Skip to content
The Browns Board
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. Draft Talk

Draft Talk

Locked The Browns Board
1.4k 63 38.7k
  • LogicIsForSquaresL LogicIsForSquares

    @wargograw said:

    How many hands do you need to count the number of 4.5 sack days in college football this season? 1?

    He got more than half of his total sacks for this year against a punching bag. If he shows out well against LSU then I will gladly apologize for understating the importance of the big game against a C-USA opponent.

    W wargograw wrote on
    #484

    @logicisforsquares said:

    He got more than half of his total sacks for this year against a punching bag. If he shows out well against LSU then I will gladly apologize for understating the importance of the big game against a C-USA opponent.

    And again, he was hurt. If it's so easy, why aren't any other elite prospects doing it all the time?

    LogicIsForSquaresL 1 Reply
  • C Clevfan4life

    We cant draft guys anymore that need more than half a season of development. We dont develop talent in cleveland. They have to come ready.

    sydS syd wrote on
    #485

    @clevfan4life said:

    We cant draft guys anymore that need more than half a season of development. We dont develop talent in cleveland. They have to come ready.

    oh like players that we draft and have them switch positions

    what I would like to see Draft in the position where we are at fucking tired of us trading around

  • W wargograw

    @logicisforsquares said:

    He got more than half of his total sacks for this year against a punching bag. If he shows out well against LSU then I will gladly apologize for understating the importance of the big game against a C-USA opponent.

    And again, he was hurt. If it's so easy, why aren't any other elite prospects doing it all the time?

    LogicIsForSquaresL LogicIsForSquares wrote on
    #486

    @wargograw said:

    And again, he was hurt. If it's so easy, why aren't any other elite prospects doing it all the time?

    Because they aren't having to stay in for the entire game against Devry?

    I already said I would gladly apologize if he looks good against LSU.

  • Canton DawgC Canton Dawg
    http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/browns-are-honing-in-on-tar-heels-qb-mitch-trubisky-in-the-2017-nfl-draft/
    LogicIsForSquaresL LogicIsForSquares wrote on
    #487

    @canton-dawg said:

    http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/browns-are-honing-in-on-tar-heels-qb-mitch-trubisky-in-the-2017-nfl-draft/

    I really hope they don't skip out on Allen to take Trubisky.

  • LogicIsForSquaresL LogicIsForSquares

    @canton-dawg said:

    http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/browns-are-honing-in-on-tar-heels-qb-mitch-trubisky-in-the-2017-nfl-draft/

    I really hope they don't skip out on Allen to take Trubisky.

    C Clevfan4life wrote on
    #488

    @logicisforsquares said:

    I really hope they don't skip out on Allen to take Trubisky.

    We might get both

  • C Clevfan4life

    @logicisforsquares said:

    I really hope they don't skip out on Allen to take Trubisky.

    We might get both

    LogicIsForSquaresL LogicIsForSquares wrote on
    #489

    @clevfan4life said:

    We might get both

    QBs always end up going in the top 3 and so far Trubisky seems to be the top of the QB class.

  • tiamat63T tiamat63 wrote on
    #490

    Watching Mitch vs Miami from this season...

    I'm starting to like Mitch. Please somebody book mark this for Cal's reference later.

    edit: I'd also like to say I"m in the market for a big, chain moving running back. Crow and Duke are decent enough but even being 220 I don't see the Crow as the punishing runner Hue wants

    for a power game between the tackles. I'm not saying get me a short yardage back, but somebody who in the middle rounds that can come in and smack a linebacker on an iso.

    LogicIsForSquaresL 1 Reply
  • MudflyM Mudfly wrote on
    #491

    There's not a position group on this team that doesnt need an upgrade....

    bpa bpa bpa

    flyingfooldougF LogicIsForSquaresL 2 Replies
  • tiamat63T tiamat63

    Watching Mitch vs Miami from this season...

    I'm starting to like Mitch. Please somebody book mark this for Cal's reference later.

    edit: I'd also like to say I"m in the market for a big, chain moving running back. Crow and Duke are decent enough but even being 220 I don't see the Crow as the punishing runner Hue wants

    for a power game between the tackles. I'm not saying get me a short yardage back, but somebody who in the middle rounds that can come in and smack a linebacker on an iso.

    LogicIsForSquaresL LogicIsForSquares wrote on
    #492

    @tiamat63 said:

    Watching Mitch vs Miami from this season...

    I'm starting to like Mitch. Please somebody book mark this for Cal's reference later.

    edit: I'd also like to say I"m in the market for a big, chain moving running back. Crow and Duke are decent enough but even being 220 I don't see the Crow as the punishing runner Hue wants

    for a power game between the tackles. I'm not saying get me a short yardage back, but somebody who in the middle rounds that can come in and smack a linebacker on an iso.

    James Conner from Pitt? Big fella who can catch the ball.

    gumby73G 1 Reply
  • MudflyM Mudfly

    There's not a position group on this team that doesnt need an upgrade....

    bpa bpa bpa

    flyingfooldougF flyingfooldoug wrote on
    #493

    @mudfly said:

    There's not a position group on this team that doesnt need an upgrade....

    bpa bpa bpa

    I'm all in on that one BUT, can they recognize pro talent? I'm thinking no.
  • MudflyM Mudfly

    There's not a position group on this team that doesnt need an upgrade....

    bpa bpa bpa

    LogicIsForSquaresL LogicIsForSquares wrote on
    #494

    @mudfly said:

    There's not a position group on this team that doesnt need an upgrade....

    bpa bpa bpa

    Pretty much. There are no shining groups on an 0-16 team.

