Skip to content

Pryor to Redskins

The Browns Board
312 51 12.4k
  • Flugs-I agree totally on Haden-the guy is a true Brown who has given his all with a total lack of a pass rush and little help from the front 7 in the running game. He has almost had to be a CB/SS all wrapped into one because of the rest of the D being so poor at what they were supposed to be doing. He's paid a heavy injury price for that sacrifice.b

    EDIT: I hope to God every pick we get has a BPA at that time that also happens to be a defender. I want to see the Browns with a real formidable defense for a change.

    FlugelF Flugel wrote on last edited by
    #50

    @texasag1969 said:

    Flugs-I agree totally on Haden-the guy is a true Brown who has given his all with a total lack of a pass rush and little help from the front 7 in the running game. He has almost had to be a CB/SS all wrapped into one because of the rest of the D being so poor at what they were supposed to be doing. He's paid a heavy injury price for that sacrifice.b

    EDIT: I hope to God every pick we get has a BPA at that time that also happens to be a defender. I want to see the Browns with a real formidable defense for a change.

    Thanks Aggies! Sounds like a sensible plan.There's a lot of defensive guys I'd love to see on our doorstep throughout the draft.

    The only offensive prospect that really intrigues me at #12 is OJ Howard and I've never been a TE fan in round 1. I just think of how Hue used Eifert for 13 TD receptions in 2015 and how OJ x-factored up 200 yards receiving and 2 TDs during Bama's last National Championship. That speed and ideal wing span can be utilized way better downfield than the traditional Kyle Bradys people like to stereotype the TE position to today. Evolved thinking takes a Graham/Gronk/Gates/Olsen/Sharpe and lines them up outside and all over the formation so their QBs can lean on them heavily. Besides, the draft is deep at Safety and corner after we land our edge rusher at #1 overall. We also have tons of money to lasso up some yes tags in free agency. Not to mention, our best defensive lineman Des Bryant returns to our front 7 with fresh legs and a flexibility to play inside or outside.

    If Davis Webb is on our door step in a bargain spot, he'd be my other offensive guy to go after.

  • @flugel said:

    While you're reminding us which of our Pro Bowl vets deserve salary increases and what ones don't - I didn't hear you fussing about Mack getting injured right after he received the best contract of his career here. He only lasted about 5-6 games before going on IR in 2014 right? You must have known you'd need to save all your bellyache exclusively on Joe Haden.

    Mack's best days either included Eric Steinbach to his immediate left or the zone blocking scheme that was brought here in 2014-2015. Understanding Mack's offense at Cal used a zbs - it only made sense both Mack & Schwartz played some of their best football here in that scheme All the time in between, Mack made no difference whatsoever in our ability to run inside of tackle. While he was very efficient in a zbs, he seemed pedestrian in other offensive systems. Unfortunately so did a lot of our other guys. It only made sense he carefully selected the zbs and our previous OC in Atlanta. Glad it all worked out for him. That said, the month we had both Bitonio and Greco healthy in 2016, Crow was averaging over 6.2 yards a carry here.

    The last Center that came here and made a difference between winning and losing was Hank Fraley. That was the very same 2007 season we went all in on a Free Agent contract that was supposed to make a previously un-injured LeCharles Bentley the highest paid Center the free agent market had ever seen. If we didn't already over-invest in Jeff Faine, that might not have been necessary. In any event, our expensive Bentley got permanently parked in the very first practice at training camp before old man Fraley jumper cabled our offense with leadership of communicating upfront and an ability to pull around end when/if necessary as a 33-34 year old Center. That was quite the pleasant surprise considering the alternatives auditioned behind door #1, door #2, door #3, door #4 etc. The next time we gave a Center that kind of LeCharles Bentley money, it was 2014 when Mack only lasted about a 3rd of the season. He left our 2nd Pittsburgh matchup when we were losing with minus yards rushing in the first half prior to the about face upfront that enabled us to beat the same team on the same day rather easily. I think Mack only contributed to 3 of the wins in our surprising 7-4 start, For all the love and adoration Mack gets from our fans - the washed-up pronounced Hank Fraley Philly demoted gave our offense every bit as much as Mack ever has. The way our training camp and season opener looked in 2007, we didn't look like we were destined for a 10 win season. The biggest thing our history reminded me of with the Center position since we bought a Bentley after over-investing in Faine is we've never had to overpay/over-invest at this position. Anyone remember us kicking an efficient Mike Baab out of town for Greg Rackoczy near the top of round 2? That went over like a fart in church. Most recently, we found an upgrade to Farmer's 1st round Center on Washington's practice squad just to remind us how many land mines our next front office needs to resolve. Gee, why would we ever want to pay attention to our history here?

