Patrick Peterson requests trade
-
Edit: and think what the Browns had at DB back then: Dixon/Minnifield. Peterson/Ward? Could surpass that duo.
Dixon/Minnifield are the couple of defenders that started all the dawg pound thing?
-
Is that a question? The answer is yes, they are.
Thank you. Bear in mind that I didn't know the Browns did even exist till around 10 years ago...
-
Is that a question? The answer is yes, they are.
Thank you. Bear in mind that I didn't know the Browns did even exist till around 10 years ago...
Thank you. Bear in mind that I didn't know the Browns did even exist till around 10 years ago...
We are here to help in that regard.
Here is a wiki article on The Dawg Pound.:
-
Here you can also look at data on the 13 Championships won by Cleveland/Northeast Ohio teams. (13 is the most in history....tied with Green Bay)
1964 Cleveland Browns (NFL,10-3-1),
1955NFLCleveland Browns (NFL,9-2-1)
1954NFLCleveland Browns (NFL,9-3)
1950NFLCleveland Browns (NFL,10-2)
1949 Cleveland Browns (AAFC,9-1-2)
1948 Cleveland Browns (AAFC,14-0)
1947 Cleveland Browns (AAFC,12-1-1)
194Cleveland Browns (AAFC,12-2)
1945NFLCleveland Rams (NFL,9-1)1)2)
1924NFLCleveland Bulldogs (NFL,7-1-1)
1923NFLCanton Bulldogs (NFL,11-0-1)
1922NFLCanton Bulldogs (NFL,10-0-2)
1920APFAAkron Pros (APFA,8-0-3)
-
Let's face it. He wants to play for a team that has a shot at a SB win, not the woeful Browns with Huey Loser.
But he's under contract, as was pointed out. Would the Cards take a lesser deal, just to make him happy? Our first round pick will be way better than the Saints should Dorsey think it's worth giving up that much.
-
Let's face it. He wants to play for a team that has a shot at a SB win, not the woeful Browns with Huey Loser.
But he's under contract, as was pointed out. Would the Cards take a lesser deal, just to make him happy? Our first round pick will be way better than the Saints should Dorsey think it's worth giving up that much.
But he's under contract, as was pointed out. Would the Cards take a lesser deal, just to make him happy? Our first round pick will be way better than the Saints should Dorsey think it's worth giving up that much.
What would the Cards want for him? As a defensive back.....he is probably as good at is position as Khalil Mack is at his....and they got TWO first round picks for him.
I suspect the Cardinals could say: that (the Mack deal) set the market price.
-
Pass Rushers are worth more than Defensive Backs Gip
-
But he's under contract, as was pointed out. Would the Cards take a lesser deal, just to make him happy? Our first round pick will be way better than the Saints should Dorsey think it's worth giving up that much.
What would the Cards want for him? As a defensive back.....he is probably as good at is position as Khalil Mack is at his....and they got TWO first round picks for him.
I suspect the Cardinals could say: that (the Mack deal) set the market price.
What would the Cards want for him? As a defensive back.....he is probably as good at is position as Khalil Mack is at his....and they got TWO first round picks for him.
I suspect the Cardinals could say: that (the Mack deal) set the market price.
Two firsts is too much. Will the Cards want to go to full rebuild mode like the Raiders? Stay tuned.
-
Is that a question? The answer is yes, they are.
Thank you. Bear in mind that I didn't know the Browns did even exist till around 10 years ago...
-
Edit: and think what the Browns had at DB back then: Dixon/Minnifield. Peterson/Ward? Could surpass that duo.
Dixon/Minnifield are the couple of defenders that started all the dawg pound thing?
Dixon/Minnifield are the couple of defenders that started all the dawg pound thing?
Sort of...
Dixon was the Daddy dawg. Started barking to psych himself up and then took it into the games celebrating plays, etc.
Hanford posed for a poster titled "Dogs of the Defense". IIRC he was in a white suit with 3 or 4 Afghans on leashes. Wish I could show it to you, but it never shows up in google searches.
From there came the Dawg Pound in old Municipal Stadium's bleachers...
NFL Films does a series of "Top Ten" this and thats. One episode was "Top Ten Cornerback Tandems". Dixon-Minniefield were #2 only behind Oakland's Mike Haynes and Lester Hayes.
Here's the clip on our duo. At the 3:24 mark there's a stat comment that is one of the most remarkable things I've ever heard:
"In 1987 only seven passes were thrown in the direction of Hanford Dixon."
Enuff said...
