3 year plan
-
Sounds great! So when do the three years actually begin?
WSS
Sounds great! So when do the three years actually begin?
WSS
5 years ago!
-
If we keep foring coaches after only 1-2 years, we will be a 1-2 win team indefinitely. Is that what u guys want?
-
Sounds great! So when do the three years actually begin?
WSS
Sounds great! So when do the three years actually begin?
WSS
-
If we keep foring coaches after only 1-2 years, we will be a 1-2 win team indefinitely. Is that what u guys want?
If we keep foring coaches after only 1-2 years, we will be a 1-2 win team indefinitely. Is that what u guys want?
I agree. That is the very heart of the Browns problem.
WSS
-
If we keep foring coaches after only 1-2 years, we will be a 1-2 win team indefinitely. Is that what u guys want?
If we keep foring coaches after only 1-2 years, we will be a 1-2 win team indefinitely. Is that what u guys want?
Especially since the issue hasnt really been coaching, but talent acquisition.....they keep giving their coaches crap rosters and then firing them for not winning.....
In re to the 3 yr thing.....this FO has to get credit for their stockpiling of draft picks.....as they have drafted 3 years worth of players in just 2 drafts.....unfortunately, they haven't scored a single star player yet....22 picks and counting.....
-
If we keep foring coaches after only 1-2 years, we will be a 1-2 win team indefinitely. Is that what u guys want?
Especially since the issue hasnt really been coaching, but talent acquisition.....they keep giving their coaches crap rosters and then firing them for not winning.....
In re to the 3 yr thing.....this FO has to get credit for their stockpiling of draft picks.....as they have drafted 3 years worth of players in just 2 drafts.....unfortunately, they haven't scored a single star player yet....22 picks and counting.....
Especially since the issue hasnt really been coaching, but talent acquisition.....they keep giving their coaches crap rosters and then firing them for not winning.....
In re to the 3 yr thing.....this FO has to get credit for their stockpiling of draft picks.....as they have drafted 3 years worth of players in just 2 drafts.....unfortunately, they haven't scored a single star player yet....22 picks and counting.....
I’ve been saying this for years.
I was against the firing of Mancini, Chud, and Pettine.
However, I’m not against getting rid of a FO that can’t draft worth a dam.
-
Especially since the issue hasnt really been coaching, but talent acquisition.....they keep giving their coaches crap rosters and then firing them for not winning.....
In re to the 3 yr thing.....this FO has to get credit for their stockpiling of draft picks.....as they have drafted 3 years worth of players in just 2 drafts.....unfortunately, they haven't scored a single star player yet....22 picks and counting.....
I’ve been saying this for years.
I was against the firing of Mancini, Chud, and Pettine.
However, I’m not against getting rid of a FO that can’t draft worth a dam.
I’ve been saying this for years.
I was against the firing of Mancini, Chud, and Pettine.
However, I’m not against getting rid of a FO that can’t draft worth a dam.
Right...exactly.....I also defended those coaches and railed for FO changes, while leaving the coaching staffs intact.....But the prevailing argument was always that the FO needed to install "their guy", whatever the f%$k that means......(as if these FO's have some special HC up their sleeves they've been wanting)
-
If we keep foring coaches after only 1-2 years, we will be a 1-2 win team indefinitely. Is that what u guys want?
Especially since the issue hasnt really been coaching, but talent acquisition.....they keep giving their coaches crap rosters and then firing them for not winning.....
In re to the 3 yr thing.....this FO has to get credit for their stockpiling of draft picks.....as they have drafted 3 years worth of players in just 2 drafts.....unfortunately, they haven't scored a single star player yet....22 picks and counting.....
Especially since the issue hasnt really been coaching, but talent acquisition.....they keep giving their coaches crap rosters and then firing them for not winning.....
In re to the 3 yr thing.....this FO has to get credit for their stockpiling of draft picks.....as they have drafted 3 years worth of players in just 2 drafts.....unfortunately, they haven't scored a single star player yet....22 picks and counting.....
And these guys probably understand that they are going to miss on a number of these draft picks....thus they believe in quantity. Though....how many of the 22 picks they have made actually been let go? Maybe 1 guy?
-
If we keep foring coaches after only 1-2 years, we will be a 1-2 win team indefinitely. Is that what u guys want?
Especially since the issue hasnt really been coaching, but talent acquisition.....they keep giving their coaches crap rosters and then firing them for not winning.....
In re to the 3 yr thing.....this FO has to get credit for their stockpiling of draft picks.....as they have drafted 3 years worth of players in just 2 drafts.....unfortunately, they haven't scored a single star player yet....22 picks and counting.....
@boo-fagley said:
All Kizer needs to do is manage the game right now. Dont turn the ball over and take your shots when its a slam dunk.
Great recipe... for a team with a strong run game and staunch D. Is that how you see us?
Especially since the issue hasnt really been coaching, but talent acquisition.....they keep giving their coaches crap rosters and then firing them for not winning.....
In re to the 3 yr thing.....this FO has to get credit for their stockpiling of draft picks.....as they have drafted 3 years worth of players in just 2 drafts.....unfortunately, they haven't scored a single star player yet....22 picks and counting.....
When did our paths diverge?
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
@boo-fagley said:
All Kizer needs to do is manage the game right now. Dont turn the ball over and take your shots when its a slam dunk.
Great recipe... for a team with a strong run game and staunch D. Is that how you see us?
Especially since the issue hasnt really been coaching, but talent acquisition.....they keep giving their coaches crap rosters and then firing them for not winning.....
In re to the 3 yr thing.....this FO has to get credit for their stockpiling of draft picks.....as they have drafted 3 years worth of players in just 2 drafts.....unfortunately, they haven't scored a single star player yet....22 picks and counting.....
When did our paths diverge?
When did our paths diverge?
When we hired Hue, Shashi and Depo at exactly the same moment that I decided I could no longer tolerate losing and would no longer blindly follow.....
I still love your takes(tho I know mine are a bit grating for you).....but Ive just decided on focusing on what this team needs to do to improve(which are weaknesses and flaws), as opposed to digging for and cheer leading the few good things that are happening....(did that for years.....decades even)
We need eyes on both sides of the fence, even though many dont like to hear it.....
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login