    Now onto your misguided Joe Haden tantrum. Most fans willing to bigger picture our defense realize Joe Haden might look pretty freakin good if we ever gave him a halfway decent pass rush to lean on. Another thing that guys who actually watch this defense play would notice about Haden prior to earning his big contract extension was how well he tackled people either in open fields or against all those RBs easily getting past our front 7 defenders (ranking with anchors vrs the run). How many of those RBs had full heads of steam while Haden was stepping up to make the tackle? He also did the little things like coming off his man to help tackle countless uncovered TEs. Sometimes the biggest difference between a keeper and a good riddance is the willingness to do all the inconvenient parts of the job beyond the glamor boy stats. Haden wasn't the only DB getting concussed or trying to play injured behind our front 7. For a guy that can't wait to jump all over the ideas and suggestions of others in here - there isn't a fan that understands Haden less. You'd hate Eric Berry - he actually had to miss football because of cancer while a next generation brat like you can only think how dare him.

    Didn't sign Mack we tagged him. Never said we we should've paid him what Atlanta did but tagging him made sense at the time. Thanks for typing 3 paragraphs as if I supported signing Mack to a large contract.

    I get that you got all butt hurt over the Howard discussion but please read what I wrote. I didn't address any of Haden's flaws, pretty much gave him a pass due to injury, but more addressed the fact that his contract made no sense for a rebuilding franchise. At the time Haden was inked our defense was lackluster and overall the team was terrible.

    FlugelF Flugel wrote on last edited by Flugel
    #51

    @baconhound said:

    Didn't sign Mack we tagged him. Never said we we should've paid him what Atlanta did but tagging him made sense at the time. Thanks for typing 3 paragraphs as if I supported signing Mack to a large contract.

    I get that you got all butt hurt over the Howard discussion but please read what I wrote. I didn't address any of Haden's flaws, pretty much gave him a pass due to injury, but more addressed the fact that his contract made no sense for a rebuilding franchise. At the time Haden was inked our defense was lackluster and overall the team was terrible.

    And how do you suppose we kept Mack here after another team like Jax offered him up the most money of any player in the NFL at his position? We paid him more $ than Jax was willing to in order to keep him. Did this keep him healthy in 2014, which of course was one of the biggest reasons you needed Tampons in Aisle 3 to plug up your Haden pms right?

    I didn't mind any of the adults that disagreed about Howard because they weren't acting like they were in 2nd grade while they explained why. No butt hurtsies at all. My reaction toward you in that thread was from a perspective of surprise that I never follow you around or go out of my way twice in 1 thread to disrespect your opinion prior to joining your precedent with me. As I explained, I let the 1st one go before I got to enjoy how you handled the karma.

    And didn't a couple adults address your concerns about re-signing good football players in this thread ? Do you remember how old Haden was when he got the next contract? Now take the age of Dwayne Bowe when he was singed here as a FA for absurd cake when he was 3 years removed from his best football and subtract Haden's age from it. After you get the answer Rain Man - remind me why you threw a tantrum about Haden instead of Bowe...

  • @baconhound said:

    Didn't sign Mack we tagged him. Never said we we should've paid him what Atlanta did but tagging him made sense at the time. Thanks for typing 3 paragraphs as if I supported signing Mack to a large contract.

    I get that you got all butt hurt over the Howard discussion but please read what I wrote. I didn't address any of Haden's flaws, pretty much gave him a pass due to injury, but more addressed the fact that his contract made no sense for a rebuilding franchise. At the time Haden was inked our defense was lackluster and overall the team was terrible.

    And how do you suppose we kept Mack here after another team like Jax offered him up the most money of any player in the NFL at his position? We paid him more $ than Jax was willing to in order to keep him. Did this keep him healthy in 2014, which of course was one of the biggest reasons you needed Tampons in Aisle 3 to plug up your Haden pms right?

