Skip to content
The Browns Board
Theme
  • System
  • Light
  • Dark
  • Login
  • Register
  • Forums
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Donate
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. Halftime

Halftime

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Browns Board
25 Posts 8 Posters 341 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Orion OrionO Conversation Starter Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
    • 9k Posts
    • 4k Reputation
    OrionO Orion wrote on last edited by Orion
    #1

    image.png.b965e63666bba8cd468fc28b34a02e03.png

    So, we're not where we hoped we'd be at the Bye.  One could argue that we could've easily won two more games...but it wouldn't change what we look like on the field.  

    Flacco did not do well for us (hindsight, probably due to WR's unable to get separation).  It was smart to then go to the rookie, Gabriel, to see what he has to offer.  We're somewhere around midway through his evaluation process.  I'd envision Sanders getting some starts towards the end of the season to round out the 2025 QB data collection process.  That data will be evaluated and used in the 2026 draft decision process.  Which will incorporate the 2026 QB draft class evaluation process.  ( I'd bet we're drafting one...a tall one I hope )

    I've been saying that our WR room is manned by Practice Squad players.  ( perhaps it's too harsh, but it gets the idea across )  So let's take a look at Receiver stats for the 1st half of the season.    Our two leading receivers BOTH play TE.  Our LEADING receiver is a ROOKIE.   Of our top six receivers ONLY ONE is a WR.  And that WR has been tabbed as a huge disappointment this year...yet he's got twice as many receptions as the next WR on the list.  We don't have a WR that averages 3 catches or more per game.  -  And that's why I refer to the WR room as such.

    Receiving
    Player                    REC    YDS    YDS/REC    LNG    TD

    Harold Fannin Jr.  38    352    9.3    24    2

    David Njoku          27    260    9.6    23    2

    Jerry Jeudy          22    257    11.7    33    0

    Jerome Ford         21    76    3.6    17    0

    Dylan Sampson   20    133    6.6    14    1

    Quinshon Judkins 12    60    5    18    0

    Isaiah Bond           11    123    11.2    35    0

    Cedric Tillman      11    106    9.6    25    2

    Jamari Thrash      10    107    10.7    23    0

    Gage Larvadain    2    22    11    14    0

    Malachi Corley     2    17    8.5    17    0

    Blake Whiteheart  2    4    2    4    0

    BEING A BROWNS FAN IS A TEST TO SEE HOW MUCH YOU CAN TAKE
    sydS 1 Reply Last reply
    😢
    Quote Reply
    • OrionO Orion

      image.png.b965e63666bba8cd468fc28b34a02e03.png

      So, we're not where we hoped we'd be at the Bye.  One could argue that we could've easily won two more games...but it wouldn't change what we look like on the field.  

      Flacco did not do well for us (hindsight, probably due to WR's unable to get separation).  It was smart to then go to the rookie, Gabriel, to see what he has to offer.  We're somewhere around midway through his evaluation process.  I'd envision Sanders getting some starts towards the end of the season to round out the 2025 QB data collection process.  That data will be evaluated and used in the 2026 draft decision process.  Which will incorporate the 2026 QB draft class evaluation process.  ( I'd bet we're drafting one...a tall one I hope )

      I've been saying that our WR room is manned by Practice Squad players.  ( perhaps it's too harsh, but it gets the idea across )  So let's take a look at Receiver stats for the 1st half of the season.    Our two leading receivers BOTH play TE.  Our LEADING receiver is a ROOKIE.   Of our top six receivers ONLY ONE is a WR.  And that WR has been tabbed as a huge disappointment this year...yet he's got twice as many receptions as the next WR on the list.  We don't have a WR that averages 3 catches or more per game.  -  And that's why I refer to the WR room as such.

