■ 2018 - 2019 ODDS TO WIN THE NCAA FOOTBALL NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIP ■
-
A long look ahead for the 2018-2019 NCAA football season, March 30, 2018......
ODDS TO WIN 2018-19 COLLEGE FOOTBALL CHAMPIONSHIP GAME (1/7/19) vegasinsider.comTeam Odds Alabama 9/4 Clemson 11/2 Ohio State 7/1 Georgia 8/1 Michigan 16/1 Penn State 16/1 Washington 22/1 Oklahoma 25/1 Auburn 28/1 Florida State 30/1 Wisconsin 30/1 LSU 35/1 Texas 35/1 Miami, Fl. 45/1 USC 45/1 Virginia Tech 45/1 West Virginia 45/1 Notre Dame 55/1 Stanford 55/1 Michigan State 65/1 Texas A&M 65/1 Arizona 100/1 Florida 100/1 UCLA 100/1 TCU 110/1 Boise State 120/1 Kansas State 120/1 Mississippi State 120/1 Missouri 120/1 Oklahoma State 120/1 Oregon 120/1 South Carolina 175/1 Nebraska 200/1 Iowa State 225/1 North Carolina State 225/1 Utah 225/1 Wake Forest 225/1 Central Florida 300/1 Iowa 350/1 Louisville 350/1 Minnesota 350/1 Northwestern 350/1 Purdue 350/1 Syracuse 350/1 Washington State 350/1 Colorado 500/1 Ole Miss 500/1 Arizona State 600/1 Arkansas 600/1 Boston College 600/1 Duke 600/1 Georgia Tech 600/1 Houston 600/1 Indiana 600/1 Kentucky 600/1 Maryland 600/1 Memphis 600/1 North Carolina 600/1 Pittsburgh 600/1 South Florida 600/1 Tennessee 600/1 Texas Tech 600/1 Vanderbilt 600/1 Virginia 600/1 Florida Atlantic 750/1 BYU 1200/1 Baylor 1200/1 California 1200/1 Colorado State 1200/1 Fresno State 1200/1 Illinois 1200/1 Kansas 1200/1 Oregon State 1200/1 Rutgers 1200/1 San Diego State 1200/1 Appalachian State 9999/1 Nevada 9999/1 UNLV 9999/1 -
Big Ten alumni bases have a lot of money to bet
-
Texas. Lol. Every. Single. Year.
-
And so does Texas
-
Big Ten alumni bases have a lot of money to bet
Traditionally over the decades BIG TEN teams have always been desirable bowl game teams because the fan base traveled well and spent money.
Particularly in cold weather months when beaches or casinos are involved.
-
Big Ten alumni bases have a lot of money to bet
Traditionally over the decades BIG TEN teams have always been desirable bowl game teams because the fan base traveled well and spent money.
Particularly in cold weather months when beaches or casinos are involved.
Traditionally over the decades BIG TEN teams have always been desirable bowl game teams because the fan base traveled well and spent money.
Particularly in cold weather months when beaches or casinos are involved.
And it has been surmised that that is one reason that they have not had as much success as they potentially should: A. they come from cold weather to warm weather and become distracted B. Also....they are always "on the road" in those games. Bowl games are held in the states of the Pac 12 or SEC...their home territory. Some minor bowl games may now be played in northern cities with domes....but most are still held in SEC/Pac 12 territory.
-
Point A is idiotic
Point B is very valid.
-
Point A is idiotic
Point B is very valid.
Point A perhaps should be idiotic....but it is nevertheless a fact. If guys come from the north and the cold and go to the south and the warm, and hang around beaches or pools....there can be some distraction to that.
-
Point A is idiotic
Point B is very valid.
Point A perhaps should be idiotic....but it is nevertheless a fact. If guys come from the north and the cold and go to the south and the warm, and hang around beaches or pools....there can be some distraction to that.
Point A perhaps should be idiotic....but it is nevertheless a fact. If guys come from the north and the cold and go to the south and the warm, and hang around beaches or pools....there can be some distraction to that.
Actually historically the BIG TEN always finished before thanksgiving, no conference championship games, did not play freshmen, did not use JuCo players all put them at a disadvantage over other conferences. Football players who sit through thanksgiving, Christmas and maybe even new year can get very sluggish and put on weight.
All of that has been somewhat corrected in recent years and it shows.

.......oh and being visitors does enter into the equation, nobody wants to play in the snow when you can go to Tampa, Miami or Disney World.
-
Point A is idiotic
Point B is very valid.
Point A perhaps should be idiotic....but it is nevertheless a fact. If guys come from the north and the cold and go to the south and the warm, and hang around beaches or pools....there can be some distraction to that.
Point A perhaps should be idiotic....but it is nevertheless a fact. If guys come from the north and the cold and go to the south and the warm, and hang around beaches or pools....there can be some distraction to that.
No.... It's not a fact.
It's not a fact that players from colleges up north get distracted by warm weather when they play down south and that it affects their play
-
Point A perhaps should be idiotic....but it is nevertheless a fact. If guys come from the north and the cold and go to the south and the warm, and hang around beaches or pools....there can be some distraction to that.
No.... It's not a fact.