    I didn't mind any of the adults that disagreed about Howard because they weren't acting like they were in 2nd grade while they explained why. No butt hurtsies at all. My reaction toward you in that thread was from a perspective of surprise that I never follow you around or go out of my way twice in 1 thread to disrespect your opinion prior to joining your precedent with me. As I explained, I let the 1st one go before I got to enjoy how you handled the karma.

    And didn't a couple adults address your concerns about re-signing good football players in this thread ? Do you remember how old Haden was when he got the next contract? Now take the age of Dwayne Bowe when he was singed here as a FA for absurd cake when he was 3 years removed from his best football and subtract Haden's age from it. After you get the answer Rain Man - remind me why you threw a tantrum about Haden instead of Bowe...

    B BaconHound wrote on last edited by
    #52

    @flugel said:

    And how did we keep Mack here after another team like Jax offered him up the most money of any player in the NFL at his position? We paid him more $ than Jax was willing to in order to keep him. Did this keep him healthy in 2014, which of course was one of the biggest reasons you needed Tampons in aisle 3 to plug up your Haden pms right?

    Stay with me here...

    Franchise Tag vs Transition Tag. Do you watch football or just get angry on the internet?

  • @the-gipper said:

    So, are you saying that the team does not need a quality, big play WR? Which TP can be.

    Sure, I would not pay him franchise tag money. That is why...if a deal can't be done, that the Transition tag may be a very viable option.

    Think about it: one year the Browns Transition tagged Alex Mack. It worked out. He got an offer they matched. They should have franchise tagged him the next year. But no, they let him go in FA.

    Now, Mack WAS a guy that was worth the average of the top 5 paid OCs in the game, because he was one of the Top 5 OCs in the game. Sure, TP is not that, but he is worth trying to keep through hook or by crook.

    Mack was a proven talent when he was tagged. TP is all guesswork. He had 5 really good games and 8 turds. What we all suffer from, myself included, is this need to find a glimmer of hope in this tire fire. Over the last few years it was Joe Haden, Jordan Cameron, Josh Gordon, Duke Johnson, Gary Barnidge and now Pryor. Problem is Haden has been hurt, Gordon is a pot head and the others are mediocre at best.

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
    #53

    @baconhound said:

    Mack was a proven talent when he was tagged. TP is all guesswork. He had 5 really good games and 8 turds. What we all suffer from, myself included, is this need to find a glimmer of hope in this tire fire. Over the last few years it was Joe Haden, Jordan Cameron, Josh Gordon, Duke Johnson, Gary Barnidge and now Pryor. Problem is Haden has been hurt, Gordon is a pot head and the others are mediocre at best.

    Well....again....I think that is why the transition tag would be more the way to go with TP. Yes, he is not a completely proven talent.....but he is clearly a talent.

    Of course...better yet....get him signed at a value that you think he is worth.

  • @baconhound said:

    Mack was a proven talent when he was tagged. TP is all guesswork. He had 5 really good games and 8 turds. What we all suffer from, myself included, is this need to find a glimmer of hope in this tire fire. Over the last few years it was Joe Haden, Jordan Cameron, Josh Gordon, Duke Johnson, Gary Barnidge and now Pryor. Problem is Haden has been hurt, Gordon is a pot head and the others are mediocre at best.

    Well....again....I think that is why the transition tag would be more the way to go with TP. Yes, he is not a completely proven talent.....but he is clearly a talent.

    Of course...better yet....get him signed at a value that you think he is worth.

    B BaconHound wrote on last edited by BaconHound
    #54

    @the-gipper said:

    Well....again....I think that is why the transition tag would be more the way to go with TP. Yes, he is not a completely proven talent.....but he is clearly a talent.

    Of course...better yet....get him signed at a value that you think he is worth.

    Completely agree on the transition tag or the non-exclusive franchise tag.

  • @baconhound said:

    Didn't sign Mack we tagged him. Never said we we should've paid him what Atlanta did but tagging him made sense at the time. Thanks for typing 3 paragraphs as if I supported signing Mack to a large contract.

    I get that you got all butt hurt over the Howard discussion but please read what I wrote. I didn't address any of Haden's flaws, pretty much gave him a pass due to injury, but more addressed the fact that his contract made no sense for a rebuilding franchise. At the time Haden was inked our defense was lackluster and overall the team was terrible.

