Skip to content

Hue Jackson: Browns won't trade No. 1 overall pick

The Browns Board
81 26 2.3k
  • Hue Jackson: Browns won't trade No. 1 overall pick

    12:58 PM CT ---- Pat McManamonESPN Staff Writer

    http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/19023944/cleveland-browns-not-trade-no-1-pick-quarterback-coach-hue-jackson-says



    Well, Bill? Your move...

    OrionO Orion wrote on last edited by
    #13

    @tour2ma said:

    Hue Jackson: Browns won't trade No. 1 overall pick

    Well, I guess HUE knows who he wants to draft.

    ...and that 'not trading' thing is always subject to change based on the offer.

  • Hue Jackson: Browns won't trade No. 1 overall pick

    12:58 PM CT ---- Pat McManamonESPN Staff Writer

    http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/19023944/cleveland-browns-not-trade-no-1-pick-quarterback-coach-hue-jackson-says



    Well, Bill? Your move...

    C Clevfan4life wrote on last edited by
    #14

    @tour2ma said:

    Hue Jackson: Browns won't trade No. 1 overall pick
    ...
     
    As the british would say...well thats a great weight off me chest tommy
  • @tour2ma said:

    Hue Jackson: Browns won't trade No. 1 overall pick

    Well, I guess HUE knows who he wants to draft.

    ...and that 'not trading' thing is always subject to change based on the offer.

    Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by
    #15

    @orion said:

    Well, I guess HUE knows who he wants to draft.

    ...and that 'not trading' thing is always subject to change based on the offer.

    True... everything has a price... but what make you think the messenger has a big say in the draft?

  • KvoetheK Kvoethe wrote on last edited by
    #16

    Brock is getting a tryout too from what i have trad

  • jcam222J jcam222 wrote on last edited by
    #17

    @ghoolie said:

    In other news................ the Browns will waste another #1 pick this April.

    So Garrett is a waste?
  • Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by
    #18

    Has the accordion king named the player he wants at one yet?

  • @orion said:

    Well, I guess HUE knows who he wants to draft.

    ...and that 'not trading' thing is always subject to change based on the offer.

    True... everything has a price... but what make you think the messenger has a big say in the draft?

    OrionO Orion wrote on last edited by
    #19

    @tour2ma said:

    but what make you think the messenger has a big say in the draft?

    That's the 64k$ question.

    He is 'supposed' to have a say....but I don't know how much The Harvard Committee cares.

  • MLD WoodyM MLD Woody wrote on last edited by
    #20

    If any QB could play until he's 46, it's Brady

  • @tour2ma said:

    Hue Jackson: Browns won't trade No. 1 overall pick

    Well, I guess HUE knows who he wants to draft.

    ...and that 'not trading' thing is always subject to change based on the offer.

    hoortaH hoorta wrote on last edited by
    #21

    @orion said:

    Well, I guess HUE knows who he wants to draft.

    ...and that 'not trading' thing is always subject to change based on the offer.

    It would take at least what Washington gave up for Griffin, if not more for the Browns to be interested- MHO We start at three firsts and a second.

    @tour2ma said:

    Has the accordion king named the player he wants at one yet?

    I know which QB he wants, but not sure if he's said @ #1 yet.

    @mld-woody said:

    If any QB could play until he's 46, it's Brady

    Until he gets hurt. That might change his mind. My bet is he won't make it that far, 2017 might well be his last season. Looked it up, Geroge Blanda played until he was 48, but his last 9 seasons he was essentially just a kicker.

  • @tour2ma said:

    but what make you think the messenger has a big say in the draft?

    That's the 64k$ question.

    He is 'supposed' to have a say....but I don't know how much The Harvard Committee cares.

    Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by
    #22

    @orion said:

    That's the 64k$ question.

    He is 'supposed' to have a say....but I don't know how much The Harvard Committee cares.

    My guess?

    Hue's is a co-equal voice with the other 2 or 3 Departments... the number depending on if you split Scouting into college and Pro.

    I think he, representing his and his staff's views, has to join the consensus... at minimum endorse any decision to target a prospect.

  • @orion said:

    Well, I guess HUE knows who he wants to draft.

    ...and that 'not trading' thing is always subject to change based on the offer.

    It would take at least what Washington gave up for Griffin, if not more for the Browns to be interested- MHO We start at three firsts and a second.

    @tour2ma said:

    Has the accordion king named the player he wants at one yet?

    I know which QB he wants, but not sure if he's said @ #1 yet.

    @mld-woody said:

    If any QB could play until he's 46, it's Brady

    Until he gets hurt. That might change his mind. My bet is he won't make it that far, 2017 might well be his last season. Looked it up, Geroge Blanda played until he was 48, but his last 9 seasons he was essentially just a kicker.

    Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by Tour2ma
    #23

    @hoorta said:

    I know which QB he wants, but not sure if he's said @ #1 yet.

    Until he gets hurt. That might change his mind. My bet is he won't make it that far, 2017 might well be his last season. Looked it up, Geroge Blanda played until he was 48, but his last 9 seasons he was essentially just a kicker.

    Except when old George trotted into a game to break our hearts... among other opponents' fans.

    Not at #1??? Does he not understand the desperate importance of the position? please let me know if he does... a simple quote click for posterity will do.

  • Has the accordion king named the player he wants at one yet?

    W wargograw wrote on last edited by
    #24

    @tour2ma said:

    Has the accordion king named the player he wants at one yet?

    Trubisky

  • Has the accordion king named the player he wants at one yet?

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
    #25

    @tour2ma said:

    Has the accordion king named the player he wants at one yet?

    He said MT.

  • @orion said:

    Well, I guess HUE knows who he wants to draft.

    ...and that 'not trading' thing is always subject to change based on the offer.

