Formerly Stone said:THAT is effing pathetic! All that excitement over a 6-3 win against a horrible team who fumbled the game away to another horrible team? WOW! You know what is truly pathetic ? losing that match. ask the fan of a losing team on that match and you will know.

I think Quinn can still be a good quarterback in a Pittsburgh-style offense. Pound the ball with the run, defense keeping the other team off the board, and Quinn just making the smart/safe plays to keep the team in the game and have a chance to win in the 4th quarter. Like I said a couple times yesterday though, these current Browns don't have any of that. DA isn't any kind of long-term answer, but he's a better placeholder on a bad team. More upside (big plays). Equal downside (losing games).

@restinpeace said:Wimbley got a garbage sack!!!! Big deal. He was awfull against the run and was invisible outside the "sack". Good gawd........ How was he relative to the team though? He had the third most tackles of the game with 5. I try to look at it in relative terms when it comes to analyzing player performance. Not saying that he was spectacular or anything but he was there comparitive to other players. If you look at the puzzle of the Browns he is an important piece.