Why the browns suck once again.... what do they do
-
-
I feel like there could be at least a comma in there somewhere.
-
I found us a good blocker for Joe's replacement. He certainly knows how to lead around the left edge. 1st Down!!
-
Calfox it's fan boys like you that can't face reality and see the problem you deflect by criticizing spelling instead of the message the line is pathetic and they do need to clean house. We have had 5 different qbs this year all of which have been running for there life and been injured the d is on the field the whole game they can't pass block or make a hole to run through. As far as Hayden goes he still good but has lost a step crow can't tell he hit in the backfield before he gets a chance to run the only brite spot is Pryor and that's will be short lived team will double team him and the qbs can't get the ball to anyone else except in junk time now calfox if you would like to make an argument instead of deflecting I would love to hear it
Calfox it's fan boys like you that can't face reality and see the problem you deflect by criticizing spelling instead of the message the line is pathetic and they do need to clean house. We have had 5 different qbs this year all of which have been running for there life and been injured the d is on the field the whole game they can't pass block or make a hole to run through. As far as Hayden goes he still good but has lost a step crow can't tell he hit in the backfield before he gets a chance to run the only brite spot is Pryor and that's will be short lived team will double team him and the qbs can't get the ball to anyone else except in junk time now calfox if you would like to make an argument instead of deflecting I would love to hear it
You place every blame on the O Line.. That may be fair. They lost Schwartz and Mack to FA, they lost Bitonio to injury. The backups that have stepped are not up to par. The rookies they have are just learning their way. Their starting center sucks swamp water and needs to be replaced. We get that.
But...here is the future: Bito will be back, Greco will be back. The Browns will draft an OL high...and another lower. Also, hopefully Drango/Coleman improve. I see a plan in place for the OL. But we still need that franchise QB at #1.
I don't see these guys doing what the team did to Tim Couch: put him out there with crap in front of him his whole tenure here.
In fact, I see the one position they may go after in FA being the OL. An Eric Steinbach like pickup. A somewhat proven commodity.
That is the OL plan as I see it.
So get a QB that can make things work behind that plan.
-
Totally reasonable way to see it Gip. But the real question still lies with how this weird FO sees it. What IS their plan?
-
If you have watched the browns the past two years you know they suck. Many of the talking heads say they need a qb. Well that could be the dumbest thing I have ever heard. The problem is the O-line period. It's why they can't run the ball it's why our defense gets blasted especially in the second half and why we can't keep a qb. The genus of the front office to keep Joe Thomas is pathetic not trading him while he was worth something was stupid his play has diminished and should be gone along with the rest of the line get rid of them all and start new bring guys in the want to play and not looking for there last check before they retire. If you look at time of possession and if I was a defensive play I'd be whooping some o-line ass they are a pathetic bunch and should be ashamed to call themselves professionals
Do you even watch what's happening on the o-line?
Calfox it's fan boys like you that can't face reality and see the problem you deflect by criticizing spelling instead of the message the line is pathetic and they do need to clean house. We have had 5 different qbs this year all of which have been running for there life and been injured the d is on the field the whole game they can't pass block or make a hole to run through. As far as Hayden goes he still good but has lost a step crow can't tell he hit in the backfield before he gets a chance to run the only brite spot is Pryor and that's will be short lived team will double team him and the qbs can't get the ball to anyone else except in junk time now calfox if you would like to make an argument instead of deflecting I would love to hear it
Give it a rest. Joe Thomas isn't the reason our qbs are getting killed on a regular basis. It's lack of depth (for one thing- Bitonio getting hurt was a killer) and with Greko getting hurt, Griffin better up his life insurance policy. Now if you want to replace Erving- go to the head of the class. Us guys who actually watch what the line is doing have wanted him benched forever.
Give it a rest. Joe Thomas isn't the reason our qbs are getting killed on a regular basis. It's lack of depth (for one thing- Bitonio getting hurt was a killer) and with Greko getting hurt, Griffin better up his life insurance policy. Now if you want to replace Erving- go to the head of the class. Us guys who actually watch what the line is doing have wanted him benched forever.And I should add this thought that just popped into my head. Opposing defenses don't even bother to attack Joe Thomas. Why should they? Of late, teams have just been putting a bum opposite Joe to keep him occupied, and attack anywhere and everywhere else.
