Camp Barkley #1 Overall
-
If we get Kirk Cousins or Alex Smith in FA then I’m in
-
Anyone besides Po in camp Barkley at #1? No? Didn’t think so...
-
Did he seriously start another Barkley thread? Sigh...
-
If we get Kirk Cousins or Alex Smith in FA then I’m in
If we get Kirk Cousins
orAlex Smithin FA then I’m inShould be available at 4 ... 2 QBs and the Tackle.
If we get Cousins, Im Ok with trading down a alittle as long as we get Barkley and Fitzpatrick.
If we don't get Cousins, gotta go Best QB with that #1 ...
Zombo
-
So when Barkley isn't AP or anywhere near his level... what then will your excuse be?
You're setting yourself up for a massive disappointment.
-
If we get Kirk Cousins
orAlex Smithin FA then I’m inShould be available at 4 ... 2 QBs and the Tackle.
If we get Cousins, Im Ok with trading down a alittle as long as we get Barkley and Fitzpatrick.
If we don't get Cousins, gotta go Best QB with that #1 ...
Zombo
Zombo said:
Should be available at 4 ... 2 QBs and the Tackle.
If we get Cousins, Im Ok with trading down a alittle as long as we get Barkley and Fitzpatrick.
If we don't get Cousins, gotta go Best QB with that #1 ...
Zombo
I agree and having #1 and 4 is a powerful position to have, a reward for being so bad! Get a journeyman QB plus Barkley and Fitzpatrick plus 10 more picks!
BROWNS-A-PALOOZA 2018! And cue the beat the dead horse againl......
-
Ideal is get starting QB at 1, and make trade with jets for their 2nd round pick or more to move back 2 spots and still get Barkley. Jets will definitely want to jump ahead of Broncos. Heck the Broncos might even do similar trade just to prevent Jets from jumping them. Indy will be the wild card in such a deal. Hopefully they will covet a player so much that they won't trade back or will ask too much for #3.
Now with the extra pick or two from jets or Broncos they trade back up and get Fitzpatrick (or James). If they miss on them, they grab Ridley. Now they are free to get best cb,de, or wr in Round 2, or best available at other need.
This kind of scenario is very likely. Brown's are sitting pretty with #1 & #4 picks.
Now me being the gambler i am, I make deal with Indy weeks before draft and offer them 2nd round pick to swap 3and4. That makes us the only team someone can deal with if they want one of the top 3 qbs. And they will have to pay plenty for it, such as their 1&2 this year and next.
-
Ideal is get starting QB at 1, and make trade with jets for their 2nd round pick or more to move back 2 spots and still get Barkley. Jets will definitely want to jump ahead of Broncos. Heck the Broncos might even do similar trade just to prevent Jets from jumping them. Indy will be the wild card in such a deal. Hopefully they will covet a player so much that they won't trade back or will ask too much for #3.
Now with the extra pick or two from jets or Broncos they trade back up and get Fitzpatrick (or James). If they miss on them, they grab Ridley. Now they are free to get best cb,de, or wr in Round 2, or best available at other need.
This kind of scenario is very likely. Brown's are sitting pretty with #1 & #4 picks.
Now me being the gambler i am, I make deal with Indy weeks before draft and offer them 2nd round pick to swap 3and4. That makes us the only team someone can deal with if they want one of the top 3 qbs. And they will have to pay plenty for it, such as their 1&2 this year and next.
Now me being the gambler i am, I make deal with Indy weeks before draft and offer them 2nd round pick to swap 3and4. That makes us the only team someone can deal with if they want one of the top 3 qbs. And they will have to pay plenty for it, such as their 1&2 this year and next.
Geeezzzus you've got to change your handle from SissyBoyFloyd to bad azz GamblerBoyFloyd.....but that doesn’t rhyme with PrettyBoy, oh well.
They don't have to be real cute if they want Rosen or Darnold and certainly not any of the other projects in this year's draft.....hopefully it doesn't come to that.
-
“We gotta take this RB at #1 overall because he’s the next coming of a running back who won 1 playoff game in his career!” **1 playoff win came with HOF quarterback**
that’s a great argument for taking a RB #1 overall for the first time in over 20 years...
-
“We gotta take this RB at #1 overall because he’s the next coming of a running back who won 1 playoff game in his career!” **1 playoff win came with HOF quarterback**
that’s a great argument for taking a RB #1 overall for the first time in over 20 years...
“We gotta take this RB at #1 overall because he’s the next coming of a running back who won 1 playoff game in his career!” **1 playoff win came with HOF quarterback**
that’s a great argument for taking a RB #1 overall for the first time in over 20 years...
