Skip to content

Atlanta Falcons

The Browns Board
60 20 2.7k
  • @boo-radley said:

    The burden of proof is on you.

    No, I am the judge, remember? You must convince me. I will be lenient with you however. Rather than proof beyond a reasonable doubt, you will only be required to show clear and convincing proof that you are not going to act like a Steelerfanfag.

    (those are two different standards).

    The intern/probation officer that I subcontracted from Zombo will have her eyes on you.

    rBVaGVWfcoiAFD2KAAHGVXTVygA945.jpg

  • @boo-radley said:

    Ok, there is no post. Never was one to begin with.

    And that's why you put Gipski on ignore... you can spend hours arguing about meaningless shit without hope of learning a goddamn thing about football.

  • @boo-radley said:

    Ok, there is no post. Never was one to begin with.

    There was, I just can't find it. Others have seen it.

    Bottom line: don't be a dumbass

    Or...do you actually object to having those boobs staring you in the face?

  • @the-gipper said:

    @boo-radley said:

    People hate the Patriots because they win.....and cheat sometimes to do it.

    Just like Ohio State. Lots of haters because they win and are never that far from another championship trophy.

    You sound a Steeler fan.

    @boo-radley said:

    It does not matter what you want.

    Destiny is destiny.

    No shit Sherlock. It doesn't matter what you want either.

    You sound a Steeler fan.

    You say you are a Pats fan? I didn't know that Pats fans were as stupid as Steeler fans.

    EVERY motherfucker on the planet thinks, no...knows that the Pats have been cheaters. Only Pats fans are in denial about that.

    Congratulations, you have just earned the silver medal in the "Stupid Fans of the NFL" Steeplechase for New England fans. You ran a great anchor leg.

    I guess I dont see the bias.

    You wouldn't now would you, silver medalist?

    If Brady and Belichick were in Cleveland that town would be the center of the NFL universe.

    There is the entire thing. I chastised you for being in denial about the Patriots allegations of cheating..and about the denial of the east coast bias . Very Steeler fanish. very Steeler fan like. But, by all means, feel free to take your cues from the pluperfect pedantic pricks around here.

  • @boo-radley said:

    Ok, there is no post. Never was one to begin with.

    And that's why you put Gipski on ignore... you can spend hours arguing about meaningless shit without hope of learning a goddamn thing about football.

    @tour2ma said:

    And that's why you put Gipski on ignore... you can spend hours arguing about meaningless shit without hope of learning a goddamn thing about football.

    The next Substantive thing I learn about football from you will be the first thing. You give your opinions and biases on things....just like the rest of us (those provide no insight). You give links to or copy what others have written, just like the rest of us. (we learn from what those others have done).

    The difference is that I don't falsely pretend to be some expert on how the game of football is played, or get all menstrual if you make a mistake of fact about something that is not all that significant, like whether a particular QB started the first game of his rookie season...or not. You know, its really not all that big of a deal.

  • @boo-radley said:

    I would rather not.

    It's your time...

    You will enjoy his trivia threads.

  • @boo-radley said:

    I honestly did not see your responses because notifications were turned off. I checked back a time or two and didnt see a thing.

    I stand by my prediction that we will see destiny when Goodell is handing Brady the Lombardi. I stand by recognizing all the whiners complaining about the Patriots because they win. Its ridiculous. If what people like you say is true, then Belichick and Brady wont be in the HOF. Both will be 1st ballot in like flint inductees. I stand by not believing in any coastal bias. I watched the Marty Browns just like the rest of the country because they were a model program that won. The St Louis Rams were the pinnacle of NFL teams. Broncos, Colts, Packers, Cowboys, the only coasts near any of these teams are from lakes. They all draw national attention.

    I have never seen someone so butt hurt over nothing.

    You are missing the point. You may be in denial...but the fact is that the rest of the NFL....owners/GMs etc. and the NFL front office see the Patriots as a cheater organization. Do you think that the million dollar fine, the loss of a first round draft choice and the 4 game suspension of Brady were just because of some deflated balls. Hell no. It was the other 31 owners of the NFL who have their problems with the way the Pats do business, (Not I). As for the east coast bias, that is a tenebrous thing, but the rest of the country feels it and is aware of it.

    It is really no sweat off my back. But, if you do want to live in denial about things, and act like a Steeler fan, then expect to be called out over it.

  • Gipski

    And here is Tour's entire problem with me. I don't fall in line and goosestep to his marching orders about what the Browns should do in the draft. I think Mitch Trubisky (ergo the ski) is the best player the Browns could take in this draft. He does not think that. Because I think differently from him his ovaries apparently get all swollen over it. He is intolerant of nonconforming opinions.

