Skip to content

Kenny Britt signing with the Browns

The Browns Board
167 48 6.7k
  • jiggins7919J jiggins7919 wrote on last edited by
    #25

    Yep. I like the signing IF Pryor was on the team. He'd be a valuable asset, and we'd have Pryor, Britt, and Coleman. A real WR corp. Alas...we now have Britt and Coleman, and three other dweebs we wasted picks on last year. And yes, I realize they were rookies, but I don't think any of them have what it takes. I hope I'm wrong. Hell, COLEMAN might not have what it takes.

  • B beare wrote on last edited by
    #26

    this could help us in keeping pryor

    Torrey Smith, 3-year deal for $15mil with the Eagles, per source maybe philly gives up on pryor now

  • D domcucch1994 wrote on last edited by
    #27

    What a Browns thing to do..

    Let's get rid of an up-and-coming WR in Pryor for an underwhelming vet in Britt..

    It's like TJ Ward and Donte Whitner all over again! >🙁

  • What a Browns thing to do..

    Let's get rid of an up-and-coming WR in Pryor for an underwhelming vet in Britt..

    It's like TJ Ward and Donte Whitner all over again! >🙁

    Mark OM Mark O wrote on last edited by
    #28

    @domcucch1994 said:

    What a Browns thing to do..

    Let's get rid of an up-and-coming WR in Pryor for an underwhelming vet in Britt..

    It's like TJ Ward and Donte Whitner all over again! > 🙁

    How is Pryor an "up and coming WR" when they're the same age?? Britt has more than one season of production under his belt and if Pryor is really trying to get $10+ million per year, then Britt is a much better signing.

  • @domcucch1994 said:

    What a Browns thing to do..

    Let's get rid of an up-and-coming WR in Pryor for an underwhelming vet in Britt..

    It's like TJ Ward and Donte Whitner all over again! > 🙁

    How is Pryor an "up and coming WR" when they're the same age?? Britt has more than one season of production under his belt and if Pryor is really trying to get $10+ million per year, then Britt is a much better signing.

    gftChrisG gftChris wrote on last edited by
    #29

    @mark-o said:

    How is Pryor an "up and coming WR" when they're the same age?? Britt has more than one season of production under his belt and if Pryor is really trying to get $10+ million per year, then Britt is a much better signing.

    Yeah but Kenny Britt didn't go to OSU so people don't like him as much...

  • @mark-o said:

    How is Pryor an "up and coming WR" when they're the same age?? Britt has more than one season of production under his belt and if Pryor is really trying to get $10+ million per year, then Britt is a much better signing.

    Yeah but Kenny Britt didn't go to OSU so people don't like him as much...

    Mark OM Mark O wrote on last edited by
    #30

    @gftchris said:

    Yeah but Kenny Britt didn't go to OSU so people don't like him as much...

    Right....I forgot the OSU bias.....

  • @domcucch1994 said:

    What a Browns thing to do..

    Let's get rid of an up-and-coming WR in Pryor for an underwhelming vet in Britt..

    It's like TJ Ward and Donte Whitner all over again! > 🙁

    How is Pryor an "up and coming WR" when they're the same age?? Britt has more than one season of production under his belt and if Pryor is really trying to get $10+ million per year, then Britt is a much better signing.

    D domcucch1994 wrote on last edited by
    #31

    @mark-o said:

    How is Pryor an "up and coming WR" when they're the same age?? Britt has more than one season of production under his belt and if Pryor is really trying to get $10+ million per year, then Britt is a much better signing.

    Actually Pryor is 27, Britt is 28

    Pryor in his first season as a WR is already better than Kenny "Brittle".

    Britt has been mediocre at best. His only 1000 yard season was last year!

    Pryor had just as good as a year as Britt has had.. This is a head scratcher..

    I would rather spend the extra 3-4 mil a year for a guy who is a year younger, and has more upside than this sup-par player we just got..

    This is Ward/Whitner all over again!

  • cambridgehoC cambridgeho wrote on last edited by
    #32

    Don't hate the singing, but this is a we can't lose out on both move. Britt has talent, but far from a true number 1. The same goes for Pryor.

  • @mark-o said:

    How is Pryor an "up and coming WR" when they're the same age?? Britt has more than one season of production under his belt and if Pryor is really trying to get $10+ million per year, then Britt is a much better signing.