One playoff game in his career with a team, which after he leaves, is playing for the NFC title
-
So if we find a left tackle that looks to be the next Joe Thomas we should pass because he has no playoff appearances or wins...correct?
-
Also Know As
Camp Moron
-
So if we find a left tackle that looks to be the next Joe Thomas we should pass because he has no playoff appearances or wins...correct?
So if we find a left tackle that looks to be the next Joe Thomas we should pass because he has no playoff appearances or wins...correct?
If it comes at the cost of the QB, you’re damn tootin’ Joe Thomas wasted a HOF career blocking for colt McCoy’s and Brandon Weedens. I don’t want his replacement going through the same Sheet.
-
If the Browns draft Barkley, that’s fine, while it’s not my first choice the kid is a freak of nature athlete and will be a major part of the offense (if Hue decides to use him) but the Browns can’t afford to continue to let the QB position take the back seat. I’d much rather settle for my 3rd RB prospect than my 3rd Qb prospect
-
Let's just merge this with "Camp Trent Richardson"
-
So if we find a left tackle that looks to be the next Joe Thomas we should pass because he has no playoff appearances or wins...correct?
If it comes at the cost of the QB, you’re damn tootin’ Joe Thomas wasted a HOF career blocking for colt McCoy’s and Brandon Weedens. I don’t want his replacement going through the same Sheet.
If it comes at the cost of the QB, you’re damn tootin’ Joe Thomas wasted a HOF career blocking for colt McCoy’s and Brandon Weedens. I don’t want his replacement going through the same Sheet.
You didn't say that, therefore I had to apply some context.
Thanks for the clarification.
-
This kid is a generational talent. He's on Adrian Petterson's level.
We have been through this before......UNTIL he is proven that he is as good as Jim Brown, OJ Simpson, Barry Sanders or LaDanian Tomlinson or Peterson.....he is just a prospect.
Right now....I am not certain that he can be as good as Zeke Elliott, Gurley, Fournette etc. Gee...how can you have 2-3 "generational talents" every year or so.
For all we know...he is a Kijana Carter, DJ Dozier, Blair Thomas, Curtis Enis type of talent. In other words.....not good enough for even a single productive NFL season.
And yea...the newest version of Trent Richardson.
I am still far more in favor of drafting a QB...and a defender...hopefully a DB...and roll with Crowe and Johnson and Dayes...and maybe someone taken later.
-
This kid is a generational talent. He's on Adrian Petterson's level.
We have been through this before......UNTIL he is proven that he is as good as Jim Brown, OJ Simpson, Barry Sanders or LaDanian Tomlinson or Peterson.....he is just a prospect.
Right now....I am not certain that he can be as good as Zeke Elliott, Gurley, Fournette etc. Gee...how can you have 2-3 "generational talents" every year or so.
For all we know...he is a Kijana Carter, DJ Dozier, Blair Thomas, Curtis Enis type of talent. In other words.....not good enough for even a single productive NFL season.
And yea...the newest version of Trent Richardson.
I am still far more in favor of drafting a QB...and a defender...hopefully a DB...and roll with Crowe and Johnson and Dayes...and maybe someone taken later.
This kid is a generational talent. He's on Adrian Petterson's level.
We have been through this before......UNTIL he is proven that he is as good as Jim Brown, OJ Simpson, Barry Sanders or LaDanian Tomlinson or Peterson.....he is just a prospect.
Right now....I am not certain that he can be as good as Zeke Elliott, Gurley, Fournette etc. Gee...how can you have 2-3 "generational talents" every year or so.
For all we know...he is a Kijana Carter, DJ Dozier, Blair Thomas, Curtis Enis type of talent. In other words.....not good enough for even a single productive NFL season.
And yea...the newest version of Trent Richardson.
I am still far more in favor of drafting a QB...and a defender...hopefully a DB...and roll with Crowe and Johnson and Dayes...and maybe someone taken later.
To be honest Gip- at least Barkley is faster than PO's last Love Boat Richardson. That was my major knock on Trent. I saw Richardson get caught from behind plenty of times on tape, something you never saw out of Adrian Peterson or Barry Sanders.
Yeah, generational backs almost every year, Gurley, Fournette....

FWIW, I'd keep an eye out and maybe take Sony Michel, Georgia (or someone similar) in the second round. He looked better than Chubb against Alabama's pro defense in the Championship Game...
To refresh Po's memory- that stiff Le'veon Bell was drafted in the second round, you just DON'T take a RB #1 overall when you're still looking for the most important piece of the puzzle- a franchise QB.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login