Skip to content

One person one vote

Political Discussion
192 17 5.3k 1
  • @bob806 said:

    Back to the original topic lol.

    Bottom right is the reason to vote "no."

    Issue12023.jpeg

    I think the middle one could be the most damning. All it takes is one back woods county to stop the will of the rest of the state. 

    @mld-woody said:

    I think the middle one could be the most damning. All it takes is one back woods county to stop the will of the rest of the state. 

    And on the flip side, we take the large Democratic cities that flip elections in favor of the Libtards.

  • @mld-woody said:

    I think the middle one could be the most damning. All it takes is one back woods county to stop the will of the rest of the state. 

    And on the flip side, we take the large Democratic cities that flip elections in favor of the Libtards.

    @canton-dawg said:

    And on the flip side, we take the large Democratic cities that flip elections in favor of the Libtards.

    You mean the places with the most citizens. The citizens that each get one vote. 

    Wild that the most populous area has the most influence in a democratic election. 

  • @canton-dawg said:

    And on the flip side, we take the large Democratic cities that flip elections in favor of the Libtards.

    You mean the places with the most citizens. The citizens that each get one vote. 

    Wild that the most populous area has the most influence in a democratic election. 

    @mld-woody said:

    You mean the places with the most citizens. The citizens that each get one vote. 

    Wild that the most populous area has the most influence in a democratic election. 

  • @canton-dawg said:

    And on the flip side, we take the large Democratic cities that flip elections in favor of the Libtards.

    You mean the places with the most citizens. The citizens that each get one vote. 

    Wild that the most populous area has the most influence in a democratic election. 

    @mld-woody said:

    You mean the places with the most citizens. The citizens that each get one vote. 

    Wild that the most populous area has the most influence in a democratic election. 

    Yes, those highly populated Democratic controlled shitholes.

    Thank God we have the Electoral College for the National Elections.

  • The founding fathers were wise.  They realized that the large metro areas is where the shit would flow to.  So they ensured that the backbone real Americans would also have a say.

  • @mld-woody said:

    You mean the places with the most citizens. The citizens that each get one vote. 

    Wild that the most populous area has the most influence in a democratic election. 

    Yes, those highly populated Democratic controlled shitholes.

    Thank God we have the Electoral College for the National Elections.

    @canton-dawg said:

    Yes, those highly populated Democratic controlled shitholes.

    Thank God we have the Electoral College for the National Elections.

    May be an image of 1 person and text that says 'VOTE BECAUSE RIGHT THE IS NUTTIER LEFI THANA SQUIRREL TURD'

  • The founders were genius. They saw the need to provide a safeguard against mob rule, and that election outcomes were the result of all demographics/states having a voice, not just demonrat infested shitholes. They explicitly maintained that the popular vote did not apply.Thank you for the Electoral College.

    Issue 1 closely is in line with the Constitution of the United States.

    51/50 is not convincing enough of a majority. It's "iffy"

    60/40 proves you got it right. No question about it, a clear majority/minority

    Vote YES on issue 1.

  • @mld-woody said:

    You mean the places with the most citizens. The citizens that each get one vote. 

    Wild that the most populous area has the most influence in a democratic election. 

    Yes, those highly populated Democratic controlled shitholes.

    Thank God we have the Electoral College for the National Elections.

    @canton-dawg said:

    Yes, those highly populated Democratic controlled shitholes.

    Thank God we have the Electoral College for the National Elections.

    Yes, the electoral college has plenty of flaws as well. Good point. 

  • @canton-dawg said:

    Yes, those highly populated Democratic controlled shitholes.

    Thank God we have the Electoral College for the National Elections.

    Yes, the electoral college has plenty of flaws as well. Good point. 

    @mld-woody said:

    Yes, the electoral college has plenty of flaws as well. Good point. 

    What are the flaws you mindlessly think it has?

    Don't just say flaws and not explain them...

  • @canton-dawg said:

    Yes, those highly populated Democratic controlled shitholes.

    Thank God we have the Electoral College for the National Elections.

    Yes, the electoral college has plenty of flaws as well. Good point. 

    @mld-woody said:

    Yes, the electoral college has plenty of flaws as well. Good point. 

    If there are "plenty" then you should be able to elaborate a teeny bit.

  • @mld-woody said:

    Yes, the electoral college has plenty of flaws as well. Good point. 

    If there are "plenty" then you should be able to elaborate a teeny bit.

    @fy56 said:

    If there are "plenty" then you should be able to elaborate a teeny bit.

