Skip to content

Kenny Britt signing with the Browns

The Browns Board
167 48 6.7k
  • @the-gipper said:

    Well....I am just going by their ages...and noted they really were not at all far apart. And I don't know if it is OSU homerism. I just think people saw a bit of a ray of light in TP. But, a ray of light is not the same as a blazing sun. TP wants "I'm a blazing sun" money...not ray of light money.

    Their ages and one player has years of production as a WR and one is a 1 year player at the position who wants to be paid like a top 5 receiver in the league.

    just saw this on twitter...

    Browns Daily: "Terrelle Pryor sill in play, despite Britt news. Offer from CLE best on table so far. Market not what he expected."

    @mark-o said:

    Their ages and one player has years of production as a WR and one is a 1 year player at the position who wants to be paid like a top 5 receiver in the league.

    just saw this on twitter...

    Browns Daily: "Terrelle Pryor sill in play, despite Britt news. Offer from CLE best on table so far. Market not what he expected."

    CBD also said we're still in the lead for Zeitler

    Britt, Tretter, Pryor, and Zeitler would make it a pretty decent free agency period for the Browns

  • @mark-o said:

    Their ages and one player has years of production as a WR and one is a 1 year player at the position who wants to be paid like a top 5 receiver in the league.

    just saw this on twitter...

    Browns Daily: "Terrelle Pryor sill in play, despite Britt news. Offer from CLE best on table so far. Market not what he expected."

    CBD also said we're still in the lead for Zeitler

    Britt, Tretter, Pryor, and Zeitler would make it a pretty decent free agency period for the Browns

    @bbedward said:

    CBD also said we're still in the lead for Zeitler

    Britt, Tretter, Pryor, and Zeitler would make it a pretty decent free agency period for the Browns

    And don't forget Collins

  • @mark-o said:

    Their ages and one player has years of production as a WR and one is a 1 year player at the position who wants to be paid like a top 5 receiver in the league.

    just saw this on twitter...

    Browns Daily: "Terrelle Pryor sill in play, despite Britt news. Offer from CLE best on table so far. Market not what he expected."

    CBD also said we're still in the lead for Zeitler

    Britt, Tretter, Pryor, and Zeitler would make it a pretty decent free agency period for the Browns

    @bbedward said:

    CBD also said we're still in the lead for Zeitler

    Britt, Tretter, Pryor, and Zeitler would make it a pretty decent free agency period for the Browns

    @jrb12711 said:

    And don't forget Collins

    And Bitonio.

  • @mark-o said:

    Their ages and one player has years of production as a WR and one is a 1 year player at the position who wants to be paid like a top 5 receiver in the league.

    just saw this on twitter...

    Browns Daily: "Terrelle Pryor sill in play, despite Britt news. Offer from CLE best on table so far. Market not what he expected."

    CBD also said we're still in the lead for Zeitler

    Britt, Tretter, Pryor, and Zeitler would make it a pretty decent free agency period for the Browns

    @bbedward said:

    CBD also said we're still in the lead for Zeitler

    Britt, Tretter, Pryor, and Zeitler would make it a pretty decent free agency period for the Browns

    Even without Pryor it would be pretty good. It would mean that in the draft the Browns would be not be after WR/OL...and probably not RBs unless very late. (and remember...Crowell was UDFA). They would be defense heavy...and get a QB...and maybe a TE.

    I could see them using their 11 picks...2 on offense....9 on defense.

  • @bbedward said:

    CBD also said we're still in the lead for Zeitler

    Britt, Tretter, Pryor, and Zeitler would make it a pretty decent free agency period for the Browns

    @jrb12711 said:

    And don't forget Collins

    And Bitonio.

    @gftchris said:

    And Bitonio.

    Bito was not FA yet by any means...was he? He has only been in the league now 2 years. This year would be his third. Still a good move to lock him up.

    Collins definitely though.

  • @gftchris said:

    And Bitonio.

    Bito was not FA yet by any means...was he? He has only been in the league now 2 years. This year would be his third. Still a good move to lock him up.

    Collins definitely though.

    @the-gipper said:

    Bito was not FA yet by any means...was he? He has only been in the league now 2 years. This year would be his third. Still a good move to lock him up.

    Collins definitely though.

    He was not, but signing a key young player before they enter a contract year is not a very browns move, and this is a nice departure from that, along with those other signings.

  • This year is Joel's 4th in the league.

  • This signing isn't anything other than the prod for TP and his agent to get back to the negotiating table. Britt won't earn any PT other than ST anyway.. he's not good.

    WalterFootball rates this a Millen F- grade for great reasons..

  • This signing isn't anything other than the prod for TP and his agent to get back to the negotiating table. Britt won't earn any PT other than ST anyway.. he's not good.