      Receiving
      Player                    REC    YDS    YDS/REC    LNG    TD

      Harold Fannin Jr.  38    352    9.3    24    2

      David Njoku          27    260    9.6    23    2

      Jerry Jeudy          22    257    11.7    33    0

      Jerome Ford         21    76    3.6    17    0

      Dylan Sampson   20    133    6.6    14    1

      Quinshon Judkins 12    60    5    18    0

      Isaiah Bond           11    123    11.2    35    0

      Cedric Tillman      11    106    9.6    25    2

      Jamari Thrash      10    107    10.7    23    0

      Gage Larvadain    2    22    11    14    0

      Malachi Corley     2    17    8.5    17    0

      Blake Whiteheart  2    4    2    4    0

      syd sydS Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
      • 7k Posts
      • 3k Reputation
      sydS syd wrote on last edited by
      #2

      @orion said:

      So, we're not where we hoped we'd be at the Bye.  One could argue that we could've easily won two more games...but it wouldn't change what we look like on the field.

      1 Reply Last reply
      😂
      Quote Reply
      • Bob806 Bob806B Conversation Starter Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
        • 5k Posts
        • 2k Reputation
        Bob806B Bob806 wrote on last edited by
        #3

        The Jeudy thing is weird. The trade was fine, the contract extension without playing a down was questionable. Let's hope things improve there.

        Gabriel, well it really looks like a reach. Hope I'm wrong, but damn you can't keep throwing 4 yard passes all day. 

        Karlis Missed
        bbedwardB OrionO 2 Replies Last reply
        ❤
        Quote Reply
        • Bob806B Bob806

          The Jeudy thing is weird. The trade was fine, the contract extension without playing a down was questionable. Let's hope things improve there.

          Gabriel, well it really looks like a reach. Hope I'm wrong, but damn you can't keep throwing 4 yard passes all day. 

          bbedward bbedwardB Conversation Starter Reacting Well Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
          • 9k Posts
          • 1k Reputation
          bbedwardB bbedward wrote on last edited by
          #4

          @bob806 said:

          you can't keep throwing 4 yard passes all day. 

          image.gif.87d96b9e0de8a44362dad02c06cdb340.gif

          1 Reply Last reply
          😂
          Quote Reply
          • Bob806B Bob806

            The Jeudy thing is weird. The trade was fine, the contract extension without playing a down was questionable. Let's hope things improve there.

            Gabriel, well it really looks like a reach. Hope I'm wrong, but damn you can't keep throwing 4 yard passes all day. 

            Orion OrionO Conversation Starter Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
            • 9k Posts
            • 4k Reputation
            OrionO Orion wrote on last edited by
            #5

            @bob806 said:

            you can't keep throwing 4 yard passes all day.

            And I harken back to the words of the wise old sage..."We're not interested in 4 yard runs.  We want 13 yard passes."  Paul DePodesta.  Well, will ya settle for 4 yard passes then?

            The hope was that Thrash would become a force in the passing game in his 2nd year.  The year isn't over but it doesn't look like he's becoming a force.

            Tillman?  I forget what he looks like.  Oh yeah...Bernie's number...he's a good blocker (for a receiver).  Another 2 catches/game guy.  Our only full size receiver.  6'3"

            Isaiah out on Bond - Another rookie.  Had no TC or Preseason with us.  ( 2nd leading WR )  Made a nice catch once.  Supposed to be fast.

            ...It's sad because we really need a Travis Henry on the team.  But we traded him away because we've got no QB.  It's almost a Chicken and the Egg thing in that what good is a QB without half decent receivers...and what good are half decent receivers without a QB.  But the reality is that we do have a couple of good pass catching TE's and RB's.  The QB actually does come before the egg.  So we did the right thing in setting ourselves us up for the April '26 draft with 2 picks for a QB.  

