@king-ghoolie-lives said:
It WAS a touchdown. I promise you it was.
Why, because the people in power looked at it, and to the best of their judgement, they called it a touchdown.
Who are any of you to read the minds of officials who weren't at the game? How do you know that Ed Hocule (sp) would not have seen this the same way?
Was it a tie in the air? According to the rules, it doesn't matter who has posession in the air. YOu have to maintain a possession all teh way through to landing on the ground. The reciever snuggled in and somehow, caught a refs eyes at teh exact time he was making his decision, at that point in time, it looked like a tie to him.
From the TV replay? YOu can't really see the ratio of reciever to defender as they first hit the turf. You really can't.
Personally, I like th replacement refs and hope they remain intact all year. As the ratings are shwoing, more people are tuning in to see this shit. It is EXCITING............ INTERESTING.............. it adds some spice to the game............. What will happen next..............
Look man, it doens't matter who teh refs are, if these guys blow or if they are good, they are going to make mistakes across the board, equally over teh long haul of a season.
Hey, if the packers were so fucking good they would have put the game away with TOUCHDOWNS. Frankly, I enjoyed seeing them lose that way. They played Kosar ball and settled for field goals. It isn't anyone's fault but their own that Seattle was within a TD to win.
People are making WAYYYYYY to much of this bullshit.
WHo cares who teh refs are? As long as they fuck up for both teams, and in this game? They fucked up in ways that helped Green Bay score earlier.
Seriously man, it is good for the soul to be brought down to earth once in awhile.
Bravo replacement refs.
LMAO if that was Browns VS Hawks and the same thing happened I am sure you would argue the same way. 
BTW jennings has both feet and both hands on the ball before Tate does. Just sayin