-
Let's face it. He wants to play for a team that has a shot at a SB win, not the woeful Browns with Huey Loser.
But he's under contract, as was pointed out. Would the Cards take a lesser deal, just to make him happy? Our first round pick will be way better than the Saints should Dorsey think it's worth giving up that much.
But he's under contract, as was pointed out. Would the Cards take a lesser deal, just to make him happy? Our first round pick will be way better than the Saints should Dorsey think it's worth giving up that much.
Nonetheless the risk is another Bowe or Britt just looking for a last good contract without producing.
-
Pass Rushers are worth more than Defensive Backs Gip
Maybe, Debatable. I will still take 2 good DBs.
But, you may be right. We had the best DBs in the game back in the day....Dixon/Minniefield......and they could not stop The Drive.
-
But he's under contract, as was pointed out. Would the Cards take a lesser deal, just to make him happy? Our first round pick will be way better than the Saints should Dorsey think it's worth giving up that much.
Nonetheless the risk is another Bowe or Britt just looking for a last good contract without producing.
Nonetheless the risk is another Bowe or Britt just looking for a last good contract without producing.
Peterson is light-years ahead of where those two were
-
Pass Rushers are worth more than Defensive Backs Gip
Maybe, Debatable. I will still take 2 good DBs.
But, you may be right. We had the best DBs in the game back in the day....Dixon/Minniefield......and they could not stop The Drive.
Maybe, Debatable. I will still take 2 good DBs.
But, you may be right. We had the best DBs in the game back in the day....Dixon/Minniefield......and they could not stop The Drive.
A lot of places will tell you it's QB, Pass Rusher, LT with WR and CB coming in after. It's a passing league. You need a guy that can pass,, a guy to sack the guy that passes, a guy to protect the guy that passes, a guy to catch the ball, and a guy to stop people from catching the ball.
-
CB > WR
-
Maybe, Debatable. I will still take 2 good DBs.
But, you may be right. We had the best DBs in the game back in the day....Dixon/Minniefield......and they could not stop The Drive.
A lot of places will tell you it's QB, Pass Rusher, LT with WR and CB coming in after. It's a passing league. You need a guy that can pass,, a guy to sack the guy that passes, a guy to protect the guy that passes, a guy to catch the ball, and a guy to stop people from catching the ball.
A lot of places will tell you it's QB, Pass Rusher, LT with WR and CB coming in after. It's a passing league. You need a guy that can pass,, a guy to sack the guy that passes, a guy to protect the guy that passes, a guy to catch the ball, and a guy to stop people from catching the ball.
And on top of that, you need more than one guy to stop people from catching the ball.
Being a pass-happy league, you need about 5 of those guys to cover well. The corner #2(T.Mitch get healthy please?), safeties, and linebackers.
Sh%#, Tampa had good ole’ Carl Nassib dropping back in coverage.
-
I would offer them a #2 in 2019 and a #2 in 2020 instead of a #1 in 2019
-
Maybe, Debatable. I will still take 2 good DBs.
But, you may be right. We had the best DBs in the game back in the day....Dixon/Minniefield......and they could not stop The Drive.
A lot of places will tell you it's QB, Pass Rusher, LT with WR and CB coming in after. It's a passing league. You need a guy that can pass,, a guy to sack the guy that passes, a guy to protect the guy that passes, a guy to catch the ball, and a guy to stop people from catching the ball.
A lot of places will tell you it's QB, Pass Rusher, LT with WR and CB coming in after. It's a passing league. You need a guy that can pass,, a guy to sack the guy that passes, a guy to protect the guy that passes, a guy to catch the ball, and a guy to stop people from catching the ball.
Well....which of those do we have? A promising rookie QB still learning. A supposedly elite pass rusher (but...is he?) LT...shaky. WRs...one good possession guy...and the rest? Shaky. CB. One promising rookie still learning.
A really great pair of CBs can make a pass rush seem a whole lot better. Just like having a QB that makes snap decisions and quick throws makes an OL look better.
-
One would think that Pgh would try hard to trade for Peterson, as their CBs are so awful. Dumbass Bell keeps freeing up more money for them by not reporting, so maybe they could do it. They seem to draft WRs very well but haven’t drafted and developed a decent DB in years (example Artie Burnt). I really doubt they have the cojones to try to pull this off.
It’s like buying gasoline and food after a hurricane, you overpay but demand is greater than supply. Some contender will give Arizona a fat draft pick for him because this could put them over the top. Nice to dream but not a realistic move for the Browns. Peterson is signed through 2020 and I don’t see the Browns contending in that window.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login