            Top priorities for the offseason:  QB ( if needed...and it's looking that way ),  OL, WR.    Everything else is several rungs of the ladder below.  If we pick a QB towards the top of the draft in April, then EVERY remaining pick should be OL or WR.  ( that's what Mike Ditka would do ) 🙂 

            BEING A BROWNS FAN IS A TEST TO SEE HOW MUCH YOU CAN TAKE
            nickersN sydS 2 Replies Last reply
            Quote Reply
            • OrionO Orion

              @bob806 said:

              you can't keep throwing 4 yard passes all day.

              And I harken back to the words of the wise old sage..."We're not interested in 4 yard runs.  We want 13 yard passes."  Paul DePodesta.  Well, will ya settle for 4 yard passes then?

              The hope was that Thrash would become a force in the passing game in his 2nd year.  The year isn't over but it doesn't look like he's becoming a force.

              Tillman?  I forget what he looks like.  Oh yeah...Bernie's number...he's a good blocker (for a receiver).  Another 2 catches/game guy.  Our only full size receiver.  6'3"

              Isaiah out on Bond - Another rookie.  Had no TC or Preseason with us.  ( 2nd leading WR )  Made a nice catch once.  Supposed to be fast.

              ...It's sad because we really need a Travis Henry on the team.  But we traded him away because we've got no QB.  It's almost a Chicken and the Egg thing in that what good is a QB without half decent receivers...and what good are half decent receivers without a QB.  But the reality is that we do have a couple of good pass catching TE's and RB's.  The QB actually does come before the egg.  So we did the right thing in setting ourselves us up for the April '26 draft with 2 picks for a QB.  

              Top priorities for the offseason:  QB ( if needed...and it's looking that way ),  OL, WR.    Everything else is several rungs of the ladder below.  If we pick a QB towards the top of the draft in April, then EVERY remaining pick should be OL or WR.  ( that's what Mike Ditka would do ) 🙂 

              nickers nickersN Conversation Starter Dedicated Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done Very Popular
              • 14k Posts
              • 5k Reputation
              nickersN nickers wrote on last edited by
              #6

              @orion said:

              And I harken back to the words of the wise old sage..."We're not interested in 4 yard runs.  We want 13 yard passes."  Paul DePodesta.  Well, will ya settle for 4 yard passes then?

              The hope was that Thrash would become a force in the passing game in his 2nd year.  The year isn't over but it doesn't look like he's becoming a force.

              Tillman?  I forget what he looks like.  Oh yeah...Bernie's number...he's a good blocker (for a receiver).  Another 2 catches/game guy.  Our only full size receiver.  6'3"

              Isaiah out on Bond - Another rookie.  Had no TC or Preseason with us.  ( 2nd leading WR )  Made a nice catch once.  Supposed to be fast.

              ...It's sad because we really need a Travis Henry on the team.  But we traded him away because we've got no QB.  It's almost a Chicken and the Egg thing in that what good is a QB without half decent receivers...and what good are half decent receivers without a QB.  But the reality is that we do have a couple of good pass catching TE's and RB's.  The QB actually does come before the egg.  So we did the right thing in setting ourselves us up for the April '26 draft with 2 picks for a QB.  

              Top priorities for the offseason:  QB ( if needed...and it's looking that way ),  OL, WR.    Everything else is several rungs of the ladder below.  If we pick a QB towards the top of the draft in April, then EVERY remaining pick should be OL or WR.  ( that's what Mike Ditka would do ) 🙂 

              But as we saw with Anthony Schwantz... Fast doesn't always translate to good or great..

              Nickers...."There are no old running QB's in the NFL "~Sam Rutigliano~
              OrionO FlugelF 2 Replies Last reply
              👍 ❤
              Quote Reply
              • nickersN nickers

                @orion said:

                And I harken back to the words of the wise old sage..."We're not interested in 4 yard runs.  We want 13 yard passes."  Paul DePodesta.  Well, will ya settle for 4 yard passes then?

                The hope was that Thrash would become a force in the passing game in his 2nd year.  The year isn't over but it doesn't look like he's becoming a force.