    It would take at least what Washington gave up for Griffin, if not more for the Browns to be interested- MHO We start at three firsts and a second.

    @tour2ma said:

    Has the accordion king named the player he wants at one yet?

    I know which QB he wants, but not sure if he's said @ #1 yet.

    @mld-woody said:

    If any QB could play until he's 46, it's Brady

    Until he gets hurt. That might change his mind. My bet is he won't make it that far, 2017 might well be his last season. Looked it up, Geroge Blanda played until he was 48, but his last 9 seasons he was essentially just a kicker.

    nickersN nickers wrote on last edited by
    #26

    @hoorta said:

    It would take at least what Washington gave up for Griffin, if not more for the Browns to be interested- MHO We start at three firsts and a second.

    I know which QB he wants, but not sure if he's said @ #1 yet.

    Until he gets hurt. That might change his mind. My bet is he won't make it that far, 2017 might well be his last season. Looked it up, Geroge Blanda played until he was 48, but his last 9 seasons he was essentially just a kicker.

    It's Paxton Lynch! , remember?.. the great Paxton lynch?.. Clip board holder/ bench warmer.. LOL

  • @hoorta said:

    It would take at least what Washington gave up for Griffin, if not more for the Browns to be interested- MHO We start at three firsts and a second.

    I know which QB he wants, but not sure if he's said @ #1 yet.

    Until he gets hurt. That might change his mind. My bet is he won't make it that far, 2017 might well be his last season. Looked it up, Geroge Blanda played until he was 48, but his last 9 seasons he was essentially just a kicker.

    It's Paxton Lynch! , remember?.. the great Paxton lynch?.. Clip board holder/ bench warmer.. LOL

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
    #27

    @nickers said:

    It's Paxton Lynch! , remember?.. the great Paxton lynch?.. Clip board holder/ bench warmer.. LOL

    Lynch was just a rookie, and IMO the Broncos did the right thing with him, basically letting him sit. For all we know he could now come out great guns. It remains to be seen.

  • @nickers said:

    It's Paxton Lynch! , remember?.. the great Paxton lynch?.. Clip board holder/ bench warmer.. LOL

    Lynch was just a rookie, and IMO the Broncos did the right thing with him, basically letting him sit. For all we know he could now come out great guns. It remains to be seen.

    Mark OM Mark O wrote on last edited by
    #28

    @the-gipper said:

    Lynch was just a rookie, and IMO the Broncos did the right thing with him, basically letting him sit. For all we know he could now come out great guns. It remains to be seen.

    And when he did play, he looked worse that Johnny Manzidiot.

  • @the-gipper said:

    Lynch was just a rookie, and IMO the Broncos did the right thing with him, basically letting him sit. For all we know he could now come out great guns. It remains to be seen.

    And when he did play, he looked worse that Johnny Manzidiot.

    B BroncoLurker wrote on last edited by
    #29

    @mark-o said:

    And when he did play, he looked worse that Johnny Manzidiot.

    He showed some flashes, but with our (Denver's) o-line and our running game, not much could be expected.

    @the-gipper said:

    Lynch was just a rookie, and IMO the Broncos did the right thing with him, basically letting him sit. For all we know he could now come out great guns. It remains to be seen.

    Would you trade for him, if so what would you give up? If for some reason the Broncos go the Romo route and are looking to deal him.

  • @mark-o said:

    And when he did play, he looked worse that Johnny Manzidiot.

    He showed some flashes, but with our (Denver's) o-line and our running game, not much could be expected.

    @the-gipper said:

    Lynch was just a rookie, and IMO the Broncos did the right thing with him, basically letting him sit. For all we know he could now come out great guns. It remains to be seen.

    Would you trade for him, if so what would you give up? If for some reason the Broncos go the Romo route and are looking to deal him.

    Mark OM Mark O wrote on last edited by
    #30

    @broncolurker said:

    Would you trade for him, if so what would you give up? If for some reason the Broncos go the Romo route and are looking to deal him.

    I would offer a bag of used footballs and maybe throw in a JUGS machine for him.

  • @mark-o said:

    And when he did play, he looked worse that Johnny Manzidiot.

    He showed some flashes, but with our (Denver's) o-line and our running game, not much could be expected.

    @the-gipper said:

    Lynch was just a rookie, and IMO the Broncos did the right thing with him, basically letting him sit. For all we know he could now come out great guns. It remains to be seen.

    Would you trade for him, if so what would you give up? If for some reason the Broncos go the Romo route and are looking to deal him.

    Bob806B Bob806 wrote on last edited by
    #31

    @broncolurker said:

    He showed some flashes, but with our (Denver's) o-line and our running game, not much could be expected.

    Would you trade for him, if so what would you give up? If for some reason the Broncos go the Romo route and are looking to deal him.

    No, we will not trade with Mr. Elway. He caused enough pain around here, although I think Marty aided & abetted him.

  • @mark-o said:

    And when he did play, he looked worse that Johnny Manzidiot.

    He showed some flashes, but with our (Denver's) o-line and our running game, not much could be expected.

    @the-gipper said:

    Lynch was just a rookie, and IMO the Broncos did the right thing with him, basically letting him sit. For all we know he could now come out great guns. It remains to be seen.

    Would you trade for him, if so what would you give up? If for some reason the Broncos go the Romo route and are looking to deal him.

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
    #32

    @broncolurker said:

    He showed some flashes, but with our (Denver's) o-line and our running game, not much could be expected.

    Would you trade for him, if so what would you give up? If for some reason the Broncos go the Romo route and are looking to deal him.

    I might. I really would have to ponder what I would give up. Perhaps #33. Though, I would still rather have MT.

    The issue would be who would be better: Lynch or one of this year's QB candidates besides MT.