#FreeMilo
-
I think freedom of speech covers saying things people might find offensive
Maybe saying "I'm going to kill you tonight" is not ok, but saying "feminism is cancer" is alright
I don't particularly find it offensive either... it's stupid, but not offensive... but that's not the point.
The point is that on Twitter, just as is the case on the BrownsBoard, there are limits to the "behavior" that is tolerated. And those limits are determined by the powers that be.
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
Yea but still saying something that offends somebody and getting banned for it can still be criticized as bullshit
They don't tend to ban people for praising a terrorist attack on their platform, but they do when a blue haired fat girl gets triggered.
-
...Also, fuck Twitter's bias. Sick of seeing this shit from them and reddit - shutting down freedom of speech when it goes against their narrative.
Case in point: http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2016/07/20/double-standards-leslie-jones-racist-twitter-history/amp/#
I didn't get angry until I saw the last post from the CEO.
-
I think freedom of speech covers saying things people might find offensive
Maybe saying "I'm going to kill you tonight" is not ok, but saying "feminism is cancer" is alright
I don't particularly find it offensive either... it's stupid, but not offensive... but that's not the point.
The point is that on Twitter, just as is the case on the BrownsBoard, there are limits to the "behavior" that is tolerated. And those limits are determined by the powers that be.
I don't particularly find it offensive either... it's stupid, but not offensive... but that's not the point.
The point is that on Twitter, just as is the case on the BrownsBoard, there are limits to the "behavior" that is tolerated. And those limits are determined by the powers that be.
There is nothing that Milo said that deserved the banhammer. Some of the things his followers said to her? Absolutely they deserved it. This sets a horrible precedent.
-
I think freedom of speech covers saying things people might find offensive
Maybe saying "I'm going to kill you tonight" is not ok, but saying "feminism is cancer" is alright
I don't particularly find it offensive either... it's stupid, but not offensive... but that's not the point.
The point is that on Twitter, just as is the case on the BrownsBoard, there are limits to the "behavior" that is tolerated. And those limits are determined by the powers that be.
...The point is that on Twitter, just as is the case on the BrownsBoard, there are limits to the "behavior" that is tolerated. And those limits are determined by the powers that be.
Yea but still saying something that offends somebody and getting banned for it can still be criticized as bullshit
They don't tend to ban people for praising a terrorist attack on their platform, but they do when a blue haired fat girl gets triggered.
Twitter is indeed allowed to set its own code of conduct on its site, but the crux of the argument is that Twitter's standards and TOS is unequally enforced. Now, i'm about as conservative as Cal is liberal or DieHard is insightful, but even I have noticed that Twitter seems to swing the ban-hammer down more quickly on conservative viewpoints - like the one's that Milo represents - than they do on statements and ideas from more left-leaning ideologies. The fact that Leslie Jones can be free to insult white people in her tweets without rebuke while at the same time crying racism when people troll her about her shitty movie seems to be disingenuous.
-
...The point is that on Twitter, just as is the case on the BrownsBoard, there are limits to the "behavior" that is tolerated. And those limits are determined by the powers that be.
Yea but still saying something that offends somebody and getting banned for it can still be criticized as bullshit
They don't tend to ban people for praising a terrorist attack on their platform, but they do when a blue haired fat girl gets triggered.
Twitter is indeed allowed to set its own code of conduct on its site, but the crux of the argument is that Twitter's standards and TOS is unequally enforced. Now, i'm about as conservative as Cal is liberal or DieHard is insightful, but even I have noticed that Twitter seems to swing the ban-hammer down more quickly on conservative viewpoints - like the one's that Milo represents - than they do on statements and ideas from more left-leaning ideologies. The fact that Leslie Jones can be free to insult white people in her tweets without rebuke while at the same time crying racism when people troll her about her shitty movie seems to be disingenuous.
Twitter is indeed allowed to set its own code of conduct on its site, but the crux of the argument is that Twitter's standards and TOS is unequally enforced. Now, i'm about as conservative as Cal is liberal or DieHard is insightful, but even I have noticed that Twitter seems to swing the ban-hammer down more quickly on conservative viewpoints - like the one's that Milo represents - than they do on statements and ideas from more left-leaning ideologies. The fact that Leslie Jones can be free to insult white people in her tweets without rebuke while at the same time crying racism when people troll her about her shitty movie seems to be disingenuous.
-
Twitter is indeed allowed to set its own code of conduct on its site, but the crux of the argument is that Twitter's standards and TOS is unequally enforced. Now, i'm about as conservative as Cal is liberal or DieHard is insightful, but even I have noticed that Twitter seems to swing the ban-hammer down more quickly on conservative viewpoints - like the one's that Milo represents - than they do on statements and ideas from more left-leaning ideologies. The fact that Leslie Jones can be free to insult white people in her tweets without rebuke while at the same time crying racism when people troll her about her shitty movie seems to be disingenuous.
TBH, those people sound like fucking losers to me. They should harden the fuck up and stand up for their freedoms in their own countries instead of saying fuck it and trying to establish a compound in South America.
-
TBH, those people sound like fucking losers to me. They should harden the fuck up and stand up for their freedoms in their own countries instead of saying fuck it and trying to establish a compound in South America.
-
-
Gotta love folks who think "freedom of speech" protects all speech everywhere...
Right. It only protects the isiah crowell's of the world. Not the milo whatevers.
Early man walked away as modern man took control. Their minds weren't all the same and to conquer was their goal. So He built his great empires and he slaughtered his own kind, and he died a confused man and killed himself in his own mind... -
Right. It only protects the isiah crowell's of the world. Not the milo whatevers.
And it apparently protects the hypocrites of the world too, like Leslie Jones:
-
-
Right. It only protects the isiah crowell's of the world. Not the milo whatevers.
Child please...
-
-
Right. It only protects the isiah crowell's of the world. Not the milo whatevers.
Child please...
-
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login