1/20/10797170/josh-gordon-applies-for-reinstatement-browns-could-control-contract

    http://www.spotrac.com/nfl/cleveland-browns/josh-gordon/

    @gftchris said:

    Of which, 2014 was basically void, because of the final game suspension, which puts him at 2016, and 2015 was a write off putting him at 2017, no?

    Correct....

    Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by Tour2ma
    #43

    @mudfly said:

    Right, but even OTC shows him signed thru 2016 only...everybody gets a 4 year contract as required by the CBA, but can out at 3 and become a RFA(except first rounders)...I was pretty sure before, but looked around a lot more today and am certain he is RFA 2017, UFA 2018....

    Here's a link that spells it out....

    http://www.dawgsbynature.com/2016/1/20/10797170/josh-gordon-applies-for-reinstatement-browns-could-control-contract

    OK... I see what is being said, but still do not understand how anyone can be a RFA after 3 years yet have terms for a 4th year on their original contract... unless...

    The terms of year 4 seen at OTC are the minimum qualifying, RFA offer we must make to retain him as an RFA. IIRC higher offers are even multiples of these minimum figures and the size of our offer sets the compensation we receive.

    Make sense?

  • @suomi said:

    The talent-poor Browns do not have the luxury of trading away a talent as great as Gordon. Granted, he's one spark away from getting kicked out of the NFL for good. However, if he stays clean and plays hard he's a pro-bowl wide out.

    The Browns absolutely have to roll the dice with Gordon. If he screws up the Browns won't be worse off than they are now. The only way that the Browns can mess this up is to trade him...because if they do Gordon will stay off the weed and put up All-Pro numbers for the next four seasons.

    ^+1

    @miktoxic said:

    sorry guys, i would. first slip up and he's gone for good with no compensation. yes best receiver we've had in a long time BUT.....

    can't stay off the WEEDen.

    Mik, apparently, he has- or you think there have been zero drug tests during his suspension?

    @mudfly said:

    ....so don't trade him?

    I'd call it 'keeping a low profile'....tho not sure what you're saying here, is it trade him now??....

    Even though you don't know what he's doing and ESPN doesn't know what he's doing, the NFL and his assigned Medical Advisor do.....and they've been working with him, monitoring his treatment plan and testing him through out his suspension.....

    So, since he's applied for reinstatement, you have to assume he's met all the requirements to do so.....or why bother?

    Right....the one dim glimmer of hope is that "after 2 years" of staying clean, he can be discharged from the program by his medical advisor....all based upon how well he's adhered to his treatment program, etc.....it's a long shot, but possible....

    Salary wise, we have him this year....and next season he will be a restricted FA, meaning we can match any offers.....If he returns to form this season, Id expect a nice contract offer, with lots of conditions(and zero guaranteed money).....IE ....he'll get the big bucks, but only if he's here and playing....

    What I wounder is if the one year suspension counts towards that two year. If that's the case he only has to stay clean for another year or so.

    miktoxicM miktoxic wrote on last edited by
    #44

    @hoorta said:

    Mik, apparently, he has- or you think there have been zero drug tests during his suspension?

    hey, no one here loves gordon as much as i do (?) but there's a difference between being secluded and away from peers painting connect the dots and hanging out with grown men after competing in a sports competition in the locker room when someone says "let's go hangout." go to a club. hot music. fast women. and boom! next thing you know you're out of the league.

    i had faith that blackmon could turn it around and what is he doing right now?

    exactly.

  • @hoorta said:

    Mik, apparently, he has- or you think there have been zero drug tests during his suspension?

    hey, no one here loves gordon as much as i do (?) but there's a difference between being secluded and away from peers painting connect the dots and hanging out with grown men after competing in a sports competition in the locker room when someone says "let's go hangout." go to a club. hot music. fast women. and boom! next thing you know you're out of the league.

    i had faith that blackmon could turn it around and what is he doing right now?

    exactly.

    Mark OM Mark O wrote on last edited by
    #45

    @miktoxic said:

    i had faith that blackmon could turn it around and what is he doing right now?

    Drugs?

  • @miktoxic said:

    i had faith that blackmon could turn it around and what is he doing right now?

    Drugs?

    miktoxicM miktoxic wrote on last edited by
    #46

    @mark-o said:

    Drugs?

    winner winner chicken fried dinner with some purple drank to wash it all down with.

  • @mark-o said:

    Drugs?

    winner winner chicken fried dinner with some purple drank to wash it all down with.

    Mark OM Mark O wrote on last edited by
    #47

    @miktoxic said:

    winner winner chicken fried dinner with some purple drank to wash it all down with.

    Hmmmmm......I'll take the chicken dinner...but can I have a beer or 10 instead of some gay purple drink?