Skip to content

Watson Undraftable

The Browns Board
145 29 4.7k
  • OK Tour-I got it. But I liked Dak before he slipped into the 4th because of the DUI. He might have been a pale horse who dropped into dark horse territory. Watson is just the only QB I see who has a chance to be one of those really good starters. The rest I see as either less talented or, even worse, chokers. So he's the only horse I can find in this race this year.

  • Here's what I wonder: Did Watson even know about this velocity metric? Was he throwing as hard as he normally does, or was he just tuning it down to ensure accuracy to receivers he's never thrown to before? I mean, he had to know this was being measured, right? Wouldn't surprise me to see this being measured at his pro day, and wouldn't surprise me if he throws much harder. I don't remember Watson ever having a "gun", but I also don't remember his power being an issue either.

    Edit: I just watched some highlights of Watson, and while I understand "highlights" aren't exactly a good representation of a player's ability, the film did at least show multiple throws with plenty of zip. Obviously I don't have a radar gun app for Youtube, but I can tell you the arm definitely passes the "eye test". Conversely, I did notice several throws that Watson kind of "lollypops" up in the air, but these were deep throws that enabled his receiver to get underneath. Whenever I saw a throw over the middle, the ball got there promptly.

  • Here's what I wonder: Did Watson even know about this velocity metric? Was he throwing as hard as he normally does, or was he just tuning it down to ensure accuracy to receivers he's never thrown to before? I mean, he had to know this was being measured, right? Wouldn't surprise me to see this being measured at his pro day, and wouldn't surprise me if he throws much harder. I don't remember Watson ever having a "gun", but I also don't remember his power being an issue either.

    Edit: I just watched some highlights of Watson, and while I understand "highlights" aren't exactly a good representation of a player's ability, the film did at least show multiple throws with plenty of zip. Obviously I don't have a radar gun app for Youtube, but I can tell you the arm definitely passes the "eye test". Conversely, I did notice several throws that Watson kind of "lollypops" up in the air, but these were deep throws that enabled his receiver to get underneath. Whenever I saw a throw over the middle, the ball got there promptly.

    @jiggins7919 said:

    Here's what I wonder: Did Watson even know about this velocity metric? Was he throwing as hard as he normally does, or was he just tuning it down to ensure accuracy to receivers he's never thrown to before? I mean, he had to know this was being measured, right? Wouldn't surprise me to see this being measured at his pro day, and wouldn't surprise me if he throws much harder. I don't remember Watson ever having a "gun", but I also don't remember his power being an issue either.

    I'd say it's pretty much guaranteed that he knew it was measured, I'm also sure concerned teams will do their own measurement when they bring him in for a visit

  • lol... this time of year you can and will find every evaluation/opinion on every player possible... excepting the select few, "elite" prospects.

    List those about which you've not heard a dissenting opinion...

    • Myles Garrett
    • Jamal Adams
    • Marshon Latimore

    Am I missing anyone?

    @tour2ma said:

    lol... this time of year you can and will find every evaluation/opinion on every player possible... excepting the select few, "elite" prospects.

    List those about which you've not heard a dissenting opinion...

    • Myles Garrett
    • Jamal Adams
    • Marshon Latimore

    Am I missing anyone?

    WTF are you talking about...never heard a dissenting opinion on Garrett? You have read a few of my posts. Even ignoring the QB situation.....there is still a chance that Allen may be as stout as Garrett...and fill a greater need for the Browns. Plus there was the comparison between Garrett and Barnett. Statistically Barnett has had an equal or better college career.

  • It's obvious he is not talking about you in the list of opinions, just people who do it for a living.. Gees. 😛

  • It's obvious he is not talking about you in the list of opinions, just people who do it for a living.. Gees. 😛

    @texasag1969 said:

    It's obvious he is not talking about you in the list of opinions, just people who do it for a living.. Gees. 😛

    I know....the Gays for Gayrett club will be out in full force whinging if anything whatsoever is said about your boy that is not pure worshipful adoration.

  • @texasag1969 said:

    It's obvious he is not talking about you in the list of opinions, just people who do it for a living.. Gees. 😛

    I know....the Gays for Gayrett club will be out in full force whinging if anything whatsoever is said about your boy that is not pure worshipful adoration.

