I don't go to the NFL for my morals
-
You should look up the definition of "denial."
Denial would be I don't believe he did anything wrong.
I'm the no.3 approach. It's called REALITY. In REALITY people do horrible sh@$ and get away with it. Since I'm not a super hero, cop or God then it's not my lane.
GO BROWNS
You should look up the definition of "denial."
Denial would be I don't believe he did anything wrong.
I'm the no.3 approach. It's called REALITY. In REALITY people do horrible sh@$ and get away with it. Since I'm not a super hero, cop or God then it's not my lane.
GO BROWNS
The denial I was referring to relates to your thinking that a situation like Watson coming to the Browns doesn't implicate your morals. But it does. It offends your morals. What I'm suggesting is if you analyze the situation objectively, you will likely come to the conclusion that Watson is being framed in a massive money grab. Therefore, you would not have any moral conflict with him coming to the Browns. Just accepting the allegations at face value is giving up too easy. Don't even get me started on cops...
-
You should look up the definition of "denial."
Denial would be I don't believe he did anything wrong.
I'm the no.3 approach. It's called REALITY. In REALITY people do horrible sh@$ and get away with it. Since I'm not a super hero, cop or God then it's not my lane.
GO BROWNS
The denial I was referring to relates to your thinking that a situation like Watson coming to the Browns doesn't implicate your morals. But it does. It offends your morals. What I'm suggesting is if you analyze the situation objectively, you will likely come to the conclusion that Watson is being framed in a massive money grab. Therefore, you would not have any moral conflict with him coming to the Browns. Just accepting the allegations at face value is giving up too easy. Don't even get me started on cops...
The denial I was referring to relates to your thinking that a situation like Watson coming to the Browns doesn't implicate your morals. But it does. It offends your morals. What I'm suggesting is if you analyze the situation objectively, you will likely come to the conclusion that Watson is being framed in a massive money grab. Therefore, you would not have any moral conflict with him coming to the Browns. Just accepting the allegations at face value is giving up too easy. Don't even get me started on cops...
Or does it implicate a lack of hypocrisy. I didn't leave my country when we gave the nuclear football to a man with 25 alleged sexual assaults, so why would I leave my team over a a quarterback with 22 of them?
Could it be a massive money grab? Certainly....the grand jury can indict a ham sandwich and they didn't indict him on even 1 charge. None of the women complained to a supervisor and most did it multiple times. The court could've done 1 and sent the other 21 packing, the 22 accusations came almost all at once when he requested a trade, the attorney lives on the Texan's owner street, family are friends and the run in the same political circles. What's also very possible is Watson is a complete perv and deserves prison.....it's just out of my hands and way above my paygrade.
-
The denial I was referring to relates to your thinking that a situation like Watson coming to the Browns doesn't implicate your morals. But it does. It offends your morals. What I'm suggesting is if you analyze the situation objectively, you will likely come to the conclusion that Watson is being framed in a massive money grab. Therefore, you would not have any moral conflict with him coming to the Browns. Just accepting the allegations at face value is giving up too easy. Don't even get me started on cops...
Or does it implicate a lack of hypocrisy. I didn't leave my country when we gave the nuclear football to a man with 25 alleged sexual assaults, so why would I leave my team over a a quarterback with 22 of them?
Could it be a massive money grab? Certainly....the grand jury can indict a ham sandwich and they didn't indict him on even 1 charge. None of the women complained to a supervisor and most did it multiple times. The court could've done 1 and sent the other 21 packing, the 22 accusations came almost all at once when he requested a trade, the attorney lives on the Texan's owner street, family are friends and the run in the same political circles. What's also very possible is Watson is a complete perv and deserves prison.....it's just out of my hands and way above my paygrade.
Or does it implicate a lack of hypocrisy. I didn't leave my country when we gave the nuclear football to a man with 25 alleged sexual assaults, so why would I leave my team over a a quarterback with 22 of them?
