Skip to content

Could DA end up with the worst QB rating EVER in a season

The Browns Board
42 22 4.2k
  • C ClevelandRocks wrote on last edited by
    #12

    Worse then jamarcus russel. Enough said and to answer your actual question yes. He may go in the record books as the worst passer ever

  • Problem is picking a "franchise" QB is a hit and miss gamble. You never know who it will be. Lots of great college Quarterbacks bomb in the NFL.

    S Solon16 wrote on last edited by
    #13

    @diehardbrownsfan said:

    Problem is picking a "franchise" QB is a hit and miss gamble. You never know who it will be. Lots of great college Quarterbacks bomb in the NFL.

    SO WHAT? When you hit...you are a playoff team year in and year out...worth the risk everytime!

  • S Solon16 wrote on last edited by
    #14

    @ ate " but I like Anderson "............ I think he is a career backup...just like BQ is....I think both Suck and want them BOTH gone! JMO

  • @diehardbrownsfan said:

    Problem is picking a "franchise" QB is a hit and miss gamble. You never know who it will be. Lots of great college Quarterbacks bomb in the NFL.

    SO WHAT? When you hit...you are a playoff team year in and year out...worth the risk everytime!

    DieHardBrownsFanD DieHardBrownsFan wrote on last edited by
    #15

    @solon16 said:

    SO WHAT? When you hit...you are a playoff team year in and year out...worth the risk everytime!

    So, if we chose Sanchez, we would be a playoff team year in and year out? Bullshit. My point is you don't know. It's a gamble. And without other players who were also great, we would still have a great Quarterback being sacked, chased all over the field and humiliated every play.

  • ballpeenB ballpeen wrote on last edited by
    #16

    He could.....passer rating is over hyped.

    Lot's goes in to passer rating. Blocking, Running, and catching are three externals that come to mind.

  • @solon16 said:

    SO WHAT? When you hit...you are a playoff team year in and year out...worth the risk everytime!

    So, if we chose Sanchez, we would be a playoff team year in and year out? Bullshit. My point is you don't know. It's a gamble. And without other players who were also great, we would still have a great Quarterback being sacked, chased all over the field and humiliated every play.

    S Solon16 wrote on last edited by Solon16
    #17

    @diehardbrownsfan said:

    So, if we chose Sanchez, we would be a playoff team year in and year out? Bullshit. My point is you don't know. It's a gamble. And without other players who were also great, we would still have a great Quarterback being sacked, chased all over the field and humiliated every play.

    Don't know if sanchez is a hit yet...do you? I do know, rothlis, flacco, ryan, eli and rivers are "hits"

  • I would like to add that it is perfectly fine to discuss QB's here. It's the way that they are discussed that has been the problem in the past. Stick to the subject and not attack the messenger and play nice boys-n-girls.

    That Brady Quinn Homo forum is trying so hard not to talk about QB's that their assholes are puckered shut so much so that they are ready to explode.

    It's ok TheBrownsBoard members, just use your head. If your coming here with a past vendetta, I'd think again about hitting reply.

    Bring some info and/or opinion about either side, not just flame.

    this QB talk ain't the life or death of the Browns or Browns fans for that matter. Be brothers, be nice.

    Lead by example.

    Good Luck.

    Thanks.

    A Alo wrote on last edited by
    #18

    @admin-0 said:

    I would like to add that it is perfectly fine to discuss QB's here. It's the way that they are discussed that has been the problem in the past. Stick to the subject and not attack the messenger and play nice boys-n-girls.

    That Brady Quinn Homo forum is trying so hard not to talk about QB's that their assholes are puckered shut so much so that they are ready to explode.

    From what I can tell, both boards are talking about the QB situation. However, the other one is putting a lot more focus on scouting potential franchise QB's.

    For a comparison, this board's Jake Locker thread includes 17 posts. The one on the 'That Brady Quinn Homo Forum' has 103 post (and once I get back to it, will have 104).

    This isn't to say that one board's better than the other. Just that a lot of people here seem to be priding themselves on a QB discussion that, if they don't start focusing on the college QB's now, won't be all that substantive once the discussion shifts to who should be the Browns' next QB.

  • E eggo31 wrote on last edited by
    #19

    Lets just draft jimmy clausen....dude is a stud and i like his confidence, and work ethic

  • Next YearN Next Year wrote on last edited by
    #20

    with our recievers i dont blame him, beisides momass there is NO upside with any of the browns recievers ........

  • He could.....passer rating is over hyped.

    Lot's goes in to passer rating. Blocking, Running, and catching are three externals that come to mind.

    F Fan Of STEEL 1 wrote on last edited by
    #21

    @ballpeen said:

    He could.....passer rating is over hyped.

    Lot's goes in to passer rating. Blocking, Running, and catching are three externals that come to mind.

    Not to mention that little thing called "passing."

