What two players dont you want in rd 1?
-
Tyler Boyd or Malcom Mitchell in the 3rd please
Or Sterling Shepherd, Charone Peake, or a bunch of other guys that can be had later on.
-
VesnaKociper said:
Of course you jackoffs don't want Lynch. You didn't want Roethlisberger or Petersen either. God forbid the Browns pick a play maker. Let's draft more OL.
Who the fuck are you talking to? I have more or less been on your side, saying Lynch may be the guy.
(and from radio reports, Hue Jackson may also be on your side)
-
I think it's easy to say WR needs to be considered in an early pick. There's no way we go in this with Hartline as our 1.
I think be prepared for a continuation of the Ray Farmer approach to wide receivers.
-
What I mean is, I see us going for the traditional hard-to-get positions early on - QB, tackle, pass rusher. Those guys are pretty hard to find later on, unlike RB, WR, DT, G.
What I mean is, I see us going for the traditional hard-to-get positions early on - QB, tackle, pass rusher. Those guys are pretty hard to find later on, unlike RB, WR, DT, G.
sure.....but that is also because those positions are nearly just as much a need for the Browns.....and there appears to be more top flight talent available at those spots than at WR. That is why the WR spot may go 2d/3rd round, not anti-WR philosophy.
-
Wait until the end of next season then I can prognosticate in hindsight. That's always a sure way to look smart.
WSS
-
Wait until the end of next season then I can prognosticate in hindsight. That's always a sure way to look smart.
WSS
Wait until the end of next season then I can prognosticate in hindsight. That's always a sure way to look smart.
WSS
Even then, a rookie class cannot be evaluated after just one year.
-
-
After finding time to watch tape late last night, I'll still maintain that I don't want Ramsey - but I'll switch out Buckner for Lynch now.
-
After finding time to watch tape late last night, I'll still maintain that I don't want Ramsey - but I'll switch out Buckner for Lynch now.
After finding time to watch tape late last night, I'll still maintain that I don't want Ramsey - but I'll switch out Buckner for Lynch now.
A fellow Buckner hater?! Welcome! What do you dislike most?
-
-
Wait until the end of next season then I can prognosticate in hindsight. That's always a sure way to look smart.
WSS
Even then, a rookie class cannot be evaluated after just one year.
Even then, a rookie class cannot be evaluated after just one year.
Oh sure they can. Is this your first visit to the Browns board?
WSS
www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons -
I don't want a RB from Bama and I damn sure don't want pick 22
-
-
A fellow Buckner hater?! Welcome! What do you dislike most?
Slow step, plays high, very inconsistent hand usage, too often he hand fights with the lineman and doesn't try to get skinny in the gap, motor and burst question, too often because of playing high he loses his feet from under him...
How far did you want me to go here?
-
Even then, a rookie class cannot be evaluated after just one year.
Oh sure they can. Is this your first visit to the Browns board?
WSS
Oh sure they can. Is this your first visit to the Browns board?
WSS
Ha! Excellent.
-
Bosa because he is a 4-3 player and Lynch because I don't think he is worth a first round pick but would not hate it if we got him in a later round.
-
Had no idea why Tour said no to Conklin in the first. Then I saw him across from Buckner this past season. Dialed up more film...
I might have to say no to Lynch and Conklin now.
-
A fellow Buckner hater?! Welcome! What do you dislike most?
Slow step, plays high, very inconsistent hand usage, too often he hand fights with the lineman and doesn't try to get skinny in the gap, motor and burst question, too often because of playing high he loses his feet from under him...
How far did you want me to go here?
Slow step, plays high?
This. He's high on the mocks cause of his physical potential but his fundamentals are lacking. Any 4-3 team that takes him as DE over bosa is straight up high. I've seen nothing from his tape that ma.kes me interested in him as a 5 tech for the Browns either. Not at 8 at least. If we drop back more and pick him up later along with more picks than yeah I'm ok with that
-
Slow step, plays high?
This. He's high on the mocks cause of his physical potential but his fundamentals are lacking. Any 4-3 team that takes him as DE over bosa is straight up high. I've seen nothing from his tape that ma.kes me interested in him as a 5 tech for the Browns either. Not at 8 at least. If we drop back more and pick him up later along with more picks than yeah I'm ok with that
This. He's high on the mocks cause of his physical potential but his fundamentals are lacking. Any 4-3 team that takes him as DE over bosa is straight up high. I've seen nothing from his tape that ma.kes me interested in him as a 5 tech for the Browns either. Not at 8 at least. If we drop back more and pick him up later along with more picks than yeah I'm ok with that
I think he's being projected inside in the 4-3 and at 5-tech in the 3-4.
Side note - say that to 99% of my friends here, even the ones that follow the game, and they have no idea, it's like I'm talking a different language.
-
Had no idea why Tour said no to Conklin in the first. Then I saw him across from Buckner this past season. Dialed up more film...
I might have to say no to Lynch and Conklin now.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login