Skip to content

One person one vote

Political Discussion
192 17 5.3k 1
  • "the constitution isn't a living breathing document. It's perfect as is. Our founding fathers knew exactly what we needed to do!!"

    "We need to change the Ohio constitution. Because, uh, outside influence and stuff!"

    Love it

    @mld-woody said:

    "the constitution isn't a living breathing document. It's perfect as is. Our founding fathers knew exactly what we needed to do!!"

    "We need to change the Ohio constitution. Because, uh, outside influence and stuff!"

    Love it

    Well it's actually both. Yes there are proper channels written into the system to make changing the Constitution possible. The 60/40 split makes it a lot harder to do for a reason.

    WSS

  • @mld-woody said:

    "the constitution isn't a living breathing document. It's perfect as is. Our founding fathers knew exactly what we needed to do!!"

    "We need to change the Ohio constitution. Because, uh, outside influence and stuff!"

    Love it

    Well it's actually both. Yes there are proper channels written into the system to make changing the Constitution possible. The 60/40 split makes it a lot harder to do for a reason.

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    Well it's actually both. Yes there are proper channels written into the system to make changing the Constitution possible. The 60/40 split makes it a lot harder to do for a reason.

    WSS

    It's ok to change a constitution if that change is to make it harder to change ... 

  • @westside-steve said:

    Well it's actually both. Yes there are proper channels written into the system to make changing the Constitution possible. The 60/40 split makes it a lot harder to do for a reason.

    WSS

    It's ok to change a constitution if that change is to make it harder to change ... 

    @mld-woody said:

    It's ok to change a constitution if that change is to make it harder to change ... 

    If you're being serious I agree. That's how the national Constitution is.

  • @mld-woody said:

    It's ok to change a constitution if that change is to make it harder to change ... 

    If you're being serious I agree. That's how the national Constitution is.

    @westside-steve said:

    If you're being serious I agree. That's how the national Constitution is.

    If that's the case then they should quit trying to kill the 1st and 2nd amendment... yet.. they keep trying to change everything

  • @westside-steve said:

    If you're being serious I agree. That's how the national Constitution is.

    If that's the case then they should quit trying to kill the 1st and 2nd amendment... yet.. they keep trying to change everything

    @nickers said:

    If that's the case then they should quit trying to kill the 1st and 2nd amendment... yet.. they keep trying to change everything

    They really don't have to eliminate those two. They can water them down to the point that they're basically meaningless.

    WSS

  • @westside-steve said:

    If you're being serious I agree. That's how the national Constitution is.

    If that's the case then they should quit trying to kill the 1st and 2nd amendment... yet.. they keep trying to change everything

    @nickers said:

    If that's the case then they should quit trying to kill the 1st and 2nd amendment... yet.. they keep trying to change everything

    How exactly are they trying to kill those two amendments? 

  • @nickers said:

    If that's the case then they should quit trying to kill the 1st and 2nd amendment... yet.. they keep trying to change everything

    How exactly are they trying to kill those two amendments? 

    @mld-woody said:

    How exactly are they trying to kill those two amendments? 

    You gotta be fucking kidding me? ??

  • @mld-woody said:

    How exactly are they trying to kill those two amendments? 

    You gotta be fucking kidding me? ??

    @canton-dawg said:

    You gotta be fucking kidding me? ??

    He's a tard... It's too hard for him...

  • Back to the original topic lol.

    Bottom right is the reason to vote "no."

    Issue12023.jpeg

  • Back to the original topic lol.

    Bottom right is the reason to vote "no."

    Issue12023.jpeg

    @bob806 said:

    Back to the original topic lol.

    Bottom right is the reason to vote "no."

    Issue12023.jpeg

    I think the middle one could be the most damning. All it takes is one back woods county to stop the will of the rest of the state. 

  • @bob806 said:

    Back to the original topic lol.

    Bottom right is the reason to vote "no."

    Issue12023.jpeg

    I think the middle one could be the most damning. All it takes is one back woods county to stop the will of the rest of the state. 