  • @diehardbrownsfan said:

    So, if we chose Sanchez, we would be a playoff team year in and year out? Bullshit. My point is you don't know. It's a gamble. And without other players who were also great, we would still have a great Quarterback being sacked, chased all over the field and humiliated every play.

    Don't know if sanchez is a hit yet...do you? I do know, rothlis, flacco, ryan, eli and rivers are "hits"

    DieHardBrownsFanD DieHardBrownsFan wrote on last edited by
    #22

    @solon16 said:

    Don't know if sanchez is a hit yet...do you? I do know, rothlis, flacco, ryan, eli and rivers are "hits"

    Yep. And look at the talent on the teams they are playing on. We have a total rebuild, vice just a QB rebuild.

  • @ballpeen said:

    He could.....passer rating is over hyped.

    Lot's goes in to passer rating. Blocking, Running, and catching are three externals that come to mind.

    Not to mention that little thing called "passing."

    ballpeenB ballpeen wrote on last edited by
    #23

    @fan-of-steel-1 said:

    Not to mention that little thing called "passing."

    No doubt......but passing is dependent on many other aspects of the game/

  • BrownIndianB BrownIndian wrote on last edited by
    #24

    Here it is so far ...

    http://www.nfl.com/fantasy/rankings/qb

    DA is not as bad as many think from the report, but he is bad for us.

  • with our recievers i dont blame him, beisides momass there is NO upside with any of the browns recievers ........

    C cmac12 wrote on last edited by
    #25

    @next-year said:

    with our recievers i dont blame him, beisides momass there is NO upside with any of the browns recievers ........

    Think it is too early to tell on robo.

  • Lets just draft jimmy clausen....dude is a stud and i like his confidence, and work ethic

    Mark OM Mark O wrote on last edited by
    #26

    @eggo31 said:

    Lets just draft jimmy clausen....dude is a stud and i like his confidence, and work ethic

    I think we already have Jimmy Clausen on the team...

  • @eggo31 said:

    Lets just draft jimmy clausen....dude is a stud and i like his confidence, and work ethic

    I think we already have Jimmy Clausen on the team...

    E eggo31 wrote on last edited by
    #27

    @mark-o said:

    I think we already have Jimmy Clausen on the team...

    if ur compairing quinn and clausen ur crazy......clausen has much better arm strength and accuracy down field

  • Mark OM Mark O wrote on last edited by
    #28

    And Quinn set how many ND records when he was there? How high did he finish in the Heisman voting?

    How great did Rick Mirer look at ND and how did that turn out in the NFL?

    Quinn was thought to be the savior and I still think he could be a very good NFL quarterback, but it won't happen in Cleveland unless Anderson gets hurt and he has another chance to play here. Otherwise, we're stuck with DA the rest of the way and it's either Andersons team or they're both gone next year and we have a new QB either via the draft or free agency or both.

  • DA is the most overhyped Qb in Browns history by some these guys....The dude absolutely fking SUCKS....BQ is fking unwatchable....when will these posters wake the fk up and realize we have to get US a Franchise QB....it's unbelievable there is anything other than OUR QB"S SUCK .......not which one sucks the least!!! Christ I don't want to hear we need more Oline to make either of these stiffs better....We need A QB! Jake Locker gets my vote....not even a hesitation! If he is there when we pick(assuming he comes out) and we don't draft him...Im the xxxx outta hear! 41 years of this fkn BS....which sucky QB is better....GEEZZZZZ

    hammertimeH hammertime wrote on last edited by
    #29

    @solon16 said:

    DA is the most overhyped Qb in Browns history by some these guys....The dude absolutely fking SUCKS....BQ is fking unwatchable....when will these posters wake the fk up and realize we have to get US a Franchise QB....it's unbelievable there is anything other than OUR QB"S SUCK .......not which one sucks the least!!! Christ I don't want to hear we need more Oline to make either of these stiffs better....We need A QB! Jake Locker gets my vote....not even a hesitation! If he is there when we pick(assuming he comes out) and we don't draft him...Im the xxxx outta hear! 41 years of this fkn BS....which sucky QB is better....GEEZZZZZ

    Jake Locker or bust?

    I have no comfort in the top pick being a qb yet.

  • C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by
    #30

    I only favor DA because I feel he distributes the ball better, ATE

    ****************************************************

    While he stares down receivers, or frantically throws quick passes into the dirt or

    over the head of the first receiver on his read.

    Yeah, kinda like that..... 😄

  • O Orange__Brown_Town wrote on last edited by
    #31

    Hope we get a qb through free agency next season. We must get a guy who is a proven winner so the players buy in. Not some hot shot rookie who has to go through growing pains. I don't care if he is past prime. As long as he is established, I am fine with it. The fact is not each draft has a franchise caliber qb. Trying to force a young kid into that role is very costly.