It's not a fact that players from colleges up north get distracted by warm weather when they play down south and that it affects their play
No.... It's not a fact.
It's not a fact that players from colleges up north get distracted by warm weather when they play down south and that it affects their play
Yes, it is. The weather alone is not the distraction.
I mean....the proof is in the pudding.....when FMU comes south to play in Columbus they are always distracted by peripheral things. Like indoor toilets, running water, paved streets, clothing that is not plaid, etc.
-
No.... It's not a fact.
It's not a fact that players from colleges up north get distracted by warm weather when they play down south and that it affects their play
Yes, it is. The weather alone is not the distraction.
I mean....the proof is in the pudding.....when FMU comes south to play in Columbus they are always distracted by peripheral things. Like indoor toilets, running water, paved streets, clothing that is not plaid, etc.
Yes, it is. The weather alone is not the distraction.
I mean....the proof is in the pudding.....when FMU comes south to play in Columbus they are always distracted by peripheral things. Like indoor toilets, running water, paved streets, clothing that is not plaid, etc.
http://www.dispatch.com/content/stories/local/2009/09/10/biggame.html
Ohio State hopes so and says it has learned its lesson from big matchups such as the Texas game in 2005, in which cleanup crews found several soiled shorts and a few coolers filled with poop.
“You either deal with the problem up front, or you deal with it later when it’s ugly,” said Kelley-Snoke.
If only OSU fans were distracted by indoor toilets, huh?
-
Point A perhaps should be idiotic....but it is nevertheless a fact. If guys come from the north and the cold and go to the south and the warm, and hang around beaches or pools....there can be some distraction to that.
No.... It's not a fact.
It's not a fact that players from colleges up north get distracted by warm weather when they play down south and that it affects their play
No.... It's not a fact.
It's not a fact that players from colleges up north get distracted by warm weather when they play down south and that it affects their play
Wrong. They can and DO get distracted big time, why do you think the BIG TEN used to do so poorly in the Rose Bowl games.
Pac 10 teams were home for another game to win, the B1G guys were there on vacation to go to Disneyland......even with superior teams that were generally the winner of the OHIO STATE/Michigan game which was the winner of the defacto BIG 2 little 8 non playoff B1G conference tournament.
Gipper 1 Woody 0. (sorry Woodman, you must of been distracted
.......just kidding pal).
-
You're mixing up correlation and causation. Sort of. That's under the assumption that the players are even distracted in any way...
-
You're mixing up correlation and causation. Sort of. That's under the assumption that the players are even distracted in any way...
You're mixing up correlation and causation. Sort of. That's under the assumption that the players are even distracted in any way...
So....what you are saying is that there were no distractions for Big Ten etc. teams when they went to bowl games out west or down south. That they lost all those games JUST because the other team was always better than them.
-
You're mixing up correlation and causation. Sort of. That's under the assumption that the players are even distracted in any way...
So....what you are saying is that there were no distractions for Big Ten etc. teams when they went to bowl games out west or down south. That they lost all those games JUST because the other team was always better than them.
So....what you are saying is that there were no distractions for Big Ten etc. teams when they went to bowl games out west or down south. That they lost all those games JUST because the other team was always better than them.
I don't think you realize what you're trying to argue. Just like someone that poops in coolers...
You're arguing that B1G teams are distracted in warm weather, and it's a major part of poor performance
1) If I argue "distractions" aren't a major factor, that doesn't mean there are "no distractions"
2) if I argue it isn't a major factor, that doesn't mean there are no external factors in poor performance
"Only dealing in absolutes" Gip is almost asbad as "All I need is anecdotal evidence" Gip.
-
So....what you are saying is that there were no distractions for Big Ten etc. teams when they went to bowl games out west or down south. That they lost all those games JUST because the other team was always better than them.
I don't think you realize what you're trying to argue. Just like someone that poops in coolers...
You're arguing that B1G teams are distracted in warm weather, and it's a major part of poor performance
1) If I argue "distractions" aren't a major factor, that doesn't mean there are "no distractions"
2) if I argue it isn't a major factor, that doesn't mean there are no external factors in poor performance
"Only dealing in absolutes" Gip is almost asbad as "All I need is anecdotal evidence" Gip.
I don't think you realize what you're trying to argue. Just like someone that poops in coolers...
You're arguing that B1G teams are distracted in warm weather, and it's a major part of poor performance
1) If I argue "distractions" aren't a major factor, that doesn't mean there are "no distractions"
2) if I argue it isn't a major factor, that doesn't mean there are no external factors in poor performance
"Only dealing in absolutes" Gip is almost asbad as "All I need is anecdotal evidence" Gip.
So....you admit that there ARE distractions when Big Ten teams go to play in bowls.....
ergo....admitting that I am right.
Discussion over.
-
Lol, this is what I expected from a cooler pooper.
You are still having a rough time following basic logic. So I think I'm done.
-
Lol, this is what I expected from a cooler pooper.
You are still having a rough time following basic logic. So I think I'm done.
Lol, this is what I expected from a cooler pooper.
You are still having a rough time following basic logic. So I think I'm done.
You are done. You lost. Go crawl back into whatever other disgusting edifice makes you happy.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login