    Actually Pryor is 27, Britt is 28

    Pryor in his first season as a WR is already better than Kenny "Brittle".

    Britt has been mediocre at best. His only 1000 yard season was last year!

    Pryor had just as good as a year as Britt has had.. This is a head scratcher..

    I would rather spend the extra 3-4 mil a year for a guy who is a year younger, and has more upside than this sup-par player we just got..

    This is Ward/Whitner all over again!

    Mark OM Mark O wrote on last edited by
    #33

    @domcucch1994 said:

    Actually Pryor is 27, Britt is 28

    Pryor in his first season as a WR is already better than Kenny "Brittle".

    Britt has been mediocre at best. His only 1000 yard season was last year!

    Pryor had just as good as a year as Britt has had.. This is a head scratcher..

    I would rather spend the extra 3-4 mil a year for a guy who is a year younger, and has more upside than this sup-par player we just got..

    This is Ward/Whitner all over again!

    That one year younger doesn't mean shit. They're essentially the same age. Pryor may have more upside, but he has a whole ton of downside as well. He has one year as a WR and might regress and you want to give him $12 million a year and pay him like one of hte best receivers in football, that's just crazy. Take off the OSU glasses. He over estimated his worth and the team moved on and paid someone else with similiar production the money that he turned down.

  • L LondonBrown wrote on last edited by
    #34

    Coleman is still the plan to be our number one, I am far from giving up on him. Flashed at times and had to deal with an injury and musical chairs at QB

  • Kenny Britt..... for 17mil?

    Really?!?

    Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by
    #35

    Surprises me every time when a Coordinator changes teams and brings a player from the opposite squad with him.

    @tiamat63 said:

    Kenny Britt..... for 17mil? Really?!?

    Guaranteed money? Over 4-years? Not seeing the issue with that figure... and it might not all be "really guaranteed". Package average is $8mm/yr.

    @wargograw said:

    Pretty solid for a #2 on the outside.

    Ding Ding Ding... for 6 of his 8 seasons with the other two lost due to injury.

    @gftchris said:

    Pryor - 77 catches, 1004 yards, 4TDs (with a carousel of mediocrity throwing the ball)

    Britt - 68 catches, 1002 yards, 5TDs (with a carousel of mediocrity throwing the ball)

    Roughly the same age, height, weight, etc.

    One year older... seven more years experience at the position. But it's not certain to be an either/or situation just yet...

  • @domcucch1994 said:

    Actually Pryor is 27, Britt is 28

    Pryor in his first season as a WR is already better than Kenny "Brittle".

    Britt has been mediocre at best. His only 1000 yard season was last year!

    Pryor had just as good as a year as Britt has had.. This is a head scratcher..

    I would rather spend the extra 3-4 mil a year for a guy who is a year younger, and has more upside than this sup-par player we just got..

    This is Ward/Whitner all over again!

    That one year younger doesn't mean shit. They're essentially the same age. Pryor may have more upside, but he has a whole ton of downside as well. He has one year as a WR and might regress and you want to give him $12 million a year and pay him like one of hte best receivers in football, that's just crazy. Take off the OSU glasses. He over estimated his worth and the team moved on and paid someone else with similiar production the money that he turned down.

    D domcucch1994 wrote on last edited by
    #36

    @mark-o said:

    That one year younger doesn't mean shit. They're essentially the same age. Pryor may have more upside, but he has a whole ton of downside as well. He has one year as a WR and might regress and you want to give him $12 million a year and pay him like one of hte best receivers in football, that's just crazy. Take off the OSU glasses. He over estimated his worth and the team moved on and paid someone else with similiar production the money that he turned down.

    It took Britt 8 fucking years to amass 1000 yards and we just pissed 8mil a year on him..

    TP is more than likely going to be gone now..

    Can't wait until he falls back to Earth next year and puts up 700 yards of mediocrity and dropped passes...

    At least we signed JC Tretter. Way better than that fuckstick Erving

  • D BoneD D Bone wrote on last edited by
    #37

    I like Britt, but signing him so early in FA makes me all warm and fuzzy about the 17 WRs taken in last year's draft.