    And how do you suppose we kept Mack here after another team like Jax offered him up the most money of any player in the NFL at his position? We paid him more $ than Jax was willing to in order to keep him. Did this keep him healthy in 2014, which of course was one of the biggest reasons you needed Tampons in Aisle 3 to plug up your Haden pms right?

    I didn't mind any of the adults that disagreed about Howard because they weren't acting like they were in 2nd grade while they explained why. No butt hurtsies at all. My reaction toward you in that thread was from a perspective of surprise that I never follow you around or go out of my way twice in 1 thread to disrespect your opinion prior to joining your precedent with me. As I explained, I let the 1st one go before I got to enjoy how you handled the karma.

    And didn't a couple adults address your concerns about re-signing good football players in this thread ? Do you remember how old Haden was when he got the next contract? Now take the age of Dwayne Bowe when he was singed here as a FA for absurd cake when he was 3 years removed from his best football and subtract Haden's age from it. After you get the answer Rain Man - remind me why you threw a tantrum about Haden instead of Bowe...

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
    #55

    @flugel said:

    And how did we keep Mack here after another team like Jax offered him up the most money of any player in the NFL at his position? We paid him more $ than Jax was willing to in order to keep him. Did this keep him healthy in 2014, which of course was one of the biggest reasons you needed Tampons in aisle 3 to plug up your Haden pms right?

    Stay with me here...

    We actually paid him the same money. With the franchise tag, we allowed Jax to set the market...we just had the right to match it and keep him.

    This FO could have Franchised tagged him the next season, but they clearly made the decision to let him walk...in favor of Cam Erving....guh!

  • @flugel said:

    And how did we keep Mack here after another team like Jax offered him up the most money of any player in the NFL at his position? We paid him more $ than Jax was willing to in order to keep him. Did this keep him healthy in 2014, which of course was one of the biggest reasons you needed Tampons in aisle 3 to plug up your Haden pms right?

    Stay with me here...

    Franchise Tag vs Transition Tag. Do you watch football or just get angry on the internet?

    FlugelF Flugel wrote on last edited by Flugel
    #56

    @baconhound said:

    Do you watch football or just get angry on the internet?

    Which one of us didn't understand why we needed to resign Haden at the time we did so? I'll give you a hint - it's the one that doesn't watch enough football to understand why he was throwing a tantrum.

    The other guy (me) that actually watches this team understands when this franchise finally has a young 1st round pick who makes Pro Bowls - it's a really good idea to re-sign him especially if he's a corner on a defense without a pass rush. Remember what Dixon and Minnifield looked like when we had no pass rush on John Elway? Nobody that watched this team play thought they sucked - only someone like you could think that.

    Now take a guess who the most popular prospect is for us in the upcoming draft. My dad used to have a dog like you that confused electric outlets with fire hydrans. The poor thing just never learned the difference...

  • @flugel said:

    And how did we keep Mack here after another team like Jax offered him up the most money of any player in the NFL at his position? We paid him more $ than Jax was willing to in order to keep him. Did this keep him healthy in 2014, which of course was one of the biggest reasons you needed Tampons in aisle 3 to plug up your Haden pms right?

    Stay with me here...

    We actually paid him the same money. With the franchise tag, we allowed Jax to set the market...we just had the right to match it and keep him.

    This FO could have Franchised tagged him the next season, but they clearly made the decision to let him walk...in favor of Cam Erving....guh!

    FlugelF Flugel wrote on last edited by Flugel
    #57

    @the-gipper said:

    We actually paid him the same money. With the franchise tag, we allowed Jax to set the market...we just had the right to match it and keep him.

    This FO could have Franchised tagged him the next season, but they clearly made the decision to let him walk...in favor of Cam Erving....guh!

    In other words, Mack received a new contract making him the highest paid Center in the NFL the very same year he went on IR by about week 5 or 6.

    Gips, no need to reply or clarify any further. The point was we re-signed 2 first round picks who panned out here to contracts showing them they are very important to us. 1 guy got hurt while the other attempted to play through injury behind a bad run defense and horrible pass rush. People that watch football - understand what Haden does as a tackler and a corner putting team-first.

