Skip to content
The Browns Board
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. Trade for Khalil Mack

Trade for Khalil Mack

The Browns Board
128 29 3.2k
  • D BoneD D Bone wrote on
    #77

    I'm betting now that Aaron Donald and the Rams have officially set the bar, Mack will sign an extension with the Raiders in the next couple of days or sooner. 

    hoortaH 1 Reply
    👍
  • C Clevfan4life

    do they need a wr? Id entertain the idea of skipping the 1st rounder and giving em a 2nd along with gordon. Than promptly signing dez

    chocoC choco wrote on
    #78

    @clevfan4life said:

    do they need a wr? Id entertain the idea of skipping the 1st rounder and giving em a 2nd along with gordon. Than promptly signing dez

    cant express just how terrible of an idea this is...

    C 1 Reply
  • D BoneD D Bone

    I'm betting now that Aaron Donald and the Rams have officially set the bar, Mack will sign an extension with the Raiders in the next couple of days or sooner. 

    hoortaH hoorta wrote on
    #79

    @d-bone said:

    I'm betting now that Aaron Donald and the Rams have officially set the bar, Mack will sign an extension with the Raiders in the next couple of days or sooner. 

    Yup- and I doubt Donald plays all seven years on that contract. 40 million up front, the money is getting crazy...  

  • chocoC choco

    @clevfan4life said:

    do they need a wr? Id entertain the idea of skipping the 1st rounder and giving em a 2nd along with gordon. Than promptly signing dez

    cant express just how terrible of an idea this is...

    C Clevfan4life wrote on
    #80

    @choco said:

    cant express just how terrible of an idea this is...

    right cause josh has proved such a solid yearly presence in our lockerroom.

    hoortaH 1 Reply
  • hoortaH hoorta

    Heard on Fox Sports the rumors are the Raiders want two first round picks for Mack- which means they're really not interested in trading him. We'll see how serious he is when he starts missing game checks. 

    Was also posited him and Aaron Donald are waiting it out to see who gets paid first to set the market. But IMHO that was already done when Suh broke the bank in Miami. I'd like to believe teams wised up after that fiasco. 

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on
    #81

    @hoorta said:

    Heard on Fox Sports the rumors are the Raiders want two first round picks for Mack- which means they're really not interested in trading him. We'll see how serious he is when he starts missing game checks. 

    Was also posited him and Aaron Donald are waiting it out to see who gets paid first to set the market. But IMHO that was already done when Suh broke the bank in Miami. I'd like to believe teams wised up after that fiasco. 

    Donald has signed a 6 year deal.    $135 mill?

  • The GipperT The Gipper

    @hoorta said:

    Heard on Fox Sports the rumors are the Raiders want two first round picks for Mack- which means they're really not interested in trading him. We'll see how serious he is when he starts missing game checks. 

    Was also posited him and Aaron Donald are waiting it out to see who gets paid first to set the market. But IMHO that was already done when Suh broke the bank in Miami. I'd like to believe teams wised up after that fiasco. 

    Donald has signed a 6 year deal.    $135 mill?

    hoortaH hoorta wrote on
    #82

    @the-gipper said:

    Donald has signed a 6 year deal.    $135 mill?

    Might be seven, but he won't finish out the contract. $86 million guaranteed.  

  • C Clevfan4life

    @choco said:

    cant express just how terrible of an idea this is...

    right cause josh has proved such a solid yearly presence in our lockerroom.

    hoortaH hoorta wrote on
    #83

    @clevfan4life said:

    right cause josh has proved such a solid yearly presence in our lockerroom.

    Then why would the Raiders want him, huh? Nope, we've invested far too much pain and suffering with Josh's troubles to kick him out the door now- even for a talent like Mack. Who, BTW isn't going anywhere.

    C 1 Reply
  • C Clevfan4life

    if we coukd keep that 1st rounder and still get mack, bye josh...like the guy wish him well, but bye

    CLEVELANDwantsPLAYOFFSC CLEVELANDwantsPLAYOFFS wrote on
    #84

    @clevfan4life said:

    if we coukd keep that 1st rounder and still get mack, bye josh...like the guy wish him well, but bye

    It seems like you don’t like him.

    Regardless he’s our #1 wideout and it seems clear by how coach Hue acts, he’s not going anywhere

  • CLEVELANDwantsPLAYOFFSC CLEVELANDwantsPLAYOFFS

    @clevfan4life said:

    if we coukd keep that 1st rounder and still get mack, bye josh...like the guy wish him well, but bye

    It seems like you don’t like him.