                Tillman?  I forget what he looks like.  Oh yeah...Bernie's number...he's a good blocker (for a receiver).  Another 2 catches/game guy.  Our only full size receiver.  6'3"

                Isaiah out on Bond - Another rookie.  Had no TC or Preseason with us.  ( 2nd leading WR )  Made a nice catch once.  Supposed to be fast.

                ...It's sad because we really need a Travis Henry on the team.  But we traded him away because we've got no QB.  It's almost a Chicken and the Egg thing in that what good is a QB without half decent receivers...and what good are half decent receivers without a QB.  But the reality is that we do have a couple of good pass catching TE's and RB's.  The QB actually does come before the egg.  So we did the right thing in setting ourselves us up for the April '26 draft with 2 picks for a QB.  

                Top priorities for the offseason:  QB ( if needed...and it's looking that way ),  OL, WR.    Everything else is several rungs of the ladder below.  If we pick a QB towards the top of the draft in April, then EVERY remaining pick should be OL or WR.  ( that's what Mike Ditka would do ) 🙂 

                But as we saw with Anthony Schwantz... Fast doesn't always translate to good or great..

                Orion OrionO Conversation Starter Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                • 9k Posts
                • 4k Reputation
                OrionO Orion wrote on last edited by
                #7

                @nickers said:

                Fast doesn't always translate to good or great..

                Right!   And being a tall, strong armed QB doesn't always translate to good/great (Derrick Anderson).  But having things that can't be taught is a good starting point.

                BEING A BROWNS FAN IS A TEST TO SEE HOW MUCH YOU CAN TAKE
                Dutch OvenD 1 Reply Last reply
                👍
                Quote Reply
                • OrionO Orion

                  @nickers said:

                  Fast doesn't always translate to good or great..

                  Right!   And being a tall, strong armed QB doesn't always translate to good/great (Derrick Anderson).  But having things that can't be taught is a good starting point.

                  Dutch Oven Dutch OvenD Dedicated Conversation Starter Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                  • 15k Posts
                  • 8k Reputation
                  Dutch OvenD Dutch Oven wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  @orion said:

                  Right!   And being a tall, strong armed QB doesn't always translate to good/great (Derrick Anderson).  But having things that can't be taught is a good starting point.

                  And as much as people want to yell and scream and throw themselves on the ground and pitch a fit that thinking is analytics. 

                  Taking info/trends and seeing what generally works and what doesn't work. 

                  Taking a 5'9" QB with middling athletic tools in the 3rd round instead of, say, a wide receiver or OLineman on a team that desperately needs them doesn't make sense analytically. (Or in any other sense either)

                  OrionO FlugelF T 3 Replies Last reply
                  Quote Reply
                  • Dutch OvenD Dutch Oven

                    @orion said:

                    Right!   And being a tall, strong armed QB doesn't always translate to good/great (Derrick Anderson).  But having things that can't be taught is a good starting point.

                    And as much as people want to yell and scream and throw themselves on the ground and pitch a fit that thinking is analytics. 

                    Taking info/trends and seeing what generally works and what doesn't work. 

                    Taking a 5'9" QB with middling athletic tools in the 3rd round instead of, say, a wide receiver or OLineman on a team that desperately needs them doesn't make sense analytically. (Or in any other sense either)

                    Orion OrionO Conversation Starter Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                    • 9k Posts
                    • 4k Reputation
                    OrionO Orion wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    @dutch-oven said:

                    And as much as people want to yell and scream and throw themselves on the ground and pitch a fit that thinking is analytics.

                    ...and next I'll be branded as antifa.  🙂   Yes, technically gathering information of any kind for the intended use of analyzing is analytics.  

                     - Taking a 5'9" QB with middling athletic tools in the 3rd round instead of, say, a wide receiver or OLineman on a team that desperately needs them doesn't make sense analytically. (Or in any other sense either) - 

                    Except that we needed a QB really badly too.  And QB trumps all.  (one could argue that THIS QB doesn't trump all...but it did to them).  I had heard, post draft, that a couple of teams planned on taking Gabriel before the Browns next pick...but that's here-say.  

