Skip to content

★ NFL WEEK 16 ★ Win or else, again • CLEVELAND  +7½  at  GB Saturday  on FOX 4:30  ET  Buck and Aikman

The Browns Board
69 18 2.3k
  • @sdbacker80 said:

    Getting ready for the rush 4 package and Rodgers sitting in a clean pocket wiping sweat from his chin and finding all the soft spots in our zone. 
     

    We need to completely change it up to have a shot.

    Fake Punt.

    Zero blitz hitting Rodgers and knocking him out of the game.

    Call an aggressive gameplan on offense 

    No turnovers

    Refs giving us a few favorable calls 

    I think we are going to be spared the Speedo run.

    a fake punt I do not remember us doing one in the past decade

    S SdBacker80 wrote on last edited by SdBacker80
    #22

    @atom said:

    a fake punt I do not remember us doing one in the past decade

    No but the desperate(?) raiders pulled it off on us last week against our special teams HC 

  • B Browns fan 1977 wrote on last edited by
    #23

    Does anyone need a you tube link for the game today 

  • @unsympathetic said:

    .  If you're wondering if this video is really worth your time.. yes.

    A lot of the really bad takes on analytics on this forum are blaming the outcome of the 4th down play on the entire notion of analytics.  Much of this season the Browns made the right decision but had bad execution of the play [or a bad playcall].

    No problem with the call.

    I always believe big moments ball needs to go to your best guys.  That’s Chubb and Hunt. Add Landry today.  Hunt is out so it is Chubb and Landry when we need a play.  Don’t overcomplicate it don’t try to fool the other team. 

    I was more upset by the predictability throughout most of the game…running into 8 man fronts on 1st and 2nd down and then putting a new QB in 3rd and unmanageable (where the Raiders knew we were throwing)

    tiamat63T tiamat63 wrote on last edited by
    #24

    @sdbacker80 said:

    I was more upset by the predictability throughout most of the game…running into 8 man fronts on 1st and 2nd down and then putting a new QB in 3rd and unmanageable (where the Raiders knew we were throwing)

    Interesting take, because that's exactly what you wanted the coaches to call during the first Ravens game.

    I even went back and upvoted the post as a reminder.

  • @sdbacker80 said:

    I was more upset by the predictability throughout most of the game…running into 8 man fronts on 1st and 2nd down and then putting a new QB in 3rd and unmanageable (where the Raiders knew we were throwing)

    Interesting take, because that's exactly what you wanted the coaches to call during the first Ravens game.

    I even went back and upvoted the post as a reminder.

    S SdBacker80 wrote on last edited by SdBacker80
    #25

    @tiamat63 said:

    Interesting take, because that's exactly what you wanted the coaches to call during the first Ravens game.

    I even went back and upvoted the post as a reminder.

    Yeah. Different game.

    And You had Abrams run blitzing on early downs.

    How about a playaction on first down?  
     

    Or Chubb screen play like that…

  • B Browns fan 1977 wrote on last edited by
    #26

    dink and dunk passes right of rip[

  • B Browns fan 1977 wrote on last edited by
    #27

    Why do we even have a fucking kicker? I mean really? Go for fucking 2 

  • @tiamat63 said:

    Interesting take, because that's exactly what you wanted the coaches to call during the first Ravens game.

    I even went back and upvoted the post as a reminder.

    Yeah. Different game.

    And You had Abrams run blitzing on early downs.

    How about a playaction on first down?  
     

    Or Chubb screen play like that…

    tiamat63T tiamat63 wrote on last edited by
    #28

    @sdbacker80 said:

    Yeah. Different game.

    And You had Abrams run blitzing on early downs.

    How about a playaction on first down?  
     

    Or Chubb screen play like that…

    I'll do the snap counts at some point on holiday.

  • tiamat63T tiamat63 wrote on last edited by
    #29

    Packer tackles having issues with pass pro.

  • tiamat63T tiamat63 wrote on last edited by
    #30

    Baker.... there's a safety sitting right there.  Like, it wasn't even fucking close man.

  • Getting ready for the rush 4 package and Rodgers sitting in a clean pocket wiping sweat from his chin and finding all the soft spots in our zone. 
     

