Fields hurt
-
So when does Flacco or Pickett get dealt to the Jets.
they are rolling with Tyrod.
In the words on northeast Ohios great Tim Misny “make them pay”
-
-
Titans lost Levis for the year too
Titans lost Levis for the year too
Who lost who there? He was so bad that Mason Rudolph was actually relevant...
-
So when does Flacco or Pickett get dealt to the Jets.
they are rolling with Tyrod.
In the words on northeast Ohios great Tim Misny “make them pay”
So when does Flacco or Pickett get dealt to the Jets.
they are rolling with Tyrod.
In the words on northeast Ohios great Tim Misny “make them pay”
It'll be interesting to see which one gives the Browns the best exchange value; especially since they may be competing with the Titans to get that done.
-
The Browns are smartly stating that the bottom 5 spots of their roster are usually for developmental players. Players that kind of rotate in and out. So, they have no problem keeping 4 QB's on the roster. Whether or not they actually think having 4 QB's is a problem or not doesn't matter. They're telling the rest of the league, Hey! Don't be waiting for us to cut one of them. Because we are fine with keeping all 4.
BEING A BROWNS FAN IS A TEST TO SEE HOW MUCH YOU CAN TAKE -
Well Fields was sidelined with what amounts as a hangnail
false alarm
-
Well Fields was sidelined with what amounts as a hangnail
false alarm
Well Fields was sidelined with what amounts as a hangnail
false alarm
Garland, Mobley and Allen must be his heroes..
-
The Browns are smartly stating that the bottom 5 spots of their roster are usually for developmental players. Players that kind of rotate in and out. So, they have no problem keeping 4 QB's on the roster. Whether or not they actually think having 4 QB's is a problem or not doesn't matter. They're telling the rest of the league, Hey! Don't be waiting for us to cut one of them. Because we are fine with keeping all 4.
The Browns are smartly stating that the bottom 5 spots of their roster are usually for developmental players. Players that kind of rotate in and out. So, they have no problem keeping 4 QB's on the roster. Whether or not they actually think having 4 QB's is a problem or not doesn't matter. They're telling the rest of the league, Hey! Don't be waiting for us to cut one of them. Because we are fine with keeping all 4.
Unless one of the veteran QBs get injured - I'd like to see the Browns use one of them to trade for help in the Secondary. I'm not talking training camp soft tissue injuries/pulls either.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login