Skip to content
The Browns Board
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. Trivia Questions and Answers

Trivia Questions and Answers

The Browns Board
1.6k 36 27.7k
  • T TexasAg1969

    Brady, Brees, Bradshaw?

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on
    #201

    @texasag1969 said:

    Brady, Brees, Bradshaw?

    Yes on Brady and Bradshaw.  No on Brees.

    Brees   .595

  • Dutch OvenD Dutch Oven wrote on
    #202

    Otto Graham, Bart Starr, Joe Montana, Steve Young, Peyton Manning, Roger Staubach

  • Dutch OvenD Dutch Oven

    Otto Graham, Bart Starr, Joe Montana, Steve Young, Peyton Manning, Roger Staubach

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on
    #203

    @dutch-oven said:

    Otto Graham, Bart Starr, Joe Montana, Steve Young, Peyton Manning, Roger Staubach

    Check on Graham, Montana, Peyton, and Staubach.      No on Starr and Young.  Starr  .623;   Young...close  .657

    Six left. 

    Hints:   2 are active.    2 go back to the 60s.  the other two primarily from the 80s.

  • Browns149B Browns149 wrote on
    #204

    Dan Marino

    Bob Greise

    Johnny Unitas

    "And they don't really know even what they're talkin' about And I can't imagine what empty heads can achieve."
  • Browns149B Browns149

    Dan Marino

    Bob Greise

    Johnny Unitas

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on
    #205

    @browns149 said:

    Dan Marino

    Bob Greise

    Johnny Unitas

    No, No, and No...but good guesses.   Marino  .613,  Griese  .622  Unitas .648

    Further hint:   One played for the Good Guys, one plays for the Bad Guys.  One was funky.  One was as bland as a sheet of paper.  Another could have been related in a way to Ted Kaczinski.   Another plays beyond his stature. 

  • The GipperT The Gipper

    @browns149 said:

    Dan Marino

    Bob Greise

    Johnny Unitas

    No, No, and No...but good guesses.   Marino  .613,  Griese  .622  Unitas .648

    Further hint:   One played for the Good Guys, one plays for the Bad Guys.  One was funky.  One was as bland as a sheet of paper.  Another could have been related in a way to Ted Kaczinski.   Another plays beyond his stature. 

    Browns149B Browns149 wrote on
    #206

    @the-gipper said:

    No, No, and No...but good guesses.   Marino  .613,  Griese  .622  Unitas .648

    Further hint:   One played for the Good Guys, one plays for the Bad Guys.  One was funky.  One was as bland as a sheet of paper.  Another could have been related in a way to Ted Kaczinski.   Another plays beyond his stature. 

    Jim McMahon

    "And they don't really know even what they're talkin' about And I can't imagine what empty heads can achieve."
  • Browns149B Browns149 wrote on
    #207

    Daryl Lamonica

    "And they don't really know even what they're talkin' about And I can't imagine what empty heads can achieve."
  • Dutch OvenD Dutch Oven wrote on
    #208

    I'm starting to think someone might be looking these up.... ?

  • Dutch OvenD Dutch Oven

    I'm starting to think someone might be looking these up.... ?

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on
    #209

    @dutch-oven said:

    I'm starting to think someone might be looking these up.... ?

    I would hope not.   Those extra clues I gave should have turned the light bulb on for someone who has been around a While.  Example....he got Jim McMahon who described himself as the "funky QB"  on the Bears  1985 Super Bowl Shuffle video.  And Lamonica's nickname was The Mad Bomber....ergo the Ted Kaczinski reference.  

    @browns149 said:

    Jim McMahon

    @browns149 said:

    Daryl Lamonica

    Check and Check. 

    So....fess up....did you look them up, or did the clues I gave ring the bell for you? 

    Browns149B 1 Reply
  • ATOMA ATOM wrote on
    #210

    kenny the snake stabler

    billy kilmer

    joe thiesman

    bernie kosar

  • ATOMA ATOM

    kenny the snake stabler

    billy kilmer

    joe thiesman

    bernie kosar

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on
    #211

    @atom said:

    kenny the snake stabler

    billy kilmer

    joe thiesman

    bernie kosar

    No on all of those

  • ATOMA ATOM wrote on
    #212

    damn

    matt ryan ? 

    he was a answer before

    The GipperT 1 Reply
  • The GipperT The Gipper

    @dutch-oven said:

    I'm starting to think someone might be looking these up.... ?