-
Totally reasonable way to see it Gip. But the real question still lies with how this weird FO sees it. What IS their plan?
Totally reasonable way to see it Gip. But the real question still lies with how this weird FO sees it. What IS their plan?
Well, in theory their plan is to draft the best players they can get.
But as we know from Browns drafts from Christmases past, the best laid plans aft gang aglay.
-
-
Give it a rest. Joe Thomas isn't the reason our qbs are getting killed on a regular basis. It's lack of depth (for one thing- Bitonio getting hurt was a killer) and with Greko getting hurt, Griffin better up his life insurance policy. Now if you want to replace Erving- go to the head of the class. Us guys who actually watch what the line is doing have wanted him benched forever.
And I should add this thought that just popped into my head. Opposing defenses don't even bother to attack Joe Thomas. Why should they? Of late, teams have just been putting a bum opposite Joe to keep him occupied, and attack anywhere and everywhere else.
And I should add this thought that just popped into my head. Opposing defenses don't even bother to attack Joe Thomas. Why should they? Of late, teams have just been putting a bum opposite Joe to keep him occupied, and attack anywhere and everywhere else.
Clearly we need to start moving Joe around to keep Defenses guessing...
-
Well there is no answer at qb in the draft the only guy out there is garoppolo and we have a good trading relationship with New England but the line needs addressed first and foremost otherwise there is no sense in getting a qb draft at center gaurd and tackle trade Thomas to the pats and a late round pick for garoppolo
-
Well there is no answer at qb in the draft the only guy out there is garoppolo and we have a good trading relationship with New England but the line needs addressed first and foremost otherwise there is no sense in getting a qb draft at center gaurd and tackle trade Thomas to the pats and a late round pick for garoppolo
Well there is no answer at qb in the draft the only guy out there is garoppolo and we have a good trading relationship with New England but the line needs addressed first and foremost otherwise there is no sense in getting a qb draft at center gaurd and tackle trade Thomas to the pats and a late round pick for garoppolo
Two reasons why not Jimmy G. Mallett and Cassell. How did those two work out when they went to other teams? Belichick isn't going to trade his QBOTF with a soon to be 40 year old Tom Brady manning the position. Trade Jimmy and keep Jacoby Brissett? Bill's smart enough to know Tom isn't going to be playing forever. Of course, if he can sucker some team into giving up a first round pick, I'm sure he'll listen.
The only reason we got Collins from the Pats is they didn't want to (or couldn't) come up with enough cash to keep him happy. The Browns have more cap room (by far) than any other team in the NFL. Bill has rarely let someone go who went on to excel with another team.
If you know anything at all about relative value to a team, left tackle (that's Joe) ranks only behind QB and pass rusher. It's why left tackles get drafted in the first round every year like clockwork. Teams don't like seeing their franchise quarterbacks getting killed. He can still probably play at his usual pro bowl level for a couple more years. If we're taking a qb either by trade or draft- a great blindside protector (like Thomas) is mandatory.
-
maybe start with all the cap room jimmy has.....
i'm worried about resigning pryor and collins next year. I'm willing to bet they both want the maximum, especially since pryors agent is rosenhaus. Is pryor really worth Julio Jones type money?
worse case, we let both go, and have even more cap room. then "build through the draft". Looking at that, it'll take 3-5 years to get a quality team. Jimmy will probably stay 40 million under the cap each year, and if his plan goes accordingly, by year 4 or 5, we'll be in the playoffs and he'll be paying the minimum. At worst, if we don't hit on the next two drafts, we go 1-15 and then 3-13 in the respective years and then he cans everyone, of course, that's the worst case scenario. Best case scenario is that we draft some studs, sign some free agents, and don't overpay for some of the people that we have. T Pryor doesn't deserve 50 or 60 million dollars in a multi year deal...... But Ricardo Louis and Cam Erving aren't talented enough to be on an NFL football team. We've gotta find some kind of balance. Call the "strategy" what you want, but Jimmy's being a cheapass.
