Skip to content
The Browns Board
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. Camp Trubisky

Camp Trubisky

The Browns Board
548 53 13.4k
  • Z Zombo

    @the-gipper said:

    I have explained this. Because he is better than anyone that has come out in two years....and perhaps anyone that will come out in the next couple of years.

    And because you said it: the Browns need to quit fucking around and get a real QB. And this guy can be a real QB. Is he perfect? No....But then, since like 1970 there have been maybe10-12 better prospects that have come out better than him.

    Bradshaw, Elway, Bernie, Vinny, Peyton, Aikman, Newton, Luck, Winston

    He is a better prospect than the likes of Jeff George, Vick, Plunket, Stafford, Palmer, Smith, Couch, Bartkowski and a number of others.

    He seems very raw with a rocket arm to me, but I will keep an open mind.

    Zombo

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on
    #461

    Zombo said:

    He seems very raw with a rocket arm to me, but I will keep an open mind.

    Zombo

    Yea, not saying he is ready immediately to step in and win games. Give him half a year to sit and learn. Its not like the Browns will likely be ready to win big at the beginning of next year. And, Like with the Browns, he does not have that good of a team around him. In games I saw this year the NC defense was pretty suckass.

  • alporciniA alporcini wrote on
    #462

    Think he'll be around when we pick at the top of the second?

    The GipperT 1 Reply
  • Z Zombo

    #90 for Stanford though ... he's ready for primetime.

    Zombo

    gumby73G gumby73 wrote on
    #463

    Zombo said:

    #90 for Stanford though ... he's ready for primetime.

    Zombo

    DE Soloman Thomas..Dudes got guns..7 tackles, 1 GW Sack but nobody wanted to block him either..Tia, if u get time. U the man on D tape Monsters..Edit--As for Mitch, I thought he played well behind a Bad OL that got beat up just as bad against a good Virginia Tech D Front..Tuff. yes raw, but got that AFCN look moving in pocket with eyes down field

    Browns & Buffett: Got to go fishin, Down to rock bottom again, with just a few Friends
  • B beare wrote on
    #464

    Garnett and trubinsky both had blah bowl games with that said id love to see trubinsky drop to 2nd rd grab him there. The biggest prob i see if we draft a qb who is gonna mentor him rg3 that would never work.

    The GipperT 1 Reply
  • flyingfooldougF flyingfooldoug wrote on
    #465

    If we pass, then he will be with the Jets

    The GipperT 1 Reply
  • alporciniA alporcini

    Think he'll be around when we pick at the top of the second?

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on
    #466

    @alporcini said:

    Think he'll be around when we pick at the top of the second?

    Why would you think anything so foolishly. If the Browns don't take him #1, he will go to the Bears/Jets/49ers likely in the Top 5.

    MudflyM gumby73G 2 Replies
  • B beare

    Garnett and trubinsky both had blah bowl games with that said id love to see trubinsky drop to 2nd rd grab him there. The biggest prob i see if we draft a qb who is gonna mentor him rg3 that would never work.

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on
    #467

    @beare said:

    Garnett and trubinsky both had blah bowl games with that said id love to see trubinsky drop to 2nd rd grab him there. The biggest prob i see if we draft a qb who is gonna mentor him rg3 that would never work.

    He may not drop past #2 if we don't take him.

    What the fuck is wrong with you people saying stupid shit like "I hope/think he would drop to round 2". He isn't fucking dropping to past the Top 1,2,3.

  • flyingfooldougF flyingfooldoug

    If we pass, then he will be with the Jets

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on
    #468

    @flyingfooldoug said:

    If we pass, then he will be with the Jets

    Or the 49ers or the Bears.

    Hello people. Wake up!! He is better than the guys that went #1 and #2 overall last year.

  • The GipperT The Gipper wrote on
    #469

    http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000766256/article/scout-browns-should-draft-mitch-trubisky-no-1-overall

  • The GipperT The Gipper

    @alporcini said:

    Think he'll be around when we pick at the top of the second?

    Why would you think anything so foolishly. If the Browns don't take him #1, he will go to the Bears/Jets/49ers likely in the Top 5.

    MudflyM Mudfly wrote on
    #470

    @the-gipper said:

    Why would you think anything so foolishly. If the Browns don't take him #1, he will go to the Bears/Jets/49ers likely in the Top 5.

    sure changed your tune from last draft, where you were screaming NOT to draft a QB high(just because he's the highest rated QB in the draft) and to, instead, draft the highest rated player(your guy was Bosa).....you said it over and over and over...

    But, this year...we should draft a QB first, JUST because he's the highest QB(even though he's not the highest rated player)?

    contradiction abounds

    The GipperT 1 Reply
  • T Taco918 wrote on
    #471

    I think Gipper might have a crush.

    The GipperT 1 Reply
  • MudflyM Mudfly wrote on
    #472

    To me....this draft feels more like 07...or 10.....or 13.....where there just isnt a good enough prospect to bet the house on.....

    They spent a 3rd round pick, just this past draft, AND signed a QB for 2yrs.....which tells me they weren't planning on drafting one high this year.....and IF they were.....whew, more bad choices....

    gumby73G 1 Reply
  • The GipperT The Gipper

    @alporcini said:

    Think he'll be around when we pick at the top of the second?

    Why would you think anything so foolishly. If the Browns don't take him #1, he will go to the Bears/Jets/49ers likely in the Top 5.

    gumby73G gumby73 wrote on
    #473

    @the-gipper said:

    Why would you think anything so foolishly. If the Browns don't take him #1, he will go to the Bears/Jets/49ers likely in the Top 5.