    WalterFootball rates this a Millen F- grade for great reasons..

    @unsympathetic said:

    This signing isn't anything other than the prod for TP and his agent to get back to the negotiating table. Britt won't earn any PT other than ST anyway.. he's not good.

    WalterFootball rates this a Millen F- grade for great reasons..

    Imagine that...some website doesn't like a FA signing. Other football experts are calling it a great signing. The guy had 1000 yards receiving on a shit team. Just like Pryor last year. Pryor wants 12 million a year...Britt was signed for 8... same age, same production 4 million dollars saved. Doesn't take a harvard nerd to figure out that it's not a terrible signing.

  • @mark-o said:

    How is Pryor an "up and coming WR" when they're the same age?? Britt has more than one season of production under his belt and if Pryor is really trying to get $10+ million per year, then Britt is a much better signing.

    Yeah but Kenny Britt didn't go to OSU so people don't like him as much...

    @gftchris said:

    Yeah but Kenny Britt didn't go to OSU so people don't like him as much...

    Bingo!!!

  • @the-gipper said:

    Britt born Sept. 1988. Pryor born June 1989. If they went to high school together they probably would have been in the same class.

    Dont confuse the OSU homers with facts. Pryor is the next Randy Moss....and Britt sucks..

    @mark-o said:

    Dont confuse the OSU homers with facts. Pryor is the next Randy Moss....and Britt sucks..

    My problem with Britt compared to TP is that Britt has a laundry list of problems. He's known to be chronically lazy, hurt, and apathetic to playing the position. As Walterfootball hints at, it's not a coincidence he had his best year in a contract year knowing this was his chance at big money.

    I'm very anxious (with great precedent) that Britt will loaf because he got his "retirement" money and we just signed another Bowe. That's why I'd much rather have TP because I believe he's going to be a lot more hungry and provide similar production. It has nothing to do with OSU ties at all.

  • What a weird move .....

    the superbowl champs have been more active than the 1-15 team in FA so far ....Gilmore is a huge pick up for them

    @darren15 said:

    What a weird move .....

    the superbowl champs have been more active than the 1-15 team in FA so far ....Gilmore is a huge pick up for them

    I hear you, but hey, the Browns have to show the rest of the league they have their $hit together. Obviously, the Browns need to sell themselves and rid the stench stigma, it's going to take time.

    This draft is huge. If they draft well, and coach well, play well, then it may be a popular FA destination.

    I hope they keep Pryor, but Rosenhaus always asks for the moon. I don't think any of the 32 teams are comfortable with him as an agent.

  • @gftchris said:

    And Bitonio.

    Bito was not FA yet by any means...was he? He has only been in the league now 2 years. This year would be his third. Still a good move to lock him up.

    Collins definitely though.

    @the-gipper said:

    Bito was not FA yet by any means...was he? He has only been in the league now 2 years. This year would be his third. Still a good move to lock him up.

    Collins definitely though.

    See below.

    @gftchris said:

    He was not, but signing a key young player before they enter a contract year is not a very browns move, and this is a nice departure from that, along with those other signings.

    Could the Browns have learned from past mistakes not locking up Mack & Schwartz to long term deals when they had the chance? Could this mean we're sticking with R Glass? Stay tuned, I believe we have to pay his roster bonus the end of the week, so the answer will be obvious by then. It would also mean if we keep Griffin, we told New England to pound salt on what they want for Garropolo.

    PS If they get Zietler, we will have a very studly OL, and the Bengals are in deep doo-doo. Dalton will be watching much of the game flat on his back. .

  • @unsympathetic said:

    This signing isn't anything other than the prod for TP and his agent to get back to the negotiating table. Britt won't earn any PT other than ST anyway.. he's not good.

    WalterFootball rates this a Millen F- grade for great reasons..

    Imagine that...some website doesn't like a FA signing. Other football experts are calling it a great signing. The guy had 1000 yards receiving on a shit team. Just like Pryor last year. Pryor wants 12 million a year...Britt was signed for 8... same age, same production 4 million dollars saved. Doesn't take a harvard nerd to figure out that it's not a terrible signing.

    @mark-o said:

    it's not a terrible signing.

    Andre Rison was not a terrible signing - until the games started, when it was clear that he just wanted to collect a paycheck and loaf around.

    Walrus was not a terrible GM selection - until his first day of work, when it was clear that he just wanted to collect a paycheck and loaf around.

    The same will be true of Britt. Of course it's good if he replicates the same effort as in his FA year.. but he won't.

  • @mark-o said:

    it's not a terrible signing.

    Andre Rison was not a terrible signing - until the games started, when it was clear that he just wanted to collect a paycheck and loaf around.

