Camp Zeke
-
couch was a good QB with no protection. it made no sense to draft a franchise kid and throw him in like palmer and crew did. at least if we draft one now and decide to do so the OL is 100x better than that mess the browns fielded then.
it's all about timing with drafting personnel. you have to have the building blocks in place first then add to them. that's why i could see drafting a young QB now. if it's a total scrap and crap then they should start by having people in line to replace those building blocks.
-
Zombo said:
Just curious, how much weed does one have to smoke to arrive at the conclusion that what this team really needs to do is draft a RB at #2?
We have not taken a QB higher than #22 in 17 years, but apparently the solution to that is take a RB in the Top 3 for the second time in five years. Cause he can block for the free QB we just picked up off the street.
Zombo
Touchdown Timmy Couch was taken #1-1 in 1999, but yeah.
Just for arguments sake, let's say that some don't think of Goff or Wentz as worthy of that high a pick, and Ramsey is seen as the next Ed Reed or Troy Polamolou (sp) and could be a 8-10 year fixture in the defensive backfield, plus being touted as being able to play corner or safety - do you take that? And perhaps get the kid Ghoolie likes later, or a different qb?
Touchdown Timmy Couch was taken #1-1 in 1999, but yeah.
Just for arguments sake, let's say that some don't think of Goff or Wentz as worthy of that high a pick, and Ramsey is seen as the next Ed Reed or Troy Polamolou (sp) and could be a 8-10 year fixture in the defensive backfield, plus being touted as being able to play corner or safety - do you take that? And perhaps get the kid Ghoolie likes later, or a different qb?
Jesus it's baffling that was 17 years ago.
-
I LOVE zeke but no, not at 2. He has no line infront of him.
More reason to take him so he can pick up the DT who just ran over Cam...

#8 is a more reasonable place to consider Zeke, but I don't like the idea of taking a franchise RB early in a rebuild process. Three-years are not guaranteed, let alone ten, as was suggested by the OP.
There will be an impact Defensive player there at #8. Buckner is the one I'd look for...
Hopefully he has a child to beat so he can be suspended for a season or so thereby lengthening his productivity in the NFL ala AP.More reason to take him so he can pick up the DT who just ran over Cam...

#8 is a more reasonable place to consider Zeke, but I don't like the idea of taking a franchise RB early in a rebuild process. Three-years are not guaranteed, let alone ten, as was suggested by the OP.
There will be an impact Defensive player there at #8. Buckner is the one I'd look for...

(sorry was that in bad taste?)
WSS
-
I'm a Michigan fan
Zeke is a beast
Picking a HB that high is stupid
-
couch was a good QB with no protection. it made no sense to draft a franchise kid and throw him in like palmer and crew did. at least if we draft one now and decide to do so the OL is 100x better than that mess the browns fielded then.
it's all about timing with drafting personnel. you have to have the building blocks in place first then add to them. that's why i could see drafting a young QB now. if it's a total scrap and crap then they should start by having people in line to replace those building blocks.
Totally agree here.couch was a good QB with no protection. it made no sense to draft a franchise kid and throw him in like palmer and crew did. at least if we draft one now and decide to do so the OL is 100x better than that mess the browns fielded then.
it's all about timing with drafting personnel. you have to have the building blocks in place first then add to them. that's why i could see drafting a young QB now. if it's a total scrap and crap then they should start by having people in line to replace those building blocks.
-
Hopefully he has a child to beat so he can be suspended for a season or so thereby lengthening his productivity in the NFL ala AP.More reason to take him so he can pick up the DT who just ran over Cam...

#8 is a more reasonable place to consider Zeke, but I don't like the idea of taking a franchise RB early in a rebuild process. Three-years are not guaranteed, let alone ten, as was suggested by the OP.
There will be an impact Defensive player there at #8. Buckner is the one I'd look for...

(sorry was that in bad taste?)
WSS
-
I'm a Michigan fan
Zeke is a beast
Picking a HB that high is stupid
Mel Kiper still says that he would not draft a RB until the 2d round at earliest.
-
I'm a Michigan fan
Zeke is a beast
Picking a HB that high is stupid
Mel Kiper still says that he would not draft a RB until the 2d round at earliest.
Mel Kiper still says that he would not draft a RB until the 2d round at earliest.
fixed it for you.
-
Mel Kiper still says that he would not draft a RB until the 2d round at earliest.
fixed it for you.
-
While I'd be personally against trading up, there are rumors that Dallas is interested. I think Philly ultimately will be the trading partner if there is one, but my question for you guys is if you don't take a QB and stay at #2, then who's the pick? Tunsil, Ramsey, Zeke, Bosa?
-
While I'd be personally against trading up, there are rumors that Dallas is interested. I think Philly ultimately will be the trading partner if there is one, but my question for you guys is if you don't take a QB and stay at #2, then who's the pick? Tunsil, Ramsey, Zeke, Bosa?
While I'd be personally against trading up, there are rumors that Dallas is interested. I think Philly ultimately will be the trading partner if there is one, but my question for you guys is if you don't take a QB and stay at #2, then who's the pick? Tunsil, Ramsey, Zeke, Bosa?
Opinions vary with Tunsil getting the least support and Bosa probably the most of the four you list, but there are more... Jack and Buckner also get mentions.
-
While I'd be personally against trading up, there are rumors that Dallas is interested. I think Philly ultimately will be the trading partner if there is one, but my question for you guys is if you don't take a QB and stay at #2, then who's the pick? Tunsil, Ramsey, Zeke, Bosa?
Opinions vary with Tunsil getting the least support and Bosa probably the most of the four you list, but there are more... Jack and Buckner also get mentions.
-
lol at this point, it does not matter

