Skip to content

Kyle Rittenhouse

Political Discussion
237 21 5.5k
  • It happened precisely because rule of law was in fact abandoned.

  • It happened precisely because rule of law was in fact abandoned.

    @the-cysko-kid said:

    It happened precisely because rule of law was in fact abandoned.

    I'm not asking about what "caused" his actions 

    I'm asking about the actions he took. Was that the "rule of law"?

  • well today was uneventful I missed the last hour of it but it seems its up to the jury now

  • It's the clearest cut case of self defense Ive ever seen brought to trial. It was him or them and he chose right. 

    Fuck them. 

    a-time-to-kill-burn-in-hell.gif

  • one thing they did show today was "jump kick man" ya thats what they are calling him tried to kick Kyle before he was shot at

  • One has to determine what's important in this country. Rule of law or mob rule and cowardice. 

    Is this who you want making decisions? This creature or it's ilk?

    Im increasingly of the opinion that these things will have to be stamped out like roaches in order for this country to survive. 

    If Rittenhouse is convicted of murder in the clearest case of self defense ever brought before the American justice system then there is no justice system. There is no law. There is nothing more to be beholden to and there is no reason to go on with this government. It will have sent a clear message who and what it supports and whyn 

    FB_IMG_1636663161746.jpg

    @the-cysko-kid said:

    One has to determine what's important in this country. Rule of law or mob rule and cowardice. 

    Is this who you want making decisions? This creature or it's ilk?

    Im increasingly of the opinion that these things will have to be stamped out like roaches in order for this country to survive. 

    If Rittenhouse is convicted of murder in the clearest case of self defense ever brought before the American justice system then there is no justice system. There is no law. There is nothing more to be beholden to and there is no reason to go on with this government. It will have sent a clear message who and what it supports and whyn 

    FB_IMG_1636663161746.jpg

    i tend to disagree if Kyle had shot and killed a black person First i think the jury may be swayed  but second since they were both white those fucks will not do a damn thing (think about it there have not been any of them outside the courthouse)

  • one thing they did show today was "jump kick man" ya thats what they are calling him tried to kick Kyle before he was shot at

    @atom said:

    one thing they did show today was "jump kick man" ya thats what they are calling him tried to kick Kyle before he was shot at

    All he accomplished was Liu Kang bicycle-kicking himself into his next incarnation.

  • @the-cysko-kid said:

    One has to determine what's important in this country. Rule of law or mob rule and cowardice. 

    Do you consider what Rittenhouse did, not his shooting but before that, why he was even in that situation to begin with, "rule of law"?

    @mld-woody said:

    Do you consider what Rittenhouse did, not his shooting but before that, why he was even in that situation to begin with, "rule of law"?

    Its not even worth insulting you anymore….

    there are no underlying conditions that erase imminent fact that it was self defense.

    you want conditions put on a 17 year old boy/man who used text book thought/reasoning/execution   To save his own life?

    your narrowing down the acceptance window you think you have.  People are gonna turn and fuck your world up.

    you are not that smart.

  • It's the clearest cut case of self defense Ive ever seen brought to trial. It was him or them and he chose right. 

    Fuck them. 

    a-time-to-kill-burn-in-hell.gif

    @the-cysko-kid said:

    It's the clearest cut case of self defense Ive ever seen brought to trial. It was him or them and he chose right. 

    Fuck them. 

    a-time-to-kill-burn-in-hell.gif

    I didn't say anything about the validity of the self defense case. I know you get all "kill them all" in your opinions pretty often though. 

    With the emphasis on "rule of law" I wanted to hear what you thought of what Rittenhouse was doing before the shootings. I can't see how that would be considered "rule of law".

  • @mld-woody said:

    Do you consider what Rittenhouse did, not his shooting but before that, why he was even in that situation to begin with, "rule of law"?

    Its not even worth insulting you anymore….

    there are no underlying conditions that erase imminent fact that it was self defense.

    you want conditions put on a 17 year old boy/man who used text book thought/reasoning/execution   To save his own life?

    your narrowing down the acceptance window you think you have.  People are gonna turn and fuck your world up.

    you are not that smart.

    @hammertime said:

    @mld-woody said:

    Do you consider what Rittenhouse did, not his shooting but before that, why he was even in that situation to begin with, "rule of law"?

    Its not even worth insulting you anymore….

    there are no underlying conditions that erase imminent fact that it was self defense.

    you want conditions put on a 17 year old boy/man who used text book thought/reasoning/execution   To save his own life?

    your narrowing down the acceptance window you think you have.  People are gonna turn and fuck your world up.

    you are not that smart.

    Excellent post. not the woodpeckers, as always.

  • so, woodpecker, tell us WHAT law says he was not allowed to be where he was?

    go ahead. look it up ...which you have never done.

  • Doc-Rittenhouse.jpg

  • @the-cysko-kid said:

    One has to determine what's important in this country. Rule of law or mob rule and cowardice. 

    Do you consider what Rittenhouse did, not his shooting but before that, why he was even in that situation to begin with, "rule of law"?

    @mld-woody said:

    Do you consider what Rittenhouse did, not his shooting but before that, why he was even in that situation to begin with, "rule of law"?

    Unfortunately the rule of law has been weaponized by political activists. It's probably always been that way but more evident because we live in this era. But seriously isn't it time for you guys oh, yes you guys, to quit screaming about white supremacists? I mean whether it fits, or even matters, or not?

    WSS

  • @mld-woody said:

    Do you consider what Rittenhouse did, not his shooting but before that, why he was even in that situation to begin with, "rule of law"?

    Unfortunately the rule of law has been weaponized by political activists. It's probably always been that way but more evident because we live in this era. But seriously isn't it time for you guys oh, yes you guys, to quit screaming about white supremacists? I mean whether it fits, or even matters, or not?

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    Unfortunately the rule of law has been weaponized by political activists. It's probably always been that way but more evident because we live in this era. But seriously isn't it time for you guys oh, yes you guys, to quit screaming about white supremacists? I mean whether it fits, or even matters, or not?

    WSS

    Who is screaming about white supremacists?

  • @westside-steve said:

    Unfortunately the rule of law has been weaponized by political activists. It's probably always been that way but more evident because we live in this era. But seriously isn't it time for you guys oh, yes you guys, to quit screaming about white supremacists? I mean whether it fits, or even matters, or not?

    WSS

    Who is screaming about white supremacists?

    @mld-woody said:

    Who is screaming about white supremacists?

    giphy.gif?cid=ecf05e47lfu6qpurtzgmxuncng

  • @westside-steve said:

    Unfortunately the rule of law has been weaponized by political activists. It's probably always been that way but more evident because we live in this era. But seriously isn't it time for you guys oh, yes you guys, to quit screaming about white supremacists? I mean whether it fits, or even matters, or not?

    WSS

    Who is screaming about white supremacists?

  • White privilege

    image.png.199edd94a090b7060013b1cbc6b68cff.png

  • Rittenhouse is just an object to ruin to establish the left's lies/narrative as maybe legit. falsely. propaganda - it's what the left does, historically.

  • @westside-steve said:

    Unfortunately the rule of law has been weaponized by political activists. It's probably always been that way but more evident because we live in this era. But seriously isn't it time for you guys oh, yes you guys, to quit screaming about white supremacists? I mean whether it fits, or even matters, or not?

    WSS

    Who is screaming about white supremacists?

  • Rittenhouse is an idiot but an innocent one.

    How have you fellas been?