Skip to content

Could we mix in a 4-3?

The Browns Board
36 10 2.7k
  • \ said:

    Gee nice discussion of an option for the defense here, and yet Stan/Lums is no where to be found.

    But we're the ones that don't want to concentrate on the rest of the team...

    Don't forget OSUSEV. Wouldn't want him to feel left out icon_twisted.gif

  • We do....when we face 3 receivers, we really do play a 4-3...

    Romeo is a tool.

    When teams bring in 3 receivers, we go nickle...take out the beef along the line and play a 4-3....then teams run.

    It isn't the 3-4....switching to a 4-3 won't do anything.....It is Romeo. Until we change that, it is always going to be something with this bunch.

  • \ said:

    We do....when we face 3 receivers, we really do play a 4-3...

    Romeo is a tool.

    When teams bring in 3 receivers, we go nickle...take out the beef along the line and play a 4-3....then teams run.

    It isn't the 3-4....switching to a 4-3 won't do anything.....It is Romeo. Until we change that, it is always going to be something with this bunch.

    You nailed it.

    On the line, it isn't even just the beef missing. They seem to always have the DEs trying to come off the edge as rushers, which just makes it so easy to run between the G and T.

  • Don't remind me.

    Wimbly totally sucks at every aspect of the game. It ticks me off.

    Really....what is the difference between Wimp and David McMillian??

    Nothing except the name.

  • \ said:

    Don't remind me.

    Wimbly totally sucks at every aspect of the game. It ticks me off.

    Really....what is the difference between Wimp and David McMillian??

    Nothing except the name.

    I would say Thompson, but I guess it would be the same point.

  • OK...Chumpson is a good comparison.

  • \ said:

    We do....when we face 3 receivers, we really do play a 4-3...

    Romeo is a tool.

    When teams bring in 3 receivers, we go nickle...take out the beef along the line and play a 4-3....then teams run.

    It isn't the 3-4....switching to a 4-3 won't do anything.....It is Romeo. Until we change that, it is always going to be something with this bunch.

    Bingo Peens, and you also are correct about Kam, he sucks at every aspect of the game, especially open field tackling.

  • how did he have any success at all his rookie year? wtf was that?

  • 3 options:

    A) Kam forgot how to play football.

    😎 Our "coaches" "coached" him to play how he is.

    -Use of quotations signifies the terms are used very loosely.

    C) He only has one move and watching 5 minutes of tape fully prepares anyone on the opposing team to make him a non-factor.

  • \ said:

    how did he have any success at all his rookie year? wtf was that?

    He was just cut lose to only rush on passing downs, no tape on him, so raw athletics/speed got him by.

  • \ said:

    3 options:

    A) Kam forgot how to play football.

    😎 Our "coaches" "coached" him to play how he is.

    -Use of quotations signifies the terms are used very loosely.

    C) He only has one move and watching 5 minutes of tape fully prepares anyone on the opposing team to make him a non-factor.

    I'll take C, with B being why that is still the case.

  • \ said:

    \ said:

    Don't forget OSUSEV. Wouldn't want him to feel left out icon_twisted.gif

    Actually he posted in here, can't knock him this time

    Ooops. I missed that.

    Good on you OSUSev. I am glad to see you posting elsewhere icon_razz.gif

    icon_e_biggrin.gif

  • and, again, it comes back to, ultimately, romeo's schemes and coaches hindering this team.

    he's the one teaching tucker his shitty version of the 3-4. it's his choices as LB coaches that haven't helped wimbley improve at all. i, for one, still think wimbley has the talent. we should get whoever coached dwight freeney into the monster that he is to work with wimbley. i think the two are comparable athletes.

  • I got to nit pick here the listing should be DT for both Rogers and Williams (RT and LT are O positions).

    I was trying to be specific an indicate I'd have Rogers on the left side with Smith as opposed to with Wimbley. Cute comment either way. icon_e_wink.gif

    My thinking here was that Wimbley's (supposed) athleticism bolstered by McGinnest's solid play against the run might have some degree of dynacism. I don't like Hall as an everydown OLB in a 4-3 as yet. Too much responsibility in space.

    Also, by going four linemen it allows Rogers to be even more of a gap shooter as opposed to a space eater and is Williams more natural element.

    Same personnel, but might create different results.

  • we already run a 4-man line on passing downs. it doesn't work.

  • \ said:

    we already run a 4-man line on passing downs. it doesn't work.

    But those 4 guys are alwasy in pass rush mode, so to speak.

    In Greythan's plan there, those OLB would really play DE in running plans. Results might not differ, but at least for some downs those guys would actually be setting up and attacking at the run, not just the pass.

  • do you think wimbley can hold the point of attack in the run game instead of getting pushed into the secondary?

  • \ said:

    do you think wimbley can hold the point of attack in the run game instead of getting pushed into the secondary?

    Oh, I don't. I'd sooner do that w/ Williams at one DE and Willie at the other. Wimbley would be over on the bench if I did it.

  • leon williams? interesting. he might be better off in a situation where he doesn't have to think as much. using his brain certainly seems to be his weakness.

  • \ said:

    leon williams? interesting. he might be better off in a situation where he doesn't have to think as much. using his brain certainly seems to be his weakness.

    No, Corey Williams. Not Leon. His ass wouldn't see the field either.