                    Being prejudice against midget QB's, I'd like to skip straight to the taller Sanders and see if he's as bad as he looked against the Rams in preseason.  

                    To me, a 5'9" QB is like having a 240 lb jockey.  🙂  

                    BEING A BROWNS FAN IS A TEST TO SEE HOW MUCH YOU CAN TAKE
                    FlugelF 1 Reply Last reply
                    ❤ 😂
                    Quote Reply
                    • OrionO Orion

                      @bob806 said:

                      you can't keep throwing 4 yard passes all day.

                      And I harken back to the words of the wise old sage..."We're not interested in 4 yard runs.  We want 13 yard passes."  Paul DePodesta.  Well, will ya settle for 4 yard passes then?

                      The hope was that Thrash would become a force in the passing game in his 2nd year.  The year isn't over but it doesn't look like he's becoming a force.

                      Tillman?  I forget what he looks like.  Oh yeah...Bernie's number...he's a good blocker (for a receiver).  Another 2 catches/game guy.  Our only full size receiver.  6'3"

                      Isaiah out on Bond - Another rookie.  Had no TC or Preseason with us.  ( 2nd leading WR )  Made a nice catch once.  Supposed to be fast.

                      ...It's sad because we really need a Travis Henry on the team.  But we traded him away because we've got no QB.  It's almost a Chicken and the Egg thing in that what good is a QB without half decent receivers...and what good are half decent receivers without a QB.  But the reality is that we do have a couple of good pass catching TE's and RB's.  The QB actually does come before the egg.  So we did the right thing in setting ourselves us up for the April '26 draft with 2 picks for a QB.  

                      Top priorities for the offseason:  QB ( if needed...and it's looking that way ),  OL, WR.    Everything else is several rungs of the ladder below.  If we pick a QB towards the top of the draft in April, then EVERY remaining pick should be OL or WR.  ( that's what Mike Ditka would do ) 🙂 

                      syd sydS Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                      • 7k Posts
                      • 3k Reputation
                      sydS syd wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      @orion said:

                      I harken

                      do you ? do you really harken ? I do sometimes also and do not remember much good from this franchise since 99

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      Quote Reply
                      • OrionO Orion

                        @dutch-oven said:

                        And as much as people want to yell and scream and throw themselves on the ground and pitch a fit that thinking is analytics.

                        ...and next I'll be branded as antifa.  🙂   Yes, technically gathering information of any kind for the intended use of analyzing is analytics.  

                         - Taking a 5'9" QB with middling athletic tools in the 3rd round instead of, say, a wide receiver or OLineman on a team that desperately needs them doesn't make sense analytically. (Or in any other sense either) - 

                        Except that we needed a QB really badly too.  And QB trumps all.  (one could argue that THIS QB doesn't trump all...but it did to them).  I had heard, post draft, that a couple of teams planned on taking Gabriel before the Browns next pick...but that's here-say.  

                        Being prejudice against midget QB's, I'd like to skip straight to the taller Sanders and see if he's as bad as he looked against the Rams in preseason.  

                        To me, a 5'9" QB is like having a 240 lb jockey.  🙂  

                        Flugel FlugelF Conversation Starter Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                        • 11k Posts
                        • 6k Reputation
                        FlugelF Flugel wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        @orion said:

                        To me, a 5'9" QB is like having a 240 lb jockey.  🙂  

                        ? Classic stuff!!!

                        Any combination of Tackles the Browns currently go with has to make any QB here feel as comfortable as Sadaam Hussein once felt when all he had standing between him and the American troops were two 69 year old security guards...