    Your properly so right Here

    @the-gipper said:

    Hello people. Wake up!! He is better than the guys that went #1 and #2 overall last year.

    Now the so called experts won't agree here.. but not many HC's keep a job without one either...#Huegotabelieve

    Browns & Buffett: Got to go fishin, Down to rock bottom again, with just a few Friends
  • gumby73G gumby73

    @the-gipper said:

    Why would you think anything so foolishly. If the Browns don't take him #1, he will go to the Bears/Jets/49ers likely in the Top 5.

    Your properly so right Here

    @the-gipper said:

    Hello people. Wake up!! He is better than the guys that went #1 and #2 overall last year.

    Now the so called experts won't agree here.. but not many HC's keep a job without one either...#Huegotabelieve

    MudflyM Mudfly wrote on
    #474

    @gumby73 said:

    Now the so called experts won't agree here.. but not many HC's keep a job without one either...#Huegotabelieve

    and what happens to FO's who use the first pick on project QB's?.....cause if he flames out, oh my......

    You thought the screaming was loud with Weeden and Johnny at 22?....wait till it's #1.....

    The GipperT 1 Reply
  • MudflyM Mudfly

    @the-gipper said:

    Why would you think anything so foolishly. If the Browns don't take him #1, he will go to the Bears/Jets/49ers likely in the Top 5.

    sure changed your tune from last draft, where you were screaming NOT to draft a QB high(just because he's the highest rated QB in the draft) and to, instead, draft the highest rated player(your guy was Bosa).....you said it over and over and over...

    But, this year...we should draft a QB first, JUST because he's the highest QB(even though he's not the highest rated player)?

    contradiction abounds

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on
    #475

    @mudfly said:

    sure changed your tune from last draft, where you were screaming NOT to draft a QB high(just because he's the highest rated QB in the draft) and to, instead, draft the highest rated player(your guy was Bosa).....you said it over and over and over...

    But, this year...we should draft a QB first, JUST because he's the highest QB(even though he's not the highest rated player)?

    contradiction abounds

    There is no change of tune......I didn't believe in the talents of those guys.and I thought we had much better options. I thought we could get Lynch toward the middle of round one. And we could have.

    I think Trubisky is much better than Goff or Wentz.

    As for being the highest rated, I was for Bosa last year....who I think was still a far better prospect than Allen or Garrett.

  • MudflyM Mudfly

    @gumby73 said:

    Now the so called experts won't agree here.. but not many HC's keep a job without one either...#Huegotabelieve

    and what happens to FO's who use the first pick on project QB's?.....cause if he flames out, oh my......

    You thought the screaming was loud with Weeden and Johnny at 22?....wait till it's #1.....

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on
    #476

    @mudfly said:

    and what happens to FO's who use the first pick on project QB's?.....cause if he flames out, oh my......

    You thought the screaming was loud with Weeden and Johnny at 22?....wait till it's #1.....

    Both Goff and Wentz are far more "project QBs" than Trubisky is.

    I am not saying a high pick QB can't flame out....or that this guy couldn't either. I just think he has "it" that no Joey Harrington or Sam Bradford or some of these high picks had.

  • T Taco918

    I think Gipper might have a crush.

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on
    #477

    @taco918 said:

    I think Gipper might have a crush.

    Or, more likely, I am just smarter than the rest of you. That's really more like it.

  • MudflyM Mudfly

    To me....this draft feels more like 07...or 10.....or 13.....where there just isnt a good enough prospect to bet the house on.....

    They spent a 3rd round pick, just this past draft, AND signed a QB for 2yrs.....which tells me they weren't planning on drafting one high this year.....and IF they were.....whew, more bad choices....

    gumby73G gumby73 wrote on
    #478

    @mudfly said:

    To me....this draft feels more like 07...or 10.....or 13.....where there just isnt a good enough prospect to bet the house on.....

    They spent a 3rd round pick, just this past draft, AND signed a QB for 2yrs.....which tells me they weren't planning on drafting one high this year.....and IF they were.....whew, more bad choices....

    @mudfly said:

    and what happens to FO's who use the first pick on project QB's?.....cause if he flames out, oh my......

    You thought the screaming was loud with Weeden and Johnny at 22?....wait till it's #1.....

    Draft Player vs Draft Player I got Mitch just outside of #15. imo we got Kess & Hogan with no field Generals left which we deal for a FA QB not named 3. but, That's not sticking to "the plan". Hue ain't played HC Russian roulette with jimmy yet, but a 3rd rook at QB? now that's a ballzie HC or a fired one

    Browns & Buffett: Got to go fishin, Down to rock bottom again, with just a few Friends
  • tiamat63T tiamat63 wrote on
    #479

    Did some good things. Did some NOT so good things. I can't get on board with a #1 overall selection though.

    Bob806B 1 Reply
  • Tim Couch Pulls OutT Tim Couch Pulls Out wrote on
    #480

    Gippers boner is solely because he's a Cleveland-ish guy. Guaranteed he wouldn't give a fuck otherwise if the guy was from anywhere else. He's probably only watched one ESPN highlight reel and declared him to be "better than anyone from the last two years".

    Guaranteed he ends up with a lower draft profile score than Winston, Goff and probably Mariota too. Possibly even Bortles and Wentz.

    I'm awesome, and I fuck dolphins. Ghoolie 12/2/2012: I have absolutely no skills, training or pride
    The GipperT 1 Reply
Log in to reply