    Walrus was not a terrible GM selection - until his first day of work, when it was clear that he just wanted to collect a paycheck and loaf around.

    The same will be true of Britt. Of course it's good if he replicates the same effort as in his FA year.. but he won't.

    @unsympathetic said:

    Andre Rison was not a terrible signing - until the games started, when it was clear that he just wanted to collect a paycheck and loaf around.

    Walrus was not a terrible GM selection - until his first day of work, when it was clear that he just wanted to collect a paycheck and loaf around.

    The same will be true of Britt. Of course it's good if he replicates the same effort as in his FA year.. but he won't.

    And how do you know that Pryor will put in the same effort next year that he put in this year? By your logic, teams should never sign a FA because some players in the past haven't lived up to their contract.

  • @unsympathetic said:

    Andre Rison was not a terrible signing - until the games started, when it was clear that he just wanted to collect a paycheck and loaf around.

    Walrus was not a terrible GM selection - until his first day of work, when it was clear that he just wanted to collect a paycheck and loaf around.

    The same will be true of Britt. Of course it's good if he replicates the same effort as in his FA year.. but he won't.

    And how do you know that Pryor will put in the same effort next year that he put in this year? By your logic, teams should never sign a FA because some players in the past haven't lived up to their contract.

    @mark-o said:

    And how do you know that Pryor will put in the same effort next year that he put in this year? By your logic, teams should never sign a FA because some players in the past haven't lived up to their contract.

    I honestly don't know enough about Britt and his personality to comment... But Pryor certainly doesn't strike me as a guy who would rest on his laurels after a contract. He seems like the kinda guy who would go out and prove that he's worth the investment.

  • @mark-o said:

    And how do you know that Pryor will put in the same effort next year that he put in this year? By your logic, teams should never sign a FA because some players in the past haven't lived up to their contract.

    I honestly don't know enough about Britt and his personality to comment... But Pryor certainly doesn't strike me as a guy who would rest on his laurels after a contract. He seems like the kinda guy who would go out and prove that he's worth the investment.

    @mr.-make-believe said:

    I honestly don't know enough about Britt and his personality to comment... But Pryor certainly doesn't strike me as a guy who would rest on his laurels after a contract. He seems like the kinda guy who would go out and prove that he's worth the investment.

    I do, and he has a marked history of loafing and under preforming. That's what worries me as noted in my other comment-the dude balled out to get a big contract and will go right back to his normal ways again. His history clearly makes that a valid concern to consider.

  • @mr.-make-believe said:

    I honestly don't know enough about Britt and his personality to comment... But Pryor certainly doesn't strike me as a guy who would rest on his laurels after a contract. He seems like the kinda guy who would go out and prove that he's worth the investment.

    I do, and he has a marked history of loafing and under preforming. That's what worries me as noted in my other comment-the dude balled out to get a big contract and will go right back to his normal ways again. His history clearly makes that a valid concern to consider.

    @jrb12711 said:

    I do, and he has a marked history of loafing and under preforming. That's what worries me as noted in my other comment-the dude balled out to get a big contract and will go right back to his normal ways again. His history clearly makes that a valid concern to consider.

    That might be so. Or he could've truly turned a new leaf as it were. Regardless, I'm not too concerned about it if only due to our current cap situation. He's a gamble we can afford.

  • @mark-o said:

    And how do you know that Pryor will put in the same effort next year that he put in this year? By your logic, teams should never sign a FA because some players in the past haven't lived up to their contract.

    I honestly don't know enough about Britt and his personality to comment... But Pryor certainly doesn't strike me as a guy who would rest on his laurels after a contract. He seems like the kinda guy who would go out and prove that he's worth the investment.

    @mr.-make-believe said:

    I honestly don't know enough about Britt and his personality to comment... But Pryor certainly doesn't strike me as a guy who would rest on his laurels after a contract. He seems like the kinda guy who would go out and prove that he's worth the investment.

    The guy who disappeared in nearly half the games last season? 6 games last season with less than 5 catches and he wants $12 million per season? That aint gonna get it done

  • @mr.-make-believe said:

    I honestly don't know enough about Britt and his personality to comment... But Pryor certainly doesn't strike me as a guy who would rest on his laurels after a contract. He seems like the kinda guy who would go out and prove that he's worth the investment.

    The guy who disappeared in nearly half the games last season? 6 games last season with less than 5 catches and he wants $12 million per season? That aint gonna get it done

    @mark-o said:

    The guy who disappeared in nearly half the games last season? 6 games last season with less than 5 catches and he wants $12 million per season? That aint gonna get it done

    Trust me. I don't like $12M/yr either. I just don't believe that's what it would take to get it done. Let Washington give him that contract if that's what he gets.