Could it be a massive money grab? Certainly....the grand jury can indict a ham sandwich and they didn't indict him on even 1 charge. None of the women complained to a supervisor and most did it multiple times. The court could've done 1 and sent the other 21 packing, the 22 accusations came almost all at once when he requested a trade, the attorney lives on the Texan's owner street, family are friends and the run in the same political circles. What's also very possible is Watson is a complete perv and deserves prison.....it's just out of my hands and way above my paygrade.
I don't think a lack of hypocrisy; but a lack of analysis and scrutiny. Anything is "possible" but taking the time to think and research turns random "possibilities" into specific "probabilities." It's your prerogative not to be interested in that.
I do like your comment about a grand jury indicting a ham sandwich. Spot on. Many people don't fully appreciate how easy it is for a grand jury to charge. They think it's the same beyond a reasonable doubt standard used at criminal trial. It's actually the same as the "more likely than not" civil standard. But it's actually even easier than the civil standard. In a grand jury proceeding, the prosecutor presents their strongest case, completely unopposed by a defense attorney to rebut the claims. The grand jury never heard of the opposing witnesses who claim that many of these women said they were going to frame Watson. Or the many who said he was a model citizen. Or the facts about the relationship between McNair and Buzbee. Or the fact that the civil lawsuits were filed one day before the start of free agency. So, if you can't convince a grand jury under the most favorable circumstances, I doubt you can convince a civil jury that will hear both sides of the story.
-
The denial I was referring to relates to your thinking that a situation like Watson coming to the Browns doesn't implicate your morals. But it does. It offends your morals. What I'm suggesting is if you analyze the situation objectively, you will likely come to the conclusion that Watson is being framed in a massive money grab. Therefore, you would not have any moral conflict with him coming to the Browns. Just accepting the allegations at face value is giving up too easy. Don't even get me started on cops...
Or does it implicate a lack of hypocrisy. I didn't leave my country when we gave the nuclear football to a man with 25 alleged sexual assaults, so why would I leave my team over a a quarterback with 22 of them?
Could it be a massive money grab? Certainly....the grand jury can indict a ham sandwich and they didn't indict him on even 1 charge. None of the women complained to a supervisor and most did it multiple times. The court could've done 1 and sent the other 21 packing, the 22 accusations came almost all at once when he requested a trade, the attorney lives on the Texan's owner street, family are friends and the run in the same political circles. What's also very possible is Watson is a complete perv and deserves prison.....it's just out of my hands and way above my paygrade.
What's also very possible is Watson is a complete perv and deserves prison
And your proof of this is.... what, exactly? The same proof that achieved zero indictments?
Or your refusal to change the snap judgement you made 7 seconds after you heard the lawsuits were filed because you'd rather ruin someone else's life for funsies than admit you're occasionally 100% wrong? Because if you admit you're wrong then you'd need to suck up your pride and change your mind - and that's a fate worse than death?
It's neither "very" possible" nor "mildly" possible nor "sort of kind of 1/24th" possible.
You recognize that grand juries indict a ham sandwich but refuse to realize that.... there wasn't ham-sandwich-level evidence, whatever that means?
They've got nothing, nada, zero, zilch..
-
What's also very possible is Watson is a complete perv and deserves prison
And your proof of this is.... what, exactly? The same proof that achieved zero indictments?
Or your refusal to change the snap judgement you made 7 seconds after you heard the lawsuits were filed because you'd rather ruin someone else's life for funsies than admit you're occasionally 100% wrong? Because if you admit you're wrong then you'd need to suck up your pride and change your mind - and that's a fate worse than death?
It's neither "very" possible" nor "mildly" possible nor "sort of kind of 1/24th" possible.
You recognize that grand juries indict a ham sandwich but refuse to realize that.... there wasn't ham-sandwich-level evidence, whatever that means?
They've got nothing, nada, zero, zilch..
And your proof of this is.... what, exactly? The same proof that achieved zero indictments?
Or your deliberate refusal to change the snap judgement you made 7 seconds after you heard the lawsuits were filed because you'd rather ruin someone else's life than admit you're occasionally 100% wrong? Because if you admit you're wrong then you'd need to suck up your pride and change your mind - and that's a fate worse than death?