  • jiggins7919J jiggins7919 wrote on
    #495

    Jason La Canfora (the eternal douche bag), just had a little article saying the Browns organization is completely in love with Mitch Trubisky. I don't have the link, but it won't be hard to find. Wouldn't surprise me if we took Mitch with the first pick, or whatever pick we have (it'll be the first, LOL). I want BPA...but who says it wouldn't be this guy? Mitch completed 11-20 passes for 184 yards and 3 tds with 0 picks this weekend against a bad Citadel team. Not great completion %, but otherwise he played well. He also had 55 yards rushing, so he's obviously somewhat mobile. You remember mobile, right?

  • gftChrisG gftChris wrote on
    #496

    Not seeing it with Mitch. At least, not seeing the kind of come in and turn this franchise right around kind of level of play you want from a number 1 pick.

    tiamat63T The GipperT 2 Replies
  • gftChrisG gftChris

    Not seeing it with Mitch. At least, not seeing the kind of come in and turn this franchise right around kind of level of play you want from a number 1 pick.

    tiamat63T tiamat63 wrote on
    #497

    @gftchris said:

    Not seeing it with Mitch. At least, not seeing the kind of come in and turn this franchise right around kind of level of play you want from a number 1 pick.

    There are very few #1overall picks in the last 20 years that had the ability to do that. The ones that did usually had some talent around them.

    Finished fine combing Mitch vs Miami. Physically - 6'3,225. Reminds me of Romo not only in his build, but his release. His Windup isn't 'slow' but it isn't super fast. His motion forward is compact and his elbow doesn't drop windmill style. Still his delivery is only 3/4 over the top. Has a strong arm, ball arrives with sauce to spare. Reasonably accurate with good consistency and solid footwork. Between his ears, makes pretty decisive decisions, times when he shows good anticipation and times when he waits for the receiver to get open but he isn't late with the ball. Mainly because it comes firing out of a shotgun. I actually see a QB working on progressions and showing the ability to hold the safety down the middle.

    Mitch had my curiosity, now he has my attention. More so than Kizer or Watson.

    edit: Maaaay have to reel it in from time to time. He has good enough touch but even the underneath stuff arrives hot. He's not Weeden by no means though.

    Better pocket presence, feet sliding and drifting away from pressure than any QB I've watched so far.

  • Canton DawgC Canton Dawg wrote on
    #498

    I like Mitch, but keeping it real we're more than just a QB away from being a competitive team.

    As Mud said, there isn't a spot on this team that could't stand an upgrade.

    Two things that will define you: Your determination when you have nothing. Your attitude when you have everything. - Mike McCartney
    The GipperT Tim Couch Pulls OutT 2 Replies
  • C calfoxwc

    Good stuff - do you think he's a second rounder? or late first?

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on
    #499

    @calfoxwc said:

    Good stuff - do you think he's a second rounder? or late first?

    I may take him with the #33 pick.

  • gftChrisG gftChris

    Not seeing it with Mitch. At least, not seeing the kind of come in and turn this franchise right around kind of level of play you want from a number 1 pick.

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on
    #500

    @gftchris said:

    Not seeing it with Mitch. At least, not seeing the kind of come in and turn this franchise right around kind of level of play you want from a number 1 pick.

    Again, I see a better prospect now than either Wentz or Goff were last year. If they were "good enough" for 1 and 2 overall....so is Tribisky.

    Beyond that....as a prime prospect, and as a local kid, this FO may say that the enthusiasm that will be engendered for him among the locals....along with his talent, will make him their top target. And why not.

    Bernie Kosar part two.

  • Canton DawgC Canton Dawg

    I like Mitch, but keeping it real we're more than just a QB away from being a competitive team.

    As Mud said, there isn't a spot on this team that could't stand an upgrade.

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on
    #501

    @canton-dawg said:

    I like Mitch, but keeping it real we're more than just a QB away from being a competitive team.

    As Mud said, there isn't a spot on this team that could't stand an upgrade.

    And primary among the need to upgrade is the QB. Kessler/McCown/RG/Hogan. Nyet. But, yea, the QB and 10 ten other spots.

    Two offensive linemen. Two DBs. Two pass rushers. An LB or two. We need about 8 first round picks.

  • C Clevfan4life wrote on
    #502

    I say go for it. Take trunisky and for the love of god dont put him out there till our line is fixed. Ideally id like to take trunisky and an OL in the first round. Defensively theres really no one out there that makes me drool so use the two first rounders on a stud OL and a qb.

  • C Clevfan4life

    I say go for it. Take trunisky and for the love of god dont put him out there till our line is fixed. Ideally id like to take trunisky and an OL in the first round. Defensively theres really no one out there that makes me drool so use the two first rounders on a stud OL and a qb.

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on
    #503

    @clevfan4life said:

    I say go for it. Take trunisky and for the love of god dont put him out there till our line is fixed. Ideally id like to take trunisky and an OL in the first round. Defensively theres really no one out there that makes me drool so use the two first rounders on a stud OL and a qb.

    I thought Allan and Garrett and others were supposed to give us a hard on....no?

    C 1 Reply
Log in to reply