    I would hope not.   Those extra clues I gave should have turned the light bulb on for someone who has been around a While.  Example....he got Jim McMahon who described himself as the "funky QB"  on the Bears  1985 Super Bowl Shuffle video.  And Lamonica's nickname was The Mad Bomber....ergo the Ted Kaczinski reference.  

    @browns149 said:

    Jim McMahon

    @browns149 said:

    Daryl Lamonica

    Check and Check. 

    So....fess up....did you look them up, or did the clues I gave ring the bell for you? 

    Browns149B Browns149 wrote on
    #213

    @the-gipper said:

    I would hope not.   Those extra clues I gave should have turned the light bulb on for someone who has been around a While.  Example....he got Jim McMahon who described himself as the "funky QB"  on the Bears  1985 Super Bowl Shuffle video.  And Lamonica's nickname was The Mad Bomber....ergo the Ted Kaczinski reference.  

    Check and Check. 

    So....fess up....did you look them up, or did the clues I gave ring the bell for you? 

    The clues gave it away

    "And they don't really know even what they're talkin' about And I can't imagine what empty heads can achieve."
    👍
  • ATOMA ATOM wrote on
    #214

    len dawson

    The GipperT 1 Reply
  • ATOMA ATOM

    damn

    matt ryan ? 

    he was a answer before

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on
    #215

    @atom said:

    damn

    matt ryan ? 

    he was a answer before

    NO....but, wrong Ryan!!

    ATOMA 1 Reply
  • ATOMA ATOM

    len dawson

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on
    #216

    @atom said:

    len dawson

    No

  • The GipperT The Gipper

    @atom said:

    damn

    matt ryan ? 

    he was a answer before

    NO....but, wrong Ryan!!

    ATOMA ATOM wrote on
    #217

    @the-gipper said:

    NO....but, wrong Ryan!!

    plunkett

  • ATOMA ATOM

    @the-gipper said:

    NO....but, wrong Ryan!!

    plunkett

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on
    #218

    @atom said:

    plunkett

    Nope...I am about to give the answers.  

  • The GipperT The Gipper

    @atom said:

    plunkett

    Nope...I am about to give the answers.  

    T TexasAg1969 wrote on
    #219

    @the-gipper said:

    Nope...I am about to give the answers.  

    This is turning into a trumpy show now.?

  • The GipperT The Gipper wrote on
    #220

    Here is today's trivia Question:

    In NFL history, there have been a dozen (12)  Quarterbacks  who have a career winning pct. of winning 2/3rds of their games.    .666 pct.  or better. 

    Name these 12 QBs.    (Note:  in one case anyway, it includes the record as an AFL starting QB). 

    Answers:

    Otto Graham   .814....and that is just in the NFL years,  with AAFC he was like  .853 win pct.

    Darryl Lamonica   .801

    Tom Brady  .774

    Roger Staubach  .746

    Joe Montana  .714

    Peyton Manning  .702

    Jim McMahon  .691  with 6 teams !!

    Terry Bradshaw  .677

    Russell Wilson  .676

    Danny White   .674

    Ben Roethlisberger   .669

    Frank Ryan    .667  with 3 teams   (but he was over .700 with the Browns)

    Stabler, Steve Young, Aaron Rodgers, Unitas and Elway follow the above. 

    The guys in blue are NOT in the HOF, even though they all have been eligible for years.  (A few are active, and IMO will make HOF....and Peyton Manning is  a clear shoo in)  Isn't winning the name of the game?  So why should these guys be given no consideration ?   Ryan, White, McMahon, Lamonica. 

    Maybe simply longevity is an issue there:  Ryan  57 career wins,  White:  62, Lamonica  66, McMahon 67.  

    But:  Norm Van Brocklin only had 61 wins, he is in.  Kurt Warner  67, he is in.    Ryan and McMahon have the same number of titles as NVB and Warner:  1 each.  (and Ryan, like Warner, lost another title game).  George Blanda only had 53 career wins...but he is sort of a special case.   Sonny Jurgenson only had  69....and he had no titles, and never even played in a title game. 

    Sorry to go on.  Maybe that should be a different thread. 

Log in to reply