Analytics say........ GOFF over Wentz
-
I didn't need "Anal-litticks'. to tell Me Goff was the better QB.. this is a dumb thread... I wish DepoDupa and Sushi would hire a real football man like Bill Pollian.. I dont trust these two as far as can spit.
I didn't need "Anal-litticks'. to tell Me Goff was the better QB.. this is a dumb thread...
The role analytics play will change from round to round...
While you shouldn't need them to spot a first round talent, you want them to confirm your board.
By the time you get to Rnd 7 and UDFAs I'd fully expect them to have ID'd players that were not seriously on your radar prior to the findings.
In between? More the former than the latter I'd think, but with more influence over where a player is taken than if he's taken.
There is a much better QB coming out of Clemson in 2017 ....take Bosa, Ramsey, Buckner or Jack at 2 a QB later in this draft ( Hogan or Prescott ) and pounce in 2017 when we have the first pick
Sounds like a sure fire recipe for us getting an all-time trade-up offer... and missing yet another QB...
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
There is a much better QB coming out of Clemson in 2017 ....take Bosa, Ramsey, Buckner or Jack at 2 a QB later in this draft ( Hogan or Prescott ) and pounce in 2017 when we have the first pick
There is a much better QB coming out of Clemson in 2017 ....take Bosa, Ramsey, Buckner or Jack at 2 a QB later in this draft ( Hogan or Prescott ) and pounce in 2017 when we have the first pick
& what if the guy blows out his knee, like Griffin did in college? There goes that plan.
I don't think you can really make your plans based on hoping to have the first pick next year.
I agree- you can't make assumptions about where you're going to be drafting next year. The Browns tied for the worst record- and got bumped out of the #1 overall by strength of schedule.
-
Don't be surprised if they don't trade down. ?I am not necessarily opposed to this. On the QBs....you know my position....I don't think these guys have the talent to warrant #2 overall selection. If you don't want to take the DE, then trade down....get multiple picks....pick up needs on defense and offense.
Don't be surprised if they pull a deal like the one they did the year they took Phil Taylor: go down to the middle of the draft, pick up another second rounder....and a first rounder next year in a trade. This FO may in fact want some quantity over quality for this year.....and may want to accumulate assets for the future (i.e. more first round picks.)
Don't be surprised if this happens.
-
I'm on the watson train if we don't take a QB this year.
I am not sure that I will board that train. A long way to go before that decision is to be made.
Remember, last year at this time the talk was that Hackenberg and Cook could likely be the best QBs going on.
See this: Prescott, Hackenberg, the OSU Triumvirate rated over Goff. This had Watson and Cody Kessler as the best QBs going into last season.....both are back right?
And you don't see the name Carson Wentz in the top 25.
-
Part of me hopes we pick at 2 and don't move up from 32 - the draft starts at 1am London time, the sooner we pick the sooner I go to bed!
-
Part of me hopes we pick at 2 and don't move up from 32 - the draft starts at 1am London time, the sooner we pick the sooner I go to bed!
-
-
There is a much better QB coming out of Clemson in 2017 ....take Bosa, Ramsey, Buckner or Jack at 2 a QB later in this draft ( Hogan or Prescott ) and pounce in 2017 when we have the first pick
& what if the guy blows out his knee, like Griffin did in college? There goes that plan.
I don't think you can really make your plans based on hoping to have the first pick next year.
I agree- you can't make assumptions about where you're going to be drafting next year. The Browns tied for the worst record- and got bumped out of the #1 overall by strength of schedule.
& what if the guy blows out his knee, like Griffin did in college? There goes that plan.
I agree- you can't make assumptions about where you're going to be drafting next year. The Browns tied for the worst record- and got bumped out of the #1 overall by strength of schedule.
He already did blow out his knee.
-
This post is hidden because you have chosen to ignore posts by nickers. View it anyway?
Nah.
-
I'm happy either way...any pick at #2...OR
Trade down...I say they trade with the Rams at 15 for both their #2s at 43 and 45
We would then own picks 15 31 43 45 65 ?NICE!!!
-
I'm happy either way...any pick at #2...OR
Trade down...I say they trade with the Rams at 15 for both their #2s at 43 and 45
We would then own picks 15 31 43 45 65 ?NICE!!!
I'm happy either way...any pick at #2...OR
Trade down...I say they trade with the Rams at 15 for both their #2s at 43 and 45
We would then own picks 15 31 43 45 65 NICE!!!
Not enough. #2 pick is worth 2,600- #15 is worth 1,050. If I'm Sashi, I want their first, the high second, and next years first- minimum. I posted elsewhere for the Rams to jump the Browns to get to #1 overall, it will cost at least three first round picks. I doubt the Rams are going to want to pay that steep a price.
-
Jimmy Donovan reported tonight that as we approach draft day, the Tits are getting phone calls from some teams that want to trade up to #1. The two teams that were mentioned was San Fran and Philly. I'm not surprised by the niners, but didn't the Eagles just sign Bradford?
Two things that will define you: Your determination when you have nothing. Your attitude when you have everything. - Mike McCartney -
I don't think you can really make your plans based on hoping to have the first pick next year.
-
I didn't need "Anal-litticks'. to tell Me Goff was the better QB.. this is a dumb thread...
The role analytics play will change from round to round...
