Skip to content

★ NFL WEEK 16 ★ Win or else, again • CLEVELAND  +7½  at  GB Saturday  on FOX 4:30  ET  Buck and Aikman

The Browns Board
69 18 2.3k
  • tiamat63T tiamat63 wrote on last edited by
    #30

    Baker.... there's a safety sitting right there.  Like, it wasn't even fucking close man.

  • Getting ready for the rush 4 package and Rodgers sitting in a clean pocket wiping sweat from his chin and finding all the soft spots in our zone. 
     

    We need to completely change it up to have a shot.

    Fake Punt.

    Zero blitz hitting Rodgers and knocking him out of the game.

    Call an aggressive gameplan on offense 

    No turnovers

    Refs giving us a few favorable calls 

    I think we are going to be spared the Speedo run.

    tiamat63T tiamat63 wrote on last edited by
    #31

    @sdbacker80 said:

    Zero blitz hitting Rodgers and knocking him out of the game.

    😳

  • @sdbacker80 said:

    Zero blitz hitting Rodgers and knocking him out of the game.

    😳

    S SdBacker80 wrote on last edited by SdBacker80
    #32

    @tiamat63 said:

    😳


    Christmas hope and dream dashed.

    Good call on the blitz - not bashing the call…but keep cherry picking 

    we can’t blitz four and play off coverage like Greedy at the goal line last drive 

  • @tiamat63 said:

    😳


    Christmas hope and dream dashed.

    Good call on the blitz - not bashing the call…but keep cherry picking 

    we can’t blitz four and play off coverage like Greedy at the goal line last drive 

    tiamat63T tiamat63 wrote on last edited by
    #33

    @sdbacker80 said:


    Christmas hope and dream dashed.

    Good call on the blitz - not bashing the call…but keep cherry picking 

    we can’t play off coverage like Greedy at the goal line last drive 

    Not cherry picking at all buddy.  Read a good deal of posts middle of this week and just didn't bother responding because unless you have a loaded secondary along with Jalen Ramsey, I can't think of many zero looks that are going to work. The Pack just have too many post snap sight adjustments to make it a viable strategy barring catching Rodgers off guard. Which happens about once a game.

  • @sdbacker80 said:


    Christmas hope and dream dashed.

    Good call on the blitz - not bashing the call…but keep cherry picking 

    we can’t play off coverage like Greedy at the goal line last drive 

    Not cherry picking at all buddy.  Read a good deal of posts middle of this week and just didn't bother responding because unless you have a loaded secondary along with Jalen Ramsey, I can't think of many zero looks that are going to work. The Pack just have too many post snap sight adjustments to make it a viable strategy barring catching Rodgers off guard. Which happens about once a game.

    T TexasAg1969 wrote on last edited by
    #34

    @tiamat63 said:

    Not cherry picking at all buddy.  Read a good deal of posts middle of this week and just didn't bother responding because unless you have a loaded secondary along with Jalen Ramsey, I can't think of many zero looks that are going to work. The Pack just have too many post snap sight adjustments to make it a viable strategy barring catching Rodgers off guard. Which happens about once a game.

    I agree. He's way too good reading what defenses are intending and we don't disguise as well as we need to to fool him.

  • T TexasAg1969 wrote on last edited by
    #35

    Oh punt dammit.

  • S SdBacker80 wrote on last edited by
    #36

    He’s too good to have too much time back there.

    But that’s not the problem today. 

  • T TexasAg1969 wrote on last edited by
    #37

    Well regardless of the outcome it's nice to see we don't lay down for anybody for the second game in a row. Ain't got no quitters on this team.

  • T TexasAg1969 wrote on last edited by
    #38

    Baker's to win. 2 min and 3 TOs.

  • T TexasAg1969 wrote on last edited by
    #39

    Lucy "Grabs" the football away from Charlie Brown once again.?

  • Baker's to win. 2 min and 3 TOs.

    S SdBacker80 wrote on last edited by
    #40

    @texasag1969 said:

    Baker's to win. 2 min and 3 TOs.

    Time to find a new signal caller 

  • @texasag1969 said:

    Baker's to win. 2 min and 3 TOs.

    Time to find a new signal caller 

    Dutch OvenD Dutch Oven wrote on last edited by Dutch Oven
    #41

    @sdbacker80 said:

    Time to find a new signal caller 

    Monday Morning QB writer Albert Breer thinks the Browns will go after Deshaun Watson. 

    Not sure if its just his conjecture, or if he has a connection in Berea. 

    I'm not sure about that theory, but if they don't sign Baker to an extension this offseason, I don't think they ever will. 

  • @sdbacker80 said:

    Time to find a new signal caller 

    Monday Morning QB writer Albert Breer thinks the Browns will go after Deshaun Watson. 

    Not sure if its just his conjecture, or if he has a connection in Berea. 

    I'm not sure about that theory, but if they don't sign Baker to an extension this offseason, I don't think they ever will. 

    S SdBacker80 wrote on last edited by
    #42

    @dutch-oven said:

    Monday Morning QB writer Albert Breer thinks the Browns will go after Deshaun Watson. 

    Not sure if its just his conjecture, or if he has a connection in Berea. 

    I'm not sure about that theory, but if they don't sign him to an extension this offseason, I don't think they ever will. 

    If his Legal team can save him he is an improvement. 

  • MLD WoodyM MLD Woody wrote on last edited by
    #43

    Well that was disappointing

  • Baker's to win. 2 min and 3 TOs.

    Browns149B Browns149 wrote on last edited by
    #44

    @texasag1969 said:

    Baker's to win. 2 min and 3 TOs.

    When was the last time he pulled if off?

  • @texasag1969 said:

    Baker's to win. 2 min and 3 TOs.

    When was the last time he pulled if off?

    T TexasAg1969 wrote on last edited by
    #45

    @browns149 said:

    When was the last time he pulled if off?

    Any way you look at it regardless of the causes, 4 ints in a game is just unacceptable in the NFL.

  • @browns149 said:

    When was the last time he pulled if off?

    Any way you look at it regardless of the causes, 4 ints in a game is just unacceptable in the NFL.

    S SdBacker80 wrote on last edited by
    #46

    @texasag1969 said:

    Any way you look at it regardless of the causes, 4 ints in a game is just unacceptable in the NFL.

    In a game where you run for 200 plus. The argument out there…Baker doesn’t have enough support.  That’s crap!!!

     How many times has a team run for 200 plus and had a QB throw 4 picks?

  • @browns149 said:

    When was the last time he pulled if off?

    Any way you look at it regardless of the causes, 4 ints in a game is just unacceptable in the NFL.

    Browns149B Browns149 wrote on last edited by
    #47

    @texasag1969 said:

    Any way you look at it regardless of the causes, 4 ints in a game is just unacceptable in the NFL.

    I totally agree. Baker is not good enough 

  • 7 7moses7 wrote on last edited by
    #48

    Baker fucking blows 

  • @mjp28 said:

    I might just take that for big money.

    1oz-gold-maple-reverse-2014.jpg

    I could see the Browns losing this by 21. EDIT: In fact Adams will get 21 himself. The Browns maybe score 10.

    mjp28M mjp28 wrote on last edited by
    #49

    @texasag1969 said:

    I could see the Browns losing this by 21. EDIT: In fact Adams will get 21 himself. The Browns maybe score 10.

    Well the BROWNS +7 was as good as gold !

    Too bad that they couldn't pull it off for the win, oh well.