Skip to content

Kruger Cut By Browns in roster trimdown

The Browns Board
107 32 3.9k
  • C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by
    #12

    if they didn't cut him, he would complain. he's just a contrarian sports bitcher.

  • Someone is not happy

    ESPN Cleveland ‏@ESPNCleveland 49s50 seconds ago
    ESPN Cleveland@ESPNCleveland
    Grossi: No one can tell me that Paul Kruger isn't one of the best 53 players on the #Browns roster.

    Grossi: No one can tell me that Paul Kruger isn't one of the best 53 players on the #Browns roster.

    jrb12711J jrb12711 wrote on last edited by
    #13

    @darren15 said:

    Someone is not happy

    Grossi: No one can tell me that Paul Kruger isn't one of the best 53 players on the #Browns roster.

    Anyone who has watched Paul Kruger play football the past year and change and thinks he's still good doesn't have ANY of my respect. The guy isn't cutting the mustard and hasn't for a long time. I'd much rather go with a young guy who may prove something that see Kruger never get to the QB and make less than 30 tackles.

    I think Coons is a good kicker but we'll see what we got I suppose. There probably was something to those 4 blocks last year being partly his fault but not enough to warrant losing his job. I haven't been following that battle closely though so maybe someone can shed light on why Coons didn't get the job back.

  • Someone is not happy

    ESPN Cleveland ‏@ESPNCleveland 49s50 seconds ago
    ESPN Cleveland@ESPNCleveland
    Grossi: No one can tell me that Paul Kruger isn't one of the best 53 players on the #Browns roster.

    Grossi: No one can tell me that Paul Kruger isn't one of the best 53 players on the #Browns roster.

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
    #14

    @darren15 said:

    Someone is not happy

    Grossi: No one can tell me that Paul Kruger isn't one of the best 53 players on the #Browns roster.

    Well here is the deal:

    A. Kruger really wasn't playing very well at all (though who on this team is)

    B. He is from the "old regime".

    C. This team is on a youth movement...needless to say...and it is plausible that the young guys can be just as productive (or non productive) as he has been.

    E. He saves the Browns like 6.5 million bucks.

  • C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by
    #15

    http://www.clevelandbrowns.com/news/article-5/Browns-kicker-competition-heating-up-as-decision-draws-closer/d80b7aa6-2c2a-4210-a4af-3621172d1c11

    They are close. Murray has the stronger leg - has hit a 55 yard FG in the past. Coons is 6'1"...

    and Murray is 5'8". That's interesting.

  • Tim Couch Pulls OutT Tim Couch Pulls Out wrote on last edited by
    #16

    But he was being misused

  • jiggins7919J jiggins7919 wrote on last edited by
    #17

    Kruger looked REALLY slow to me, and I'm not sure what good he was doing on our roster. Problem is, who do we have that is better? We obviously have plenty of financial cap room, and Kruger isn't a malcontent, so I guess we were just ready to move on. Kruger's contract was bloated and he definitely wasn't playing up to his salary. I don't mind the room, I just wish we had a talented player to replace the guy.

    Mud...are you out there? Happy days, no? LOL.

  • Kruger looked REALLY slow to me, and I'm not sure what good he was doing on our roster. Problem is, who do we have that is better? We obviously have plenty of financial cap room, and Kruger isn't a malcontent, so I guess we were just ready to move on. Kruger's contract was bloated and he definitely wasn't playing up to his salary. I don't mind the room, I just wish we had a talented player to replace the guy.

    Mud...are you out there? Happy days, no? LOL.

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
    #18

    @jiggins7919 said:

    Kruger looked REALLY slow to me, and I'm not sure what good he was doing on our roster. Problem is, who do we have that is better? We obviously have plenty of financial cap room, and Kruger isn't a malcontent, so I guess we were just ready to move on. Kruger's contract was bloated and he definitely wasn't playing up to his salary. I don't mind the room, I just wish we had a talented player to replace the guy.

    Mud...are you out there? Happy days, no? LOL.

    See the new depth chart. The team is willing to go with Ogbah, Orchard, Schobert, etc. now over Kruger.

  • Krueger was one of the worse FA signings in brown's history.

    Didn't see bibbs or coons getting cut.

    Damn, that just sounds bad. Like watchin a local affiliate's bad southern BBQ ad.

    "Come down to shortys and get some ribs you coons make sure u got bibbs!"

    D BoneD D Bone wrote on last edited by
    #19

    @miktoxic said:

    Damn, that just sounds bad. Like watchin a local affiliate's bad southern BBQ ad.

    "Come down to shortys and get some ribs you coons make sure u got bibbs!"

    Dude, warn a guy when he's drinking coffee with his laptop in his lap.

  • Terminated the contracts of:

    QB Austin Davis

    DL Nick Hayden

    LB Paul Kruger

    Waived:

    DB Sean Baker

    TE E.J. Bibbs

    WR Josh Boyce

    K Travis Coons

    WR Ed Eagan

    FB Robert Hughes

    TE David Reeves

    OL Cory Tucker

    Placed on injured reserve:

    DL Nike Lawrence-Stample (shoulder

    Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by
    #20

    Mud's still out painting the woods... or something...