                        I welcome the only Defensive Coordinator to earn a Superbowl Ring in New Orleans while understanding Revenge of the Nerds is a sequel. "Come get some!"
                        1 Reply Last reply
                        👍
                        Quote Reply
                        • Dutch OvenD Dutch Oven

                          @orion said:

                          Right!   And being a tall, strong armed QB doesn't always translate to good/great (Derrick Anderson).  But having things that can't be taught is a good starting point.

                          And as much as people want to yell and scream and throw themselves on the ground and pitch a fit that thinking is analytics. 

                          Taking info/trends and seeing what generally works and what doesn't work. 

                          Taking a 5'9" QB with middling athletic tools in the 3rd round instead of, say, a wide receiver or OLineman on a team that desperately needs them doesn't make sense analytically. (Or in any other sense either)

                          Flugel FlugelF Conversation Starter Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                          • 11k Posts
                          • 6k Reputation
                          FlugelF Flugel wrote on last edited by
                          #12

                          @dutch-oven said:

                          And as much as people want to yell and scream and throw themselves on the ground and pitch a fit that thinking is analytics. 

                          Taking info/trends and seeing what generally works and what doesn't work. 

                          Taking a 5'9" QB with middling athletic tools in the 3rd round instead of, say, a wide receiver or OLineman on a team that desperately needs them doesn't make sense analytically. (Or in any other sense either)

                          Precisely!  Here's a 5th round Tackle (Marcus Mbow) the NYG took this year.  He was a RT at Purdue (earlier on he played OG); but he got his 1st opportunity to start at LT.  Here's a video of him narrated by Former NFL Offensive Lineman Brian Baldinger:

                          I welcome the only Defensive Coordinator to earn a Superbowl Ring in New Orleans while understanding Revenge of the Nerds is a sequel. "Come get some!"
                          Dutch OvenD 1 Reply Last reply
                          Quote Reply
                          • Dutch OvenD Dutch Oven

                            @orion said:

                            Right!   And being a tall, strong armed QB doesn't always translate to good/great (Derrick Anderson).  But having things that can't be taught is a good starting point.

                            And as much as people want to yell and scream and throw themselves on the ground and pitch a fit that thinking is analytics. 

                            Taking info/trends and seeing what generally works and what doesn't work. 

                            Taking a 5'9" QB with middling athletic tools in the 3rd round instead of, say, a wide receiver or OLineman on a team that desperately needs them doesn't make sense analytically. (Or in any other sense either)

                            TexasAg1969 T Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                            • 23k Posts
                            • 6k Reputation
                            T TexasAg1969 wrote on last edited by
                            #13

                            @dutch-oven said:

                            Taking a 5'9" QB with middling athletic tools in the 3rd round instead of, say, a wide receiver or OLineman on a team that desperately needs them doesn't make sense analytically. (Or in any other sense either)

                            Makes perfect sense if you don't know shit about real football. And they don't.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            Quote Reply
                            • FlugelF Flugel

                              @dutch-oven said:

                              And as much as people want to yell and scream and throw themselves on the ground and pitch a fit that thinking is analytics. 

                              Taking info/trends and seeing what generally works and what doesn't work. 

                              Taking a 5'9" QB with middling athletic tools in the 3rd round instead of, say, a wide receiver or OLineman on a team that desperately needs them doesn't make sense analytically. (Or in any other sense either)

                              Precisely!  Here's a 5th round Tackle (Marcus Mbow) the NYG took this year.  He was a RT at Purdue (earlier on he played OG); but he got his 1st opportunity to start at LT.  Here's a video of him narrated by Former NFL Offensive Lineman Brian Baldinger:

                              Dutch Oven Dutch OvenD Dedicated Conversation Starter Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                              • 15k Posts
                              • 8k Reputation
                              Dutch OvenD Dutch Oven wrote on last edited by
                              #14

                              @flugel said:

                              Precisely!  Here's a 5th round Tackle (Marcus Mbow) the NYG took this year.  He was a RT at Purdue (earlier on he played OG); but he got his 1st opportunity to start at LT.  Here's a video of him narrated by Former NFL Offensive Lineman Brian Baldinger:

                              I remember that you wanted him in your mock drafts and that he fell farther than either you or I figured he would, glad to hear he's doing well. 

