Skip to content
The Browns Board
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. Hue Jackson: Browns won't trade No. 1 overall pick

Hue Jackson: Browns won't trade No. 1 overall pick

The Browns Board
81 26 2.3k

  • Brock is getting a tryout too from what i have trad

  • @ghoolie said:

    In other news................ the Browns will waste another #1 pick this April.

    So Garrett is a waste?

  • Has the accordion king named the player he wants at one yet?

    "When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196
    W The GipperT tiamat63T 3 Replies
  • Tour2maT Tour2ma

    @orion said:

    Well, I guess HUE knows who he wants to draft.

    ...and that 'not trading' thing is always subject to change based on the offer.

    True... everything has a price... but what make you think the messenger has a big say in the draft?

    @tour2ma said:

    but what make you think the messenger has a big say in the draft?

    That's the 64k$ question.

    He is 'supposed' to have a say....but I don't know how much The Harvard Committee cares.

    BEING A BROWNS FAN IS A TEST TO SEE HOW MUCH YOU CAN TAKE
    Tour2maT 1 Reply

  • If any QB could play until he's 46, it's Brady

    Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody!
  • OrionO Orion

    @tour2ma said:

    Hue Jackson: Browns won't trade No. 1 overall pick

    Well, I guess HUE knows who he wants to draft.

    ...and that 'not trading' thing is always subject to change based on the offer.

    @orion said:

    Well, I guess HUE knows who he wants to draft.

    ...and that 'not trading' thing is always subject to change based on the offer.

    It would take at least what Washington gave up for Griffin, if not more for the Browns to be interested- MHO We start at three firsts and a second.

    @tour2ma said:

    Has the accordion king named the player he wants at one yet?

    I know which QB he wants, but not sure if he's said @ #1 yet.

    @mld-woody said:

    If any QB could play until he's 46, it's Brady

    Until he gets hurt. That might change his mind. My bet is he won't make it that far, 2017 might well be his last season. Looked it up, Geroge Blanda played until he was 48, but his last 9 seasons he was essentially just a kicker.

    Tour2maT nickersN 2 Replies
  • OrionO Orion

    @tour2ma said:

    but what make you think the messenger has a big say in the draft?

    That's the 64k$ question.

    He is 'supposed' to have a say....but I don't know how much The Harvard Committee cares.

    @orion said:

    That's the 64k$ question.

    He is 'supposed' to have a say....but I don't know how much The Harvard Committee cares.

    My guess?

    Hue's is a co-equal voice with the other 2 or 3 Departments... the number depending on if you split Scouting into college and Pro.

    I think he, representing his and his staff's views, has to join the consensus... at minimum endorse any decision to target a prospect.

    "When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196
  • hoortaH hoorta

    @orion said:

    Well, I guess HUE knows who he wants to draft.

    ...and that 'not trading' thing is always subject to change based on the offer.

    It would take at least what Washington gave up for Griffin, if not more for the Browns to be interested- MHO We start at three firsts and a second.

    @tour2ma said:

    Has the accordion king named the player he wants at one yet?

    I know which QB he wants, but not sure if he's said @ #1 yet.

    @mld-woody said:

    If any QB could play until he's 46, it's Brady

    Until he gets hurt. That might change his mind. My bet is he won't make it that far, 2017 might well be his last season. Looked it up, Geroge Blanda played until he was 48, but his last 9 seasons he was essentially just a kicker.

    @hoorta said:

    I know which QB he wants, but not sure if he's said @ #1 yet.

    Until he gets hurt. That might change his mind. My bet is he won't make it that far, 2017 might well be his last season. Looked it up, Geroge Blanda played until he was 48, but his last 9 seasons he was essentially just a kicker.

    Except when old George trotted into a game to break our hearts... among other opponents' fans.

    Not at #1??? Does he not understand the desperate importance of the position? please let me know if he does... a simple quote click for posterity will do.

    "When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196
  • Tour2maT Tour2ma

    Has the accordion king named the player he wants at one yet?

    @tour2ma said:

    Has the accordion king named the player he wants at one yet?

