Skip to content

Haden a Steeler

The Browns Board
256 52 10.5k 1
  • Canton DawgC Canton Dawg wrote on last edited by

    Kindred & Boddy-Calhoun made the top 5 in the PFF grading scale for the Browns.

    Not one Steeler DB made the top 5.

    https://www.profootballfocus.com/news/pro-refocused-pittsburgh-steelers-21-cleveland-browns-18

  • Canton DawgC Canton Dawg wrote on last edited by

    CB JOE HADEN, 51.4 OVERALL GRADE

    Haden’s first game in a new uniform coincidentally came against his former team. While he broke up a pass early on, the rest of his outing was average at best. He didn’t give up any major plays, but did allow six catches for 80 yards and a 106.3 passer rating into his coverage.

  • gumby73G gumby73 wrote on last edited by gumby73

    Thanks Canton..shows what I thought.Taylor did have a tough day.----1 block punt TD...1 Taylor pulls a inside hand of Brown that was not catch-able  FG...1 ball before half that could get knocked down tips to Brown TD....1 Ben throw up at end Brown high points between 3 defenders,,ballgame..it truly is a game of who creates your own lucky breaks      

  • @unsympathetic said:

    Vindication

    PFF rated Haden all of 51.4 today.  Once again, the FO was right...

    You cant base the performance of a player off of one game. I thought he had a solid game honestly. He almost had a int. 

    U Unsympathetic wrote on last edited by Unsympathetic

    @vagitron said:

    You cant base the performance of a player off of one game.

    Objectively false.  Baseline is exactly the same for all players of the same position - that's the utility of PFF scoring..

    This is his grade for one game.

    He sucked.

  • @vagitron said:

    You cant base the performance of a player off of one game.

    Objectively false.  Baseline is exactly the same for all players of the same position - that's the utility of PFF scoring..

    This is his grade for one game.

    He sucked.

    VagitronV Vagitron wrote on last edited by

    @unsympathetic said:

    Objectively false.  Baseline is exactly the same for all players of the same position - that's the utility of PFF scoring..

    This is his grade for one game.

    He sucked.

    No, our offense didnt sustain drives and our defense was on the field a lot. Slow start which is par for the course, especially on the road. Ben isnt exactly mr. Road game. 

  • R RoyceRolls wrote on last edited by RoyceRolls

    IIRC, Haden was 1 foot away from giving up a huge bomb that just barely went out of bounds. Even with that stroke of luck he certainly was not "par for the course". 

    The media, fan base and even FO (if you read between the lines) view the Browns receiving corps as one of the weakest in the league, and Slow Haden was still lucky to average bogey.  

  • IIRC, Haden was 1 foot away from giving up a huge bomb that just barely went out of bounds. Even with that stroke of luck he certainly was not "par for the course". 

    The media, fan base and even FO (if you read between the lines) view the Browns receiving corps as one of the weakest in the league, and Slow Haden was still lucky to average bogey.  

    VagitronV Vagitron wrote on last edited by

    @roycerolls said:

    IIRC, Haden was 1 foot away from giving up a huge bomb that just barely went out of bounds. Even with that stroke of luck he certainly was not "par for the course". 

    The media, fan base and even FO (if you read between the lines) view the Browns receiving corps as one of the weakest in the league, and Slow Haden was still lucky to average bogey.  

    Zone, he was responsible for the underneath. Safety over the top was to blame. 

  • D BoneD D Bone wrote on last edited by

    @boo-fagley said:

    The Steelers gave Haden the game ball

    Much like a 6th place Little League team getting a trophy. 

  • R RoyceRolls wrote on last edited by

    Haden's "zone" was responsible for six catches and 80 yards, quit trying to polish a turd. 

  • Kindred & Boddy-Calhoun made the top 5 in the PFF grading scale for the Browns.

    Not one Steeler DB made the top 5.

    https://www.profootballfocus.com/news/pro-refocused-pittsburgh-steelers-21-cleveland-browns-18

    Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by

    @canton-dawg said:

    https://www.profootballfocus.com/news/pro-refocused-pittsburgh-steelers-21-cleveland-browns-18

    A little surprised at Zeitler's high marks... impression was he had some issues. We shall see...

    @vagitron said:

    No, our offense didnt sustain drives and our defense was on the field a lot. Slow start which is par for the course, especially on the road. Ben isnt exactly mr. Road game. 

    .... and our D had something to do with that. But if you want to blame a Steeler, blame Bell and his hold out. He clearly was not in game form.

  • Canton DawgC Canton Dawg wrote on last edited by

    @boo-fagley said:

    The Steelers gave Haden the game ball.

    Commitment to mediocrity.

    I consider it a "Participation Trophy"...you know...to make the Stoolers FO feel like that did something right.

    They want to get that bad taste of Justin Gilbert out of their mouth.

  • @unsympathetic said:

    Objectively false.  Baseline is exactly the same for all players of the same position - that's the utility of PFF scoring..

    This is his grade for one game.