    @the-gipper said:

    I know....the Gays for Gayrett club will be out in full force whinging if anything whatsoever is said about your boy that is not pure worshipful adoration.

    Ah, Trump jr. deflects from the issue as to whom Tour was referring. Nice try Donnie. Almost lawyerlike. 😆

  • @the-gipper said:

    I know....the Gays for Gayrett club will be out in full force whinging if anything whatsoever is said about your boy that is not pure worshipful adoration.

    Ah, Trump jr. deflects from the issue as to whom Tour was referring. Nice try Donnie. Almost lawyerlike. 😆

    @texasag1969 said:

    Ah, Trump jr. deflects from the issue as to whom Tour was referring. Nice try Donnie. Almost lawyerlike. 😆

    Boy you are so far off if you think I have any remote inkling toward #45. And it is of no consequence as to whom he was referring. We have already been well aware that "professionals" have no greater clue about things than any of us here do.

    From the way the Browns have drafted over the years that is pretty conclusive...fair to say?

  • @texasag1969 said:

    Ah, Trump jr. deflects from the issue as to whom Tour was referring. Nice try Donnie. Almost lawyerlike. 😆

    Boy you are so far off if you think I have any remote inkling toward #45. And it is of no consequence as to whom he was referring. We have already been well aware that "professionals" have no greater clue about things than any of us here do.

    From the way the Browns have drafted over the years that is pretty conclusive...fair to say?

    Unfortunately yes

    @the-gipper said:

    Boy you are so far off if you think I have any remote inkling toward #45. And it is of no consequence as to whom he was referring. We have already been well aware that "professionals" have no greater clue about things than any of us here do.

    From the way the Browns have drafted over the years that is pretty conclusive...fair to say?

    .

    Unfortunately yes, that is fair to say Gip. Just pulling on your tail this morning. And where the hell is Tour? He's been up to make a pick now for about 5 hours and remains offline. Very strange since he has been staying up regularly with the Browns draft board.

  • Unfortunately yes

    @the-gipper said:

    Boy you are so far off if you think I have any remote inkling toward #45. And it is of no consequence as to whom he was referring. We have already been well aware that "professionals" have no greater clue about things than any of us here do.

    From the way the Browns have drafted over the years that is pretty conclusive...fair to say?

    .

    Unfortunately yes, that is fair to say Gip. Just pulling on your tail this morning. And where the hell is Tour? He's been up to make a pick now for about 5 hours and remains offline. Very strange since he has been staying up regularly with the Browns draft board.

    @texasag1969 said:

    Unfortunately yes

    .

    Unfortunately yes, that is fair to say Gip. Just pulling on your tail this morning. And where the hell is Tour? He's been up to make a pick now for about 5 hours and remains offline. Very strange since he has been staying up regularly with the Browns draft board.

    Sometimes some of us have work to do. I don't know if he is retired or not. My job for the most part is done here at my desk with the computer on it...but occasionally I have to do a better part of the day in client meetings, in court or otherwise. So I suspect he has that too.

  • @choco said:

    Even lattinore came in heavy...Called it water weight.

    OK... sub Solomon for Marshon and call it "point made"...

    Seems extra crazy this year. I'm not sure I'm going to make it draft day before my head explodes...

    @tour2ma said:

    OK... sub Solomon for Marshon and call it "point made"...

    Seems extra crazy this year. I'm not sure I'm going to make it draft day before my head explodes...

    Nah, I'm an idiot. Read lattimore, thought fournette.

    ?

  • Here's what I wonder: Did Watson even know about this velocity metric? Was he throwing as hard as he normally does, or was he just tuning it down to ensure accuracy to receivers he's never thrown to before? I mean, he had to know this was being measured, right? Wouldn't surprise me to see this being measured at his pro day, and wouldn't surprise me if he throws much harder. I don't remember Watson ever having a "gun", but I also don't remember his power being an issue either.

