If the Playoffs started today 11/6/18
-
If the playoffs started today, here is who would be in:
AFCE Patriots 7-2
AFCN Steelers 5-2-1
AFCS Texans 6-3
AFCW Chiefs 8-1 #1 seed
Wildcards: Chargers 6-2, Bengals 5-3
NFCE Redskins 5-3
NFCN Bears 5-3
NFCS Saints 7-1 #1 seed
NFCW Rams 8-1
Wildcards: Panthers 6-2, Vikings 5-3-1
-
The "race" for the #1 overall draft pick:
Raiders 1-7
Giants 1-7
49ers 2-7
Bills 2-7
Cardinals 2-6
Browns 2-6-1
Additional note......in both the playoff picture And the draft order picture those TIES loom large: Steelers have a half game division lead over Bengals because of tie (which could also be extrapolated to a 1.5 game lead, because the Bengals lost to the Squibs). The Vikings tie on their record 5-3-1 means that they trail the Bears who are at 5-3.
And, the tie on the Browns record means that they actually are considered to have a better record that the 2-7 and 2-6 teams.
Do not be surprised if these ties make some definite difference in the playoff/draft pick situations.
-
The biggest games of the coming week between playoff contending teams are actually two AFCN vs. NFCS games:
Carolina at Pittsburgh, Thursday night
Saints at Bengals Sunday 1:00
I guess we shall see which of these divisions is the stronger.......as Browns play Falcons, another AFCN vs. NFCS. Ravens are on bye week.
Also, this gem of a Monday Night game:
Giants at 49ers!! Could be big in that #1 pick race. (did the schedule makers really think these teams would be good....or were they just going for the big market matchup? I think the latter.
-
The "race" for the #1 overall draft pick:
Raiders 1-7
Giants 1-7
49ers 2-7
Bills 2-7
Cardinals 2-6
Browns 2-6-1
Additional note......in both the playoff picture And the draft order picture those TIES loom large: Steelers have a half game division lead over Bengals because of tie (which could also be extrapolated to a 1.5 game lead, because the Bengals lost to the Squibs). The Vikings tie on their record 5-3-1 means that they trail the Bears who are at 5-3.
And, the tie on the Browns record means that they actually are considered to have a better record that the 2-7 and 2-6 teams.
Do not be surprised if these ties make some definite difference in the playoff/draft pick situations.
The "race" for the #1 overall draft pick:
Raiders 1-7
Giants 1-7
49ers 2-7
Bills 2-7
Cardinals 2-6
Browns 2-6-1
Additional note......in both the playoff picture And the draft order picture those TIES loom large: Steelers have a half game division lead over Bengals because of tie (which could also be extrapolated to a 1.5 game lead, because the Bengals lost to the Squibs). The Vikings tie on their record 5-3-1 means that they trail the Bears who are at 5-3.
And, the tie on the Browns record means that they actually are considered to have a better record that the 2-7 and 2-6 teams.
Do not be surprised if these ties make some definite difference in the playoff/draft pick situations.
How long until we are back in our usual position of picking 1 ?
-
The "race" for the #1 overall draft pick:
Raiders 1-7
Giants 1-7
49ers 2-7
Bills 2-7
Cardinals 2-6
Browns 2-6-1
Additional note......in both the playoff picture And the draft order picture those TIES loom large: Steelers have a half game division lead over Bengals because of tie (which could also be extrapolated to a 1.5 game lead, because the Bengals lost to the Squibs). The Vikings tie on their record 5-3-1 means that they trail the Bears who are at 5-3.
And, the tie on the Browns record means that they actually are considered to have a better record that the 2-7 and 2-6 teams.
Do not be surprised if these ties make some definite difference in the playoff/draft pick situations.
How long until we are back in our usual position of picking 1 ?
How long until we are back in our usual position of picking 1 ?
Probably never. Browns are 1.5 games better than either Raiders or Giants.....and I might be surprised if either of those teams could win 2 more games.
-
Probably never. Browns are 1.5 games better than either Raiders or Giants.....and I might be surprised if either of those teams could win 2 more games.
One of them beat the Browns
-
Probably never. Browns are 1.5 games better than either Raiders or Giants.....and I might be surprised if either of those teams could win 2 more games.
One of them beat the Browns
-
Probably never. Browns are 1.5 games better than either Raiders or Giants.....and I might be surprised if either of those teams could win 2 more games.