    He never does. Just bloats and blathers crap. Like mjp saying Trump lied about Jan 6th, and I simply asked him to explain. No exclamation - just leaves the forum. It's just belligerent gas-lighting.

  • @fy56 said:

    If there are "plenty" then you should be able to elaborate a teeny bit.

    He never does. Just bloats and blathers crap. Like mjp saying Trump lied about Jan 6th, and I simply asked him to explain. No exclamation - just leaves the forum. It's just belligerent gas-lighting.

    @calfoxwc said:

    He never does. Just bloats and blathers crap. Like mjp saying Trump lied about Jan 6th, and I simply asked him to explain. No exclamation - just leaves the forum. It's just belligerent gas-lighting.

    I had also asked him to elaborate on a couple other issues. Nothing but silence.

  • @mld-woody said:

    Yes, the electoral college has plenty of flaws as well. Good point. 

    If there are "plenty" then you should be able to elaborate a teeny bit.

    @fy56 said:

    If there are "plenty" then you should be able to elaborate a teeny bit.

    Gorka, you've been around hee a while. You've seen threads on this. You've seen the flaws of this system pointed out. Winner take all in states, small state votes counting many times more, solidly red or blue states not mattering, etc. 

    I'm not giving you a full rundown here that you and others will ignore. Look it up. 

  • @fy56 said:

    If there are "plenty" then you should be able to elaborate a teeny bit.

    He never does. Just bloats and blathers crap. Like mjp saying Trump lied about Jan 6th, and I simply asked him to explain. No exclamation - just leaves the forum. It's just belligerent gas-lighting.

    @calfoxwc said:

    He never does. Just bloats and blathers crap. Like mjp saying Trump lied about Jan 6th, and I simply asked him to explain. No exclamation - just leaves the forum. It's just belligerent gas-lighting.

    Shit gets explained to you on here constantly you old dumbass. Constantly. For years. 

    You not getting something explained to you and you not liking / agreeing with the explanation are very different things. But you're a fragile little snowflake and you can't handle differing opinions. 

    But it's clear the dementia is setting in more and more each day and you're just not worth the trouble. 

    If your grandkids even still bother talking to you go talk to them and get off social media and right wing political news. It's melting your already damaged brain..

  • @fy56 said:

    If there are "plenty" then you should be able to elaborate a teeny bit.

    Gorka, you've been around hee a while. You've seen threads on this. You've seen the flaws of this system pointed out. Winner take all in states, small state votes counting many times more, solidly red or blue states not mattering, etc. 

    I'm not giving you a full rundown here that you and others will ignore. Look it up. 

    @mld-woody said:

    Gorka, you've been around hee a while. You've seen threads on this. You've seen the flaws of this system pointed out. Winner take all in states, small state votes counting many times more, solidly red or blue states not mattering, etc. 

    I'm not giving you a full rundown here that you and others will ignore. Look it up. 

    I vaguely recall threads on the electoral college. I didn't ask for a full rundown either.

    You won't be ignored. I doubt you've ever been ignored. That screams copout. 

    The Electoral College may not be perfect, but it is the best system ever to be conceived. It's an exceptional system required for an exceptional nation.

    I could post a well-done video on the Electoral College, done by good, educated and honest people, but rather than take a look, and provide a response, you'd be the one doing the ignoring and dismiss it as some right-wing extremist production.

  • @mld-woody said:

    Gorka, you've been around hee a while. You've seen threads on this. You've seen the flaws of this system pointed out. Winner take all in states, small state votes counting many times more, solidly red or blue states not mattering, etc. 

    I'm not giving you a full rundown here that you and others will ignore. Look it up. 

    I vaguely recall threads on the electoral college. I didn't ask for a full rundown either.

    You won't be ignored. I doubt you've ever been ignored. That screams copout. 

    The Electoral College may not be perfect, but it is the best system ever to be conceived. It's an exceptional system required for an exceptional nation.

    I could post a well-done video on the Electoral College, done by good, educated and honest people, but rather than take a look, and provide a response, you'd be the one doing the ignoring and dismiss it as some right-wing extremist production.

    @fy56 said:

    I vaguely recall threads on the electoral college. I didn't ask for a full rundown either.

    You won't be ignored. I doubt you've ever been ignored. That screams copout. 

    The Electoral College may not be perfect, but it is the best system ever to be conceived. It's an exceptional system required for an exceptional nation.

