Skip to content

Atlanta Falcons

The Browns Board
60 20 2.7k
  • @boo-radley said:

    I dont know how to help you.

    Preparation H? Have you tried it yet?

    It must be hell sitting all day in so much pain and discomfort. My heart goes out to you.

    So, is that a tacit admission that you are still in denial about the reason for the Patriots seemingly harsh punishment? Seems to be.

    There is a very easy way to help me, and everyone else on here as well as yourself: Don't be ignorant about things such as this. Have you tried that?

  • @boo-radley said:

    You dont even know all the facts.

    You think that you do. And do not ask me to explain what happened to you.

    The facts are that the Patriots got hammered by the league for multiple acts of cheating. The other owners got tired of it and told the commish to hammer them. (If you don't think that is what happened, then you should take a trip to Lake Victoria, which is the source of De Nile)

    But...go ahead Kelly Conway, please feel free to tell what your "Alternate Facts" are.

  • giphy.gif

  • It's always easier to make excuses for somebody else's success than to put on your big-boy pants and vow to do better.

    Hammered by the league and still...

    WSS

  • It's always easier to make excuses for somebody else's success than to put on your big-boy pants and vow to do better.

    Hammered by the league and still...

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    It's always easier to make excuses for somebody else's success than to put on your big-boy pants kilt and vow to do better.

    FIFY...

  • @boo-radley said:

    I dont have time for an exercise in futility.

    It would not sink in anyway. I know when I am beat.

    Agree. It is futile for you to deny what is undeniable.

  • It's always easier to make excuses for somebody else's success than to put on your big-boy pants and vow to do better.

    Hammered by the league and still...

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    It's always easier to make excuses for somebody else's success than to put on your big-boy pants and vow to do better.

    Hammered by the league and still...

    WSS

    Yes, the Pats were hammered by the league and are still highly successful. To me, it shows that they really had no reason to cheat, but yet they did anyway. It evidences a very Nixonian mindset and speaks of their hubris.

  • @boo-radley said:

    First I would need the person on the other end to be bright enough to understand.

    So, I will give up.

    You need someone on your end bright enough to understand....where you gonna find him.?

    Just curious, is that the Blue deNile or the White deNile that you are swimming in about the Pats cheating?

    Better yet....go ahead, take a poll. Ask everyone here if they think, as you do, that the Pats are not cheaters.

  • So, ultimately what became the tie breakers between our 4 QBs in the conference championship games? The defenses that could pressure the QB more frequently, cause turnovers and limit the other 2 TOP QBs to just 16 and 21 points.

    While we remember Brady mostly for beating Seattle in their last Superbowl, NE's defense picking off Russell Wilson at the goal line on 1st and goal at the 1 (with 1 or 2 timeouts remaining for Seattle) sure helped that SB winning % of Brady.

    And then the next SB was a 24-10 victory for Denver over Carolina on 1 of the worst years Manning ever had at QB. Pretty cool margin of error knowing all he had to do was score more than 10 points especially when his defense was willing to score at least 1 TD in the process.

  • So, ultimately what became the tie breakers between our 4 QBs in the conference championship games? The defenses that could pressure the QB more frequently, cause turnovers and limit the other 2 TOP QBs to just 16 and 21 points.

    While we remember Brady mostly for beating Seattle in their last Superbowl, NE's defense picking off Russell Wilson at the goal line on 1st and goal at the 1 (with 1 or 2 timeouts remaining for Seattle) sure helped that SB winning % of Brady.

    And then the next SB was a 24-10 victory for Denver over Carolina on 1 of the worst years Manning ever had at QB. Pretty cool margin of error knowing all he had to do was score more than 10 points especially when his defense was willing to score at least 1 TD in the process.

    @flugel said:

    So, ultimately what became the tie breakers between our 4 QBs in the conference championship games? The defenses that could pressure the QB more frequently, cause turnovers and limit the other 2 TOP QBs to just 16 and 21 points.

    While we remember Brady mostly for beating Seattle in their last Superbowl, NE's defense picking off Russell Wilson at the goal line on 1st and goal at the 1 (with 1 or 2 timeouts remaining for Seattle) sure helped that SB winning % of Brady.

    And then the next SB was a 24-10 victory for Denver over Carolina on 1 of the worst years Manning ever had at QB. Pretty cool margin of error knowing all he had to do was score more than 10 points especially when his defense was willing to score at least 1 TD in the process.

    Certainly Tom. While we had 4 pretty great QBs playing in the Conf. title games, it was the team's that could do the most to frustrate the other team's super QB that took home the prize.

    Again, the balance thing. Great QBs and great defenses win championships.