Skip to content

Browns Trade For NYJ S Calvin Pryor

The Browns Board
89 35 4.1k
  • U Unsympathetic wrote on last edited by
    #23

    Davis wasn't going to start - so might as well trade him for somebody who might. Peppers and Pryor looks a lot better than last year.

    They might not have predetermined positions [eg, just S rather than SS/FS] and could just alternate the single-high based on ball location..

  • V VikingDawg wrote on last edited by
    #24

    Goddamn, I gotta hand it to theae guys, this here... THIS is that missing piece we needed to take that next step. A fucking bust at SS. The needle just moved ladies and gents, we are on our way with Pryor.

  • U Unsympathetic wrote on last edited by
    #25

    Nobody ever said "this" was the missing piece except you. Pryor is better than who we had on the roster, period. All good teams look for small ways to get better every day, and this is yet another brick in the road.

    And we didn't give up anything to get him.

    Time for you to change your unrealistic expectations. The only thing that's a bust is your understanding of how good teams are actually built.

  • Goddamn, I gotta hand it to theae guys, this here... THIS is that missing piece we needed to take that next step. A fucking bust at SS. The needle just moved ladies and gents, we are on our way with Pryor.

    Tim Couch Pulls OutT Tim Couch Pulls Out wrote on last edited by
    #26

    @vikingdawg said:

    Goddamn, I gotta hand it to theae guys, this here... THIS is that missing piece we needed to take that next step. A fucking bust at SS. The needle just moved ladies and gents, we are on our way with Pryor.

    who are you?

  • miktoxicM miktoxic wrote on last edited by
    #27

    ghoolie's nephew.

    the glass an eighth full crowd.

  • I wouldn't be surprised if Pryor gets a chance to play FS. At Louisville he was a playmaker. He was either lay big shots or making crazy picks. He has range so I think he could play the single high safety role, but I don't know about him coming down and playing man

    tiamat63T tiamat63 wrote on last edited by
    #28

    @louisville-slugger said:

    I wouldn't be surprised if Pryor gets a chance to play FS. At Louisville he was a playmaker. He was either lay big shots or making crazy picks. He has range so I think he could play the single high safety role, but I don't know about him coming down and playing man

    Not a chance he plays centerfield unless we are in deep shit.

  • MLD WoodyM MLD Woody wrote on last edited by
    #29

    First of all, ignore ghoolie the troll

    Second, what does this mean position wise?

    - Pryor at FS? Probably not

    - Pryor at SS with Pep at SAM? Probably not

    - Pryor at SS with Pep at FS? Unlikely

    - Pep at SS and Pryor at a LB hybrid role? Maybe

    - Pep at SS in base sets, with Pryor at SS and Pep at nickel/SAM in 4-2-5 packages? I think that's most likely.

    Who knows

  • First of all, ignore ghoolie the troll

    Second, what does this mean position wise?

    - Pryor at FS? Probably not

    - Pryor at SS with Pep at SAM? Probably not

    - Pryor at SS with Pep at FS? Unlikely

    - Pep at SS and Pryor at a LB hybrid role? Maybe

    - Pep at SS in base sets, with Pryor at SS and Pep at nickel/SAM in 4-2-5 packages? I think that's most likely.

    Who knows

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
    #30

    @mld-woody said:

    First of all, ignore ghoolie the troll

    Second, what does this mean position wise?

    - Pryor at FS? Probably not

    - Pryor at SS with Pep at SAM? Probably not

    - Pryor at SS with Pep at FS? Unlikely

    - Pep at SS and Pryor at a LB hybrid role? Maybe

    - Pep at SS in base sets, with Pryor at SS and Pep at nickel/SAM in 4-2-5 packages? I think that's most likely.

    Who knows

    Maybe we will just have a bunch of roaming, swarming pack of dogs, like a wolf pack...and the actual label of the position they play will be irrelevent.

    Like a basketball team where all 5 guys on the court are 6'7 to 6'9 and interchangeable.

  • First of all, ignore ghoolie the troll

    Second, what does this mean position wise?

    - Pryor at FS? Probably not

    - Pryor at SS with Pep at SAM? Probably not

    - Pryor at SS with Pep at FS? Unlikely

    - Pep at SS and Pryor at a LB hybrid role? Maybe

    - Pep at SS in base sets, with Pryor at SS and Pep at nickel/SAM in 4-2-5 packages? I think that's most likely.

    Who knows

    Tim Couch Pulls OutT Tim Couch Pulls Out wrote on last edited by
    #31

    @mld-woody said:

    First of all, ignore ghoolie the troll

    Second, what does this mean position wise?

    - Pryor at FS? Probably not

    - Pryor at SS with Pep at SAM? Probably not

    - Pryor at SS with Pep at FS? Unlikely

    - Pep at SS and Pryor at a LB hybrid role? Maybe

    - Pep at SS in base sets, with Pryor at SS and Pep at nickel/SAM in 4-2-5 packages? I think that's most likely.

    Who knows

    Pryor at full time SS, Peppers at full time SAM who slides out to $lb from time to time.

    Peppers is probably our Barron/Bucannon.

  • KvoetheK Kvoethe wrote on last edited by
    #32

    We wanted someone on the team with the last name pryor. It confuses the wannabe fans.

  • Goddamn, I gotta hand it to theae guys, this here... THIS is that missing piece we needed to take that next step. A fucking bust at SS. The needle just moved ladies and gents, we are on our way with Pryor.

    One PostO One Post wrote on last edited by
    #33

    @vikingdawg said:

    Goddamn, I gotta hand it to theae guys, this here... THIS is that missing piece we needed to take that next step. A fucking bust at SS. The needle just moved ladies and gents, we are on our way with Pryor.

