Skip to content

Draft Talk

Locked The Browns Board
1.4k 63 38.7k
  • Can someone explain to me why some folks here even have fournette on the brain? Why? If there wasvanything on this team thst gives me any modicum of hope its the running game with duke and crow. Im not a fournette hater but we've gotbthe worst defense in football....theres honestly not a position on the entire defense that is locked up. We talk about the front 7 mostly but jesus that secondary needs all kinds of help.

    Please for the love of god.....no more talk about RB's. Its almost giving the team absolutely no credit and thats such a slit ur wrist mentality. The running gamevis showing serious f'ing promise, now think what the running game could be if our o line gets addressed through FA or the draft.....

    tiamat63T tiamat63 wrote on last edited by

    @clevfan4life said:

    Can someone explain to me why some folks here even have fournette on the brain? Why?

    Because they think by drafting him we'll become the Cowboys over night. Nevermind having quality skill players, the best Oline in the NFL, a capable QB, and stable front office/coaching staff.

  • If Crowell was as good as Fournette... Duke Johnson would never see the field. 🙂

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by The Gipper

    @poeticg said:

    If Crowell was as good as Fournette... Duke Johnson would never see the field. 🙂

    You have just fallen in love again PoG.

    Look, my advocacy for Trubisky is the same as why I wanted Bosa last year: a top player filling a desperate team need.

    Purely logical.

    I see Fournette as no better than Dalvin Cook and some others.

    And this may be the LAST position of need on this team. So, so, so much more is needed on this team before we go looking for a running back.

  • tiamat63T tiamat63 wrote on last edited by

    Like I said in the other thread. The top player in a weak draft class.

    You're addressing the position for the sake of it at that point.

    Would you take Aaron Donald, or Blake Bortles??

  • Canton DawgC Canton Dawg wrote on last edited by

    MKC tweeted. . .

    #Browns Brown on Pryor and Collins: "Our plan on both of those players is to try to extend them without using the (franchise) tag''

  • Like I said in the other thread. The top player in a weak draft class.

    You're addressing the position for the sake of it at that point.

    Would you take Aaron Donald, or Blake Bortles??

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by

    @tiamat63 said:

    Like I said in the other thread. The top player in a weak draft class.

    You're addressing the position for the sake of it at that point.

    Would you take Aaron Donald, or Blake Bortles??

    Who are you talking to? PoG re Fournette?

  • W Westside Steve wrote on last edited by
  • 75% of that highlight tape is Fournette running through massive holes

    Mark OM Mark O wrote on last edited by

    @roycerolls said:

    75% of that highlight tape is Fournette running through massive holes

    Trent Richardson part 2.

  • Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by

    Fournette's injury issues eliminate him from early 1st consideration here...

    @westside-steve said:

    If we took the players that fall at #1, #14/15 and #33 I'd be semi-happy...

    • 1. Allen (DE/DT) - BAMA
    • 12. Thomas (DE)
    • 33. Kizer (QB)

    Thomas is a good player, but I can't see dounbling down at DE this high.

    So that #12 pick may be a tad problematic, but someone will fall to us should Trubs jump up... please be Foster... please be Foster...

    If no one does fall, then a modest trade down can still land us a quality CB or maybe OLB Tim Williams.

  • Fournette's injury issues eliminate him from early 1st consideration here...

    @westside-steve said:

    If we took the players that fall at #1, #14/15 and #33 I'd be semi-happy...

    • 1. Allen (DE/DT) - BAMA
    • 12. Thomas (DE)
    • 33. Kizer (QB)

    Thomas is a good player, but I can't see dounbling down at DE this high.

    So that #12 pick may be a tad problematic, but someone will fall to us should Trubs jump up... please be Foster... please be Foster...

    If no one does fall, then a modest trade down can still land us a quality CB or maybe OLB Tim Williams.

    gftChrisG gftChris wrote on last edited by

    @tour2ma said:

    Fournette's injury issues eliminate him from early 1st consideration here...

    If we took the players that fall at #1, #14/15 and #33 I'd be semi-happy...

    • 1. Allen (DE/DT) - BAMA
    • 12. Thomas (DE)
    • 33. Kizer (QB)

    Thomas is a good player, but I can't see dounbling down at DE this high.

    So that #12 pick may be a tad problematic, but someone will fall to us should Trubs jump up... please be Foster... please be Foster...

    If no one does fall, then a modest trade down can still land us a quality CB or maybe OLB Tim Williams.

    I have a feeling Malik Hooker will end up showing around that #12 spot, which would be lovely.

  • jiggins7919J jiggins7919 wrote on last edited by

    Yeah, no kidding about Hooker. He'd fill a huge need, and I heard someone say he's the best pure free safety prospect since Ed Reid. The problem with picking Hooker is...who do we get to be our damn QB? Can we really pass on Garrett? Do we really want another second or third round rookie QB prospect? Ugh....

  • Yeah, no kidding about Hooker. He'd fill a huge need, and I heard someone say he's the best pure free safety prospect since Ed Reid. The problem with picking Hooker is...who do we get to be our damn QB? Can we really pass on Garrett? Do we really want another second or third round rookie QB prospect? Ugh....

    gftChrisG gftChris wrote on last edited by

    @jiggins7919 said:

    Yeah, no kidding about Hooker. He'd fill a huge need, and I heard someone say he's the best pure free safety prospect since Ed Reid. The problem with picking Hooker is...who do we get to be our damn QB? Can we really pass on Garrett? Do we really want another second or third round rookie QB prospect? Ugh....