    He sucked.

    No, our offense didnt sustain drives and our defense was on the field a lot. Slow start which is par for the course, especially on the road. Ben isnt exactly mr. Road game. 

    U Unsympathetic wrote on last edited by

    @vagitron said:

    No, our offense didnt sustain drives and our defense was on the field a lot. Slow start which is par for the course, especially on the road. Ben isnt exactly mr. Road game. 

    The PFF grade describes only Joe Haden's individual performance.

    Not the team offense.

    Not the team defense.

    Not the slow or fast offensive scoring rhythm.

    Not the home or road stadium location.

    Not the opposing team QB's performance.

    This is his grade for one game.  And he sucked.

  • @unsympathetic said:

    Vindication

    PFF rated Haden all of 51.4 today.  Once again, the FO was right...

    You cant base the performance of a player off of one game. I thought he had a solid game honestly. He almost had a int. 

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by

    @vagitron said:

    You cant base the performance of a player off of one game. I thought he had a solid game honestly. He almost had a int. 

    I almost won the lottery...I was only off by 5 numbers.

  • @bjh2130 said:

    Almost had a int? Stop the fucking presses. 

    Game one in a new defense. I was happy with haden. He doesnt need to be a world beater, thats what artie burns is for. I have zero expectations for haden but hes a high character, team oriented veteran that says hes 100%. Im glad hes a steeler. 

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by

    @vagitron said:

    Game one in a new defense. I was happy with haden. He doesnt need to be a world beater, thats what artie burns is for. I have zero expectations for haden but hes a high character, team oriented veteran that says hes 100%. Im glad hes a steeler. 

    OK....at least this is a bit of a somewhat honest post:

    1. We are fine that you are happy with a player that wasn't good enough for the Browns....and that you are glad that he is a Steeler (we are too...with our below average WR corps we want them to play against below average DBs)

    2. You are right to have -0- expectations from him.....and my prediction is that he will fulfill those expectations

    3. Joe IS a high character, team oriented veteran....and you should take him at his word that he will give you 100% of whatever he has...which at this point, unfortunately does not appear to be much

    4. Its a good thing that Joe does not have to be a world beater (because he is not that any longer).....and its good that you think that that is what artie burns is for  ....as yes, artie burns will get beat by the world.

  • Dick MellonD Dick Mellon wrote on last edited by

    UPDATE: Seven weeks later PIT is #1 against the pass.

    It's not because of Joe Haden alone.  He has played well but there has been an improved pass-rush and the rookie corner, Burns has matured a bit.

    Joe Haden replaced Ross Sockrell on the roster, who has since started one game with NYG and is not playing as well as Joe Haden.  Haden covered the Chiefs Tyree Hill quite well in week 6, limiting Hill to two receptions for 15 yards against Haden in coverage. Haden also had an INT while covering AJ Green in week 7 against CIN. 

    PIT had a hole to fill and Joe Haden filled-in nicely. PIT has improved at the position. The GM was thrilled to get him, saying that guys like Haden are usually not available - in that quality veterans are either over-priced or over-the hill.

    He was not worth was CLE was paying him. He's considered to be a good guy in the locker room, the press likes him and he has become a fan favorite.

    Thus far, things have worked out quite well.

  • Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by

    Awesome... thanks for sharing.

    Saw Joe got his first pick yesterday... on a tipped ball he gathered in five or so behind the WR in his zone, AJ Green. There was a day when he manned up and shut down AJ... back when he was a #1 CB, not the #2 you are paying him to be??? $9mm per year thru 2019... kinda steep for a #2... basically about 30% over the money we offered him. And he's amassed 12 tackles and 2 assists.

    Then there's his replacement, McCourty... 3 INTs so far including a pick 6 plus 19 Tackles, a couple of which were big hits, and 5 Assists. And here's the kicker... he's signed thru 2018 for an average of $3mm/yr.

    Who would you say has been the better value to this point?

    Say hi to Joe for me...

  • UPDATE: Seven weeks later PIT is #1 against the pass.

    It's not because of Joe Haden alone.  He has played well but there has been an improved pass-rush and the rookie corner, Burns has matured a bit.

    Joe Haden replaced Ross Sockrell on the roster, who has since started one game with NYG and is not playing as well as Joe Haden.  Haden covered the Chiefs Tyree Hill quite well in week 6, limiting Hill to two receptions for 15 yards against Haden in coverage. Haden also had an INT while covering AJ Green in week 7 against CIN. 

    PIT had a hole to fill and Joe Haden filled-in nicely. PIT has improved at the position. The GM was thrilled to get him, saying that guys like Haden are usually not available - in that quality veterans are either over-priced or over-the hill.

    He was not worth was CLE was paying him. He's considered to be a good guy in the locker room, the press likes him and he has become a fan favorite.

    Thus far, things have worked out quite well.

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by

    @dick-mellon said:

    UPDATE: Seven weeks later PIT is #1 against the pass.