    Here comes the NFL draft with the top rated player, who also happens to be the top pass rusher, on our door step at #1 overall... The last time we had this kind of slam dunk with Khalil Mack on our door step, we traded back and ended up with a Corner that doesn't like to tackle or work hard with any degree of consistency so what could possibly go wrong?

  • @canton-mike said:

    Pray tell WHAT, in your opinion, the Browns NEED? Please reply before the combine & free agency & please be specific. Surely you have an idea since you know specifically what they DON'T need.

    Mike

    I think they need a pass rushing end, an ILB that can be effective in pass protection but is fierce against the run and another DB.

    Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by
    #58

    First, Mack was Transition Tagged, not Franchise tagged. We signed Mack when we matched JAX's Transition offer.

    Second, there is no difference between the Exclusive and Non-Exclusive Franchise tags, if the player draws no offers. And since no team will spend two 1st-round picks for Pryor, there therefore is no effective difference between the two franchise tag options. So either tag means TP will be paid the average of the Top 5 WR salaries for 2017.

    @baconhound said:

    ... an ILB that can be effective in pass protection...

    A two-way, ILB/OG, is an interesting criteria for this era...

  • @baconhound said:

    Do you watch football or just get angry on the internet?

    Which one of us didn't understand why we needed to resign Haden at the time we did so? I'll give you a hint - it's the one that doesn't watch enough football to understand why he was throwing a tantrum.

    The other guy (me) that actually watches this team understands when this franchise finally has a young 1st round pick who makes Pro Bowls - it's a really good idea to re-sign him especially if he's a corner on a defense without a pass rush. Remember what Dixon and Minnifield looked like when we had no pass rush on John Elway? Nobody that watched this team play thought they sucked - only someone like you could think that.

    Now take a guess who the most popular prospect is for us in the upcoming draft. My dad used to have a dog like you that confused electric outlets with fire hydrans. The poor thing just never learned the difference...

    B BaconHound wrote on last edited by BaconHound
    #59

    @flugel said:

    Which one of us didn't understand why we needed to resign Haden at the time we did so? I'll give you a hint - it's the one that doesn't watch enough football to understand why he was throwing a tantrum.

    The other guy (me) that actually watches this team understands when this franchise finally has a young 1st round pick who makes Pro Bowls - it's a really good idea to re-sign him especially if he's a corner on a defense without a pass rush. Remember what Dixon and Minnifield looked like when we had no pass rush on John Elway? Nobody that watched this team play thought they sucked - only someone like you could think that.

    Now take a guess who the most popular prospect is for us in the upcoming draft. My dad used to have a dog like you that confused electric outlets with fire hydrans. The poor thing just never learned the difference...

    And how's that working out? You couldn't get a team to give you a 4th round pick for the guy who's hitting your cap at $14.4, $14.4 & $10.5. Thank god we paid Haden for past work cause that is what the NFL business is all about.

    And don't take my word for it https://www.profootballfocus.com/pro-5-worst-nfl-cornerback-contracts/

  • First, Mack was Transition Tagged, not Franchise tagged. We signed Mack when we matched JAX's Transition offer.

    Second, there is no difference between the Exclusive and Non-Exclusive Franchise tags, if the player draws no offers. And since no team will spend two 1st-round picks for Pryor, there therefore is no effective difference between the two franchise tag options. So either tag means TP will be paid the average of the Top 5 WR salaries for 2017.

    @baconhound said:

    ... an ILB that can be effective in pass protection...

    A two-way, ILB/OG, is an interesting criteria for this era...

    B BaconHound wrote on last edited by
    #60

    @tour2ma said:

    First, Mack was Transition Tagged, not Franchise tagged. We signed Mack when we matched JAX's Transition offer.

    Second, there is no difference between the Exclusive and Non-Exclusive Franchise tags, if the player draws no offers. And since no team will spend two 1st-round picks for Pryor, there therefore is no effective difference between the two franchise tag options. So either tag means TP will be paid the average of the Top 5 WR salaries for 2017.

    A two-way, ILB/OG, is an interesting criteria for this era...

    Poor description should've been fierce in run defense and adequate in pass defense, my bad.