    Time for a new name.
  • U Unsympathetic wrote on last edited by
    #34

    Mini Ghoolie

    Face Badly In Need Of A Fist

  • Nobody ever said "this" was the missing piece except you. Pryor is better than who we had on the roster, period. All good teams look for small ways to get better every day, and this is yet another brick in the road.

    And we didn't give up anything to get him.

    Time for you to change your unrealistic expectations. The only thing that's a bust is your understanding of how good teams are actually built.

    V VikingDawg wrote on last edited by
    #35

    @unsympathetic said:

    Nobody ever said "this" was the missing piece except you. Pryor is better than who we had on the roster, period. All good teams look for small ways to get better every day, and this is yet another brick in the road.

    And we didn't give up anything to get him.

    Time for you to change your unrealistic expectations. The only thing that's a bust is your understanding of how good teams are actually built.

    Good teams are built off the QB. From there good teams don't trade for busts and fucking trash while rebuilding. Football 101 stuff right there so not a surprise some faggot polesmoker from MA wouldn't understand the basics of the game.

  • @miktoxic said:

    wasn't he the kid from louisville who's mom bitched about the browns not picking him and said she's glad a bum franchise like the browns didn't draft....lol?

    what a small world. betcha she's changed her tune now.

    That was Bridgewater.

    R RoyceRolls wrote on last edited by
    #36

    @logicisforsquares said:

    That was Devante Parker.

    FIFY

  • jrb12711J jrb12711 wrote on last edited by
    #37

    http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/19511375/new-york-jets-trade-former-first-round-pick-calvin-pryor-cleveland-browns

    Just putting this in here to rep the classy response by Demario Davis. Good luck my man.

  • I am interested to see what happens. I have heard that Wiliams will run a 4-2-5 defense a lot. Basically, 2 LB's being Collins and Kirksey with Peppers and Poyer in the box SS with a FS and the two CB's. Also, I wouldn't discount McCourty moving to FS in these types of sets. If you have Haden and BBC/Taylor on the outside and McCourty out high, this may not be so bad.

    gumby73G gumby73 wrote on last edited by gumby73
    #38

    @bigalow80 said:

    I am interested to see what happens. I have heard that Wiliams will run a 4-2-5 defense a lot. Basically, 2 LB's being Collins and Kirksey with Peppers and Poyer in the box SS with a FS and the two CB's. Also, I wouldn't discount McCourty moving to FS in these types of sets. If you have Haden and BBC/Taylor on the outside and McCourty out high, this may not be so bad.

    Poyer's gone to Bills..Williams will run mostly 4 2 5 or nickle. Peppers on 3rd & longs maybe resting on sidelines awaiting punt return..this is where McCourty/T.Powell &/or Pryor will see time at S/FS imo

  • @logicisforsquares said:

    That was Devante Parker.

    FIFY

    LogicIsForSquaresL LogicIsForSquares wrote on last edited by
    #39

    @roycerolls said:

    FIFY

    Shit. You are right.

  • @mld-woody said:

    First of all, ignore ghoolie the troll

    Second, what does this mean position wise?

    - Pryor at FS? Probably not

    - Pryor at SS with Pep at SAM? Probably not

    - Pryor at SS with Pep at FS? Unlikely

    - Pep at SS and Pryor at a LB hybrid role? Maybe

    - Pep at SS in base sets, with Pryor at SS and Pep at nickel/SAM in 4-2-5 packages? I think that's most likely.

    Who knows

    Maybe we will just have a bunch of roaming, swarming pack of dogs, like a wolf pack...and the actual label of the position they play will be irrelevent.

    Like a basketball team where all 5 guys on the court are 6'7 to 6'9 and interchangeable.

    Canton MikeC Canton Mike wrote on last edited by
    #40

    @the-gipper said:

    Maybe we will just have a bunch of roaming, swarming pack of dogs, like a wolf pack...and the actual label of the position they play will be irrelevent.

    Like a basketball team where all 5 guys on the court are 6'7 to 6'9 and interchangeable.

    Gip, someone on this board said this D will play their way into a nickname..It may just turn out to be "Wolf Pack"....relentless in attack & pursuit.

    Mike

  • @unsympathetic said:

    Nobody ever said "this" was the missing piece except you. Pryor is better than who we had on the roster, period. All good teams look for small ways to get better every day, and this is yet another brick in the road.

    And we didn't give up anything to get him.

    Time for you to change your unrealistic expectations. The only thing that's a bust is your understanding of how good teams are actually built.

    Good teams are built off the QB. From there good teams don't trade for busts and fucking trash while rebuilding. Football 101 stuff right there so not a surprise some faggot polesmoker from MA wouldn't understand the basics of the game.

    chocoC choco wrote on last edited by
    #41

    @vikingdawg said:

    Good teams are built off the QB. From there good teams don't trade for busts and fucking trash while rebuilding. Football 101 stuff right there so not a surprise some faggot polesmoker from MA wouldn't understand the basics of the game.

    Oh look, the ESPN fanboy has an original take. How cute...

    Hows trollies sloppy seconds Workin for ya?

  • @the-gipper said:

    Maybe we will just have a bunch of roaming, swarming pack of dogs, like a wolf pack...and the actual label of the position they play will be irrelevent.

    Like a basketball team where all 5 guys on the court are 6'7 to 6'9 and interchangeable.

    Gip, someone on this board said this D will play their way into a nickname..It may just turn out to be "Wolf Pack"....relentless in attack & pursuit.

    Mike

    Tim Couch Pulls OutT Tim Couch Pulls Out wrote on last edited by
    #42

    @canton-mike said:

    Gip, someone on this board said this D will play their way into a nickname..It may just turn out to be "Wolf Pack"....relentless in attack & pursuit.

    Mike

    I don't hate the Brown Bombers. Saw that one mentioned elsewhere.