    Trubisky

  • Tour2maT Tour2ma

    Has the accordion king named the player he wants at one yet?

    @tour2ma said:

    Has the accordion king named the player he wants at one yet?

    He said MT.

  • hoortaH hoorta

    @orion said:

    Well, I guess HUE knows who he wants to draft.

    ...and that 'not trading' thing is always subject to change based on the offer.

    It would take at least what Washington gave up for Griffin, if not more for the Browns to be interested- MHO We start at three firsts and a second.

    @tour2ma said:

    Has the accordion king named the player he wants at one yet?

    I know which QB he wants, but not sure if he's said @ #1 yet.

    @mld-woody said:

    If any QB could play until he's 46, it's Brady

    Until he gets hurt. That might change his mind. My bet is he won't make it that far, 2017 might well be his last season. Looked it up, Geroge Blanda played until he was 48, but his last 9 seasons he was essentially just a kicker.

    @hoorta said:

    It would take at least what Washington gave up for Griffin, if not more for the Browns to be interested- MHO We start at three firsts and a second.

    I know which QB he wants, but not sure if he's said @ #1 yet.

    Until he gets hurt. That might change his mind. My bet is he won't make it that far, 2017 might well be his last season. Looked it up, Geroge Blanda played until he was 48, but his last 9 seasons he was essentially just a kicker.

    It's Paxton Lynch! , remember?.. the great Paxton lynch?.. Clip board holder/ bench warmer.. LOL

    Nickers...."There are no old running QB's in the NFL "~Sam Rutigliano~
  • nickersN nickers

    @hoorta said:

    It would take at least what Washington gave up for Griffin, if not more for the Browns to be interested- MHO We start at three firsts and a second.

    I know which QB he wants, but not sure if he's said @ #1 yet.

    Until he gets hurt. That might change his mind. My bet is he won't make it that far, 2017 might well be his last season. Looked it up, Geroge Blanda played until he was 48, but his last 9 seasons he was essentially just a kicker.

    It's Paxton Lynch! , remember?.. the great Paxton lynch?.. Clip board holder/ bench warmer.. LOL

    @nickers said:

    It's Paxton Lynch! , remember?.. the great Paxton lynch?.. Clip board holder/ bench warmer.. LOL

    Lynch was just a rookie, and IMO the Broncos did the right thing with him, basically letting him sit. For all we know he could now come out great guns. It remains to be seen.

  • The GipperT The Gipper

    @nickers said:

    It's Paxton Lynch! , remember?.. the great Paxton lynch?.. Clip board holder/ bench warmer.. LOL

    Lynch was just a rookie, and IMO the Broncos did the right thing with him, basically letting him sit. For all we know he could now come out great guns. It remains to be seen.

    @the-gipper said:

    Lynch was just a rookie, and IMO the Broncos did the right thing with him, basically letting him sit. For all we know he could now come out great guns. It remains to be seen.

    And when he did play, he looked worse that Johnny Manzidiot.

  • Mark OM Mark O

    @the-gipper said:

    Lynch was just a rookie, and IMO the Broncos did the right thing with him, basically letting him sit. For all we know he could now come out great guns. It remains to be seen.

    And when he did play, he looked worse that Johnny Manzidiot.

    @mark-o said:

    And when he did play, he looked worse that Johnny Manzidiot.

    He showed some flashes, but with our (Denver's) o-line and our running game, not much could be expected.

    @the-gipper said:

    Lynch was just a rookie, and IMO the Broncos did the right thing with him, basically letting him sit. For all we know he could now come out great guns. It remains to be seen.

    Would you trade for him, if so what would you give up? If for some reason the Broncos go the Romo route and are looking to deal him.

    Mark OM Bob806B The GipperT R 4 Replies
  • B BroncoLurker

    @mark-o said:

    And when he did play, he looked worse that Johnny Manzidiot.

    He showed some flashes, but with our (Denver's) o-line and our running game, not much could be expected.

    @the-gipper said:

    Lynch was just a rookie, and IMO the Broncos did the right thing with him, basically letting him sit. For all we know he could now come out great guns. It remains to be seen.

