Skip to content

★ NFL WEEK 16 ★ Win or else, again • CLEVELAND  +7½  at  GB Saturday  on FOX 4:30  ET  Buck and Aikman

The Browns Board
69 18 2.3k
  • @sdbacker80 said:

    I was more upset by the predictability throughout most of the game…running into 8 man fronts on 1st and 2nd down and then putting a new QB in 3rd and unmanageable (where the Raiders knew we were throwing)

    Interesting take, because that's exactly what you wanted the coaches to call during the first Ravens game.

    I even went back and upvoted the post as a reminder.

    S SdBacker80 wrote on last edited by SdBacker80
    #25

    @tiamat63 said:

    Interesting take, because that's exactly what you wanted the coaches to call during the first Ravens game.

    I even went back and upvoted the post as a reminder.

    Yeah. Different game.

    And You had Abrams run blitzing on early downs.

    How about a playaction on first down?  
     

    Or Chubb screen play like that…

  • B Browns fan 1977 wrote on last edited by
    #26

    dink and dunk passes right of rip[

  • B Browns fan 1977 wrote on last edited by
    #27

    Why do we even have a fucking kicker? I mean really? Go for fucking 2 

  • @tiamat63 said:

    Interesting take, because that's exactly what you wanted the coaches to call during the first Ravens game.

    I even went back and upvoted the post as a reminder.

    Yeah. Different game.

    And You had Abrams run blitzing on early downs.

    How about a playaction on first down?  
     

    Or Chubb screen play like that…

    tiamat63T tiamat63 wrote on last edited by
    #28

    @sdbacker80 said:

    Yeah. Different game.

    And You had Abrams run blitzing on early downs.

    How about a playaction on first down?  
     

    Or Chubb screen play like that…

    I'll do the snap counts at some point on holiday.

  • tiamat63T tiamat63 wrote on last edited by
    #29

    Packer tackles having issues with pass pro.

  • tiamat63T tiamat63 wrote on last edited by
    #30

    Baker.... there's a safety sitting right there.  Like, it wasn't even fucking close man.

  • Getting ready for the rush 4 package and Rodgers sitting in a clean pocket wiping sweat from his chin and finding all the soft spots in our zone. 
     

    We need to completely change it up to have a shot.

    Fake Punt.

    Zero blitz hitting Rodgers and knocking him out of the game.

    Call an aggressive gameplan on offense 

    No turnovers

    Refs giving us a few favorable calls 

    I think we are going to be spared the Speedo run.

    tiamat63T tiamat63 wrote on last edited by
    #31

    @sdbacker80 said:

    Zero blitz hitting Rodgers and knocking him out of the game.

    😳

  • @sdbacker80 said:

    Zero blitz hitting Rodgers and knocking him out of the game.

    😳

    S SdBacker80 wrote on last edited by SdBacker80
    #32

    @tiamat63 said:

    😳


    Christmas hope and dream dashed.

    Good call on the blitz - not bashing the call…but keep cherry picking 

    we can’t blitz four and play off coverage like Greedy at the goal line last drive 

  • @tiamat63 said:

    😳


    Christmas hope and dream dashed.

    Good call on the blitz - not bashing the call…but keep cherry picking 

    we can’t blitz four and play off coverage like Greedy at the goal line last drive 

    tiamat63T tiamat63 wrote on last edited by
    #33

    @sdbacker80 said:


    Christmas hope and dream dashed.

    Good call on the blitz - not bashing the call…but keep cherry picking 

    we can’t play off coverage like Greedy at the goal line last drive 

    Not cherry picking at all buddy.  Read a good deal of posts middle of this week and just didn't bother responding because unless you have a loaded secondary along with Jalen Ramsey, I can't think of many zero looks that are going to work. The Pack just have too many post snap sight adjustments to make it a viable strategy barring catching Rodgers off guard. Which happens about once a game.

  • @sdbacker80 said:


    Christmas hope and dream dashed.

    Good call on the blitz - not bashing the call…but keep cherry picking 

    we can’t play off coverage like Greedy at the goal line last drive 

    Not cherry picking at all buddy.  Read a good deal of posts middle of this week and just didn't bother responding because unless you have a loaded secondary along with Jalen Ramsey, I can't think of many zero looks that are going to work. The Pack just have too many post snap sight adjustments to make it a viable strategy barring catching Rodgers off guard. Which happens about once a game.

    T TexasAg1969 wrote on last edited by
    #34

    @tiamat63 said:

    Not cherry picking at all buddy.  Read a good deal of posts middle of this week and just didn't bother responding because unless you have a loaded secondary along with Jalen Ramsey, I can't think of many zero looks that are going to work. The Pack just have too many post snap sight adjustments to make it a viable strategy barring catching Rodgers off guard. Which happens about once a game.

    I agree. He's way too good reading what defenses are intending and we don't disguise as well as we need to to fool him.

  • T TexasAg1969 wrote on last edited by
    #35

    Oh punt dammit.

  • S SdBacker80 wrote on last edited by
    #36

    He’s too good to have too much time back there.

    But that’s not the problem today. 

  • T TexasAg1969 wrote on last edited by
    #37

    Well regardless of the outcome it's nice to see we don't lay down for anybody for the second game in a row. Ain't got no quitters on this team.

  • T TexasAg1969 wrote on last edited by
    #38

    Baker's to win. 2 min and 3 TOs.

  • T TexasAg1969 wrote on last edited by
    #39

    Lucy "Grabs" the football away from Charlie Brown once again.?

  • Baker's to win. 2 min and 3 TOs.

    S SdBacker80 wrote on last edited by
    #40

    @texasag1969 said:

    Baker's to win. 2 min and 3 TOs.

    Time to find a new signal caller 

  • @texasag1969 said:

    Baker's to win. 2 min and 3 TOs.

    Time to find a new signal caller 

    Dutch OvenD Dutch Oven wrote on last edited by Dutch Oven
    #41

    @sdbacker80 said:

    Time to find a new signal caller 

    Monday Morning QB writer Albert Breer thinks the Browns will go after Deshaun Watson. 

    Not sure if its just his conjecture, or if he has a connection in Berea. 

    I'm not sure about that theory, but if they don't sign Baker to an extension this offseason, I don't think they ever will. 

  • @sdbacker80 said:

    Time to find a new signal caller 

    Monday Morning QB writer Albert Breer thinks the Browns will go after Deshaun Watson. 

    Not sure if its just his conjecture, or if he has a connection in Berea. 

    I'm not sure about that theory, but if they don't sign Baker to an extension this offseason, I don't think they ever will. 

    S SdBacker80 wrote on last edited by
    #42

    @dutch-oven said:

    Monday Morning QB writer Albert Breer thinks the Browns will go after Deshaun Watson. 

    Not sure if its just his conjecture, or if he has a connection in Berea. 

    I'm not sure about that theory, but if they don't sign him to an extension this offseason, I don't think they ever will. 

    If his Legal team can save him he is an improvement. 

  • MLD WoodyM MLD Woody wrote on last edited by
    #43

    Well that was disappointing

  • Baker's to win. 2 min and 3 TOs.

    Browns149B Browns149 wrote on last edited by
    #44

    @texasag1969 said:

    Baker's to win. 2 min and 3 TOs.

    When was the last time he pulled if off?