    @mld-woody said:

    I think the middle one could be the most damning. All it takes is one back woods county to stop the will of the rest of the state. 

    And on the flip side, we take the large Democratic cities that flip elections in favor of the Libtards.

  • @mld-woody said:

    I think the middle one could be the most damning. All it takes is one back woods county to stop the will of the rest of the state. 

    And on the flip side, we take the large Democratic cities that flip elections in favor of the Libtards.

    @canton-dawg said:

    And on the flip side, we take the large Democratic cities that flip elections in favor of the Libtards.

    You mean the places with the most citizens. The citizens that each get one vote. 

    Wild that the most populous area has the most influence in a democratic election. 

  • @canton-dawg said:

    And on the flip side, we take the large Democratic cities that flip elections in favor of the Libtards.

    You mean the places with the most citizens. The citizens that each get one vote. 

    Wild that the most populous area has the most influence in a democratic election. 

    @mld-woody said:

    You mean the places with the most citizens. The citizens that each get one vote. 

    Wild that the most populous area has the most influence in a democratic election. 

  • @canton-dawg said:

    And on the flip side, we take the large Democratic cities that flip elections in favor of the Libtards.

    You mean the places with the most citizens. The citizens that each get one vote. 

    Wild that the most populous area has the most influence in a democratic election. 

    @mld-woody said:

    You mean the places with the most citizens. The citizens that each get one vote. 

    Wild that the most populous area has the most influence in a democratic election. 

    Yes, those highly populated Democratic controlled shitholes.

    Thank God we have the Electoral College for the National Elections.

  • The founding fathers were wise.  They realized that the large metro areas is where the shit would flow to.  So they ensured that the backbone real Americans would also have a say.

  • @mld-woody said:

    You mean the places with the most citizens. The citizens that each get one vote. 

    Wild that the most populous area has the most influence in a democratic election. 

    Yes, those highly populated Democratic controlled shitholes.

    Thank God we have the Electoral College for the National Elections.

    @canton-dawg said:

    Yes, those highly populated Democratic controlled shitholes.

    Thank God we have the Electoral College for the National Elections.

    May be an image of 1 person and text that says 'VOTE BECAUSE RIGHT THE IS NUTTIER LEFI THANA SQUIRREL TURD'

  • The founders were genius. They saw the need to provide a safeguard against mob rule, and that election outcomes were the result of all demographics/states having a voice, not just demonrat infested shitholes. They explicitly maintained that the popular vote did not apply.Thank you for the Electoral College.

    Issue 1 closely is in line with the Constitution of the United States.

    51/50 is not convincing enough of a majority. It's "iffy"

    60/40 proves you got it right. No question about it, a clear majority/minority

    Vote YES on issue 1.

  • @mld-woody said:

    You mean the places with the most citizens. The citizens that each get one vote. 

    Wild that the most populous area has the most influence in a democratic election. 

    Yes, those highly populated Democratic controlled shitholes.

    Thank God we have the Electoral College for the National Elections.

    @canton-dawg said:

    Yes, those highly populated Democratic controlled shitholes.

    Thank God we have the Electoral College for the National Elections.

    Yes, the electoral college has plenty of flaws as well. Good point. 

  • @canton-dawg said:

    Yes, those highly populated Democratic controlled shitholes.

    Thank God we have the Electoral College for the National Elections.

    Yes, the electoral college has plenty of flaws as well. Good point. 

    @mld-woody said:

    Yes, the electoral college has plenty of flaws as well. Good point. 

    What are the flaws you mindlessly think it has?

    Don't just say flaws and not explain them...

  • @canton-dawg said:

    Yes, those highly populated Democratic controlled shitholes.

    Thank God we have the Electoral College for the National Elections.

    Yes, the electoral college has plenty of flaws as well. Good point. 

    @mld-woody said:

    Yes, the electoral college has plenty of flaws as well. Good point. 

    If there are "plenty" then you should be able to elaborate a teeny bit.