    I could post a well-done video on the Electoral College, done by good, educated and honest people, but rather than take a look, and provide a response, you'd be the one doing the ignoring and dismiss it as some right-wing extremist production.

    Because you'd probably post a Prager U video on it, or some very clearly conservative think tank video

    And honestly, I don't care. None of you are worth that much effort. Popping on if I have a few minutes is honestly too much effort. But if you think ANY of you have shown ANYTHING to want me to engage in some kind of good faith debate you're delusional. That's been attempted in the past and it's just insults and delusion. Not worth it. 

  • @fy56 said:

    I vaguely recall threads on the electoral college. I didn't ask for a full rundown either.

    You won't be ignored. I doubt you've ever been ignored. That screams copout. 

    The Electoral College may not be perfect, but it is the best system ever to be conceived. It's an exceptional system required for an exceptional nation.

    I could post a well-done video on the Electoral College, done by good, educated and honest people, but rather than take a look, and provide a response, you'd be the one doing the ignoring and dismiss it as some right-wing extremist production.

    Because you'd probably post a Prager U video on it, or some very clearly conservative think tank video

    And honestly, I don't care. None of you are worth that much effort. Popping on if I have a few minutes is honestly too much effort. But if you think ANY of you have shown ANYTHING to want me to engage in some kind of good faith debate you're delusional. That's been attempted in the past and it's just insults and delusion. Not worth it. 

    @mld-woody said:

    Because you'd probably post a Prager U video on it, or some very clearly conservative think tank video

    And honestly, I don't care. None of you are worth that much effort. Popping on if I have a few minutes is honestly too much effort. But if you think ANY of you have shown ANYTHING to want me to engage in some kind of good faith debate you're delusional. That's been attempted in the past and it's just insults and delusion. Not worth it. 

    0s.gif.3d399cae49076dfd058b9e920c83b588.gif

  • @calfoxwc said:

    He never does. Just bloats and blathers crap. Like mjp saying Trump lied about Jan 6th, and I simply asked him to explain. No exclamation - just leaves the forum. It's just belligerent gas-lighting.

    Shit gets explained to you on here constantly you old dumbass. Constantly. For years. 

    You not getting something explained to you and you not liking / agreeing with the explanation are very different things. But you're a fragile little snowflake and you can't handle differing opinions. 

    But it's clear the dementia is setting in more and more each day and you're just not worth the trouble. 

    If your grandkids even still bother talking to you go talk to them and get off social media and right wing political news. It's melting your already damaged brain..

    @mld-woody said:

    Shit gets explained to you on here constantly you old dumbass. Constantly. For years. 

    You not getting something explained to you and you not liking / agreeing with the explanation are very different things. But you're a fragile little snowflake and you can't handle differing opinions. 

    But it's clear the dementia is setting in more and more each day and you're just not worth the trouble. 

    If your grandkids even still bother talking to you go talk to them and get off social media and right wing political news. It's melting your already damaged brain..

    run your mouth again, but ignore the issue as typical birdbrain woodpecker.

    NOTE: you faked being a victim about bringing family members into a discussion about your family by another poster - I don't like that - but here you are, doing the same thing.

      You lefties can break all the rules because you are so "special".

    but on the flip side - you are "victims" of others breaking rules.

    Personal attacks do not make any valid point, woodpecker. You don't make valid points.

  • @fy56 said:

    I vaguely recall threads on the electoral college. I didn't ask for a full rundown either.

    You won't be ignored. I doubt you've ever been ignored. That screams copout. 

    The Electoral College may not be perfect, but it is the best system ever to be conceived. It's an exceptional system required for an exceptional nation.

    I could post a well-done video on the Electoral College, done by good, educated and honest people, but rather than take a look, and provide a response, you'd be the one doing the ignoring and dismiss it as some right-wing extremist production.

    Because you'd probably post a Prager U video on it, or some very clearly conservative think tank video

    And honestly, I don't care. None of you are worth that much effort. Popping on if I have a few minutes is honestly too much effort. But if you think ANY of you have shown ANYTHING to want me to engage in some kind of good faith debate you're delusional. That's been attempted in the past and it's just insults and delusion. Not worth it. 

    @mld-woody said:

    That's been attempted in the past and it's just insults and delusion. Not worth it. 

    totally fake excuse. you are the prime insulter. Go back and read your own posts, fake victim.

  • woodpecker is only here to troll and whine that the forum is bad because he gets rebuttals that make him squawk.

    he? stinks up conversations and complains the stink makes him cry.