It's neither "very" possible" nor "mildly" possible nor "sort of kind of 1/24th" possible.
You recognize that grand juries indict a ham sandwich but refuse to realize that.... there wasn't ham-sandwich-level evidence, whatever that means?
Sheesh....reread the ENTIRE reply I typed
-
And your proof of this is.... what, exactly? The same proof that achieved zero indictments?
Or your deliberate refusal to change the snap judgement you made 7 seconds after you heard the lawsuits were filed because you'd rather ruin someone else's life than admit you're occasionally 100% wrong? Because if you admit you're wrong then you'd need to suck up your pride and change your mind - and that's a fate worse than death?
It's neither "very" possible" nor "mildly" possible nor "sort of kind of 1/24th" possible.
You recognize that grand juries indict a ham sandwich but refuse to realize that.... there wasn't ham-sandwich-level evidence, whatever that means?
Sheesh....reread the ENTIRE reply I typed
Sheesh....reread the ENTIRE reply I typed
I did.
You're being so open-minded that your brains have fallen out.
The question isn't What Is Possible -- it's always possible that aliens are among us -- the question is how PROBABLE things are. And we learn that probability from.. the evidence.
-
Sheesh....reread the ENTIRE reply I typed
I did.
You're being so open-minded that your brains have fallen out.
The question isn't What Is Possible -- it's always possible that aliens are among us -- the question is how PROBABLE things are. And we learn that probability from.. the evidence.
I did.
You're being so open-minded that your brains have fallen out.
The question isn't What Is Possible -- it's always possible that aliens are among us -- the question is how PROBABLE things are. And we learn that probability from.. the evidence.
You're reading into it what you want to read into it for argument sake.
I worked for a criminal defense attorney for 7 years out of law school.
Deal with definites.
I wasn't there...nor were you. Bottomline.
Just because you don't go to jail don't mean you didn't do it.
Just because you go to jail don't mean you did do it.
Those are statements of fact proven time and time again by DNA evidence and the Freedom project.
You're welcome
-
The denial I was referring to relates to your thinking that a situation like Watson coming to the Browns doesn't implicate your morals. But it does. It offends your morals. What I'm suggesting is if you analyze the situation objectively, you will likely come to the conclusion that Watson is being framed in a massive money grab. Therefore, you would not have any moral conflict with him coming to the Browns. Just accepting the allegations at face value is giving up too easy. Don't even get me started on cops...
Or does it implicate a lack of hypocrisy. I didn't leave my country when we gave the nuclear football to a man with 25 alleged sexual assaults, so why would I leave my team over a a quarterback with 22 of them?
Could it be a massive money grab? Certainly....the grand jury can indict a ham sandwich and they didn't indict him on even 1 charge. None of the women complained to a supervisor and most did it multiple times. The court could've done 1 and sent the other 21 packing, the 22 accusations came almost all at once when he requested a trade, the attorney lives on the Texan's owner street, family are friends and the run in the same political circles. What's also very possible is Watson is a complete perv and deserves prison.....it's just out of my hands and way above my paygrade.
Or does it implicate a lack of hypocrisy. I didn't leave my country when we gave the nuclear football to a man with 25 alleged sexual assaults, so why would I leave my team over a a quarterback with 22 of them?
Could it be a massive money grab? Certainly....the grand jury can indict a ham sandwich and they didn't indict him on even 1 charge. None of the women complained to a supervisor and most did it multiple times. The court could've done 1 and sent the other 21 packing, the 22 accusations came almost all at once when he requested a trade, the attorney lives on the Texan's owner street, family are friends and the run in the same political circles...
How many more posts by you until you have finally convinced yourself?
-
Or does it implicate a lack of hypocrisy. I didn't leave my country when we gave the nuclear football to a man with 25 alleged sexual assaults, so why would I leave my team over a a quarterback with 22 of them?
