Skip to content

★ NFL WEEK 16 ★ Win or else, again • CLEVELAND  +7½  at  GB Saturday  on FOX 4:30  ET  Buck and Aikman

The Browns Board
69 18 2.3k
  • T TexasAg1969 wrote on last edited by
    #37

    Well regardless of the outcome it's nice to see we don't lay down for anybody for the second game in a row. Ain't got no quitters on this team.

  • T TexasAg1969 wrote on last edited by
    #38

    Baker's to win. 2 min and 3 TOs.

  • T TexasAg1969 wrote on last edited by
    #39

    Lucy "Grabs" the football away from Charlie Brown once again.?

  • Baker's to win. 2 min and 3 TOs.

    S SdBacker80 wrote on last edited by
    #40

    @texasag1969 said:

    Baker's to win. 2 min and 3 TOs.

    Time to find a new signal caller 

  • @texasag1969 said:

    Baker's to win. 2 min and 3 TOs.

    Time to find a new signal caller 

    Dutch OvenD Dutch Oven wrote on last edited by Dutch Oven
    #41

    @sdbacker80 said:

    Time to find a new signal caller 

    Monday Morning QB writer Albert Breer thinks the Browns will go after Deshaun Watson. 

    Not sure if its just his conjecture, or if he has a connection in Berea. 

    I'm not sure about that theory, but if they don't sign Baker to an extension this offseason, I don't think they ever will. 

  • @sdbacker80 said:

    Time to find a new signal caller 

    Monday Morning QB writer Albert Breer thinks the Browns will go after Deshaun Watson. 

    Not sure if its just his conjecture, or if he has a connection in Berea. 

    I'm not sure about that theory, but if they don't sign Baker to an extension this offseason, I don't think they ever will. 

    S SdBacker80 wrote on last edited by
    #42

    @dutch-oven said:

    Monday Morning QB writer Albert Breer thinks the Browns will go after Deshaun Watson. 

    Not sure if its just his conjecture, or if he has a connection in Berea. 

    I'm not sure about that theory, but if they don't sign him to an extension this offseason, I don't think they ever will. 

    If his Legal team can save him he is an improvement. 

  • MLD WoodyM MLD Woody wrote on last edited by
    #43

    Well that was disappointing

  • Baker's to win. 2 min and 3 TOs.

    Browns149B Browns149 wrote on last edited by
    #44

    @texasag1969 said:

    Baker's to win. 2 min and 3 TOs.

    When was the last time he pulled if off?

  • @texasag1969 said:

    Baker's to win. 2 min and 3 TOs.

    When was the last time he pulled if off?

    T TexasAg1969 wrote on last edited by
    #45

    @browns149 said:

    When was the last time he pulled if off?

    Any way you look at it regardless of the causes, 4 ints in a game is just unacceptable in the NFL.

  • @browns149 said:

    When was the last time he pulled if off?

    Any way you look at it regardless of the causes, 4 ints in a game is just unacceptable in the NFL.

    S SdBacker80 wrote on last edited by
    #46

    @texasag1969 said:

    Any way you look at it regardless of the causes, 4 ints in a game is just unacceptable in the NFL.

    In a game where you run for 200 plus. The argument out there…Baker doesn’t have enough support.  That’s crap!!!

     How many times has a team run for 200 plus and had a QB throw 4 picks?

  • @browns149 said:

    When was the last time he pulled if off?

    Any way you look at it regardless of the causes, 4 ints in a game is just unacceptable in the NFL.

    Browns149B Browns149 wrote on last edited by
    #47

    @texasag1969 said:

    Any way you look at it regardless of the causes, 4 ints in a game is just unacceptable in the NFL.

    I totally agree. Baker is not good enough 

  • 7 7moses7 wrote on last edited by
    #48

    Baker fucking blows 

  • @mjp28 said:

    I might just take that for big money.

    1oz-gold-maple-reverse-2014.jpg

    I could see the Browns losing this by 21. EDIT: In fact Adams will get 21 himself. The Browns maybe score 10.

    mjp28M mjp28 wrote on last edited by
    #49

    @texasag1969 said:

    I could see the Browns losing this by 21. EDIT: In fact Adams will get 21 himself. The Browns maybe score 10.

    Well the BROWNS +7 was as good as gold !

    Too bad that they couldn't pull it off for the win, oh well.