                              Would've been a good choice for the Browns. I still cannot believe the Browns used a top 100 pick on Gabriel. 

                              FlugelF 1 Reply Last reply
                              👍
                              Quote Reply
                              • Dutch OvenD Dutch Oven

                                @flugel said:

                                Precisely!  Here's a 5th round Tackle (Marcus Mbow) the NYG took this year.  He was a RT at Purdue (earlier on he played OG); but he got his 1st opportunity to start at LT.  Here's a video of him narrated by Former NFL Offensive Lineman Brian Baldinger:

                                I remember that you wanted him in your mock drafts and that he fell farther than either you or I figured he would, glad to hear he's doing well. 

                                Would've been a good choice for the Browns. I still cannot believe the Browns used a top 100 pick on Gabriel. 

                                Flugel FlugelF Conversation Starter Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                                • 11k Posts
                                • 6k Reputation
                                FlugelF Flugel wrote on last edited by Flugel
                                #15

                                @dutch-oven said:

                                I remember that you wanted him in your mock drafts and that he fell farther than either you or I figured he would, glad to hear he's doing well. 

                                Would've been a good choice for the Browns. I still cannot believe the Browns used a top 100 pick on Gabriel. 

                                My Athlon Draft Guide had him projected for round 3. Unfortunately my wife used my Lindy's Draft Guide as a fly swatter so I can't remember where they had him projected; since she's a lot stronger and tougher than Calfox News -  I didn't give her a hard time about it.  

                                I welcome the only Defensive Coordinator to earn a Superbowl Ring in New Orleans while understanding Revenge of the Nerds is a sequel. "Come get some!"
                                Dutch OvenD 1 Reply Last reply
                                😂
                                Quote Reply
                                • FlugelF Flugel

                                  @dutch-oven said:

                                  I remember that you wanted him in your mock drafts and that he fell farther than either you or I figured he would, glad to hear he's doing well. 

                                  Would've been a good choice for the Browns. I still cannot believe the Browns used a top 100 pick on Gabriel. 

                                  My Athlon Draft Guide had him projected for round 3. Unfortunately my wife used my Lindy's Draft Guide as a fly swatter so I can't remember where they had him projected; since she's a lot stronger and tougher than Calfox News -  I didn't give her a hard time about it.  

                                  Dutch Oven Dutch OvenD Dedicated Conversation Starter Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                                  • 15k Posts
                                  • 8k Reputation
                                  Dutch OvenD Dutch Oven wrote on last edited by
                                  #16

                                  @flugel said:

                                  My Athlon Draft Guide had him projected for round 3. Unfortunately my wife used my Lindy's Draft Guide as a fly swatter so I can't remember where they had him projected; since she's a lot stronger and tougher Calfox News -  I didn't give her a hard time about it.  

                                  I just happen to have the Lindy's Draft Guide right here...

                                  They had Marcus Mbow as a 1st/2nd round prospect. 

                                  FlugelF 1 Reply Last reply
                                  ❤
                                  Quote Reply
                                  • Dutch OvenD Dutch Oven

                                    @flugel said:

                                    My Athlon Draft Guide had him projected for round 3. Unfortunately my wife used my Lindy's Draft Guide as a fly swatter so I can't remember where they had him projected; since she's a lot stronger and tougher Calfox News -  I didn't give her a hard time about it.  

                                    I just happen to have the Lindy's Draft Guide right here...

                                    They had Marcus Mbow as a 1st/2nd round prospect. 

                                    Flugel FlugelF Conversation Starter Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                                    • 11k Posts
                                    • 6k Reputation
                                    FlugelF Flugel wrote on last edited by
                                    #17

                                    @dutch-oven said:

                                    I just happen to have the Lindy's Draft Guide right here...

