Browns picks over next two years
-
Currently have eight in the first two rounds. Three first rounders and five second rounders.
Yes they have to get them right etc but it feels like now or never for this franchise. They'll never have a better chance to get this team going in the right direction.
-
The QB will be the absolute key of this whole re-Boot..Our divisional teams are still full of aging veterans & there QB's are not getting any younger either..Need the Big Boot behind center. but we got better pieces around it today..Baby Steps took a big step today..
Browns & Buffett: Got to go fishin, Down to rock bottom again, with just a few Friends Team Brotherhood-"It's not about You,Me or I. It's about building We"..Hue Jackson -
I wouldn't trade these picks for Elway,Manning, or Elway. 8 in the first 2 rounds? We could do so serious damage at this point.
-
I wouldn't trade these picks for Elway,Manning, or Elway. 8 in the first 2 rounds? We could do so serious damage at this point.
I wouldn't trade these picks for Elway,Manning, or Elway. 8 in the first 2 rounds? We could do so serious damage at this point.
no shit, Elway is old as dirt, Manning is aging/so-so, and Elway is old as dirt.
-
-
Pick up Bennett in FA and then we don't need to take O.J. as a TE @ 12. Use it on another quality defender.
-
OR could they be stockpiling for a qb next year???
Possiblity.
With Garrett added this year - some DBs would be nice - Browns D might actually win them some games.
With a mid-teens #1 next year, they could package some of those #2s to move up and get a QB.
Wouldn't surprise me if this wasn't 'the plan' (roughly) since last year when this FO was put together.
-
2017: 1, 1, 2, 2, 3, 4, 4, 5, 5, 5, 6
2018: 1, 2, 2, 2, 3, 4, 4, 5, 6, 6, 7
-
We have ammo for any trade we want. I see us building the defense this year and the FO going all in on Josh Rosen next year.
-
One of the points on NFL Live yesterday is that this many picks cannot be used to draft individual players beyond year 2 of a rebuild. To do so would turn over the roster too fast, keep it too young to ever develop into a successful playoff team. So that leaves using the accumulated picks as currency to trade for players or higher picks.
I agree for the most part, but that two-year limit is contingent upon drafting well both of those years. This is our year two and I think most here agree that our year one draft was OK at best.
Combine that with our growing confidence in our FO's ability to evaluate player worth (Schwartz and TP) and I feel pretty good about letting them determine the most effective path to our next QB.
And I would not be surprised to see that path have more than one branch... just as a hedge.
-
The QB will be the absolute key of this whole re-Boot..Our divisional teams are still full of aging veterans & there QB's are not getting any younger either..Need the Big Boot behind center. but we got better pieces around it today..Baby Steps took a big step today..
The QB will be the absolute key of this whole re-Boot..Our divisional teams are still full of aging veterans & there QB's are not getting any younger either..Need the Big Boot behind center. but we got better pieces around it today..Baby Steps took a big step today..
More and more though it may be possible that that QB will be someone they may want to after in next year's draft...not this year's.
Darnold
Rosen etc.
-
The QB will be the absolute key of this whole re-Boot..Our divisional teams are still full of aging veterans & there QB's are not getting any younger either..Need the Big Boot behind center. but we got better pieces around it today..Baby Steps took a big step today..
More and more though it may be possible that that QB will be someone they may want to after in next year's draft...not this year's.
Darnold
Rosen etc.
More and more though it may be possible that that QB will be someone they may want to after in next year's draft...not this year's.
Darnold
Rosen etc.
NFL Network speculated on that saying the Browns may be building the way Seattle did, build the rest of the team first, then drop in a QB who is not under pressure to "save" the franchise, just get 17 or so completions a game. We have addressed our OL very well so far and if we go "all in" on a D with this strong defensive draft, then we have our answer. BO in the meantime can try to rekindle his prospects with a guy who loves the taller QBs. That latter was my thought, not theirs.
-
** shudders **
Please, keep thoughts like that last one to yourself...
You know how allergic I am too long motions and slow releases...
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
** shudders **
Please, keep thoughts like that last one to yourself...
You know how allergic I am too long motions and slow releases...
-
** shudders **
Please, keep thoughts like that last one to yourself...
You know how allergic I am too long motions and slow releases...
** shudders **
Please, keep thoughts like that last one to yourself...
You know how allergic I am too long motions and slow releases...
LOL Gip ( that would be OL, OL for you Tour)
Since we have him and released RG III, there is now no harm in trying if we do not acquire anyone else in FA or draft. Would you just rather have Kessler/Hogan?
-
With all the 2nds the next 2 years. Would it be possible to trade a few 2nds for a 15-32 range pick. Not sure how the points add up.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login