  • @flugel said:

    Which one of us didn't understand why we needed to resign Haden at the time we did so? I'll give you a hint - it's the one that doesn't watch enough football to understand why he was throwing a tantrum.

    The other guy (me) that actually watches this team understands when this franchise finally has a young 1st round pick who makes Pro Bowls - it's a really good idea to re-sign him especially if he's a corner on a defense without a pass rush. Remember what Dixon and Minnifield looked like when we had no pass rush on John Elway? Nobody that watched this team play thought they sucked - only someone like you could think that.

    Now take a guess who the most popular prospect is for us in the upcoming draft. My dad used to have a dog like you that confused electric outlets with fire hydrans. The poor thing just never learned the difference...

    And how's that working out? You couldn't get a team to give you a 4th round pick for the guy who's hitting your cap at $14.4, $14.4 & $10.5. Thank god we paid Haden for past work cause that is what the NFL business is all about.

    And don't take my word for it https://www.profootballfocus.com/pro-5-worst-nfl-cornerback-contracts/

    hoortaH hoorta wrote on last edited by
    #61

    @baconhound said:

    And how's that working out? You couldn't get a team to give you a 4th round pick for the guy who's hitting your cap at $14.4, $14.4 & $10.5. Thank god we paid Haden for past work cause that is what the NFL business is all about.

    And don't take my word for it https://www.profootballfocus.com/pro-5-worst-nfl-cornerback-contracts/

    As the article said- we're stuck with him this season. If you've read Walter football, his opinion is the Browns secondary is the worst in the league. It's not so much he's not worth what we're paying him, it's he's the best we've currently got. Or would you rather see Dead Boddy Calhoon get torched by other teams #1 WRs instead?

  • @baconhound said:

    And how's that working out? You couldn't get a team to give you a 4th round pick for the guy who's hitting your cap at $14.4, $14.4 & $10.5. Thank god we paid Haden for past work cause that is what the NFL business is all about.

    And don't take my word for it https://www.profootballfocus.com/pro-5-worst-nfl-cornerback-contracts/

    As the article said- we're stuck with him this season. If you've read Walter football, his opinion is the Browns secondary is the worst in the league. It's not so much he's not worth what we're paying him, it's he's the best we've currently got. Or would you rather see Dead Boddy Calhoon get torched by other teams #1 WRs instead?

    jcam222J jcam222 wrote on last edited by
    #62

    @hoorta said:

    As the article said- we're stuck with him this season. If you've read Walter football, his opinion is the Browns secondary is the worst in the league. It's not so much he's not worth what we're paying him, it's he's the best we've currently got. Or would you rather see Dead Boddy Calhoon get torched by other teams #1 WRs instead?

    You don't see Boddy with upside?
  • Terrel Pryor at all costs.

    He is a great example and role model to a player like Josh Gordon.

    Both together would be an amazing to watch! Plus, a speedster like Coleman added to Gordon and Pryor would make it nearly impossible to stop.

    Pryor and Gordon go together like Peanut Butter and Jelly.

    DieHardBrownsFanD DieHardBrownsFan wrote on last edited by
    #63

    @poeticg said:

    Terrel Pryor at all costs.

    He is a great example and role model to a player like Josh Gordon.

    Both together would be an amazing to watch! Plus, a speedster like Coleman added to Gordon and Pryor would make it nearly impossible to stop.

    Pryor and Gordon go together like Peanut Butter and Jelly.

    Throw in Trent and you could have a free for all you fucking faggot.

  • @baconhound said:

    And how's that working out? You couldn't get a team to give you a 4th round pick for the guy who's hitting your cap at $14.4, $14.4 & $10.5. Thank god we paid Haden for past work cause that is what the NFL business is all about.

    And don't take my word for it https://www.profootballfocus.com/pro-5-worst-nfl-cornerback-contracts/

    As the article said- we're stuck with him this season. If you've read Walter football, his opinion is the Browns secondary is the worst in the league. It's not so much he's not worth what we're paying him, it's he's the best we've currently got. Or would you rather see Dead Boddy Calhoon get torched by other teams #1 WRs instead?

    B BaconHound wrote on last edited by
    #64

    @hoorta said:

    As the article said- we're stuck with him this season. If you've read Walter football, his opinion is the Browns secondary is the worst in the league. It's not so much he's not worth what we're paying him, it's he's the best we've currently got. Or would you rather see Dead Boddy Calhoon get torched by other teams #1 WRs instead?