  • @texasag1969 said:

    I could see the Browns losing this by 21. EDIT: In fact Adams will get 21 himself. The Browns maybe score 10.

    Well the BROWNS +7 was as good as gold !

    Too bad that they couldn't pull it off for the win, oh well.

    K Kegeratorz wrote on last edited by
    #50

    @mjp28 said:

    Well the BROWNS +7 was as good as gold !

     Too bad that they couldn't pull it off for the win, oh well.

    I got it at 8. Thought for sure that missed FG and 2pt conv was gonna come back and haunt me. 

  • KvoetheK Kvoethe wrote on last edited by
    #51

    IMG_2769.jpg

  • C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by
    #52

    QUESTION:

    Watching the ratbird-bengal game, the bengals challeged a no call on "too many men on the field" on the ratbirds.

    It turned out, both teams did ... LOL.

    So....why couldn't the Browns have thrown the flag and challenged the no call at that time when Peoples-Jones was deliberately held and it ended up in an int?

    I don't remember, did they not have a time out? I think they did.

    Even with no time outs, I think a team should be to challenge refs in the last two minutes. It's stupid for refs to

    not have any accountability by the NFL for all the bad calls/no calls we're seeing this season.

  • QUESTION:

    Watching the ratbird-bengal game, the bengals challeged a no call on "too many men on the field" on the ratbirds.

    It turned out, both teams did ... LOL.

    So....why couldn't the Browns have thrown the flag and challenged the no call at that time when Peoples-Jones was deliberately held and it ended up in an int?

    I don't remember, did they not have a time out? I think they did.

    Even with no time outs, I think a team should be to challenge refs in the last two minutes. It's stupid for refs to

    not have any accountability by the NFL for all the bad calls/no calls we're seeing this season.

    K Kegeratorz wrote on last edited by
    #53

    @calfoxwc said:

    It's stupid for refs to

    not have any accountability by the NFL for all the bad calls/no calls we're seeing this season.

    Exactly, I always felt if the refs dictate you fate then you didn’t do your job well enough. However, some of these calls/no calls need to be addressed all around the league. I get it’s real time and split second judgment but something has to give.

    It’s okay to be wrong as long as you get it right. 

  • @calfoxwc said:

    It's stupid for refs to

    not have any accountability by the NFL for all the bad calls/no calls we're seeing this season.

    Exactly, I always felt if the refs dictate you fate then you didn’t do your job well enough. However, some of these calls/no calls need to be addressed all around the league. I get it’s real time and split second judgment but something has to give.

    It’s okay to be wrong as long as you get it right. 

    T TexasAg1969 wrote on last edited by TexasAg1969
    #54

    @kegeratorz said:

    Exactly, I always felt if the refs dictate you fate then you didn’t do your job well enough. However, some of these calls/no calls need to be addressed all around the league. I get it’s real time and split second judgment but something has to give.

    It’s okay to be wrong as long as you get it right. 

    I think erroneous no-calls like the tug on the shirt to steal the interception should be reviewable if a team is willing to throw their red flag to risk losing a TO. That no-call changed the outcome of the game.

  • @kegeratorz said:

    Exactly, I always felt if the refs dictate you fate then you didn’t do your job well enough. However, some of these calls/no calls need to be addressed all around the league. I get it’s real time and split second judgment but something has to give.

    It’s okay to be wrong as long as you get it right. 

    I think erroneous no-calls like the tug on the shirt to steal the interception should be reviewable if a team is willing to throw their red flag to risk losing a TO. That no-call changed the outcome of the game.

    Browns149B Browns149 wrote on last edited by
    #55

    @texasag1969 said:

    I think erroneous no-calls like the tug on the shirt to steal the interception should be reviewable if a team is willing to throw their red flag to risk losing a TO. That no-call changed the outcome of the game.

    You are not allowed to challenge in the last 2 minutes. 

  • @texasag1969 said:

    I think erroneous no-calls like the tug on the shirt to steal the interception should be reviewable if a team is willing to throw their red flag to risk losing a TO. That no-call changed the outcome of the game.

    You are not allowed to challenge in the last 2 minutes. 

    K Kegeratorz wrote on last edited by
    #56

    @browns149 said:

    You are not allowed to challenge in the last 2 minutes. 

    That seems like the most important time to challenge and the easiest way, intended or not, to manipulate an outcome.