  • I like Britt, but signing him so early in FA makes me all warm and fuzzy about the 17 WRs taken in last year's draft.

    cambridgehoC cambridgeho wrote on last edited by
    #38

    @d-bone said:

    I like Britt, but signing him so early in FA makes me all warm and fuzzy about the 17 WRs taken in last year's draft.

    They will probably say f it and draft Mike Williams as well.

  • F Frenchie wrote on last edited by
    #39

    Wonder if this gives them leverage on TP. They're still in negotiations and this levels the "You need me" card, with a "I've already implemented a contingency" card.

  • chocoC choco wrote on last edited by
    #40

    OSU homers are quite amusing. Thinking 8 figures on a WR convert with 1 OK year is good move.

  • WTF, buying scraps again. IF this is with Pryor is meh ok. If it's instead of Pryor someone needs fired today. 1) We have to demonstrate willingness to pay players to keep them 2) 1000 yards 5 TD's is Britts career best , it's Pryors floor in first year a a receiver. I expected better I really did.

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
    #41

    @jcam222 said:

    WTF, buying scraps again. IF this is with Pryor is meh ok. If it's instead of Pryor someone needs fired today. 1) We have to demonstrate willingness to pay players to keep them 2) 1000 yards 5 TD's is Britts career best , it's Pryors floor in first year a a receiver. I expected better I really did.

    Britt is basically the same age as Pryor....so as far as it being someone's floor or ceiling....they both stand about in equal status as far as I am concerned.

    I don't think Pryor's ability to learn the position is any better or worse than Britt's.

    But...if they can have both...sure...why not?

    (if that were the case...the guy that loses out possibly: Josh Gordon on his comeback attempt. Though I may still keep him too if I were the Browns. WTF. Better than like Rannell Hall or something)

  • What a Browns thing to do..

    Let's get rid of an up-and-coming WR in Pryor for an underwhelming vet in Britt..

    It's like TJ Ward and Donte Whitner all over again! >🙁

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
    #42

    @domcucch1994 said:

    What a Browns thing to do..

    Let's get rid of an up-and-coming WR in Pryor for an underwhelming vet in Britt..

    It's like TJ Ward and Donte Whitner all over again! > 🙁

    Big age difference there though....not so with Pryor/Britt. 9 month age difference.

  • @mark-o said:

    How is Pryor an "up and coming WR" when they're the same age?? Britt has more than one season of production under his belt and if Pryor is really trying to get $10+ million per year, then Britt is a much better signing.

    Actually Pryor is 27, Britt is 28

    Pryor in his first season as a WR is already better than Kenny "Brittle".

    Britt has been mediocre at best. His only 1000 yard season was last year!

    Pryor had just as good as a year as Britt has had.. This is a head scratcher..

    I would rather spend the extra 3-4 mil a year for a guy who is a year younger, and has more upside than this sup-par player we just got..

    This is Ward/Whitner all over again!

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
    #43

    @domcucch1994 said:

    Actually Pryor is 27, Britt is 28

    Pryor in his first season as a WR is already better than Kenny "Brittle".

    Britt has been mediocre at best. His only 1000 yard season was last year!

    Pryor had just as good as a year as Britt has had.. This is a head scratcher..

    I would rather spend the extra 3-4 mil a year for a guy who is a year younger, and has more upside than this sup-par player we just got..

    This is Ward/Whitner all over again!

    Britt born Sept. 1988. Pryor born June 1989. If they went to high school together they probably would have been in the same class.

  • @domcucch1994 said:

    Actually Pryor is 27, Britt is 28

    Pryor in his first season as a WR is already better than Kenny "Brittle".

    Britt has been mediocre at best. His only 1000 yard season was last year!

    Pryor had just as good as a year as Britt has had.. This is a head scratcher..

    I would rather spend the extra 3-4 mil a year for a guy who is a year younger, and has more upside than this sup-par player we just got..

    This is Ward/Whitner all over again!

    Britt born Sept. 1988. Pryor born June 1989. If they went to high school together they probably would have been in the same class.

    Mark OM Mark O wrote on last edited by
    #44

    @the-gipper said:

    Britt born Sept. 1988. Pryor born June 1989. If they went to high school together they probably would have been in the same class.

    Dont confuse the OSU homers with facts. Pryor is the next Randy Moss....and Britt sucks..