One of them beat the Browns
-
The "race" for the #1 overall draft pick:
Raiders 1-7
Giants 1-7
49ers 2-7
Bills 2-7
Cardinals 2-6
Browns 2-6-1
Additional note......in both the playoff picture And the draft order picture those TIES loom large: Steelers have a half game division lead over Bengals because of tie (which could also be extrapolated to a 1.5 game lead, because the Bengals lost to the Squibs). The Vikings tie on their record 5-3-1 means that they trail the Bears who are at 5-3.
And, the tie on the Browns record means that they actually are considered to have a better record that the 2-7 and 2-6 teams.
Do not be surprised if these ties make some definite difference in the playoff/draft pick situations.
The "race" for the #1 overall draft pick:
Raiders 1-7 gms.left- LAC/@Zona/@Ravens/KC/Pitt/@Cinn./Den./@KC (win-able /Zona or Den.?) KC may sit starters
Giants 1-7 gms. left- @9'ers/TB/@Philly/Chi./@Skins/Tenn./@Colts/Dallas (win-able/9'ers/TB or Dallas?)
49ers 2-7 gms. left- NYG/@TB/@Sea./Den./Sea./Chi./@Rams (win-able NYG,TB,Den?) Rams may sit starters
Bills 2-7 gms. gms. left- at Jets/Jags/@Mia./Jets/Det./@Pats./Mia. (can they get a split with Jets/Mia? or better sweep Jets?) Pats may sit some
Cardinals 2-6 gms. left- at KC/Oak./@LAC/@GB/Det./@Atl./Rams/@Sea. (win-able Oak./Det?) Rams may sit some
Browns 2-6-gms. left- Atl./@Cinn/@Houst./Car/@Den/Cinn./@Ravens (win-ables?)
Pick'em.^^^^.. want to play?
-
The "race" for the #1 overall draft pick:
Raiders 1-7
Giants 1-7
49ers 2-7
Bills 2-7
Cardinals 2-6
Browns 2-6-1
Additional note......in both the playoff picture And the draft order picture those TIES loom large: Steelers have a half game division lead over Bengals because of tie (which could also be extrapolated to a 1.5 game lead, because the Bengals lost to the Squibs). The Vikings tie on their record 5-3-1 means that they trail the Bears who are at 5-3.
And, the tie on the Browns record means that they actually are considered to have a better record that the 2-7 and 2-6 teams.
Do not be surprised if these ties make some definite difference in the playoff/draft pick situations.
The "race" for the #1 overall draft pick:
Raiders 1-7
Giants 1-7
49ers 2-7
Bills 2-7
Cardinals 2-6
Browns 2-6-1
Additional note......in both the playoff picture And the draft order picture those TIES loom large: Steelers have a half game division lead over Bengals because of tie (which could also be extrapolated to a 1.5 game lead, because the Bengals lost to the Squibs). The Vikings tie on their record 5-3-1 means that they trail the Bears who are at 5-3.
And, the tie on the Browns record means that they actually are considered to have a better record that the 2-7 and 2-6 teams.
Do not be surprised if these ties make some definite difference in the playoff/draft pick situations.
Hey Gip, isn't there some protocol that even if the Browns have the worst record again, they don't get the #1 #1?
The Cleveland Browns have the hardest hit players in the NFL -
We're only 3 game outside of winning the division with 3 more division games to go. Whole lotta football, let's win this Sheet.
-
The "race" for the #1 overall draft pick:
Raiders 1-7
Giants 1-7
49ers 2-7
Bills 2-7
Cardinals 2-6
Browns 2-6-1
Additional note......in both the playoff picture And the draft order picture those TIES loom large: Steelers have a half game division lead over Bengals because of tie (which could also be extrapolated to a 1.5 game lead, because the Bengals lost to the Squibs). The Vikings tie on their record 5-3-1 means that they trail the Bears who are at 5-3.
And, the tie on the Browns record means that they actually are considered to have a better record that the 2-7 and 2-6 teams.
Do not be surprised if these ties make some definite difference in the playoff/draft pick situations.
Hey Gip, isn't there some protocol that even if the Browns have the worst record again, they don't get the #1 #1?
Hey Gip, isn't there some protocol that even if the Browns have the worst record again, they don't get the #1 #1?
No
-
No
And for the record- NO team has ever had the #1 overall three years running, and I'd bet the ranch the Browns won't be picking first come 2019. That tie virtually guarantees it.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login