Could it be a massive money grab? Certainly....the grand jury can indict a ham sandwich and they didn't indict him on even 1 charge. None of the women complained to a supervisor and most did it multiple times. The court could've done 1 and sent the other 21 packing, the 22 accusations came almost all at once when he requested a trade, the attorney lives on the Texan's owner street, family are friends and the run in the same political circles...
How many more posts by you until you have finally convinced yourself?
-
Or does it implicate a lack of hypocrisy. I didn't leave my country when we gave the nuclear football to a man with 25 alleged sexual assaults, so why would I leave my team over a a quarterback with 22 of them?
Could it be a massive money grab? Certainly....the grand jury can indict a ham sandwich and they didn't indict him on even 1 charge. None of the women complained to a supervisor and most did it multiple times. The court could've done 1 and sent the other 21 packing, the 22 accusations came almost all at once when he requested a trade, the attorney lives on the Texan's owner street, family are friends and the run in the same political circles...
How many more posts by you until you have finally convinced yourself?
How many more posts by you until you have finally convinced yourself?
Only one question came close to the one I would have asked but did anyone notice that it was sidestepped? The very last one. So Kevin, Andrew, your research has led you to the conclusion that all 22 women were lying? The last question came close but not nearly specific enough in my opinion. I'm guessing this video has been posted before.
And as happens so often the hyperbolic headline.
WSS
-
People don't understand that when you're in the public eye, you are held to a higher standard...because you become a role model. Like it or not. The young kids look up to them. They are being molded by what they see and experience. Now, guys can avoid this 'higher standard' thing. They can instead go work at Dunkin Donuts.
-
People don't understand that when you're in the public eye, you are held to a higher standard...because you become a role model. Like it or not. The young kids look up to them. They are being molded by what they see and experience. Now, guys can avoid this 'higher standard' thing. They can instead go work at Dunkin Donuts.
People don't understand that when you're in the public eye, you are held to a higher standard...because you become a role model. Like it or not. The young kids look up to them. They are being molded by what they see and experience. Now, guys can avoid this 'higher standard' thing. They can instead go work at Dunkin Donuts.
Nope....thats on who raises you. Not 1 damn time growing up did I think I could do what a celebrity or a professional athlete could do. My parents and my faith......if your kid is emulating a famous person and u don't check them...thats on you. It's not on anyone else,let alone a famous athlete to raise your sex trophy.
-
People don't understand that when you're in the public eye, you are held to a higher standard...because you become a role model. Like it or not. The young kids look up to them. They are being molded by what they see and experience. Now, guys can avoid this 'higher standard' thing. They can instead go work at Dunkin Donuts.
People don't understand that when you're in the public eye, you are held to a higher standard...because you become a role model. Like it or not. The young kids look up to them. They are being molded by what they see and experience. Now, guys can avoid this 'higher standard' thing. They can instead go work at Dunkin Donuts.
Who the hell looks up to an NFL player?
-
People don't understand that when you're in the public eye, you are held to a higher standard...because you become a role model. Like it or not. The young kids look up to them. They are being molded by what they see and experience. Now, guys can avoid this 'higher standard' thing. They can instead go work at Dunkin Donuts.
People don't understand that when you're in the public eye, you are held to a higher standard...because you become a role model. Like it or not. The young kids look up to them. They are being molded by what they see and experience. Now, guys can avoid this 'higher standard' thing. They can instead go work at Dunkin Donuts.
Exactly. But it's not just kids who are impacted by what they experience and how they process it. We all have to resolve the tensions with us. But many don't understand this and even worse, insist on denying what they don't understand.
-
People don't understand that when you're in the public eye, you are held to a higher standard...because you become a role model. Like it or not. The young kids look up to them. They are being molded by what they see and experience. Now, guys can avoid this 'higher standard' thing. They can instead go work at Dunkin Donuts.
Who the hell looks up to an NFL player?
Who the hell looks up to an NFL player?
Maybe for kids it's about looking up to an NFL player. For adults, it's the underlying moral theme that seeps into our psyche.
-
Who the hell looks up to an NFL player?
Maybe for kids it's about looking up to an NFL player. For adults, it's the underlying moral theme that seeps into our psyche.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login