Park your tents
-
Nightmare scenario:
- trade down with Dallas
- Dallas picks Wentz
- SF trades up to #3 and tabs Goff
- We tread water another year...Tour
***************
Exactly. And the NFL would laugh at the Browns for an entire season or more.
- trade down with Dallas
-
Nightmare scenario:
- trade down with Dallas
- Dallas picks Wentz
- SF trades up to #3 and tabs Goff
- We tread water another year...Tour
***************
Exactly. And the NFL would laugh at the Browns for an entire season or more.
Nightmare scenario:
- trade down with Dallas
- Dallas picks Wentz
- SF trades up to #3 and tabs Goff
- We tread water another year...Tour
***************
Exactly. And the NFL would laugh at the Browns for an entire season or more.
So under this nightmare scenario we would be forced to find the best defensive player in a defensive class? Oh, woe is us. 🥷
- trade down with Dallas
-
better to draft the best offensive player in the draft = quarterback.
The draft is deep in DL, lbs, cb's,...
you watch on draft morning, pick #2
-
better to draft the best offensive player in the draft = quarterback.
The draft is deep in DL, lbs, cb's,...
you watch on draft morning, pick #2
better to draft the best offensive player in the draft = quarterback.
The draft is deep in DL, lbs, cb's,...
you watch on draft morning, pick #2
Morning - it'll be about 1am for me.
But for once I agree with you calblaze - there's a big drop off in QB talent, it's a WR poor draft, and very deep in DL/DB. It makes much more sense to go QB first and D on day two.
-
I'm in camp trade back. I know it takes two for a trade, but hopefully there's a partner out there. I'm not sold that any of the QBs are "franchise QB" material........ If we select one of them at 2, and he's the next former Browns QB, we are set back another 5yrs. Give me a couple of safer picks like Jack @ 7-10, then whoever at 32 and of course someone with the pick(s) we got in the trade.
North Dakota State is a long way from the NFL.
If we pick a QB at 2 and he is indeed the next former QB, we're only set back a couple of years - are we set any further back now than when we drafted Manziel 2 years ago? How about then compared to Weeden in 2012?
That being said, I'd move back a couple of spots to pick up a second or a first.
If we pick a QB at 2 and he is indeed the next former QB, we're only set back a couple of years - are we set any further back now than when we drafted Manziel 2 years ago? How about then compared to Weeden in 2012?
That being said, I'd move back a couple of spots to pick up a second or a first.
Kind of answered your own question? lol We went 3-13 this season and missing on both of the turds at #22 is one of the reasons why.... Also, a 1st QB off the board, #2 pick is way different than a second selection in the 1st, #22 QB. So much more will be expected from him, it's not even realistic to compare them.
-
If we pick a QB at 2 and he is indeed the next former QB, we're only set back a couple of years - are we set any further back now than when we drafted Manziel 2 years ago? How about then compared to Weeden in 2012?
That being said, I'd move back a couple of spots to pick up a second or a first.
Kind of answered your own question? lol We went 3-13 this season and missing on both of the turds at #22 is one of the reasons why.... Also, a 1st QB off the board, #2 pick is way different than a second selection in the 1st, #22 QB. So much more will be expected from him, it's not even realistic to compare them.
Kind of answered your own question? lol We went 3-13 this season and missing on both of the turds at #22 is one of the reasons why.... Also, a 1st QB off the board, #2 pick is way different than a second selection in the 1st, #22 QB. So much more will be expected from him, it's not even realistic to compare them.
So, not exactly setting us back 5 years, was my point. More like 2.
-
Kind of answered your own question? lol We went 3-13 this season and missing on both of the turds at #22 is one of the reasons why.... Also, a 1st QB off the board, #2 pick is way different than a second selection in the 1st, #22 QB. So much more will be expected from him, it's not even realistic to compare them.
So, not exactly setting us back 5 years, was my point. More like 2.
So, not exactly setting us back 5 years, was my point. More like 2.
.95' to 16' ........... Looks like 21 to me
My point being is if we take one of these dudes at 2, then he better be the next Cam or Andrew, or we'll just keep going around the toilet bowl in circles................ Here's to hoping the jump from NDS to the NFL is a tiny one. Gotta love the combine.
-
better to draft the best offensive player in the draft = quarterback.
The draft is deep in DL, lbs, cb's,...
you watch on draft morning, pick #2
Morning - it'll be about 1am for me.
But for once I agree with you calblaze - there's a big drop off in QB talent, it's a WR poor draft, and very deep in DL/DB. It makes much more sense to go QB first and D on day two.
Morning - it'll be about 1am for me.
But for once I agree with you calblaze - there's a big drop off in QB talent, it's a WR poor draft, and very deep in DL/DB. It makes much more sense to go QB first and D on day two.
Depth perception has shifted lately. This "weak" QB class is now judged to have not only 2 solid ones leading the way, but more Depth than average. It's possible we'll see 4 go in the 1st and likely 7 in the first two rounds.
