Skip to content

THE CLEVELAND FOOTBALL BROWNS Game Day Thread

The Browns Board
244 22 5.7k
  • @mjp28 said:

    Back to the numbers. CLE -3 and the O/U 41½  it looks like raiders are living up. to that.

    Are the defense going to have to win the game ?

    I saw Browns + 1.5 at kickoff

    mjp28M mjp28 wrote on last edited by mjp28
    #91

    @browns149 said:

    I saw Browns + 1.5 at kickoff

    Yes the lines were all over the place our pickem Las Vegas -3 VI has them 2 to -3  now  but they were  Cleveland -7 to  +3 and even off depending on when you got them.

    Right now the over looks good   -but-   the BROWNS' look. TBD depending on if they get their offensive head out of their ass.

    GO BROWNS !

  • gumby73G gumby73 wrote on last edited by
    #92

     Mullins looks OK.. he needs some help..

    defense needs some Carr wrecks.. 

  • hx214H hx214 wrote on last edited by
    #93

    Way to pound that practice kick through Chase!

  • D BoneD D Bone wrote on last edited by
    #94

    Defense has to hold to a FG at worst on this opening drive as a TD will make it a 3 score game and that would just about hit the last nail right on the head. 

  • OrionO Orion wrote on last edited by
    #95

    We need a reliable kicker.  Put that on our Christmas list.

  • jrb12711J jrb12711 wrote on last edited by
    #96

    The shame is it feels like if we just got mayfield and Landry back this game would at worst be tied. 

  • D BoneD D Bone wrote on last edited by
    #97

    Man we need a 3 and out 

  • D BoneD D Bone wrote on last edited by
    #98

    Nice catch De Shawn 

  • hx214H hx214 wrote on last edited by
    #99

    Mullens is playing well enough that I'd save 7 million on Case next year

  • jrb12711J jrb12711 wrote on last edited by

    So who is to blame on the depth of these routes? Seems pretty strongly on the coaches. 
     

    i hope everyone saw that drive and realizes the run game ain’t happening tonight unless we get creative. 

  • So who is to blame on the depth of these routes? Seems pretty strongly on the coaches. 
     

    i hope everyone saw that drive and realizes the run game ain’t happening tonight unless we get creative. 

    Browns149B Browns149 wrote on last edited by

    @jrb12711 said:

    So who is to blame on the depth of these routes? Seems pretty strongly on the coaches. 
     

    i hope everyone saw that drive and realizes the run game ain’t happening tonight unless we get creative. 

    I’d say the guy who designed the plays. It is RIDICULOUS that they run routes short of the sticks 

    Kurt Warner, a hall-of-famer keeps saying you don’t give your team a chance by running those plays

  • tiamat63T tiamat63 wrote on last edited by

    Like the first Ravens game. 

    - scrap the outside zone 

    - involve the TE screen game 

    - need to connect on the perimeter 

    - throw a double move on early downs 

    Have to force them to at least adjust depth and not play so heavy at the sticks. Raiders play a ton of single high, even when they're getting bombed on. Only choice you have is to improve your horizontal passing game.   Schwartz is active, you can use that lateral action to your favor. 

  • So who is to blame on the depth of these routes? Seems pretty strongly on the coaches. 
     

    i hope everyone saw that drive and realizes the run game ain’t happening tonight unless we get creative. 

    D BoneD D Bone wrote on last edited by

    @jrb12711 said:

    So who is to blame on the depth of these routes? Seems pretty strongly on the coaches. 
     

    i hope everyone saw that drive and realizes the run game ain’t happening tonight unless we get creative. 

    Don't know the run game won't work until you try. They at least have given it to Chubb back to back on a drive or two. Both Kurt and Willie agree. 

  • Like the first Ravens game. 

    - scrap the outside zone 

    - involve the TE screen game 

    - need to connect on the perimeter 

    - throw a double move on early downs 

    Have to force them to at least adjust depth and not play so heavy at the sticks. Raiders play a ton of single high, even when they're getting bombed on. Only choice you have is to improve your horizontal passing game.   Schwartz is active, you can use that lateral action to your favor. 

    jrb12711J jrb12711 wrote on last edited by

    @tiamat63 said:

    Like the first Ravens game. 

    - scrap the outside zone 

    - involve the TE screen game 

    - need to connect on the perimeter 

    - throw a double move on early downs 

    Have to force them to at least adjust depth and not play so heavy at the sticks. Raiders play a ton of single high, even when they're getting bombed on. Only choice you have is to improve your horizontal passing game.   Schwartz is active, you can use that lateral action to your favor. 

    Couldn’t have said it better myself. I get being conservative to this point but that point is gone. 

    @d-bone said:

    Don't know the run game won't work until you try. They at least have given it to Chubb back to back on a drive or two. Both Kurt and Willie agree. 

    When there’s 9 guys in the box, yea you can. 

  • Browns149B Browns149 wrote on last edited by

    More terrible coaching

  • D BoneD D Bone wrote on last edited by

    FUMBLE!!

  • S SdBacker80 wrote on last edited by

    Raiders taking the risks we need to take 

  • @tiamat63 said:

    Like the first Ravens game. 

    - scrap the outside zone 

    - involve the TE screen game 

    - need to connect on the perimeter 

    - throw a double move on early downs 

    Have to force them to at least adjust depth and not play so heavy at the sticks. Raiders play a ton of single high, even when they're getting bombed on. Only choice you have is to improve your horizontal passing game.   Schwartz is active, you can use that lateral action to your favor. 

    Couldn’t have said it better myself. I get being conservative to this point but that point is gone. 

    @d-bone said:

    Don't know the run game won't work until you try. They at least have given it to Chubb back to back on a drive or two. Both Kurt and Willie agree. 

    When there’s 9 guys in the box, yea you can. 

    D BoneD D Bone wrote on last edited by

    @jrb12711 said:

    Couldn’t have said it better myself. I get being conservative to this point but that point is gone. 

    When there’s 9 guys in the box, yea you can. 

    Shit... may as well forfeit. 

  • Browns149B Browns149 wrote on last edited by

    Man JOK can’t make a good solo tackle. He’s been run over twice 

  • Browns149B Browns149 wrote on last edited by

    FUMBLE