    We need to completely change it up to have a shot.

    Fake Punt.

    Zero blitz hitting Rodgers and knocking him out of the game.

    Call an aggressive gameplan on offense 

    No turnovers

    Refs giving us a few favorable calls 

    I think we are going to be spared the Speedo run.

    tiamat63T tiamat63 wrote on last edited by
    #31

    @sdbacker80 said:

    Zero blitz hitting Rodgers and knocking him out of the game.

    😳

  • @sdbacker80 said:

    Zero blitz hitting Rodgers and knocking him out of the game.

    😳

    S SdBacker80 wrote on last edited by SdBacker80
    #32

    @tiamat63 said:

    😳


    Christmas hope and dream dashed.

    Good call on the blitz - not bashing the call…but keep cherry picking 

    we can’t blitz four and play off coverage like Greedy at the goal line last drive 

  • @tiamat63 said:

    😳


    Christmas hope and dream dashed.

    Good call on the blitz - not bashing the call…but keep cherry picking 

    we can’t blitz four and play off coverage like Greedy at the goal line last drive 

    tiamat63T tiamat63 wrote on last edited by
    #33

    @sdbacker80 said:


    Christmas hope and dream dashed.

    Good call on the blitz - not bashing the call…but keep cherry picking 

    we can’t play off coverage like Greedy at the goal line last drive 

    Not cherry picking at all buddy.  Read a good deal of posts middle of this week and just didn't bother responding because unless you have a loaded secondary along with Jalen Ramsey, I can't think of many zero looks that are going to work. The Pack just have too many post snap sight adjustments to make it a viable strategy barring catching Rodgers off guard. Which happens about once a game.

  • @sdbacker80 said:


    Christmas hope and dream dashed.

    Good call on the blitz - not bashing the call…but keep cherry picking 

    we can’t play off coverage like Greedy at the goal line last drive 

    Not cherry picking at all buddy.  Read a good deal of posts middle of this week and just didn't bother responding because unless you have a loaded secondary along with Jalen Ramsey, I can't think of many zero looks that are going to work. The Pack just have too many post snap sight adjustments to make it a viable strategy barring catching Rodgers off guard. Which happens about once a game.

    T TexasAg1969 wrote on last edited by
    #34

    @tiamat63 said:

    Not cherry picking at all buddy.  Read a good deal of posts middle of this week and just didn't bother responding because unless you have a loaded secondary along with Jalen Ramsey, I can't think of many zero looks that are going to work. The Pack just have too many post snap sight adjustments to make it a viable strategy barring catching Rodgers off guard. Which happens about once a game.

    I agree. He's way too good reading what defenses are intending and we don't disguise as well as we need to to fool him.

  • T TexasAg1969 wrote on last edited by
    #35

    Oh punt dammit.

  • S SdBacker80 wrote on last edited by
    #36

    He’s too good to have too much time back there.

    But that’s not the problem today. 

  • T TexasAg1969 wrote on last edited by
    #37

    Well regardless of the outcome it's nice to see we don't lay down for anybody for the second game in a row. Ain't got no quitters on this team.

  • T TexasAg1969 wrote on last edited by
    #38

    Baker's to win. 2 min and 3 TOs.

  • T TexasAg1969 wrote on last edited by
    #39

    Lucy "Grabs" the football away from Charlie Brown once again.?

  • Baker's to win. 2 min and 3 TOs.

    S SdBacker80 wrote on last edited by
    #40

    @texasag1969 said:

    Baker's to win. 2 min and 3 TOs.

    Time to find a new signal caller 

  • @texasag1969 said:

    Baker's to win. 2 min and 3 TOs.

    Time to find a new signal caller 

    Dutch OvenD Dutch Oven wrote on last edited by Dutch Oven
    #41

    @sdbacker80 said:

    Time to find a new signal caller 

    Monday Morning QB writer Albert Breer thinks the Browns will go after Deshaun Watson. 

    Not sure if its just his conjecture, or if he has a connection in Berea. 

    I'm not sure about that theory, but if they don't sign Baker to an extension this offseason, I don't think they ever will.