    @alkid3 said:

    Terminated the contracts of: QB Austin Davis; DL Nick Hayden; LB Paul Kruger

    Waived: DB Sean Baker; TE E.J. Bibbs; WR Josh Boyce; K Travis Coons; WR Ed Eagan; FB Robert Hughes; TE David Reeves; OL Cory Tucker

    Placed on injured reserve: DL Nike Lawrence-Stample (shoulder)

    • A little surprised at Hayden... thought he had some good moments.
    • Tucker is only a surprise in that I did not think he'd be the first OL to go.
    • Hughes going means its Malcolm in the Middle V2.0.
    • Davis gone means no deal for McC.

    @the-gipper said:

    Well here is the deal:

    C. This team is on a youth movement...needless to say...and it is plausible that the young guys can be just as productive (or non productive) as he has been.

    E. He saves the Browns like 6.5 million bucks.

    Is "D" a secret?

    C. Spot on... someone is getting OJT...

    E. $7mm per OTC, but more surprising was only got $2.4mm in walking money... thought it was more than that.

    Wonder if Krugs ends up in BLT? or NE? 🙂

    @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    But he was being misused

    lol...

  • C Clevfan4life wrote on last edited by
    #21

    In his defense he was misused from the beginning. We immediately started tinkering with what he did well in Blt. Dude dhould never have been allowed to get under 275-280 lbs. That was the weight where he was a load for o lineman to handle. When he got down under 270 his lack of a top end skillset got exposed badly.

    Honestly i think nassib already has a better toolbag than kruger has. He just needs to get stronger. He does that we have a draft steal on our roster

  • C Clevfan4life wrote on last edited by
    #22

    Im not comfortable with ogbah as our primary "elephant" olb'er per hortons scheme. Schobert and orchard arent going to hold up agsinst strong run teams so i hope horton gives nassib some time out there as he gets stronger and quicker

  • Mud's still out painting the woods... or something...

    @alkid3 said:

    Terminated the contracts of: QB Austin Davis; DL Nick Hayden; LB Paul Kruger

    Waived: DB Sean Baker; TE E.J. Bibbs; WR Josh Boyce; K Travis Coons; WR Ed Eagan; FB Robert Hughes; TE David Reeves; OL Cory Tucker

    Placed on injured reserve: DL Nike Lawrence-Stample (shoulder)

    • A little surprised at Hayden... thought he had some good moments.
    • Tucker is only a surprise in that I did not think he'd be the first OL to go.
    • Hughes going means its Malcolm in the Middle V2.0.
    • Davis gone means no deal for McC.

    @the-gipper said:

    Well here is the deal:

    C. This team is on a youth movement...needless to say...and it is plausible that the young guys can be just as productive (or non productive) as he has been.

    E. He saves the Browns like 6.5 million bucks.

    Is "D" a secret?

    C. Spot on... someone is getting OJT...

    E. $7mm per OTC, but more surprising was only got $2.4mm in walking money... thought it was more than that.

    Wonder if Krugs ends up in BLT? or NE? 🙂

    @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    But he was being misused

    lol...

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
    #23

    @tour2ma said:

    Is "D" a secret?

    C. Spot on... someone is getting OJT...

    E. $7mm per OTC, but more surprising was only got $2.4mm in walking money... thought it was more than that.

    lol...

    Yea.....that is for your fill in the blank entry. Either that or I need to sing my alphabet better. 😳

  • P Pumpkin Eater wrote on last edited by
    #24

    Austin Davis sucked. So did Kruger.

  • Austin Davis sucked. So did Kruger.

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
    #25

    @pumpkin-eater said:

    Austin Davis sucked. So did Kruger.

    Or, again, this team decided that they could be just as bad without them....thus giving the young guys the opportunities.

  • miktoxicM miktoxic wrote on last edited by
    #26

    krueger sucks. only reason he might have done anything in baltimore was due to the fact of the other guy on the other end of the line.

  • The Cysko KidT The Cysko Kid wrote on last edited by
    #27

    Kruger would terrorize the offense...if they were asleep

    Get it?

  • krueger sucks. only reason he might have done anything in baltimore was due to the fact of the other guy on the other end of the line.

    C Clevfan4life wrote on last edited by
    #28

    @miktoxic said:

    krueger sucks. only reason he might have done anything in baltimore was due to the fact of the other guy on the other end of the line.

    Well theres still a tackle on his side he had to fight through mik. And he did it well enough in blt but couldnt here. I could never really figure out what changed except horton originally adking him to get smaller. I think in blt his bullrush set up his outside rip, he still had a decent bull when he first came here but got leaned outof the edge constantly cause he didnt have the size anymore to hold off an OL as he turned the corner. There are smaller olb'ers in the nfl that can go around the edge just fine even with a tackle hangin all over them, but they lean into the tackle and dig around the corner with their bodies leaned in.

    Kruger just doesnt have that skill and apparently could never develop it. He's so upright going around the edge that big TE's could easily force him wide.

  • Kruger would terrorize the offense...if they were asleep

    Get it?

    C Clevfan4life wrote on last edited by
    #29

    @the-cysko-kid said:

    Kruger would terrorize the offense...if they were asleep

    Get it?

    Oh shit i see what you did there now. Didnt get it right away but yeah...,well done.

  • stillmotionS stillmotion wrote on last edited by
    #30

    merry early Christmas, Mud

  • But he was being misused

    U Unsympathetic wrote on last edited by
    #31

    @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    But he was being misused

    He needs to possess a skill [any skill!] before that skill can be "mis"used..