WRs look pretty lean after the Combine. Ditto the TEs.
OTs look good although a couple of the top ones elude me. More than made up for by some Day 2 prospects. Interoior OL kinda lean, but love a couple.
DTs are the flat out strength of the draft including some outstanding 3-4 DE conversion candidates. Edge are good, but hurt by injuries.
OLs are disappointing. Ragland falling inside and beyond top couple OLBs not much, but I have taken to Schobert.
CBs may be as deep as I can remember. Safeties??? Not so much...
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
Morning - it'll be about 1am for me.
But for once I agree with you calblaze - there's a big drop off in QB talent, it's a WR poor draft, and very deep in DL/DB. It makes much more sense to go QB first and D on day two.
Depth perception has shifted lately. This "weak" QB class is now judged to have not only 2 solid ones leading the way, but more Depth than average. It's possible we'll see 4 go in the 1st and likely 7 in the first two rounds.
WRs look pretty lean after the Combine. Ditto the TEs.
OTs look good although a couple of the top ones elude me. More than made up for by some Day 2 prospects. Interoior OL kinda lean, but love a couple.
DTs are the flat out strength of the draft including some outstanding 3-4 DE conversion candidates. Edge are good, but hurt by injuries.
OLs are disappointing. Ragland falling inside and beyond top couple OLBs not much, but I have taken to Schobert.
CBs may be as deep as I can remember. Safeties??? Not so much...
Someone on Twitter said the same thing about the "weak" QB class in this year 's draft.Depth perception has shifted lately. This "weak" QB class is now judged to have not only 2 solid ones leading the way, but more Depth than average. It's possible we'll see 4 go in the 1st and likely 7 in the first two rounds.
That same person (I think it was Charlie Casserly) said that Goff graded out better than Mariota.
Two things that will define you: Your determination when you have nothing. Your attitude when you have everything. - Mike McCartney -
Hue knows Qb's and so therefore, I trust him to know what he wants in a QB. Maybe he's in love with Osweiler so we go all in to sign him away from Denver...I don't see that happening but it's possible...whoever Hue wants as QB will be most likely the best QB we've had since Couch.
-
Hue knows Qb's and so therefore, I trust him to know what he wants in a QB. Maybe he's in love with Osweiler so we go all in to sign him away from Denver...I don't see that happening but it's possible...whoever Hue wants as QB will be most likely the best QB we've had since Couch.
Hue knows Qb's and so therefore, I trust him to know what he wants in a QB. Maybe he's in love with Osweiler so we go all in to sign him away from Denver...I don't see that happening but it's possible...whoever Hue wants as QB will be most likely the best QB we've had since Couch.
This is my take as well. I trust that Hue will know better than any of us as to what a good QB looks like.
-
Someone on Twitter said the same thing about the "weak" QB class in this year 's draft.Depth perception has shifted lately. This "weak" QB class is now judged to have not only 2 solid ones leading the way, but more Depth than average. It's possible we'll see 4 go in the 1st and likely 7 in the first two rounds.
That same person (I think it was Charlie Casserly) said that Goff graded out better than Mariota.
Someone on Twitter said the same thing about the "weak" QB class in this year 's draft.
That same person (I think it was Charlie Casserly) said that Goff graded out better than Mariota.
And so he did...
MM graded out at 6.38 - http://www.nfl.com/combine/profiles/marcus-mariota?id=2552466
JG graded out at 6.73 - http://www.nfl.com/combine/profiles/jared-goff?id=2555334
-
Cowboys won't draft a QB at #4...take it as you will, it's silly season after all.
-
Hue knows Qb's and so therefore, I trust him to know what he wants in a QB. Maybe he's in love with Osweiler so we go all in to sign him away from Denver...I don't see that happening but it's possible...whoever Hue wants as QB will be most likely the best QB we've had since Couch.
Hue knows Qb's and so therefore, I trust him to know what he wants in a QB. Maybe he's in love with Osweiler so we go all in to sign him away from Denver...I don't see that happening but it's possible...whoever Hue wants as QB will be most likely the best QB we've had since Couch.
Wonder how much affect Hue's decision will weigh on his former coaching back at Cal. You would think he's got the full school book, practice tapes etc.. on Goff more than Wentz?
-
OK, I picked Goff, Everybody keeps saying franchise QB, Hell can ether Goff or Wentz become a top 15 QB in the NFL, if so then a pick at two is worth doing. I'd love a so called franchise QB, but top 15 is still worth a number two.
-
Cowboys won't draft a QB at #4...take it as you will, it's silly season after all.
In the words of the old Knight in Indy and the Last Crusade.... "You have chosen wisely."
Cowboys won't draft a QB at #4...take it as you will, it's silly season after all.
I believe in Jerrah... and Jerrah thinks Romo will play forever...
Wonder how much affect Hue's decision will weigh on his former coaching back at Cal. You would think he's got the full school book, practice tapes etc.. on Goff more than Wentz?
Except for Goff's body of work being thicker... Who knows?
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login