-
I'm talking about drafting a star asskicking SS, ILB, DE, C, OG/OT, CB...
and QB. and WR. and RB. and TE. and RT. and RG. and LG. and LT. and K. and P. and DL. and DL. and MLB. and OLB. and..............scouts that can evaluate talent. and GMs who aren't blind and dumb. and HCs that can find a way to win. and................
and QB. and WR. and RB. and TE. and RT. and RG. and LG. and LT. and K. and P. and DL. and DL. and MLB. and OLB. and..............scouts that can evaluate talent. and GMs who aren't blind and dumb. and HCs that can find a way to win. and................
I really like the part about scouts that can evaluate talent.
-
I'm talking about drafting a star asskicking SS, ILB, DE, C, OG/OT, CB...
and QB. and WR. and RB. and TE. and RT. and RG. and LG. and LT. and K. and P. and DL. and DL. and MLB. and OLB. and..............scouts that can evaluate talent. and GMs who aren't blind and dumb. and HCs that can find a way to win. and................
and QB. and WR. and RB. and TE. and RT. and RG. and LG. and LT. and K. and P. and DL. and DL. and MLB. and OLB. and..............scouts that can evaluate talent. and GMs who aren't blind and dumb. and HCs that can find a way to win. and................
Not to mention this newfangled machine.
-
and QB. and WR. and RB. and TE. and RT. and RG. and LG. and LT. and K. and P. and DL. and DL. and MLB. and OLB. and..............scouts that can evaluate talent. and GMs who aren't blind and dumb. and HCs that can find a way to win. and................
Not to mention this newfangled machine.
Our next QB?Not to mention this newfangled machine.
-
The fact that both Cassell and Mallet haven't performed well isn't lost on me. If we trade for Garoppolo, it would DEFINITELY be scary, but no more worrisome than drafting Kizer, Mitch, or Watson, right? We obviously need a QB, but a part of me says that it doesn't matter who our QB is if we can't protect him or provide him with ANY kind of a running game. What would you guys think if we used our first four picks (2 first round, 2 second round) on strengthening OTHER parts of our team, and we didn't address QB at all? We go Garrett, CB, OL, OL. We then start Kessler, and use RG III or Josh as the backup. A part of me says I'd throw myself off a cliff, the other says, "Well, let's get our foundation more solid, and THEN get our QB."
I don't know...I really just don't. We need so much.
-
The fact that both Cassell and Mallet haven't performed well isn't lost on me. If we trade for Garoppolo, it would DEFINITELY be scary, but no more worrisome than drafting Kizer, Mitch, or Watson, right? We obviously need a QB, but a part of me says that it doesn't matter who our QB is if we can't protect him or provide him with ANY kind of a running game. What would you guys think if we used our first four picks (2 first round, 2 second round) on strengthening OTHER parts of our team, and we didn't address QB at all? We go Garrett, CB, OL, OL. We then start Kessler, and use RG III or Josh as the backup. A part of me says I'd throw myself off a cliff, the other says, "Well, let's get our foundation more solid, and THEN get our QB."
I don't know...I really just don't. We need so much.
The fact that both Cassell and Mallet haven't performed well isn't lost on me. If we trade for Garoppolo, it would DEFINITELY be scary, but no more worrisome than drafting Kizer, Mitch, or Watson, right? We obviously need a QB, but a part of me says that it doesn't matter who our QB is if we can't protect him or provide him with ANY kind of a running game. What would you guys think if we used our first four picks (2 first round, 2 second round) on strengthening OTHER parts of our team, and we didn't address QB at all? We go Garrett, CB, OL, OL. We then start Kessler, and use RG III or Josh as the backup. A part of me says I'd throw myself off a cliff, the other says, "Well, let's get our foundation more solid, and THEN get our QB."
I don't know...I really just don't. We need so much.
i'd gladly trade myles garrett for jimmy g, call me crazy but that's a QB you can build around.
