Skip to content

Latest Power Rankings

The Browns Board
42 15 1.9k
  • darren15D darren15 wrote on last edited by
    #1
  • One PostO One Post wrote on last edited by
    #2

    We're #3? Awesome!

  • S sdballis wrote on last edited by
    #3

    33?

    The way most news outlets have it, its 31 NFL teams, Alabama, the Browns

  • 33?

    The way most news outlets have it, its 31 NFL teams, Alabama, the Browns

    darren15D darren15 wrote on last edited by
    #4

    @sdballis said:

    33?

    The way most news outlets have it, its 31 NFL teams, Alabama, the Browns

    Well there was a debate as to whether last seasons Buckeyes would beat the Browns 🙂

  • @sdballis said:

    33?

    The way most news outlets have it, its 31 NFL teams, Alabama, the Browns

    Well there was a debate as to whether last seasons Buckeyes would beat the Browns 🙂

    miktoxicM miktoxic wrote on last edited by
    #5

    @darren15 said:

    Well there was a debate as to whether last seasons Buckeyes would beat the Browns 🙂

    only those who would start an online draft, pick the browns as their team so he could then pick bosa over a QB.

    can you shove ohio state any further up your ass than you already have it? must have an ass of a 70 year old fag. no way to start high school junior.

  • Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by Tour2ma
    #6
  • @darren15 said:

    Well there was a debate as to whether last seasons Buckeyes would beat the Browns 🙂

    only those who would start an online draft, pick the browns as their team so he could then pick bosa over a QB.

    can you shove ohio state any further up your ass than you already have it? must have an ass of a 70 year old fag. no way to start high school junior.

    darren15D darren15 wrote on last edited by
    #7

    @miktoxic said:

    only those who would start an online draft, pick the browns as their team so he could then pick bosa over a QB.

    can you shove ohio state any further up your ass than you already have it? must have an ass of a 70 year old fag. no way to start high school junior.

    Were you as high with Manziel, Weeden and Quinn ?

  • miktoxicM miktoxic wrote on last edited by
    #8

    hated all those picks. my big blow moments of recent memory have been all for D guys...mingo and gilbert come to mind. when other people screamed QB i screamed D, and they drafted D.

    and look what we have for it. maybe 2-3 starters out of how many years picking D first?

    jackson is a QB guy. even the analytical guys would (IMO) say get the guy something to work with out the gate.

  • @miktoxic said:

    only those who would start an online draft, pick the browns as their team so he could then pick bosa over a QB.

    can you shove ohio state any further up your ass than you already have it? must have an ass of a 70 year old fag. no way to start high school junior.

    Were you as high with Manziel, Weeden and Quinn ?

    One PostO One Post wrote on last edited by
    #9

    @darren15 said:

    Were you as high with Manziel, Weeden and Quinn ?

    All three of these qb's came with two draft picks in the first round. Maybe if the Browns can get a first round qb this year luck will be on our side.
  • The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
    #10

    Call me when they start playing games. The standings are the only power rankings I am interested in.

  • Call me when they start playing games. The standings are the only power rankings I am interested in.

    bbedwardB bbedward wrote on last edited by
    #11

    @the-gipper said:

    Call me when they start playing games. The standings are the only power rankings I am interested in.

    Too bad those are usually bad too 🙁

  • @the-gipper said:

    Call me when they start playing games. The standings are the only power rankings I am interested in.

    Too bad those are usually bad too 🙁

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
    #12

    @bbedward said:

    Too bad those are usually bad too 🙁

    At least they are accurate.

  • @darren15 said:

    Were you as high with Manziel, Weeden and Quinn ?

    All three of these qb's came with two draft picks in the first round. Maybe if the Browns can get a first round qb this year luck will be on our side.
    Mike HM Mike H wrote on last edited by
    #13

    One Post From the Truth said:

    All three of these qb's came with two draft picks in the first round. Maybe if the Browns can get a first round qb this year luck will be on our side.

    It's incredible how many first round picks the Browns franchise has blown. Hard to really wrap my head around it. Would be better if PoG was running the team.

  • One Post From the Truth said:

    All three of these qb's came with two draft picks in the first round. Maybe if the Browns can get a first round qb this year luck will be on our side.

