Trade for Khalil Mack
-
I'm not saying you should do it no matter what.
....but there's nothing wrong with the general idea of acquiring proven talent. What's a draft pick? It's a hope and a prayer. What's proven talent? It's not a hope and a prayer.
We trade a draft pick to team X......for a proven player. We tell team X, Please use that draft pick to draft a good prospect. If he turns out to be good, perhaps we'll trade you another draft pick for HIM.
....but there's nothing wrong with the general idea of acquiring proven talent.
there's nothing wrong with that unless the talent wants cap imploding money and said talent doesn't get this "current" team deep into the playoffs. For 21m that's a "piece" that gets us "home". As I said, for 15 or 16m....I would consider it. But not now, I would need a better idea of where this team is. If the defense isn't "close"...we're paying 21m and wrecking our ability to sign current talent, for a guy that's just gonna give the fans a few highlight sacks but get us nowhere in the rankings. That's not worth it, as much as I love Khalil mack...it isn't worth it.
-
I'm not saying you should do it no matter what.
....but there's nothing wrong with the general idea of acquiring proven talent. What's a draft pick? It's a hope and a prayer. What's proven talent? It's not a hope and a prayer.
We trade a draft pick to team X......for a proven player. We tell team X, Please use that draft pick to draft a good prospect. If he turns out to be good, perhaps we'll trade you another draft pick for HIM.
....but there's nothing wrong with the general idea of acquiring proven talent. What's a draft pick? It's a hope and a prayer. What's proven talent? It's not a hope and a prayer.
We trade a draft pick to team X......for a proven player. We tell team X, Please use that draft pick to draft a good prospect. If he turns out to be good, perhaps we'll trade you another draft pick for HIM.
That's you're fallacy- You don't pay Kahlil Mack $21 million unless you think he's taking you to the Super Bowl. Just look back at NFL history. Name me one defensive player (other than Reggie White) FA who fits that description. Suh couldn't do it in Miami- so Mack is a sure shot in Cleveland? Not iMHO.
-
....but there's nothing wrong with the general idea of acquiring proven talent. What's a draft pick? It's a hope and a prayer. What's proven talent? It's not a hope and a prayer.
We trade a draft pick to team X......for a proven player. We tell team X, Please use that draft pick to draft a good prospect. If he turns out to be good, perhaps we'll trade you another draft pick for HIM.
That's you're fallacy- You don't pay Kahlil Mack $21 million unless you think he's taking you to the Super Bowl. Just look back at NFL history. Name me one defensive player (other than Reggie White) FA who fits that description. Suh couldn't do it in Miami- so Mack is a sure shot in Cleveland? Not iMHO.
That's you're fallacy- You don't pay Kahlil Mack $21 million unless
I happen to agree with that. A team certainly cannot have every position paid at the top of the market value. I'm just sayin' that a draft pick is a token that you put in a slot machine in April. (at least that's how it's been for us). Whereas trading a draft pick for Landry takes the slot machine out of the equation. Although his bill will come due next year.
-
Heard on Fox Sports the rumors are the Raiders want two first round picks for Mack- which means they're really not interested in trading him. We'll see how serious he is when he starts missing game checks.
Was also posited him and Aaron Donald are waiting it out to see who gets paid first to set the market. But IMHO that was already done when Suh broke the bank in Miami. I'd like to believe teams wised up after that fiasco.
-
Heard on Fox Sports the rumors are the Raiders want two first round picks for Mack- which means they're really not interested in trading him. We'll see how serious he is when he starts missing game checks.
Was also posited him and Aaron Donald are waiting it out to see who gets paid first to set the market. But IMHO that was already done when Suh broke the bank in Miami. I'd like to believe teams wised up after that fiasco.
Heard on Fox Sports the rumors are the Raiders want two first round picks for Mack- which means they're really not interested in trading him. We'll see how serious he is when he starts missing game checks.
Was also posited him and Aaron Donald are waiting it out to see who gets paid first to set the market. But IMHO that was already done when Suh broke the bank in Miami. I'd like to believe teams wised up after that fiasco.
Well I doubt anyone wised up. Just liked Flacco set the market, and now guys are getting close to double. Contracts have just gone up, so has the cap.
Suh isnt a great example either. Because he could be even more valuable if he focused just on doing his best playing on the field. His antics have cost him money. And Donald is quite a bit better than him
-
Heard on Fox Sports the rumors are the Raiders want two first round picks for Mack- which means they're really not interested in trading him. We'll see how serious he is when he starts missing game checks.
Was also posited him and Aaron Donald are waiting it out to see who gets paid first to set the market. But IMHO that was already done when Suh broke the bank in Miami. I'd like to believe teams wised up after that fiasco.
-
...for one of the eleven guys who tackle people.
right. u go after a guy like that either in the draft or in FA where u know he's coming cause he wants to play here and not being strongarmed by a team thats saying if u want out its gonna have to be to these huckleberries who are fixin to.give us 2 1st rounders. no uh uh no way
-
So you're saying there's a chance?
https://247sports.com/nfl/cleveland-browns/Article/Khalil-Mack-trade-Browns-121224306/
-
"The inclusion of a player like defensive end Emmanuel Ogbah or Collins might make the deal more intriguing for Oakland as well."
ooooooooo, not sure about a 1st rounder AND collins.....but ogbah? yup. And if they can frontload tgat contract so that they're cleared up better when other guys come due.......mmmmm, man thats making me think
-
My spidey sense tells me this is about to go down, stay tuned. BTW anyone notice the big grin Dorsey gave when asked about Mack last night as he deftly deferred to answer?
-
Too much money and too many picks required for one of the eleven guys who tackle people.
yeah...no. while im kinda shying away from this idea, Mack is not a guy that tackles people. hes the guy that rushes the passer....THE premier position on defense...the position that makes it difficult to pass in this pass-happy league.
however, it comes at the expense of solving DT through trade or cuts, as next draft appears heavy for DL.
-
do they need a wr? Id entertain the idea of skipping the 1st rounder and giving em a 2nd along with gordon. Than promptly signing dez
-
if we coukd keep that 1st rounder and still get mack, bye josh...like the guy wish him well, but bye
-
do they need a wr? Id entertain the idea of skipping the 1st rounder and giving em a 2nd along with gordon. Than promptly signing dez
do they need a wr? Id entertain the idea of skipping the 1st rounder and giving em a 2nd along with gordon. Than promptly signing dez
cant express just how terrible of an idea this is...
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login