While you shouldn't need them to spot a first round talent, you want them to confirm your board.
By the time you get to Rnd 7 and UDFAs I'd fully expect them to have ID'd players that were not seriously on your radar prior to the findings.
In between? More the former than the latter I'd think, but with more influence over where a player is taken than if he's taken.
There is a much better QB coming out of Clemson in 2017 ....take Bosa, Ramsey, Buckner or Jack at 2 a QB later in this draft ( Hogan or Prescott ) and pounce in 2017 when we have the first pick
Sounds like a sure fire recipe for us getting an all-time trade-up offer... and missing yet another QB...
The role analytics play will change from round to round...
While you shouldn't need them to spot a first round talent, you want them to confirm your board.
By the time you get to Rnd 7 and UDFAs I'd fully expect them to have ID'd players that were not seriously on your radar prior to the findings.
In between? More the former than the latter I'd think, but with more influence over where a player is taken than if he's taken.
Sounds like a sure fire recipe for us getting an all-time trade-up offer... and missing yet another QB...
..
If this team of assholes needs "anal litticks".. were in trouble.. lol!.. It's like saying " Ok if we fuck up" we can blame this math/system because were too egg head stupid to use our eyes in the first place'.. LAME!
Nickers...."There are no old running QB's in the NFL "~Sam Rutigliano~ -
Paul and Brown could work as a gm combo if they have a stat sheet for a prospect's overall love of the game. Every gm has used anal licking from day 1. I wonder what the "new" slant this duo brings to studying stat sheets? I do take a little hope in the name combo. Good omen
-
The role analytics play will change from round to round...
While you shouldn't need them to spot a first round talent, you want them to confirm your board.
By the time you get to Rnd 7 and UDFAs I'd fully expect them to have ID'd players that were not seriously on your radar prior to the findings.
In between? More the former than the latter I'd think, but with more influence over where a player is taken than if he's taken.
Sounds like a sure fire recipe for us getting an all-time trade-up offer... and missing yet another QB...
..
If this team of assholes needs "anal litticks".. were in trouble.. lol!.. It's like saying " Ok if we fuck up" we can blame this math/system because were too egg head stupid to use our eyes in the first place'.. LAME!
If this team of assholes needs "anal litticks".. were in trouble.. lol!.. It's like saying " Ok if we fuck up" we can blame this math/system because were too egg head stupid to use our eyes in the first place'.. LAME!
Take a midol and come back when you are being rational.
I hope you realize that every other team in the league uses analytics. The Browns are just now getting around to it. You act as if that is all they are going to use and none of the scouts or coaches will have input.
-
If this team of assholes needs "anal litticks".. were in trouble.. lol!.. It's like saying " Ok if we fuck up" we can blame this math/system because were too egg head stupid to use our eyes in the first place'.. LAME!
Take a midol and come back when you are being rational.
I hope you realize that every other team in the league uses analytics. The Browns are just now getting around to it. You act as if that is all they are going to use and none of the scouts or coaches will have input.
Take a midol and come back when you are being rational.
I hope you realize that every other team in the league uses analytics. The Browns are just now getting around to it. You act as if that is all they are going to use and none of the scouts or coaches will have input.
Idiots fear what they can't comprehend.
-
Take a midol and come back when you are being rational.
I hope you realize that every other team in the league uses analytics. The Browns are just now getting around to it. You act as if that is all they are going to use and none of the scouts or coaches will have input.
Idiots fear what they can't comprehend.
Idiots fear what they can't comprehend.
Or conversely jump right on the bandwagon.
WSS
www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons -
"Analytics" is not a single entity with one idea. That's very much like saying All Liberals Think (xyz) in politics.
[Pro tip: Every time you see someone say All Liberals Think, whatever follows in the XYZ is guaranteed to be 100% pure bullshit. Deal with it.]
The OP of this thread is NOT posting the collected gathered wisdom of all QB analysts who each have their own opinion on the Goff/Wentz discussion... rather, one ESPN analysis was posted. Thus, the title of the thread was incorrect. Instead of "Analytics says", a correct title would be "One analysis says"
"Analytics" does not say anything on "its" own. Any analytics deliverable is the product of the analysts who create it.. thus, analytics is by its very nature quite nuanced. A leader then USES those analytics to support their conclusion.
Hue Jackson has commented many times on the importance the Browns place on his input and loves him some analytics.
"Analytics is just a part of it. It’s not the whole thing, but it’s a piece of it. Eventually, everybody’s going to be doing what we’re doing."
-
Paul and Brown could work as a gm combo if they have a stat sheet for a prospect's overall love of the game. Every gm has used anal licking from day 1. I wonder what the "new" slant this duo brings to studying stat sheets? I do take a little hope in the name combo. Good omen
Paul and Brown could work as a gm combo if they have a stat sheet for a prospect's overall love of the game. Every gm has used anal licking from day 1. I wonder what the "new" slant this duo brings to studying stat sheets? I do take a little hope in the name combo. Good omen
I saw that.
And even Paul Brown wasn't infallible. He drafted Bobby Garrett.....#1 overall....but who could not call plays because of stuttering.
And he traded away or let go of Len Dawson, Doug Atkins, Willie Davis, Henry Jordan, Dick LeBeau....all future HOF with other teams.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login