    It's incredible how many first round picks the Browns franchise has blown. Hard to really wrap my head around it. Would be better if PoG was running the team.

    gftChrisG gftChris wrote on last edited by
    #14

    @mike-h said:

    It's incredible how many first round picks the Browns franchise has blown. Hard to really wrap my head around it. Would be better if PoG was running the team.

    We'd still have taken Richardson and Manziel.

  • W wargograw wrote on last edited by
    #15

    Bengals seem low. Cowboys too.

  • Bengals seem low. Cowboys too.

    Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by
    #16

    @wargograw said:

    Bengals seem low. Cowboys too.

    #9 seems about right for Cinci as of now. PTG is posed to retake the division, but may be a tad high at #4 given Bryant's suspension.

    The Boy's around 15 seems right given they have a run game to sort out.

    Raiders look low to me. They are going to give DNV a real run for their money this year.

  • W wargograw wrote on last edited by
    #17

    Bengals roster is phenomenal top to bottom, pretty much. Such a well-oiled machine that their first two picks from last year were both able to take redshirts. So I have to disagree there, especially when you put teams with holes all over them ahead of them (Pats or Broncos for example). Then again, I thought this was a ranking of roster strength and not necessarily who would win on the field.

  • One Post From the Truth said:

    All three of these qb's came with two draft picks in the first round. Maybe if the Browns can get a first round qb this year luck will be on our side.

    It's incredible how many first round picks the Browns franchise has blown. Hard to really wrap my head around it. Would be better if PoG was running the team.

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
    #18

    @mike-h said:

    It's incredible how many first round picks the Browns franchise has blown. Hard to really wrap my head around it. Would be better if PoG was running the team.

    No, because we still would have had TR, Weeden, JMZ etc. He loved those guys....though I do think he was higher on Carr than on JFF.

  • @wargograw said:

    Bengals seem low. Cowboys too.

    #9 seems about right for Cinci as of now. PTG is posed to retake the division, but may be a tad high at #4 given Bryant's suspension.

    The Boy's around 15 seems right given they have a run game to sort out.

    Raiders look low to me. They are going to give DNV a real run for their money this year.

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
    #19

    @tour2ma said:

    #9 seems about right for Cinci as of now. PTG is posed to retake the division, but may be a tad high at #4 given Bryant's suspension.

    The Boy's around 15 seems right given they have a run game to sort out.

    Raiders look low to me. They are going to give DNV a real run for their money this year.

    What has happened in the off season to give Peetown the jump? Other than maybe getting Laveon Bell back, what have they done to improve their team over what the Bengals have done. (given that in my opinion the Bengals had more talent to start with).

    Hopefully, the Bengals biggest loss was losing their OC to become the Browns HC.

  • @tour2ma said:

    #9 seems about right for Cinci as of now. PTG is posed to retake the division, but may be a tad high at #4 given Bryant's suspension.

    The Boy's around 15 seems right given they have a run game to sort out.

    Raiders look low to me. They are going to give DNV a real run for their money this year.

    What has happened in the off season to give Peetown the jump? Other than maybe getting Laveon Bell back, what have they done to improve their team over what the Bengals have done. (given that in my opinion the Bengals had more talent to start with).

    Hopefully, the Bengals biggest loss was losing their OC to become the Browns HC.

    VagitronV Vagitron wrote on last edited by Vagitron
    #20

    @the-gipper said:

    What has happened in the off season to give Peetown the jump? Other than maybe getting Laveon Bell back, what have they done to improve their team over what the Bengals have done. (given that in my opinion the Bengals had more talent to start with).

    Hopefully, the Bengals biggest loss was losing their OC to become the Browns HC.

    You say other than getting Bell back like it's not a big deal. He's the best running back in the nfl. Pouncey back from IR instead of Cody Wallace at center. Senquez Golson our second round corner off ir. Sammie Coates should be able to fill in just fine with the suspension. If the steelers were healthy through the playoffs do you think they would have lost to Denver? They barely lost with Ben hobbled, no brown, no bell and no pouncey. In addition to no beachum at left tackle even though the steelers let him walk. They are at 4 for a reason because most people realize they would have been damn near impossible to stop offensively if they were healthy. They also signed one of the fastest tight ends in the nfl who also happens to be 6'6. Edit: Heath retiring will be interesting but that's why they signed green.