    Regardless he’s our #1 wideout and it seems clear by how coach Hue acts, he’s not going anywhere

    C Clevfan4life wrote on
    #85

    @clevelandwantsplayoffs said:

    It seems like you don’t like him.

    Regardless he’s our #1 wideout and it seems clear by how coach Hue acts, he’s not going anywhere

    i dont hate him, at all....but im also not hopeful about him. Todd haley feels the same way and he knows far more about josh gordons troubles than we do. Yes, coach jackson is optimistic.....we'll see

  • hoortaH hoorta

    @clevfan4life said:

    right cause josh has proved such a solid yearly presence in our lockerroom.

    Then why would the Raiders want him, huh? Nope, we've invested far too much pain and suffering with Josh's troubles to kick him out the door now- even for a talent like Mack. Who, BTW isn't going anywhere.

    C Clevfan4life wrote on
    #86

    @hoorta said:

    Then why would the Raiders want him, huh? 

    cause if they dont want to pay mack 22m they might settle on multiple pieces coupled perhaps with a later round. Mack is prob not going anywhere, my suggestion about was just a thought. If they're adamant about a 1st rounder than yeah they dont get gordon packaged up. I just opined that if they were amenable to a later round pick and a package of ogbah, gordon and some beers......id do it. Just my opinion.

    But all that is predicated on how mack would want his contract structured. If we couldnt work something out with him that left us good with other key players we need the cap to sign, than no deal. 

  • sydS syd wrote on
    #87

    this just in hue Jackson  has offered up baker Mayfield and miles garrett plus next years  1st and 2nd round picks for  mack and carr and their 3rd round pick rumor from mkc stating that there is going to be a shake up in the front office and that Haley may be replaced with Zampese 

    😂
  • sydS syd

    this just in hue Jackson  has offered up baker Mayfield and miles garrett plus next years  1st and 2nd round picks for  mack and carr and their 3rd round pick rumor from mkc stating that there is going to be a shake up in the front office and that Haley may be replaced with Zampese 

    D BoneD D Bone wrote on
    #88

    @syd said:

    this just in hue Jackson  has offered up baker Mayfield and miles garrett plus next years  1st and 2nd round picks for  mack and carr and their 3rd round pick rumor from mkc stating that there is going to be a shake up in the front office and that Haley may be replaced with Zampese 

    Ernie or Ken? 

  • LBC mikeL LBC mike wrote on
    #89

    What would you feel comfortable with offering? 

  • LBC mikeL LBC mike wrote on
    #90

    I would offer a 1st round with orchard and nassib or late round picks.

    Mack and Garrett  can cause some trouble.

  • LBC mikeL LBC mike

    I would offer a 1st round with orchard and nassib or late round picks.

    Mack and Garrett  can cause some trouble.

    C Clevfan4life wrote on
    #91

    @lbc-mike said:

    Mack and Garrett  can cause some trouble.

    they would define the word "trouble". That being said, the price can be too high and id be perfectly comfirtable going after nick bosa next year

    hoortaH 1 Reply
  • LBC mikeL LBC mike wrote on
    #92

    We have to stop the mentality of picking early every year

  • C Clevfan4life

    @lbc-mike said:

    Mack and Garrett  can cause some trouble.

    they would define the word "trouble". That being said, the price can be too high and id be perfectly comfirtable going after nick bosa next year

    hoortaH hoorta wrote on
    #93

    @clevfan4life said:

    they would define the word "trouble". That being said, the price can be too high and id be perfectly comfirtable going after nick bosa next year

    That finally makes sense...  Trading up in the first round next year to get Bosa for four years (on a rookie deal) is more intelligent than breaking the bank to get Mack. 

  • LBC mikeL LBC mike wrote on
    #94

    Yeah let's loose 14 games this year to get bosa.  Makes sense

    The GipperT hoortaH DieHardBrownsFanD 3 Replies
    😂
  • LBC mikeL LBC mike

    Yeah let's loose 14 games this year to get bosa.  Makes sense

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on
    #95

    @lbc-mike said:

    Yeah let's loose 14 games this year to get bosa.  Makes sense

    Loose as in footloose footlooseLoose as in footloose footloose. Or did you mean lose

  • Canton DawgC Canton Dawg wrote on
    #96

    Ian Rapoport just tweeted. . .

    And here we go: The #Bears are now expected to trade for star Khalil Mack. They are the team.

    Two things that will define you: Your determination when you have nothing. Your attitude when you have everything. - Mike McCartney
Log in to reply