  • @boo-radley said:

    I dont know how to help you.

    Preparation H? Have you tried it yet?

    It must be hell sitting all day in so much pain and discomfort. My heart goes out to you.

    So, is that a tacit admission that you are still in denial about the reason for the Patriots seemingly harsh punishment? Seems to be.

    There is a very easy way to help me, and everyone else on here as well as yourself: Don't be ignorant about things such as this. Have you tried that?

  • @boo-radley said:

    You dont even know all the facts.

    You think that you do. And do not ask me to explain what happened to you.

    The facts are that the Patriots got hammered by the league for multiple acts of cheating. The other owners got tired of it and told the commish to hammer them. (If you don't think that is what happened, then you should take a trip to Lake Victoria, which is the source of De Nile)

    But...go ahead Kelly Conway, please feel free to tell what your "Alternate Facts" are.

  • giphy.gif

  • It's always easier to make excuses for somebody else's success than to put on your big-boy pants and vow to do better.

    Hammered by the league and still...

    WSS

  • It's always easier to make excuses for somebody else's success than to put on your big-boy pants and vow to do better.

    Hammered by the league and still...

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    It's always easier to make excuses for somebody else's success than to put on your big-boy pants kilt and vow to do better.

    FIFY...

  • @boo-radley said:

    I dont have time for an exercise in futility.

    It would not sink in anyway. I know when I am beat.

    Agree. It is futile for you to deny what is undeniable.

  • It's always easier to make excuses for somebody else's success than to put on your big-boy pants and vow to do better.

    Hammered by the league and still...

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    It's always easier to make excuses for somebody else's success than to put on your big-boy pants and vow to do better.

    Hammered by the league and still...

    WSS

    Yes, the Pats were hammered by the league and are still highly successful. To me, it shows that they really had no reason to cheat, but yet they did anyway. It evidences a very Nixonian mindset and speaks of their hubris.

  • @boo-radley said:

    First I would need the person on the other end to be bright enough to understand.

    So, I will give up.

    You need someone on your end bright enough to understand....where you gonna find him.?

    Just curious, is that the Blue deNile or the White deNile that you are swimming in about the Pats cheating?

    Better yet....go ahead, take a poll. Ask everyone here if they think, as you do, that the Pats are not cheaters.

  • So, ultimately what became the tie breakers between our 4 QBs in the conference championship games? The defenses that could pressure the QB more frequently, cause turnovers and limit the other 2 TOP QBs to just 16 and 21 points.

    While we remember Brady mostly for beating Seattle in their last Superbowl, NE's defense picking off Russell Wilson at the goal line on 1st and goal at the 1 (with 1 or 2 timeouts remaining for Seattle) sure helped that SB winning % of Brady.

    And then the next SB was a 24-10 victory for Denver over Carolina on 1 of the worst years Manning ever had at QB. Pretty cool margin of error knowing all he had to do was score more than 10 points especially when his defense was willing to score at least 1 TD in the process.

  • So, ultimately what became the tie breakers between our 4 QBs in the conference championship games? The defenses that could pressure the QB more frequently, cause turnovers and limit the other 2 TOP QBs to just 16 and 21 points.

    While we remember Brady mostly for beating Seattle in their last Superbowl, NE's defense picking off Russell Wilson at the goal line on 1st and goal at the 1 (with 1 or 2 timeouts remaining for Seattle) sure helped that SB winning % of Brady.

    And then the next SB was a 24-10 victory for Denver over Carolina on 1 of the worst years Manning ever had at QB. Pretty cool margin of error knowing all he had to do was score more than 10 points especially when his defense was willing to score at least 1 TD in the process.

    @flugel said:

    So, ultimately what became the tie breakers between our 4 QBs in the conference championship games? The defenses that could pressure the QB more frequently, cause turnovers and limit the other 2 TOP QBs to just 16 and 21 points.

    While we remember Brady mostly for beating Seattle in their last Superbowl, NE's defense picking off Russell Wilson at the goal line on 1st and goal at the 1 (with 1 or 2 timeouts remaining for Seattle) sure helped that SB winning % of Brady.

    And then the next SB was a 24-10 victory for Denver over Carolina on 1 of the worst years Manning ever had at QB. Pretty cool margin of error knowing all he had to do was score more than 10 points especially when his defense was willing to score at least 1 TD in the process.

    Certainly Tom. While we had 4 pretty great QBs playing in the Conf. title games, it was the team's that could do the most to frustrate the other team's super QB that took home the prize.

    Again, the balance thing. Great QBs and great defenses win championships.