@1-more-season said:Wow! Talk about looking back through rose colored glasses. Listen to you guys.
5-22 with the Browns and below .500 lifetime! Yes, I know talent wah wah wah.
Returned the Browns to relevance. Really? That disaster on Sunday was the only national game the Browns had this year and after the halftime crew got done laughing at the team the network cut away to a more competitive game. 6 min. later!!!! Gotta be a record. That is what the rest of the country thinks of the Browns too a joke.
Sure there were some improvements just like there were with Romeo or Butch or any coach but Mangini doesn't seem to have what it takes to be an HC.
Now you'all turn your venom to Holgrem.... a successful HC? You hate Holgrem who's taken teams to SB's you hate Romeo who won more in 1 season then any Browns coach in the last 10 years but love a guy who brought 2 5-11 season's while the rest of the leagues down teams found a way to win with what they have because of some perceived "right direction".
Mangini was another bad decision from the start. Holmgren will be the one to set this team in the right direction.
I don't like a new coach every 2 years and I hope that when they have the right guy he stays for 20 years.
first of all Mangini was 10-22 not 5-22 with the browns. both suck. the only pt. I will argue is that "the rest of the leagues down teams found a way to win with what they have."
I assume you are talking about the rams, chiefs, and bucs. All three teams beat 1 team with a winning record. rams were 7-9 in the worst division in the league (and worst division I have ever seen). that is not better than 5-11 in the AFC North. the chiefs were 2-4 in their mediocre division and got 4 freebie wins from the NFC West (rams division). the bucs got 4 freebie wins from the AFC West too. the bucs also beat carolina twice, cincinnati, cleveland, and washington. hardly a tough schedule. the only impressive win on their schedule was their victory over the saints. but then again, we beat them too...