    It's not because of Joe Haden alone.  He has played well but there has been an improved pass-rush and the rookie corner, Burns has matured a bit.

    Joe Haden replaced Ross Sockrell on the roster, who has since started one game with NYG and is not playing as well as Joe Haden.  Haden covered the Chiefs Tyree Hill quite well in week 6, limiting Hill to two receptions for 15 yards against Haden in coverage. Haden also had an INT while covering AJ Green in week 7 against CIN. 

    PIT had a hole to fill and Joe Haden filled-in nicely. PIT has improved at the position. The GM was thrilled to get him, saying that guys like Haden are usually not available - in that quality veterans are either over-priced or over-the hill.

    He was not worth was CLE was paying him. He's considered to be a good guy in the locker room, the press likes him and he has become a fan favorite.

    Thus far, things have worked out quite well.

    well, maybe Joe did improve that position.   A D student is, after all, better than an F student.  And the Steelers GM is right.....guys are usually only available because they are overpriced or over the hill.  In Joe's case, both applied.

  • G Gafreleets wrote on last edited by

    Well guess it's one of those rare moments when it works out equally well for both teams.

    Yeah, Haden wasn't a all pro his first game on his new team.

    And he's been pretty rock solid since.

    He has contributed positively to our team, is not regularly picked on or targeted all game like some of our previous CBs. Our pass defense went from something that was a obvious weakness that teams could exploit to LITERALLY the best in the league.

    He was exactly what the Steelers needed....especially since Cleveland is picking up 3,000,000 of his salary....... and is partly responsible for us being 5-2.

    Just for comparison.......how many games has McCourty helped the Clowns win?

    Asking for a friend.

  • Well guess it's one of those rare moments when it works out equally well for both teams.

    Yeah, Haden wasn't a all pro his first game on his new team.

    And he's been pretty rock solid since.

    He has contributed positively to our team, is not regularly picked on or targeted all game like some of our previous CBs. Our pass defense went from something that was a obvious weakness that teams could exploit to LITERALLY the best in the league.

    He was exactly what the Steelers needed....especially since Cleveland is picking up 3,000,000 of his salary....... and is partly responsible for us being 5-2.

    Just for comparison.......how many games has McCourty helped the Clowns win?

    Asking for a friend.

    hx214H hx214 wrote on last edited by

    @gafreleets said:

    Well guess it's one of those rare moments when it works out equally well for both teams.

    Yeah, Haden wasn't a all pro his first game on his new team.

    And he's been pretty rock solid since.

    He has contributed positively to our team, is not regularly picked on or targeted all game like some of our previous CBs. Our pass defense went from something that was a obvious weakness that teams could exploit to LITERALLY the best in the league.

    He was exactly what the Steelers needed....especially since Cleveland is picking up 3,000,000 of his salary....... and is partly responsible for us being 5-2.

    Just for comparison.......how many games has McCourty helped the Clowns win?

    Asking for a friend.

    So you like Haden's 1 INT over McCourty's 3 at more than double the price playing the 3CB on the roster to McCourty's 1CB.

    Got it.

    Tell your friend to go F U CK himself a ss clown.  

  • Well guess it's one of those rare moments when it works out equally well for both teams.

    Yeah, Haden wasn't a all pro his first game on his new team.

    And he's been pretty rock solid since.

    He has contributed positively to our team, is not regularly picked on or targeted all game like some of our previous CBs. Our pass defense went from something that was a obvious weakness that teams could exploit to LITERALLY the best in the league.

    He was exactly what the Steelers needed....especially since Cleveland is picking up 3,000,000 of his salary....... and is partly responsible for us being 5-2.

    Just for comparison.......how many games has McCourty helped the Clowns win?

    Asking for a friend.

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by

    @gafreleets said:

    Well guess it's one of those rare moments when it works out equally well for both teams.

    Yeah, Haden wasn't a all pro his first game on his new team.

    And he's been pretty rock solid since.

    He has contributed positively to our team, is not regularly picked on or targeted all game like some of our previous CBs. Our pass defense went from something that was a obvious weakness that teams could exploit to LITERALLY the best in the league.

    Lets not go honey dipping in the LSD pot. Joe may be better than what was there....but that does not make them anywhere near close to the top in the league.

    He was exactly what the Steelers needed....especially since Cleveland is picking up 3,000,000 of his salary....... and is partly responsible for us being 5-2.

    I am not of the opinion that Joe could not have helped the Browns. He would have added needed depth here. But he wasn't going to be the man as he once was. 

    Just for comparison.......how many games has McCourty helped the Clowns win?

    Actually could have been a few if not for the horrible play on the other side of the ball. And for some mistakes made in how the DBs were deployed.  E.g.  In the first half of the Colts game.....T.Y. Hilton ran wild in the first half with Jamar Taylor on him.  They switched to McCourty playing him in the second half and he shut Hilton down.  Same basic thing happened vs. Pitt and A. Brown....except I don't think they did ever switch to McCourty covering him.

    Asking for a friend.