    Would you trade for him, if so what would you give up? If for some reason the Broncos go the Romo route and are looking to deal him.

    @broncolurker said:

    Would you trade for him, if so what would you give up? If for some reason the Broncos go the Romo route and are looking to deal him.

    I would offer a bag of used footballs and maybe throw in a JUGS machine for him.

  • B BroncoLurker

    @mark-o said:

    And when he did play, he looked worse that Johnny Manzidiot.

    He showed some flashes, but with our (Denver's) o-line and our running game, not much could be expected.

    @the-gipper said:

    Lynch was just a rookie, and IMO the Broncos did the right thing with him, basically letting him sit. For all we know he could now come out great guns. It remains to be seen.

    Would you trade for him, if so what would you give up? If for some reason the Broncos go the Romo route and are looking to deal him.

    @broncolurker said:

    He showed some flashes, but with our (Denver's) o-line and our running game, not much could be expected.

    Would you trade for him, if so what would you give up? If for some reason the Broncos go the Romo route and are looking to deal him.

    No, we will not trade with Mr. Elway. He caused enough pain around here, although I think Marty aided & abetted him.

    Karlis Missed
  • B BroncoLurker

    @mark-o said:

    And when he did play, he looked worse that Johnny Manzidiot.

    He showed some flashes, but with our (Denver's) o-line and our running game, not much could be expected.

    @the-gipper said:

    Lynch was just a rookie, and IMO the Broncos did the right thing with him, basically letting him sit. For all we know he could now come out great guns. It remains to be seen.

    Would you trade for him, if so what would you give up? If for some reason the Broncos go the Romo route and are looking to deal him.

    @broncolurker said:

    He showed some flashes, but with our (Denver's) o-line and our running game, not much could be expected.

    Would you trade for him, if so what would you give up? If for some reason the Broncos go the Romo route and are looking to deal him.

    I might. I really would have to ponder what I would give up. Perhaps #33. Though, I would still rather have MT.

    The issue would be who would be better: Lynch or one of this year's QB candidates besides MT.

  • B BroncoLurker

    @mark-o said:

    And when he did play, he looked worse that Johnny Manzidiot.

    He showed some flashes, but with our (Denver's) o-line and our running game, not much could be expected.

    @the-gipper said:

    Lynch was just a rookie, and IMO the Broncos did the right thing with him, basically letting him sit. For all we know he could now come out great guns. It remains to be seen.

    Would you trade for him, if so what would you give up? If for some reason the Broncos go the Romo route and are looking to deal him.

    @broncolurker said:

    He showed some flashes, but with our (Denver's) o-line and our running game, not much could be expected.

    Would you trade for him, if so what would you give up? If for some reason the Broncos go the Romo route and are looking to deal him.

    Broncos wouldn't Trade their 23 year old first rd QB because they brought in an over the hill, chronically broke-dick has-been who couldn't stay healthy behind what is widely regarded as the best O line in the NFL.

  • R RoyceRolls

    @broncolurker said:

    He showed some flashes, but with our (Denver's) o-line and our running game, not much could be expected.

    Would you trade for him, if so what would you give up? If for some reason the Broncos go the Romo route and are looking to deal him.

    Broncos wouldn't Trade their 23 year old first rd QB because they brought in an over the hill, chronically broke-dick has-been who couldn't stay healthy behind what is widely regarded as the best O line in the NFL.

    @roycerolls said:

    Broncos wouldn't Trade their 23 year old first rd QB because they brought in an over the hill, chronically broke-dick has-been who couldn't stay healthy behind what is widely regarded as the best O line in the NFL.

    Probably not, but they also have a guy they drafted the year before. It's hard to read how they really feel about the 2 and would possibly trade the one with the bigger trade value if they rate them equal and bring in Romo.

  • I can't imagine any GM would see Romo as anything more than a 4 game solution. The guy has injured his back in 3 of the last 4 seasons and is on the wrong side of 35. Just ask Frida Kahlo how hard it is to Return from back injury.

    gumby73G 1 Reply
Log in to reply