                                    They had Marcus Mbow as a 1st/2nd round prospect. 

                                    Yeah, we're on the same page this is the type of talent we needed in the round 3 spot where we drafted the next Doug Flutie instead.  

                                    I welcome the only Defensive Coordinator to earn a Superbowl Ring in New Orleans while understanding Revenge of the Nerds is a sequel. "Come get some!"
                                    OrionO 1 Reply Last reply
                                    Quote Reply
                                    • FlugelF Flugel

                                      @dutch-oven said:

                                      I just happen to have the Lindy's Draft Guide right here...

                                      They had Marcus Mbow as a 1st/2nd round prospect. 

                                      Yeah, we're on the same page this is the type of talent we needed in the round 3 spot where we drafted the next Doug Flutie instead.  

                                      Orion OrionO Conversation Starter Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                                      • 9k Posts
                                      • 4k Reputation
                                      OrionO Orion wrote on last edited by
                                      #18

                                      @flugel said:

                                      Yeah, we're on the same page this is the type of talent we needed in the round 3 spot where we drafted the next Doug Flutie instead.  

                                      Whoa!  Do you mean Gabriel should be able to drop kick an extra point?  Can ya still do that from the 2 yard line?

                                      BEING A BROWNS FAN IS A TEST TO SEE HOW MUCH YOU CAN TAKE
                                      FlugelF 1 Reply Last reply
                                      Quote Reply
                                      • TexasAg1969 T Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                                        • 23k Posts
                                        • 6k Reputation
                                        T TexasAg1969 wrote on last edited by TexasAg1969
                                        #19

                                        Speaking of winners and losers I thought I'd throw this in there ...............................?.........daughter's novel last year hit #1 on NY Times bestseller list and today her 2nd in the series sold more in the first week than that one did and hit #3 on that list behind new ones by Grisham and Connelly the same day. Abigail Owen's "The Things Gods Break" is not really about the Browns since her heroine is actually a winner.   

                                        OK-plug for the book is done. Thanks for listening.?

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        👍
                                        Quote Reply
                                        • OrionO Orion

                                          @flugel said:

                                          Yeah, we're on the same page this is the type of talent we needed in the round 3 spot where we drafted the next Doug Flutie instead.  

                                          Whoa!  Do you mean Gabriel should be able to drop kick an extra point?  Can ya still do that from the 2 yard line?

                                          Flugel FlugelF Conversation Starter Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                                          • 11k Posts
                                          • 6k Reputation
                                          FlugelF Flugel wrote on last edited by Flugel
                                          #20

                                          @orion said:

                                          Whoa!  Do you mean Gabriel should be able to drop kick an extra point?  Can ya still do that from the 2 yard line?

                                          ? ? Knock it off! 

                                          To answer your question though... Not sure - but my guess is Gabriel would have to be able to move like Flutie (and we've seen that's not possible) in order to execute such a thing.  Flutie was as agile is it gets not to mention how quick he was (and I'm talking game speed not stop watch).  Some stop watch gems that can't see the field well (straight ahead or peripherally) aren't as fast at the speed of NFL Game.   Will Gabriel vs Sanders reach the level QB controversy Rob Johnson vs Doug Flutie got to in Buffalo?

                                          image.png.f71c18359af0885b183ab33fa3460748.png

                                          I welcome the only Defensive Coordinator to earn a Superbowl Ring in New Orleans while understanding Revenge of the Nerds is a sequel. "Come get some!"
                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          Quote Reply

                                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                          Register Login
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          Theme
                                          • System
                                          • Light
                                          • Dark
                                          The Browns Board Terms Privacy

                                          The Browns Board is an independent fan community. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the Cleveland Browns, Cleveland Cavaliers, Cleveland Guardians, the NFL, NBA, MLB, or any of their affiliates. Team names, logos, and other marks are the property of their respective owners.

                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Forums
                                          • Recent
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Donate