@taco918 said: Ill give you the 4 for the 6, a first in 2013, and a first in 2014. Or give me Bradford, Amendola, and the 6 this year for Colt and the 4. Anything less then that and you can suck my left nut. The trade itself doesn't really bug me, its the PR side of it. Our FO looks like a complete joke for not willing to throw in an extra 2nd and we pretty much killed any confidence (if there is any left) Colt might still have. If the Rams didn't burn that bridge I don't know what will. If H&H trade the 4 to the Rams for anything less then I'm joining team Ghoolie. As far as Barkely goes I'm sure we'll end up with the pick right after the one that Barkley is taken with. I think our FO looks brilliant...or at least they are luck....for not having to give up the farm for the Rams pick. As for Barkley....you already have a better version of Barkley playing for you right now: Colt McCoy. Barkley if the same height and weight as McCoy. But McCoy actually has the stronger arm, and is more mobile. I would prefer Charles Barkley over Matt Barkley. At least Chuck could maybe play the OL.