    I just don't want to see the Browns make another mistake giving Pryor #1 FA money. Use the non-exclusive franchise tag and see what suitors are out there.

  • @flugel said:

    Which one of us didn't understand why we needed to resign Haden at the time we did so? I'll give you a hint - it's the one that doesn't watch enough football to understand why he was throwing a tantrum.

    The other guy (me) that actually watches this team understands when this franchise finally has a young 1st round pick who makes Pro Bowls - it's a really good idea to re-sign him especially if he's a corner on a defense without a pass rush. Remember what Dixon and Minnifield looked like when we had no pass rush on John Elway? Nobody that watched this team play thought they sucked - only someone like you could think that.

    Now take a guess who the most popular prospect is for us in the upcoming draft. My dad used to have a dog like you that confused electric outlets with fire hydrans. The poor thing just never learned the difference...

    And how's that working out? You couldn't get a team to give you a 4th round pick for the guy who's hitting your cap at $14.4, $14.4 & $10.5. Thank god we paid Haden for past work cause that is what the NFL business is all about.

    And don't take my word for it https://www.profootballfocus.com/pro-5-worst-nfl-cornerback-contracts/

    FlugelF Flugel wrote on last edited by Flugel
    #65

    @baconhound said:

    And how's that working out? You couldn't get a team to give you a 4th round pick for the guy who's hitting your cap at $14.4, $14.4 & $10.5. Thank god we paid Haden for past work cause that is what the NFL business is all about.

    And don't take my word for it https://www.profootballfocus.com/pro-5-worst-nfl-cornerback-contracts/

    Well, let's see. The article in the link below indicates Cleveland has the most cap room in the NFL in an amount of $50.123 million. Understanding that, why should I panic we gave a young corner that was one of the most reliable tacklers in our defense the contract he deserved at the time? When he had better Safeties and a younger Corner opposite him - we saw what he could do in spite of a mediocre pass rush.

    What PFF probably doesn't consider is how crappy our run defense was the last 2 years while a pass rush has been MIA. Again, when we couldn't put a pass rush on John Elway - Dixon and Minnifield had some of their worst games. Now imagine if they had that same circumstance all season while they were also playing hurt - do we really need Pro Football Focus to tell us how that would handcuff their ability to succeed? Let's add the best edge rusher in this draft and some better help in the secondary via free agency and the draft before we race to conclusions about Haden.

    http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/agents-take-the-teams-with-the-most-money-to-burn-in-nfl-free-agency/

  • @hoorta said:

    As the article said- we're stuck with him this season. If you've read Walter football, his opinion is the Browns secondary is the worst in the league. It's not so much he's not worth what we're paying him, it's he's the best we've currently got. Or would you rather see Dead Boddy Calhoon get torched by other teams #1 WRs instead?

    I just don't want to see the Browns make another mistake giving Pryor #1 FA money. Use the non-exclusive franchise tag and see what suitors are out there.

    FlugelF Flugel wrote on last edited by
    #66

    @baconhound said:

    I just don't want to see the Browns make another mistake giving Pryor #1 FA money. Use the non-exclusive franchise tag and see what suitors are out there.

    Believe it or not, I'm actually with you on that one.

  • @baconhound said:

    And how's that working out? You couldn't get a team to give you a 4th round pick for the guy who's hitting your cap at $14.4, $14.4 & $10.5. Thank god we paid Haden for past work cause that is what the NFL business is all about.

    And don't take my word for it https://www.profootballfocus.com/pro-5-worst-nfl-cornerback-contracts/

    Well, let's see. The article in the link below indicates Cleveland has the most cap room in the NFL in an amount of $50.123 million. Understanding that, why should I panic we gave a young corner that was one of the most reliable tacklers in our defense the contract he deserved at the time? When he had better Safeties and a younger Corner opposite him - we saw what he could do in spite of a mediocre pass rush.

