Cincinnati Bengals in Super Bowl LVI
-
They are the real deal and will represent the AFC (North) in the big game.
Congratulations to the Bengals. -
I live in the Cincinnati area, so I'm happy for all my family and friends who are Bengals fans that they got to see their team make it to the big dance.
It also pisses me off that much more that the Browns blew it this season, because we went 2-0 against the Bengals.
-
I live in the Cincinnati area, so I'm happy for all my family and friends who are Bengals fans that they got to see their team make it to the big dance.
It also pisses me off that much more that the Browns blew it this season, because we went 2-0 against the Bengals.
I live in the Cincinnati area, so I'm happy for all my family and friends who are Bengals fans that they got to see their team make it to the big dance.
It also pisses me off that much more that the Browns blew it this season, because we went 2-0 against the Bengals.
So does Kentucky get to celebrate the win too?
-
I live in the Cincinnati area, so I'm happy for all my family and friends who are Bengals fans that they got to see their team make it to the big dance.
It also pisses me off that much more that the Browns blew it this season, because we went 2-0 against the Bengals.
So does Kentucky get to celebrate the win too?
-
For me the frustrating part is watching cincy shut down the run..
Yes, it's all well and good to Hope And Wish for guys who can both shut down the run and rush the passer, but those guys are a who's who of who's not coming to Cleveland. And so the Browns answer to date has been a stream of guys who are sort-of-OK at both but aren't lockdown at either one. Bengals said F all that, just stop the interior run.. and it's working.
-
good for joe and what did they say ? that only joe nammath joe montana have won the fbs and a super bowl will burrow make it 3 joes ?
-
-
-
I said it before and ill say it again- Joe Burrow is the easiest QB eval I've done since Andrew Luck.
Hurts to see him in Cincy and not CLE - where the bastion of Buckeye support is.
-
I said it before and ill say it again- Joe Burrow is the easiest QB eval I've done since Andrew Luck.
Hurts to see him in Cincy and not CLE - where the bastion of Buckeye support is.
I said it before and ill say it again- Joe Burrow is the easiest QB eval I've done since Andrew Luck.
Hurts to see him in Cincy and not CLE - where the bastion of Buckeye support is.
It's frustrating that the Browns do a tank job, end up with the #1 overall pick and end up with Baker Mayfield, while the Bengals do the same and end up with Joe Burrow.
The difference between the two outcomes of tank jobs is, IMO, going to be felt for a decade plus.
-
I said it before and ill say it again- Joe Burrow is the easiest QB eval I've done since Andrew Luck.
Hurts to see him in Cincy and not CLE - where the bastion of Buckeye support is.
I said it before and ill say it again- Joe Burrow is the easiest QB eval I've done since Andrew Luck.
Hurts to see him in Cincy and not CLE - where the bastion of Buckeye support is.
If Baker doesn't ball out next year, he's done. Browns were better in almost every position and coaching than the Bengals this year except QB [edit: and WR] and the Bengals are in the Super Bowl while Browns nation is sitting here talking about "what if".
-
I said it before and ill say it again- Joe Burrow is the easiest QB eval I've done since Andrew Luck.
Hurts to see him in Cincy and not CLE - where the bastion of Buckeye support is.
If Baker doesn't ball out next year, he's done. Browns were better in almost every position and coaching than the Bengals this year except QB [edit: and WR] and the Bengals are in the Super Bowl while Browns nation is sitting here talking about "what if".
If Baker doesn't ball out next year, he's done. Browns we're better in almost every position and coaching than the Bengals this year except QB, and the Bengals are in the Super Bowl while Browns nation is sitting here talking about "what if".
The Bengals are significantly better at the WR position too, but I get your overall point.
-
I would've respected Baker alot more this year if he shut it down for the year after 1-2 games after he got hurt, at the most? Would we still have sucked with Keeum playing instead of Baker? Maybe, maybe not. But by Baker being stubborn and playing while he's obviously hurt bad, he cost us several games. If he would've shut it down and had surgery earlier, he'd be well on the road to recovery and had ample time to prepare for the '22 season and nobody would really have much to burn him for. All he accomplished by being stubborn and playing through the injury was that he got himself hurt worse and hurt his team.
-
If Baker doesn't ball out next year, he's done. Browns we're better in almost every position and coaching than the Bengals this year except QB, and the Bengals are in the Super Bowl while Browns nation is sitting here talking about "what if".
The Bengals are significantly better at the WR position too, but I get your overall point.
The Bengals are significantly better at the WR position too, but I get your overall point.
Browns spend 124.3M on offense..Defense 65.6M.... QB's 27.2M....Offensive Line..47.2M*
Bengals spend 67.1M on offense.. Defense 85.5M.... QB's 9.8M......Offensive Line..20.9M*
Burrow's OL looks as bad as the Seattle SB runs...It's not bothered Burrow 1 iota.. Oddly..they must have backed OBJ's salary out? Says we match the WR Bengals around 19M
-
Interesting case studies this postseason…
Bengals- Jonah Williams and a patchwork line around him. They needed a lineman but took a WR in the top 10.
Rams- traded away every pick they own for veterans to complete their roster all this happened after aggressively going after a QB in the offseason. Their old QB played in a SB for them a couple seasons ago.
-
The Bengals are significantly better at the WR position too, but I get your overall point.
Browns spend 124.3M on offense..Defense 65.6M.... QB's 27.2M....Offensive Line..47.2M*
Bengals spend 67.1M on offense.. Defense 85.5M.... QB's 9.8M......Offensive Line..20.9M*
Burrow's OL looks as bad as the Seattle SB runs...It's not bothered Burrow 1 iota.. Oddly..they must have backed OBJ's salary out? Says we match the WR Bengals around 19M
Browns spend 124.3M on offense..Defense 65.6M.... QB's 27.2M....Offensive Line..47.2M*
Bengals spend 67.1M on offense.. Defense 85.5M.... QB's 9.8M......Offensive Line..20.9M*
Burrow's OL looks as bad as the Seattle SB runs...It's not bothered Burrow 1 iota.. Oddly..they must have backed OBJ's salary out? Says we match the WR Bengals around 19M
It hurts the Browns' cap space for not drafting their wide receivers. Obj and Landry were about 14 million or more each, and hooper gets big money this coming season. The Bengals drafted all three of their starting wr's - Boyd, Tee Higgins and Ja'Marr Chase. Paying top money to get a big name wr costs a lot more. And the Bengals would LOVE to have the Browns' offensive line. I just wonder if Hooper and Landry fit into their plans for next year, they cost so much.
-
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login