-
maybe start with all the cap room jimmy has.....
i'm worried about resigning pryor and collins next year. I'm willing to bet they both want the maximum, especially since pryors agent is rosenhaus. Is pryor really worth Julio Jones type money?
worse case, we let both go, and have even more cap room. then "build through the draft". Looking at that, it'll take 3-5 years to get a quality team. Jimmy will probably stay 40 million under the cap each year, and if his plan goes accordingly, by year 4 or 5, we'll be in the playoffs and he'll be paying the minimum. At worst, if we don't hit on the next two drafts, we go 1-15 and then 3-13 in the respective years and then he cans everyone, of course, that's the worst case scenario. Best case scenario is that we draft some studs, sign some free agents, and don't overpay for some of the people that we have. T Pryor doesn't deserve 50 or 60 million dollars in a multi year deal...... But Ricardo Louis and Cam Erving aren't talented enough to be on an NFL football team. We've gotta find some kind of balance. Call the "strategy" what you want, but Jimmy's being a cheapass.
maybe start with all the cap room jimmy has.....
i'm worried about resigning pryor and collins next year. I'm willing to bet they both want the maximum, especially since pryors agent is rosenhaus. Is pryor really worth Julio Jones type money?
Best case scenario is that we draft some studs, sign some free agents, and don't overpay for some of the people that we have. T Pryor doesn't deserve 50 or 60 million dollars in a multi year deal.....
Jimmy's being a cheapass.
First, I don't buy the "cheap-ass" bit... when the time comes, Jimmah will open his wallet for the team he'll put on the field. You just have to look at what he's paying players and coaches to no longer be here to see that... not to mention the stadium improvements he's funded.
On the other hand I share your resign concerns... especially with Collins. Unless he's a total mercenary at heart, then I think he'll take less to go to a contender. It's just hard for me to see a former Patriot being satisfied to be part of a multi-year rebuild. On the other hand he may be one of those whose ego would embrace being a centerpiece of a rebuild.
Pryor on the other hand... there are ways to pay potential to stick around. He's 17th in YPG, so he's on the cusp of joining the best in the game. In 2018 the 17th highest paid WR will pull down ~$8mm. A base in that area as the foundation of an incentive laden deal in its first years combined with back-end, mutual-option years, just might get it done. Including some extra-healthy guaranteed $$$ and injury insurance would also help. Then a $40mm-ish deal has $60mm potential if he turns out to be worth "it".
But if all else fails the WSH route with Cousins is there... tag him. It overpays TP for another one-year look, but identifying his value is our reward.
Finally... least we end on an agreeable high note... once you open the wallet for FAs, who are almost always "overpaid", then those with whom you bargained hard tend to say, "Hey! Where was mine?"
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
Well there is no answer at qb in the draft the only guy out there is garoppolo and we have a good trading relationship with New England but the line needs addressed first and foremost otherwise there is no sense in getting a qb draft at center gaurd and tackle trade Thomas to the pats and a late round pick for garoppolo
Two reasons why not Jimmy G. Mallett and Cassell. How did those two work out when they went to other teams? Belichick isn't going to trade his QBOTF with a soon to be 40 year old Tom Brady manning the position. Trade Jimmy and keep Jacoby Brissett? Bill's smart enough to know Tom isn't going to be playing forever. Of course, if he can sucker some team into giving up a first round pick, I'm sure he'll listen.
The only reason we got Collins from the Pats is they didn't want to (or couldn't) come up with enough cash to keep him happy. The Browns have more cap room (by far) than any other team in the NFL. Bill has rarely let someone go who went on to excel with another team.
If you know anything at all about relative value to a team, left tackle (that's Joe) ranks only behind QB and pass rusher. It's why left tackles get drafted in the first round every year like clockwork. Teams don't like seeing their franchise quarterbacks getting killed. He can still probably play at his usual pro bowl level for a couple more years. If we're taking a qb either by trade or draft- a great blindside protector (like Thomas) is mandatory.
Two reasons why not Jimmy G. Mallett and Cassell. How did those two work out when they went to other teams? Belichick isn't going to trade his QBOTF with a soon to be 40 year old Tom Brady manning the position. Trade Jimmy and keep Jacoby Brissett? Bill's smart enough to know Tom isn't going to be playing forever. Of course, if he can sucker some team into giving up a first round pick, I'm sure he'll listen.