    What PFF probably doesn't consider is how crappy our run defense was the last 2 years while a pass rush has been MIA. Again, when we couldn't put a pass rush on John Elway - Dixon and Minnifield had some of their worst games. Now imagine if they had that same circumstance all season while they were also playing hurt - do we really need Pro Football Focus to tell us how that would handcuff their ability to succeed? Let's add the best edge rusher in this draft and some better help in the secondary via free agency and the draft before we race to conclusions about Haden.

    http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/agents-take-the-teams-with-the-most-money-to-burn-in-nfl-free-agency/

    B BaconHound wrote on last edited by BaconHound
    #67

    @flugel said:

    Well, let's see. The article in the link below indicates Cleveland has the most cap room in the NFL in an amount of $50.123 million. Understanding that, why should I panic we gave a young corner that was one of the most reliable tacklers in our defense the contract he deserved at the time? When he had better Safeties and a younger Corner opposite him - we saw what he could do in spite of a mediocre pass rush.

    What PFF probably doesn't consider is how crappy our run defense was the last 2 years while a pass rush has been MIA. Again, when we couldn't put a pass rush on John Elway - Dixon and Minnifield had some of their worst games. Now imagine if they had that same circumstance all season while they were also playing hurt - do we really need Pro Football Focus to tell us how that would handcuff their ability to succeed? Let's add the best edge rusher in this draft and some better help in the secondary via free agency and the draft before we race to conclusions about Haden.

    http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/agents-take-the-teams-with-the-most-money-to-burn-in-nfl-free-agency/

    Unfortunately I fear the Browns, due to poor record and history, are going to have to overpay established free agents. I think we all hope in the next 2 or 3 years the Browns might be one or two pieces away from really good and I'd hate to see a limited ability to bring in current talent because we are paying Haden & Pryor.

  • @flugel said:

    Well, let's see. The article in the link below indicates Cleveland has the most cap room in the NFL in an amount of $50.123 million. Understanding that, why should I panic we gave a young corner that was one of the most reliable tacklers in our defense the contract he deserved at the time? When he had better Safeties and a younger Corner opposite him - we saw what he could do in spite of a mediocre pass rush.

    What PFF probably doesn't consider is how crappy our run defense was the last 2 years while a pass rush has been MIA. Again, when we couldn't put a pass rush on John Elway - Dixon and Minnifield had some of their worst games. Now imagine if they had that same circumstance all season while they were also playing hurt - do we really need Pro Football Focus to tell us how that would handcuff their ability to succeed? Let's add the best edge rusher in this draft and some better help in the secondary via free agency and the draft before we race to conclusions about Haden.

    http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/agents-take-the-teams-with-the-most-money-to-burn-in-nfl-free-agency/

    Unfortunately I fear the Browns, due to poor record and history, are going to have to overpay established free agents. I think we all hope in the next 2 or 3 years the Browns might be one or two pieces away from really good and I'd hate to see a limited ability to bring in current talent because we are paying Haden & Pryor.

    FlugelF Flugel wrote on last edited by
    #68

    @baconhound said:

    Unfortunately I fear the Browns, due to poor record and history, are going to have to overpay established free agents. I think we all hope in the next 2 or 3 years the Browns might be one or two pieces away from really good and I'd hate to see a limited ability to bring in current talent because we are paying Haden & Pryor.

    I think you're right that we'll probably have to pay worthwhile free agents more money. As for Haden, I think he'd be willing to restructure his contract if we ever got to being only 1 or 2 pieces away. Unfortunately, I don't think Rosenhaus would be nearly as willing to do that on behalf of Pryor.

  • @baconhound said:

    Unfortunately I fear the Browns, due to poor record and history, are going to have to overpay established free agents. I think we all hope in the next 2 or 3 years the Browns might be one or two pieces away from really good and I'd hate to see a limited ability to bring in current talent because we are paying Haden & Pryor.

    I think you're right that we'll probably have to pay worthwhile free agents more money. As for Haden, I think he'd be willing to restructure his contract if we ever got to being only 1 or 2 pieces away. Unfortunately, I don't think Rosenhaus would be nearly as willing to do that on behalf of Pryor.

    B BaconHound wrote on last edited by
    #69

    @flugel said:

    I think you're right that we'll probably have to pay worthwhile free agents more money. As for Haden, I think he'd be willing to restructure his contract if we ever got to being only 1 or 2 pieces away. Unfortunately, I don't think Rosenhaus would be nearly as willing to do that on behalf of Pryor.

    Drew is a pain in the ass.