    If we don't take a QB with one of our first rounders, there's no point taking a QB to be honest.

    But imagine a draft looking like Myles Garrett, Malik Hooker, Adoree' Jackson, Pat Elflein...I could live with it.

  • Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by

    Hooker entering the picture helps push Foster down... 🙂 ... but I would not mind Hooker being the pick.

    QB-wise... I really like Kizer at #33.

  • T TexasAg1969 wrote on last edited by

    It's kinda fun having #1 and #12. 😁

  • Hooker entering the picture helps push Foster down... 🙂 ... but I would not mind Hooker being the pick.

    QB-wise... I really like Kizer at #33.

    W Westside Steve wrote on last edited by

    @tour2ma said:

    Hooker entering the picture helps push Foster down... 🙂 ... but I would not mind Hooker being the pick.

    QB-wise... I really like Kizer at #33.

    Notre Dame Homer?

    😉

    WSS

  • @tour2ma said:

    Hooker entering the picture helps push Foster down... 🙂 ... but I would not mind Hooker being the pick.

    QB-wise... I really like Kizer at #33.

    Notre Dame Homer?

    😉

    WSS

    Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by

    @westside-steve said:

    Notre Dame Homer?

    Far from it, Sir Kilts-a-Lot. I have never been a fan of the Domers... just like Kizer's chances enough to spend the 33 on him.

  • LogicIsForSquaresL LogicIsForSquares wrote on last edited by

    Word is that Josh Allen QB from Wyoming may be declaring. From what I watched of him, he has the physical tools but is another project.

  • @westside-steve said:

    Notre Dame Homer?

    Far from it, Sir Kilts-a-Lot. I have never been a fan of the Domers... just like Kizer's chances enough to spend the 33 on him.

    Tim Couch Pulls OutT Tim Couch Pulls Out wrote on last edited by

    @tour2ma said:

    Far from it, Sir Kilts-a-Lot. I have never been a fan of the Domers... just like Kizer's chances enough to spend the 33 on him.

    Kizer is going to make 31 teams upset they passed on him, IMO. Not a ND fan in the least, save for the fact that I'm Catholic so I have to be.

    His flaws are manageable and his strengths are franchise-material. There is something to be said for a guy who can drop dimes anywhere on the field while under pressure, which there is no denying Kizer can do. It's working out the kinks in the rest of his game that's the concern. Perfect pick for #33.

  • @tour2ma said:

    Far from it, Sir Kilts-a-Lot. I have never been a fan of the Domers... just like Kizer's chances enough to spend the 33 on him.

    Kizer is going to make 31 teams upset they passed on him, IMO. Not a ND fan in the least, save for the fact that I'm Catholic so I have to be.

    His flaws are manageable and his strengths are franchise-material. There is something to be said for a guy who can drop dimes anywhere on the field while under pressure, which there is no denying Kizer can do. It's working out the kinks in the rest of his game that's the concern. Perfect pick for #33.

    LogicIsForSquaresL LogicIsForSquares wrote on last edited by

    @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    Kizer is going to make 31 teams upset they passed on him, IMO. Not a ND fan in the least, save for the fact that I'm Catholic so I have to be.

    His flaws are manageable and his strengths are franchise-material. There is something to be said for a guy who can drop dimes anywhere on the field while under pressure, which there is no denying Kizer can do. It's working out the kinks in the rest of his game that's the concern. Perfect pick for #33.

    Do you think he will last till 33?

  • @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    Kizer is going to make 31 teams upset they passed on him, IMO. Not a ND fan in the least, save for the fact that I'm Catholic so I have to be.

    His flaws are manageable and his strengths are franchise-material. There is something to be said for a guy who can drop dimes anywhere on the field while under pressure, which there is no denying Kizer can do. It's working out the kinks in the rest of his game that's the concern. Perfect pick for #33.

    Do you think he will last till 33?

    R RoyceRolls wrote on last edited by

    @logicisforsquares said:

    Do you think he will last till 33?

    I don't think so, but it sure would be nice. The Browns picking up 2 difference makers on defense in the first, and a prospect like Kizer at the top of the second would be titties.

  • @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    Kizer is going to make 31 teams upset they passed on him, IMO. Not a ND fan in the least, save for the fact that I'm Catholic so I have to be.

    His flaws are manageable and his strengths are franchise-material. There is something to be said for a guy who can drop dimes anywhere on the field while under pressure, which there is no denying Kizer can do. It's working out the kinks in the rest of his game that's the concern. Perfect pick for #33.

    Do you think he will last till 33?

    Tim Couch Pulls OutT Tim Couch Pulls Out wrote on last edited by

    @logicisforsquares said:

    Do you think he will last till 33?

    I don't. I could see a team like Arizona trading out to #20 or later and nabbing him there. Especially if Peppers or another top 5 guy slides down to 11 and a team like NY or Oakland thinks they are one playmaker away from making a run.

    Kizer would fit in pretty well in an Arians offense.