The only reason we got Collins from the Pats is they didn't want to (or couldn't) come up with enough cash to keep him happy. The Browns have more cap room (by far) than any other team in the NFL. Bill has rarely let someone go who went on to excel with another team.
If you know anything at all about relative value to a team, left tackle (that's Joe) ranks only behind QB and pass rusher. It's why left tackles get drafted in the first round every year like clockwork. Teams don't like seeing their franchise quarterbacks getting killed. He can still probably play at his usual pro bowl level for a couple more years. If we're taking a qb either by trade or draft- a great blindside protector (like Thomas) is mandatory.
Last bit earned you a "+1".
Collins isn't there because he was not "doing his job" and analytics said his production could be replaced. Likely not by one player, but his production could be replaced (think Moneyball scene where Billy is meeting with his scouts and trying to get them to "think right").
As for Garoppolo... Bill B. would trade his son for the right price. Bill has created the market for his past back-ups. I think he's done it again.. in no small part with an assist from Goodell. Also bear in mind that 2017 is the last year of Jimmy's rookie deal... and Tom Terrific will play forever...
I really like the part about scouts that can evaluate talent.
lol... yeah, that'd help.
Really Sashi ought to just read this board. Someone here is right about every player. Of course that "someone" tends to vary from player to player. But the history is here to apply analytics and determine posters' "batting averages"...
Could pay us by flying us on Jimmah's jet to join him in his owner's box... helluvalot cheaper than his scout payroll... and maybe with better results.
-
maybe start with all the cap room jimmy has.....
i'm worried about resigning pryor and collins next year. I'm willing to bet they both want the maximum, especially since pryors agent is rosenhaus. Is pryor really worth Julio Jones type money?
Best case scenario is that we draft some studs, sign some free agents, and don't overpay for some of the people that we have. T Pryor doesn't deserve 50 or 60 million dollars in a multi year deal.....
Jimmy's being a cheapass.
First, I don't buy the "cheap-ass" bit... when the time comes, Jimmah will open his wallet for the team he'll put on the field. You just have to look at what he's paying players and coaches to no longer be here to see that... not to mention the stadium improvements he's funded.
On the other hand I share your resign concerns... especially with Collins. Unless he's a total mercenary at heart, then I think he'll take less to go to a contender. It's just hard for me to see a former Patriot being satisfied to be part of a multi-year rebuild. On the other hand he may be one of those whose ego would embrace being a centerpiece of a rebuild.
Pryor on the other hand... there are ways to pay potential to stick around. He's 17th in YPG, so he's on the cusp of joining the best in the game. In 2018 the 17th highest paid WR will pull down ~$8mm. A base in that area as the foundation of an incentive laden deal in its first years combined with back-end, mutual-option years, just might get it done. Including some extra-healthy guaranteed $$$ and injury insurance would also help. Then a $40mm-ish deal has $60mm potential if he turns out to be worth "it".
But if all else fails the WSH route with Cousins is there... tag him. It overpays TP for another one-year look, but identifying his value is our reward.
Finally... least we end on an agreeable high note... once you open the wallet for FAs, who are almost always "overpaid", then those with whom you bargained hard tend to say, "Hey! Where was mine?"
On the other hand I share your resign concerns... especially with Collins. Unless he's a total mercenary at heart, then I think he'll take less to go to a contender. It's just hard for me to see a former Patriot being satisfied to be part of a multi-year rebuild. On the other hand he may be one of those whose ego would embrace being a centerpiece of a rebuild.
I dont think Jimmah is cheap either.....in fact....I think he'd spend every penny if he knew we'd win....heck, he had the highest paid, yet worst, defense in the league.....just a year ago.....
And....Im thinking Collins could easily be a mercenary.....in fact, dude doesnt even like football.....says he's not a fan and never has been.....just happens to be a good player....
So, Im thinking he's a very unique character....one who doesnt care that much about wins, etc....but still always plays to win....
I think we can sign him.....cause even when he loses, he still sleeps well......
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login