    Edit: I just watched some highlights of Watson, and while I understand "highlights" aren't exactly a good representation of a player's ability, the film did at least show multiple throws with plenty of zip. Obviously I don't have a radar gun app for Youtube, but I can tell you the arm definitely passes the "eye test". Conversely, I did notice several throws that Watson kind of "lollypops" up in the air, but these were deep throws that enabled his receiver to get underneath. Whenever I saw a throw over the middle, the ball got there promptly.

    @jiggins7919 said:

    Edit: I just watched some highlights of Watson, and while I understand "highlights" aren't exactly a good representation of a player's ability, the film did at least show multiple throws with plenty of zip. Obviously I don't have a radar gun app for Youtube, but I can tell you the arm definitely passes the "eye test". Conversely, I did notice several throws that Watson kind of "lollypops" up in the air, but these were deep throws that enabled his receiver to get underneath. Whenever I saw a throw over the middle, the ball got there promptly.

    Deep lollypops take arm strength, too. Strength is not necessarily the same thing as velocity (quick twitch vs. slow twitch), but if I had to pick between them, then I think I go for strength.

    I wonder what Watson's effective range is... certainly 50-yds... probably 55... 60?

    The other warning sign would be at what distance does his accuracy start to fall apart. Straining for distance (or velocity) hurts accuracy.

  • http://www.wbir.com/mb/news/local/ut-freshman-does-the-math-behind-the-vols-perfect-play-vs-georgia/328445390

    Got interested in Dobbs' velocity and found this story. If you do the math, Dobbs is at least capable of 54mph haha. Might have only been on one play.

  • Word out of Clemson's Pro-Day is Watson killed it...

    Here's Mayock's report:

    C7DbvyNVoAIjor2.jpg

    Some year this QB shit will be easy for us, but ain't looking like it'll be 2017...

  • https://twitter.com/nfldraftscout/status/842424217136164865?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw

    Matt Millers take

    "Hearing a lot of inconsistent comments from scouts at the Clemson pro day on Watson. Think it depends on if you liked him prior"

    Matt Miller@nfldraftscout
    Hearing a lot of inconsistent comments from scouts at the Clemson pro day on Watson. Think it depends on if you liked him prior
  • Seems about right...

    Daniel Jeremiah‏Verified account @MoveTheSticks

    Scout at Clemson on Watson's day: Average day. Inconsistent timing/placement...solid on deep ball. It was a B-/C+ type workout.

    https://twitter.com/movethesticks/status/842402207060262912

    Daniel Jeremiah@MoveTheSticks
    Scout at Clemson on Watson's day:
    Average day. Inconsistent timing/placement...solid on deep ball. It was a B-/C+ type workout.
  • Once heard that Manziel's proday was one of the best ever seen.

  • Once heard that Manziel's proday was one of the best ever seen.

    @tiamat63 said:

    Once heard that Manziel's proday was one of the best ever seen.

    Yep........ and he even wore a helmet too!

  • @tiamat63 said:

    Once heard that Manziel's proday was one of the best ever seen.

    Yep........ and he even wore a helmet too!

    @d-bone said:

    Yep........ and he even wore a helmet too!

    And pads!
  • Word out of Clemson's Pro-Day is Watson killed it...

    Here's Mayock's report:

    C7DbvyNVoAIjor2.jpg

    Some year this QB shit will be easy for us, but ain't looking like it'll be 2017...

    @tour2ma said:

    Word out of Clemson's Pro-Day is Watson killed it...

    Here's Mayock's report:

    C7DbvyNVoAIjor2.jpg

    Some year this QB shit will be easy for us, but ain't looking like it'll be 2017...

    Word is that others didn't think it was all that and a bag of chips. From the Akron Beacon Journal:

    Watson received mixed reviews for his pro day throwing session.

    NFL Network analyst Mike Mayock said on the air Watson had a "very impressive workout."

    NFL Network analyst Daniel Jeremiah tweeted that a scout at Clemson's pro day told him Watson's timing and placement were inconsistent but his deep throws were solid.

    "It was a B-/C+ type workout," the scout told Jeremiah.

    Watson completed 54-of-62 passes, according to the Associated Press. He also took snaps under center, something he'll need to adjust to in the NFL after operating out of the shotgun in Clemson's spread offense.