Yup... the world changed again today.
-
Good move by you guys. Kinda bummed that the Eagles will get Wentz or Goff, but at least you guys made them pay.
-
I don't see Zeke being available at #8, and even if he somehow is, I think another team will trade up with the Browns to snag him. We'll get more picks, and Zeke will go somewhere else. I read that Miami really, really wants him.
-
Good move by you guys. Kinda bummed that the Eagles will get Wentz or Goff, but at least you guys made them pay.
Good move by you guys. Kinda bummed that the Eagles will get Wentz or Goff, but at least you guys made them pay.
Heard a breakdown yesterday where if the Eagles hit with their selected QB, then in two to three years they will be positioned to dominate the division for a period. Came to this conclusion after they analyzed the division's QB ages, the next three drafts, and next three FA QB circumstances.
So where are the 'Boys leaning? Elliot at RB? Bosa at DE? Other?
-
I don't see Zeke being available at #8, and even if he somehow is, I think another team will trade up with the Browns to snag him. We'll get more picks, and Zeke will go somewhere else. I read that Miami really, really wants him.
I read that Miami really, really wants him.
As frustrated as Miami is after their RB FA pursuit, they should be ripe for plucking. And 13 is not that much further down...
They are acting like they have one of those "windows of opportunity that's closing". Personally I do not see it, but as long as they do...
-
Good move by you guys. Kinda bummed that the Eagles will get Wentz or Goff, but at least you guys made them pay.
Heard a breakdown yesterday where if the Eagles hit with their selected QB, then in two to three years they will be positioned to dominate the division for a period. Came to this conclusion after they analyzed the division's QB ages, the next three drafts, and next three FA QB circumstances.
So where are the 'Boys leaning? Elliot at RB? Bosa at DE? Other?
Heard a breakdown yesterday where if the Eagles hit with their selected QB, then in two to three years they will be positioned to dominate the division for a period. Came to this conclusion after they analyzed the division's QB ages, the next three drafts, and next three FA QB circumstances.
So where are the 'Boys leaning? Elliot at RB? Bosa at DE? Other?
Well, you have Romo...who I think has about 2 years left in him, if that. You have Eli....who I think will play another 5 years. Then Kirk Cousins who is still young and entrenched in DC. So, yes, the Eagles have a chance to make hay in that division......be it with a healthy productive Bradford, or a with Wentz.....unless he busts.
Dan McGwire 2.0?
-
If Miami wants to give up another pick just to move back to their original #8 spot [1400] from their current #13 [1150], more power to them.
It should cost their original first plus their second in this year's [#11 in the second round, 470].
I would only do that on draft day - eg, if Buckner is there, we take Buckner. But if none of Buckner/Bosa/Jack are available, trade down.
-
Good move by you guys. Kinda bummed that the Eagles will get Wentz or Goff, but at least you guys made them pay.
Heard a breakdown yesterday where if the Eagles hit with their selected QB, then in two to three years they will be positioned to dominate the division for a period. Came to this conclusion after they analyzed the division's QB ages, the next three drafts, and next three FA QB circumstances.
So where are the 'Boys leaning? Elliot at RB? Bosa at DE? Other?
Heard a breakdown yesterday where if the Eagles hit with their selected QB, then in two to three years they will be positioned to dominate the division for a period. Came to this conclusion after they analyzed the division's QB ages, the next three drafts, and next three FA QB circumstances.
So where are the 'Boys leaning? Elliot at RB? Bosa at DE? Other?
Hard to tell to be honest. I would have taken Goff or Wentz, and just let them sit for 2 years, but that isn't happening now and it never seemed that Jerry would have done that. There was some interest in Goff, but that disappeared when the Eagles traded up. Some of the rumors circulating now are the coaching staff likes Elliot and the scouts like Ramsey. Personally, I would not pick a DB (they view Ramsey as a CB) who has 3 ints in like 40+ career games with the 4th pick and I'm not sure if I like Elliot enough to pick him at #4.
Stephen Jones said DE was our biggest need, and I'd agree, but I heard we're not big on Bosa, and I personally like Buckner more than most, but I think they try and add a DE in round 2.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login